Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism

HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 61-67

  Eyssel, Friederike ^a   Kuchenbrandt, Dieta ^a   Bobinger, Simon ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Effectance motivation; Human Robot interaction; Predictability of robot behavior

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; EFFECTANCE MOTIVATION; PREDICTABILITY OF ROBOT BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; ROBOT BEHAVIOR; ROBOT INTERACTIONS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION; RESEARCH;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 79953141779     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1957656.1957673     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Luczak, H., Rötung, M., and Schmidt, L. 2003. Lets talk: Anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices. Ergonomics, 46, 1361-1374 (Pubitemid 37461133)
2. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
3. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 1, 81-103. (Pubitemid 30442265)
4. Powers, A. and Kiesler, S. 2006. The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2006. 218-225. (Pubitemid 44032410)
5. Powers, A., Kramer, A. D. I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S-L., and Kiesler, S. 2005. Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 158-163. (Pubitemid 44144376)
6. Eyssel, F. and Hegel, F. (accepted). (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
7. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F., Horstmann, G., and Wagner, C. 2010. Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In Proceedings ofthe 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010);, 681-686.
8. Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the clouds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Epley, N., Waytz, A., and Cacioppo, J. T. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864-886.
10. White, R.W. 1959. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
11. Dennett, D. C. 1987. The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., and Cacioppo, J. T. 2008. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143-155.
13. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., and Epley, N. 2010. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219-232.
14. Hegel, F. 2010. Gestalterisch-konstruktiver Entwurf eines sozialen Roboters [Design and concept of a social robot]. Der Andere Verlag, Tönning, Germany.
15. Hegel, F., Eyssel, F., and Wrede, B. 2010. The social robot Flobi: Key Concepts of industrial design. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), 120-125.
16. Haslam, N., Bain, P., Loughnan, S., and Kashima, Y. 2008. Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 55-85.