Natural variation in the yeast glucose-signaling network reveals a new role for the Mig3p transcription factor

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1607-1612

  Lewis, Jeffrey A ^a   Gasch, Audrey P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerevisiae; Environmental; Gene expression; Glucose signaling; Natural variation; Saccharomyces; Stress

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; GLUCOSE; MIG3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GLUCOSE SIGNALING; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NATURAL VARIATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE SIGNALING; NATURAL VARIATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ETHANOL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84883158858     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.112.004127     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Badis, G., E. T. Chan, H. Van Bakel, L. Pena-Castillo, D. Tillo et al., 2008 A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell 32: 878-887.
2. Bailey, T. L., and C. Elkan, 1994 Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 2: 28-36.
3. Berry, D. B., and A. P. Gasch, 2008 Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 19: 4580-4587.
4. Boyle, E. I., S. Weng, J. Gollub, H. Jin, D. Botstein et al., 2004 GO:Term- Finder-open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics 20: 3710-3715.
5. Doniger, S. W., H. S. Kim, D. Swain, D. Corcuera, M. Williams et al., 2008 A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000183.
6. Dowell, R. D., O. Ryan, A. Jansen, D. Cheung, S. Agarwala et al., 2010 Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328: 469.
7. Dubacq, C., A. Chevalier, and C. Mann, 2004 The protein kinase Snf1 is required for tolerance to the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor hydroxyurea. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 2560-2572.
8. Gasch, A. P., 2002 Yeast genomic expression studies using DNA microarrays. Methods Enzymol. 350: 393-414.
9. Gerke, J. P., C. T. Chen, and B. A. Cohen, 2006 Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 174: 985-997.
10. Hazbun, T. R., and S. Fields, 2002 A genome-wide screen for site-specific DNA-binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1: 538-543.
11. Huebert, D. J., P. F. Kuan, S. Keles, and A. P. Gasch, 2012 Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but linked to transcription and chromatin regulators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32: 1645-1653.
12. Lee, M. V., S. E. Topper, S. L. Hubler, J. Hose, C. D. Wenger et al., 2011 A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7: 514.
13. Lewis, J. A., I. M. Elkon, M. A. Mcgee, A. J. Higbee, and A. P. Gasch, 2010 Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance. Genetics 186: 1197-1205.
14. Liti, G., D. M. Carter, A. M. Moses, J. Warringer, L. Parts et al., 2009 Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
15. Longtine, M. S., A. Mckenzie 3rd, D. J. Demarini, N. G. Shah, A. Wach et al., 1998 Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953-961.
16. Lutfiyya, L. L., and M. Johnston, 1996 Two zinc-finger-containing repressors are responsible for glucose repression of SUC2 expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 4790-4797.
17. Lutfiyya, L. L., V. R. Iyer, J. Derisi, M. J. Devit, P. O. Brown et al., 1998 Characterization of three related glucose repressors and genes they regulate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 150: 1377-1391.
18. Pena-Castillo, L., and T. R. Hughes, 2007 Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes? Genetics 176: 7-14.
19. Santangelo, G. M., 2006 Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70: 253-282.
20. Smith, E. N., and L. Kruglyak, 2008 Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol. 6: e83.
21. Smyth, G. K., 2004 Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3: Article3.
22. Sopko, R., D. Huang, N. Preston, G. Chua, B. Papp et al., 2006 Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 21: 319-330.
23. Storey, J. D., and R. Tibshirani, 2003 Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 9440-9445.
24. Takahashi, T., T. Yano, J. Zhu, G. W. Hwang, and A. Naganuma, 2010 Overexpression of FAP7, MIG3, TMA19, or YLR392c confers resistance to arsenite on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Toxicol. Sci. 35: 945-946.
25. Treitel, M. A., and M. Carlson, 1995 Repression by SSN6-TUP1 is directed by MIG1, a repressor/activator protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 3132-3136.
26. Turatsinze, J. V., M. Thomas-Chollier, M. Defrance, and J. Van Helden, 2008 Using RSAT to scan genome sequences for transcription factor binding sites and cis-regulatory modules. Nat. Protoc. 3: 1578-1588.
27. Warringer, J., E. Zorgo, F. A. Cubillos, A. Zia, A. Gjuvsland et al., 2011 Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002111.
28. Westholm, J. O., N. Nordberg, E. Muren, A. Ameur, J. Komorowski et al., 2008 Combinatorial control of gene expression by the three yeast repressors Mig1, Mig2 and Mig3. BMC Genomics 9: 601.
29. Winzeler, E. A., D. D. Shoemaker, A. Astromoff, H. Liang, K. Anderson et al., 1999 Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285: 901-906.
30. Wohlbach, D. J., A. Kuo, T. K. Sato, K. M. Potts, A. A. Salamov et al., 2011 Comparative genomics of xylose-fermenting fungi for enhanced biofuel production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 13212-13217.