Toward a new way of mapping scientific fields: Authors' competence for publishing in scholarly journals

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 772-786

  Minguillo, David ^a,b  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREE OF SIMILARITY; EMPIRICAL TEST; EXISTING METHOD; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURES; LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NEW APPROACHES; SCHOLARLY JOURNALS; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; THEORETICAL BASIS;

ACCESS CONTROL;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77949835264     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21282     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Åström, F. (2008). Formalizing a discipline: The institutionalization of library and information science research in the Nordic countries. Journal of Documentation, 64(5), 721-737.
2. Borgatti, S.P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
3. Borgatti, S.P, & Everett, M.G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243-269.
4. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social networks analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5. Borner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
6. Börner, K., Sanyal, S., & Vespignani, A. (2007). Network, science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 537-607.
7. Cano, V. (1999). Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(8), 675-680.
8. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford, England: Black well.
9. Chen, C. (2003a). Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization. London, New York: Springer.
10. Chen, C. (2003b). Visualizing scientific paradigms: An introduction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 392-393.
11. Chen, C. (2004a). Information visualization: Beyond the horizon. London: Springer.
12. Chen, C. (2004b). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101(Suppl. 1), 5303-5310.
13. Chubin, D.E. (1.976). The conceptualization of scientific specialties. The Sociological Quarterly, 17(4), 448-476.
14. Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441.
15. Cole, S. (2000). The role of journals in the growth of scientific knowledge. In B. Cronin & H. Atkins (Eds.), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. .109-142). Medford, NJ: ASIS.
16. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17. De Moya Anegon, F., Jimenez Contreras, E., & De La Moneda Corrochano, M. (1998). Research fronts in library and information science in Spain (1985-1994). Scientometrics, 42(2), 229-246.
18. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industrygovernment relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
19. Everett, M., & Borgatti, S. (2005). Extending centrality. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 57-76). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fry, J. (2006). Scholarly research and information practices: A domain analytic approach. Information Processing and Management, 42(1), 299-316.
21. Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2007). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital, resources. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 115-133.
22. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A.I., & Istomin, V.S. (2003). Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 400-412.
23. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
24. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
25. Hyland, K., & Salager-Meyer, R (2008). Scientific writing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 297-338.
26. Jimenez-Contreras, E., De Moya Anegon, F., & Lopez-Cozar, E.D. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI). Research Policy, 32(1), 123-142.
27. Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.
28. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. (2009). Towards a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455-476.
29. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(14), 1306-1320.
30. Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L., & Crumley, E. (2004). A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal, of Information Science, 30(3), 227-239.
31. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 25-38.
34. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444.
35. Moravcsik, M.J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92.
36. Morris, S.A., & Van Der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 213-295.
37. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual. Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641.
38. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of "Ba:" Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 3, 40-54.
39. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
40. Palmer, C.L. (1996). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking library services to research practices. Library Trends, 45(2), 165-191.
41. Palmer, C.L. (1999). Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 242-253.
42. Palmer, C.L., & Cragin, M.H. (2008). Scholarship and disciplinary practices. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 165-212.
43. Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2005). Interdependence and social processes: Dependence graphs and generalized dependence structures. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social, network, analysis (pp. 192-214). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
45. Schvaneveldt, W. (Ed.). (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. SCImago. (2007). SJR-SCImago Journal. & Country Rank. Available at: http://www.scimagojr.com
47. Scott, J. (2000). Social, network, analysis: A handbook. Los Angeles: Sage.
48. Shaw, W.M. (.1981). Information theory and scientific communication. Scientometrics, 3(3), 235-249.
49. Siegelman, S.S. (1998). The genesis of modern science: Contributions of scientific societies and scientific journals. Radiology, 208(1), 9-16.
50. Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 394-399.
51. Van Raan, A.F.J., & Peters, H.P.R (1989). Dynamics of a scientific field analysed by co-subfield structures. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 607-620.
52. Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, R (2007). Visualizing the structure of science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
53. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1998). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Watts, D.J., & Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.
55. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.
56. Whitley, R. (1983). From the sociology of scientific communities to the study of scientists' negotiations and beyond. Social Science Information/Information sur les Sciences Sociales, 22(4-5), 681-720.
57. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Ziman, J. (1968). Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.