Opening the genetic toolbox of niche model organisms with high throughput techniques: Novel proteins in regeneration as a case study

BioEssays

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 407-418

  Looso, Mario ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HEART AND LUNG RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

High throughput; Newt; Next generation sequencing; Niche model organism; Regeneration

Indexed keywords

CELL MARKER; CONTIG; PROTEOME; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL REGENERATION; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; DNA BINDING; EXON; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC MANIPULATION; GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; HYDRA; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INTRON; LIMB REGENERATION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NEMATOSTELLA VECTENSIS; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; NOTOPHTHALMUS VIRIDESCENS; OPEN READING FRAME; ORTHOLOGY; POLISTES METRICUS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGENERATION; SCHMIDTEA MEDITERRANEA; SHOTGUN PROTEOMIC; STEM CELL; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; TRANSPOSON; TURBELLARIA; WASP; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALIA; HYDRA; MAMMALIA; SALAMANDRIDAE; TURBELLARIA;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HYDRA; PLANARIANS; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REGENERATION; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84896701909     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201300093     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Novina CD, Sharp PA. 2004. The RNAi revolution. Nature 430: 161-4.
2. Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, et al. 2013. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature 495: 384-8.
3. Ramskold D, Luo S, Wang YC, Li R, et al. 2012. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat Biotechnol 30: 777-82.
4. Kurimoto K, Yabuta Y, Ohinata Y, Ono Y, et al. 2006. An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 34: e42.
5. Bodenmiller B, Zunder ER, Finck R, Chen TJ, et al. 2012. Multiplexed mass cytometry profiling of cellular states perturbed by small-molecule regulators. Nat Biotechnol 30: 858-67.
6. Zubarev RA, Makarov A. 2013. Orbitrap mass spectromery. Anal Chem 85: 5288-96.
7. Kruger M, Moser M, Ussar S, Thievessen I, et al. 2008. SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function. Cell 134: 353-64.
8. Sury MD, Chen JX, Selbach M. 2010. The SILAC fly allows for accurate protein quantification in vivo. Mol Cell Proteomics 9: 2173-83.
9. Boersema PJ, Geiger T, Wisniewski JR, Mann M. 2013. Quantification of the N-glycosylated secretome by super-SILAC during breast cancer progression and in human blood samples. Mol Cell Proteomics 12: 158-71.
10. Deeb SJ, D'Souza RC, Cox J, Schmidt-Supprian M, et al. 2012. Super-SILAC allows classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes by their protein expression profiles. Mol Cell Proteomics 11: 77-89.
11. Geiger T, Cox J, Ostasiewicz P, Wisniewski JR, et al. 2010. Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue. Nat Methods 7: 383-5.
12. Bantscheff M, Kuster B. 2012. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics. Anal Bioanal Chem 404: 937-8.
13. Rotilio D, Della Corte A, D'Imperio M, Coletta W, et al. 2012. Proteomics: bases for protein complexity understanding. Thromb Res 129: 257-62.
14. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376-80.
15. Green RE, Krause J, Ptak SE, Briggs AW, et al. 2006. Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA. Nature 444: 330-6.
16. Shendure J, Porreca GJ, Reppas NB, Lin X, et al. 2005. Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science 309: 1728-32.
17. Harris TD, Buzby PR, Babcock H, Beer E, et al. 2008. Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome. Science 320: 106-9.
18. Lundquist PM, Zhong CF, Zhao P, Tomaney AB, et al. 2008. Parallel confocal detection of single molecules in real time. Opt Lett 33: 1026-8.
19. Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, et al. 2008. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456: 53-9.
20. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2009. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: 57-63.
21. Soon WW, Hariharan M, Snyder MP. 2013. High-throughput sequencing for biology and medicine. Mol Syst Biol 9: 640.
22. Clark MJ, Chen R, Lam HY, Karczewski KJ, et al. 2011. Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nat Biotechnol 29: 908-14.
23. Massie CE, Mills IG. 2008. ChIPping away at gene regulation. EMBO Rep 9: 337-43.
24. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520-62.
25. Chapman JA, Kirkness EF, Simakov O, Hampson SE, et al. 2010. The dynamic genome of Hydra. Nature 464: 592-6.
26. Adamidi C, Wang Y, Gruen D, Mastrobuoni G, et al. 2011. De novo assembly and validation of planaria transcriptome by massive parallel sequencing and shotgun proteomics. Genome Res 21: 1193-200.
27. Kumar A, Gates PB, Brockes JP. 2007. Positional identity of adult stem cells in salamander limb regeneration. C R Biol 330: 485-90.
