Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

European Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1881-1895

  De Jong, Marcus C ^a   Genders, Tessa S S ^a   Van Geuns, Robert Jan ^a   Moelker, Adriaan ^a   Hunink, M G Myriam ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Diagnostic performance; Meta analysis; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; ALBUMIN; ATROPINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIPYRIDAMOLE; DOBUTAMINE; FLUOROCARBON; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; PERFLUBUTANE; PERFLUOROCARBON EXPOSED SONICATED DEXTROSE ALBUMIN; PERFLUTREN; SONOVUE; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M; THALLIUM 201; TRACER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EMBASE; EXERCISE TEST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MODEL; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARD; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84864680769     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1997) Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349:1436-1442
2. Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, Segal M, Redberg R (1999) Metaanalysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 83:660-666
3. Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R et al (1991) Cardiac catheterization 1990: A report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 24:75-83
4. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756-1824
5. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MRIMPACT: Comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29:480-489
6. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur SR, Reddy P, Carlos RC (2008) Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: A metaanalysis. Acad Radiol 15:444-451
7. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: A meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1343-1353
8. Abdelmoneim SS, Dhoble A, Bernier M et al (2009) Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography during pharmacological stress for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-Analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:813-825
9. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M et al (2004) Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: The evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:261-291
10. Hamon M, Fau G, Nee G, Ehtisham J, Morello R (2010) Metaanalysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:29
11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535
12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-Analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700
13. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG (2007) Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: A meta-Analysis of diagnostic performance. Am Heart J 154:415-423
14. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25
15. Arends LR, Hamza TH, van Houwelingen JC, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG, Stijnen T (2008) Bivariate random effects meta-Analysis of ROC curves. Med Decis Making 28:621-638
16. Knottnerus JA (1987) The effects of disease verification and referral on the relationship between symptoms and diseases. Med Decis Making 7:139-148
17. Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2010) Meta-Analysis: Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 152:167-177
18. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298:317-323
19. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271:703-707
20. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D et al (2009) EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) registry: Results of the German pilot phase. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1457-1466
21. Arnold JR, Karamitsos TD, Pegg TJ et al (2010) Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: A comparison with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:934-943
22. Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B et al (2009) Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: A multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1292-1300
23. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD et al (2007) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: A comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2440-2449
24. Cury RC, Cattani CA, Gabure LA et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 240:39-45
25. Donati OF, Scheffel H, Stolzmann P et al (2010) Combined cardiac CT and MRI for the comprehensive workup of hemodynamically relevant coronary stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:920-926
26. Doyle M, Fuisz A, Kortright E et al (2003) The impact of myocardial flow reserve on the detection of coronary artery disease by perfusion imaging methods: An NHLBI WISE study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 5:475-485
27. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Paetsch I et al (2007) MR myocardial perfusion imaging with k-space and time broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique: Feasibility study. Radiology 245:863-871
28. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Paetsch I et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion MR at 3 T in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 247:57-63
29. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Manka R et al (2011) High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion imaging during high dose dobutamine/atropine stress magnetic resonance using k-t SENSE. Int J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01. 060
30. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R et al (2004) Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: First European multicentre experience. Eur Heart J 25:1657-1665
31. Kawase Y, Nishimoto M, Hato K, Okajima K, Yoshikawa J (2004) Assessment of coronary artery disease with nicorandil stress magnetic resonance imaging. Osaka City Med J 50:87-94
32. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Nagata M et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadoliniumenhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: A multicenter study. Eur Radiol 18:2808-2816
