Levels of embodiment: Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI

HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 463-470

  Fischer, Kerstin ^a   Lohan, Katrin S ^b   Foth, Kilian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

degrees of freedom; embodiment; linguistic analysis; robot simulation; verbal human robot interaction

Indexed keywords

EMBODIMENT; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; ROBOT SIMULATIONS; VERBAL INTERACTION;

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; LINGUISTICS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MECHANICS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

EID: 84859973661     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2157689.2157839     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J.W., Kim, E.S. and Scasselati, B. 2010. The Benefit of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 1-2.
2. Cross, T., Johnson-Morris, J.E. and T.G. Nienhuys. 1980. Linguistic Feedback and Maternal Speech: Comparisons of Mothers Addressing Hearing and Hearing-impaired Children. First Language 1, 3:163-189.
3. Dautenhahn, K., B. Ogden and T. Quick. 2002. From Embodied to Socially Embedded Agents - Implications for Interaction-aware Robots. Cognitive Systems Research 3: 397-428. (Pubitemid 38647209)
4. Diewald, G. 2006. Discourse Particles and Modal Particles as Grammatical Elements. In Fischer, K. (ed.): Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Fischer, K. 2006. What Computer Talk is and Isn't: Human-Computer Conversation as Intercultural Communication. AQ, Saarbrücken.
6. Fischer, K. 2007. Grounding and common ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In A. Fetzer and K. Fischer (eds.), Lexical Markers of Common Grounds. Studies in Pragmatics 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Fischer, K. 2011. Interpersonal Variation in Understanding Robots as Social Actors. HRI'11, Lausanne, Switzerland.
8. Fischer, K., Foth, K., Rohlfing, K. and B. Wrede, 2011. Mindful Tutors: Linguistic Choice and Action Demonstration in Speech to Infants and a Simulated Robot. Interaction Studies 12, 1: 134-161.
9. Foth, K., Menzel, W. and Schröder, I. 2000. A Transformation-based Parsing Technique with Anytime Properties. 4th Int. Workshop on Parsing Technologies, IWPT-2000, pp. 89-100.
10. Fussell, S.R., Kiesler, S., Setlock, L.D. and Yew, V. 2008. How people anthropomorphize robots. Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction 2008 (pp. 145-152). NY: ACM Press.
11. Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C. 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
12. Hawkins, J.A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge University Press.
13. Hoffmann, L. and Krämer, N.C. 2011. How Should an Artificial Entity be Embodied? Comparing the Effects of a Physically Present Robot and its Virtual Representation. Proceedings of the HRI 2011 Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 14-20.
14. Itti, L., Koch, C. Niebur, L. et al. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1254-1259.
15. Kidd, C. and Breazeal, C. 2004. Effect of a Robot on Uer Perceptions. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots nd Systems, pp. 3559-3564.
16. Kiesler, S., Powers, A., Fussell, S. and Torrey, C. 2008. Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot-like Agent. Social Cognition 26, 2: 169-181.
17. Koda, T. and P. Maes. 1996. Agents with Faces: The Effect of Personification. Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.
18. Komatsu, T. and Abe, Y. 2008. Comparing an On-Screen Agent with a Robotic Agent in Non-Face-to-Face Interactions. In Prendinger, H., Lester, J. and Ishizuka, M. (eds.), IVA 2008. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 498-504.
19. Komatsu, T. and Kuki, N. 2009a. Can Users React toward an On-Screen Agent as if they are Reacting toward a Robotic Agent? HRI'09, La Jolla, CA, pp. 217-218.
20. th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan.
21. Lohan, K., Gieselmann, S., Vollmer, A.L., Rohlfing, K. and B. Wrede. 2010. Does Embodiment Affect Tutoring Behavior? Proceedings of ICDL'10.
22. Lopes, M., Bernardino, A., Santos-Victor, K. Rosander, and C. von Hofsten, 2009. Biomimetic Eye-Neck Coordination. ICDL 2009.
23. Lusk, M.M. and R.K. Atkinson. 2007. Animated Pedagogical Agents: Does their Degree of Embodiment Impact Learning from Static or Animated Worked Examples? Applied Cognitive Psychology 21: 747-764. (Pubitemid 47490406)
24. Metta, G. Sandini, G. Vernon, D. Natale, L. and F. Nori, 2008. The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition. PerMIS: Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop. Aug, 2008, pp. 19-21.
25. Nagai, Y. and Rohlfing, K.J. 2009. Computational analysis of Motionese toward scaffolding robot action learning. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 1: 44-54.
26. Nass, C. 2004. Etiquette Equality: Exhibitions and Expectations of Computer Politeness. Communications of the ACM 47, 4: 35-37.
27. Roy, B., Frank, M.C. and Roy, D. 2009. Exploring word learning in a high-density longitudinal corpus. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
28. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
29. Sproull, L., Subramani, R., Kiesler, S., Walker, J., and Waters, K. 1996. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction 11, 97-124. (Pubitemid 126706063)
30. Takayama, L. 2009. Making Sense of Agentic Objects and Teleoperation: In-the-moment and Reflective Perspectives. Late Breaking Results of Human Robot Interaction (HRI), San Diego, CA, pp.239-240.
31. Wainer, J., Feil-Seigfer, D.J., Shell, D.A. and Mataric, M.J. 2007. Embodiment and Human-Robot Interaction: A Task-Based Perspective. 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Jeju, Korea.
32. Zeschel, A. forthcoming. Basic Argument Structure Constructions in Child-Directed Speech. Journal of Child Language.
33. Ziemke, T. 2003. What's that Thing Called Embodiment? In: Alterman and Kirsh (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1134-1139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.