Dose reduction in dynamic CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of 80-kV/370-mAs and 100-kV/300-mAs protocols

European Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 748-755

  Fujita, Makiko ^a   Kitagawa, Kakuya ^a   Ito, Tatsuro ^a   Shiraishi, Yasuyuki ^a   Kurobe, Yusuke ^a   Nagata, Motonori ^a   Ishida, Masaki ^a   Sakuma, Hajime ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dual source computed tomography; Image quality; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Radiation dose reduction

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHIC PERFUSION; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION;

ADENOSINE; AGED; ARTIFACTS; BODY MASS INDEX; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84896704423     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3063-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324-2336
2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724-1732
3. Tamarappoo B, Hachamovitch R (2011) Myocardial perfusion imaging versus CT coronary angiography: when to use which? J Nucl Med 52:1079-1086
4. Blankstein R, Di Carli MF (2010) Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:226-236
5. Jong M, Genders TS, Geuns R-J, Moelker A, Hunink MGM (2012) Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 22:1881-1895
6. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F et al (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260:689-698
7. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C (2010) Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:811-820
8. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X et al (2012) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:521-529
9. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ (2010) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Investig Radiol 45:306-313
10. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H et al (2010) Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Investig Radiol 45:298-305
11. Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 204. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park
12. Bankier AA, Kressel HY (2012) Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. Radiology 265:4-8
13. Kim SM, Kim YN, Choe YH (2012) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT: optimization of the CT protocol to reduce the radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
14. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al (2009) Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:174-182
15. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1072-1084
16. Ko S, Choi J, Song M et al (2011) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 21:26-35
17. Nasis A, Ko B, Leung M et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Eur Radiol 23:1812-1821
18. George RT, Ichihara T, Lima JAC, Lardo AC (2010) A method for reconstructing the arterial input function during helical CT: implications for myocardial perfusion distribution imaging 1. Radiology 255:396-404
19. Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A et al (2013) Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Investig Radiol 48:32-40
20. Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F et al (2012) Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model. Investig Radiol 47:71-77