33. Klein C, Gebker R, Kokocinski T et al (2008) Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:45
34. Klein C, Nagel E, Gebker R et al (2009) Magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion imaging in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:437-445
35. Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ et al (2006) Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1630-1638
36. Klumpp BD, Seeger A, Doesch C et al (2010) High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent. Eur Radiol 20:533-541
37. Krittayaphong R, Boonyasirinant T, Saiviroonporn P et al (2009) Myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: Do we need rest images? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:139-148
38. Merkle N, Wohrle J, Grebe O et al (2007) Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steadystate, free-precession magnetic resonance first-pass imaging. Heart 93:1381-1385
39. Meyer C, Strach K, Thomas D et al (2008) High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 18:226-233
40. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432-437
41. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A et al (2004) Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 110:835-842
42. Pilz G, Bernhardt P, Klos M, Ali E, Wild M, Hofling B (2006) Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography. Clin Res Cardiol 95:531-538
43. Pingitore A, Lombardi M, Scattini B et al (2008) Head to head comparison between perfusion and function during accelerated high-dose dipyridamole magnetic resonance stress for the detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 101:8-14
44. Plein S, Radjenovic A, Ridgway JP et al (2005) Coronary artery disease: Myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography. Radiology 235:423-430
45. Plein S, Kozerke S, Suerder D et al (2008) High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 29:2148-2155
46. Plein S, Schwitter J, Suerder D, Greenwood JP, Boesiger P, Kozerke S (2008) k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-Accelerated myocardial perfusion. Radiology 249:493-500
47. Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H, Scheffel H et al (2010) Combining cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography coronary calcium scoring: Added value for the assessment of morphological coronary disease? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:969-977
48. Takase B, Nagata M, Kihara T et al (2004) Whole-heart dipyridamole stress first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI for the detection of coronary artery disease. Jpn Heart J 45:475-486
49. Aggeli C, Christoforatou E, Giannopoulos G et al (2007) The diagnostic value of adenosine stress-contrast echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients: Comparison to Tl-201 single-photon emission computed tomography. Am J Hypertens 20:533-538
50. Chiou KR, Huang WC, Lin SL et al (2004) Real-time dobutamine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease: Correlating abnormal wall motion and disturbed perfusion. Can J Cardiol 20:1237-1243
51. Jeetley P, Hickman M, Kamp O et al (2006) Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: A prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:141-145
52. Kowatsch I, Tsutsui JM, Osorio AF et al (2007) Head-to-head comparison of dobutamine and adenosine stress real-time myocardial perfusion echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1109-1117
53. Lipiec P, Wejner-Mik P, Krzeminska-Pakula M et al (2008) Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: Comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:941-947
54. Miszalski-Jamka T, Kuntz-Hehner S, Schmidt H et al (2009) Impact of previous myocardial infarction on the incremental value of myocardial contrast to two-dimensional supine bicycle stress echocardiography in evaluation of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 136:47-55
55. Moir S, Haluska BA, Jenkins C, McNab D, Marwick TH (2005) Myocardial blood volume and perfusion reserve responses to combined dipyridamole and exercise stress: A quantitative approach to contrast stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1187-1193
56. Peltier M, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A et al (2004) Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with technetium-99msestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:257-264
57. Senior R, Lepper W, Pasquet A et al (2004) Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc singlephoton emission computed tomography. Am Heart J 147:1100-1105
58. Astarita C, Palinkas A, Nicolai E, Maresca FS, Varga A, Picano E (2001) Dipyridamole-Atropine stress echocardiography versus exercise SPECT scintigraphy for detection of coronary artery disease in hypertensives with positive exercise test. J Hypertens 19:495-502
59. Budoff MJ, Rasouli ML, Shavelle DM et al (2007) Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-A comparison in detecting significant coronary artery disease. Acad Radiol 14:252-257
60. Gonzalez P, Massardo T, Jofre MJ et al (2005) 201Tl myocardial SPECT detects significant coronary artery disease between 50% and 75% angiogram stenosis. Rev Esp Med Nucl 24:305-311
61. Johansen A, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Christensen HW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in a study population without post-test referral bias. J Nucl Cardiol 12:530-537
62. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P et al (2007) Added value of coronary artery calcium score as an adjunct to gated SPECT for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in an intermediate-risk population. J Nucl Med 48:1424-1430
63. Yao Z, Liu XJ, Shi RF et al (2000) A comparison of 99Tcm-MIBI myocardial SPET and electron beam computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery disease in two different age groups. Nucl Med Commun 21:43-48
64. Yeih DF, Huang PJ, Ho YL (2007) Enhanced diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women by dobutamine thallium-201 ST-segment/heart rate slope and thallium-201 myocardial SPECT. J Formos Med Assoc 106:832-839