Industry research production and linkages with academia: Evidence from UK science parks

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 985-1002

  Minguillo, David ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS); INDUSTRY RESEARCH; MATERIAL ENGINEERING; RESEARCH DOMAINS; RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; RESEARCH QUALITY; SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION; UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84896868286     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University-industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6-7), 498-507.
2. Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865-1883.
3. Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks' performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489-505.
4. Birch, K. (2009). The knowledge-space dynamic in the UK bioeconomy. Area, 41(3), 273-284.
5. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007). Multiple Publication on a Single Research Study: Does It Pay? The Influence of Number of Research Articles on Total Citation Counts in Biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(2000), 1100-1107. doi:10.1002/asi
6. Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
7. Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
8. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
9. Cooke, P. (2001). Biotechnology Clusters in the UK: Lessons from Localisation in the Commercialisation of Science. Small Business Economics, 43-59.
10. Dyson, J. (2010). Ingenious Britain: making the UK the leading high tech exporter in Europe. London.
11. D'Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
12. Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381-400.
13. Godin, B. (1996). Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy, 25(4), 587-606.
14. Hauser, H. (2010). The Current and Future Role of Technology and Innovation Centres in the UK (p. 29). London.
15. Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(3), 625-636.
16. Hu, M.-C. (2011). Evolution of knowledge creation and diffusion: the revisit of Taiwan's Hsinchu Science Park. Scientometrics, 88(3), 949-977.
17. Hung, W. C. (2012). Measuring the use of public research in firm R&D in the Hsinchu Science Park. Scientometrics, (106). doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0726-5
18. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
19. Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. Norwich: H. M. Treasury.
20. Lee, J., & Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24(5), 433-442. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00101-3
21. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). U.S. science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323-1356.
22. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2007). The economics of university research parks. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 661-674.
23. López-Illescas, C., Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304-316.
24. Marston, L. (2011). All together now: Improving cross-sector collaboration in the UK biomedical industry. NESTA report London. London.
25. Meho, L., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-• index of human-• computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1711-1726.
26. Minguillo, D. (2010). Toward a new way of mapping scientific fields: Authors' competence for publishing in scholarly journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 772-786. doi:10.1002/asi.21282
27. Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial role of the University: a link analysis of York Science Park. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISSI 2001 Conference - 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics & Informetrics, Durban, South Africa, July 4-8 (pp. 570-583). South Africa.
28. Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross-sectoral interactions reflected on the web. Aslib Proceedings, 64(5).
29. Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115-131.
30. OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for (p. 252). Paris: OECD.
31. Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161-175.
32. Rafols, I., Hopkins, M. M., Hoekman, J., Siepel, J., O'Hare, A., Perianes-Rodríguez, A., & Nightingale, P. (2012). Big Pharma, little science? Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
33. Rothaermel, F., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation?The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7), 1076-1090.
34. Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2010). Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 30(9-10), 485-495.
35. Siegel, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1357-1369.
36. Suvinen, N., Konttinen, J., & Nieminen, M. (2010). How Necessary are Intermediary Organizations in the Commercialization of Research? European Planning Studies, 18(9), 1365-1389.
37. Teixeira, A. a. C., & Mota, L. (2012). A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university-industry links. Scientometrics, 93(3), 719-743.
38. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy, 33(5), 709-733. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.002
39. UKSPA. (2012). United Kingdom Science Park Association. Retrieved December 12, 2012, from www.ukspa.org.uk/
40. Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17(9), 491-531.
41. Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega, 23(4), 345-360.