28. Kumar A, Godwin JW, Gates PB, Garza-Garcia AA, et al. 2007. Molecular basis for the nerve dependence of limb regeneration in an adult vertebrate. Science 318: 772-7.
29. Looso M, Preussner J, Sousounis K, Bruckskotten M, et al. 2013. A de novo assembly of the newt transcriptome combined with proteomic validation identifies new protein families expressed during tissue regeneration. Genome Biol 14: R16.
30. Abdullayev I, Kirkham M, Bjorklund AK, Simon A, et al. 2013. A reference transcriptome and inferred proteome for the salamander Notophthalmus viridescens. Exp Cell Res 319: 1187-97.
31. Rao N, Jhamb D, Milner DJ, Li B, et al. 2009. Proteomic analysis of blastema formation in regenerating axolotl limbs. BMC Biol 7: 83.
32. Berghoff BA, Konzer A, Mank NN, Looso M, et al. 2013. Integrative "omics"-approach discovers dynamic and regulatory features of bacterial stress responses. PLoS Genet 9: e1003576.
33. Nakajima K, Nakajima T, Takase M, Yaoita Y. 2012. Generation of albino Xenopus tropicalis using zinc-finger nucleases. Dev Growth Differ 54: 777-84.
34. Lei Y, Guo X, Liu Y, Cao Y, et al. 2012. Efficient targeted gene disruption in Xenopus embryos using engineered transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 17484-9.
35. Aryan A, Anderson MA, Myles KM, Adelman ZN. 2013. TALEN-based gene disruption in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS One 8: e60082.
36. Keeling CI, Yuen MM, Liao NY, Roderick Docking T, et al. 2013. Draft genome of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, a major forest pest. Genome Biol 14: R27.
37. Shaffer HB, Minx P, Warren DE, Shedlock AM, et al. 2013. The western painted turtle genome, a model for the evolution of extreme physiological adaptations in a slowly evolving lineage. Genome Biol 14: R28.
38. Toth AL, Varala K, Newman TC, Miguez FE, et al. 2007. Wasp gene expression supports an evolutionary link between maternal behavior and eusociality. Science 318: 441-4.
39. Genome KCoS. 2009. Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10, 000 vertebrate species. J Hered 100: 659-74.
40. Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IM, et al. 2012. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D571-9.
41. Wang XW, Luan JB, Li JM, Bao YY, et al. 2010. De novo characterization of a whitefly transcriptome and analysis of its gene expression during development. BMC Genomics 11: 400.
42. Vera JC, Wheat CW, Fescemyer HW, Frilander MJ, et al. 2008. Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing. Mol Ecol 17: 1636-147.
43. Meyer E, Aglyamova GV, Wang S, Buchanan-Carter J, et al. 2009. Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GSFlx. BMC Genomics 10: 219.
44. Wilkins MR, Pasquali C, Appel RD, Ou K, et al. 1996. From proteins to proteomes: large scale protein identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and amino acid analysis. Biotechnology (N Y) 14: 61-5.
45. Picotti P, Clement-Ziza M, Lam H, Campbell DS, et al. 2013. A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis. Nature 494: 266-70.
46. Mann M, Kulak NA, Nagaraj N, Cox J. 2013. The coming age of complete, accurate, and ubiquitous proteomes. Mol Cell 49: 583-90.
47. Sousounis K, Looso M, Maki N, Ivester CJ, et al. 2013. Transcriptome analysis of newt lens regeneration reveals distinct gradients in gene expression patterns. PLoS One 8: e61445.
48. Konzer A, Ruhs A, Braun H, Jungblut B, et al. 2013. Stable isotope labelling in zebrafish allows in vivo monitoring of cardiac morphogenesis. Mol Cell Proteomics 12: 1502-12.
49. Wisniewski JR, Dus K, Mann M. 2013. Proteomic workflow for analysis of archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded clinical samples to a depth of 10, 000 proteins. Proteomics Clin Appl 7: 225-33.
50. Habermann B, Oegema J, Sunyaev S, Shevchenko A. 2004. The power and the limitations of cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry-driven sequence similarity searches. Mol Cell Proteomics 3: 238-49.
51. Junqueira M, Spirin V, Balbuena TS, Thomas H, et al. 2008. Protein identification pipeline for the homology-driven proteomics. J Proteomics 71: 346-56.
52. Alhaider AA, Bayoumy N, Argo E, Gader AG, et al. 2012. Survey of the camel urinary proteome by shotgun proteomics using a multiple database search strategy. Proteomics 12: 3403-6.
53. Borchardt T, Looso M, Bruckskotten M, Weis P, et al. 2010. Analysis of newly established EST databases reveals similarities between heart regeneration in newt and fish. BMC Genomics 11: 4.
54. Leonardi A, Biass D, Kordis D, Stocklin R, et al. 2012. Conus consors snail venom proteomics proposes functions, pathways, and novel families involved in its venomic system. J Proteome Res 11: 5046-58.
55. Looso M, Borchardt T, Kruger M, Braun T. 2010. Advanced identification of proteins in uncharacterized proteomes by pulsed in vivo stable isotope labeling-based mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 9: 1157-66.
56. Standing KG. 2003. Peptide and protein de novo sequencing by mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13: 595-601.
57. Liska AJ, Popov AV, Sunyaev S, Coughlin P, et al. 2004. Homology-based functional proteomics by mass spectrometry: application to the Xenopus microtubule-associated proteome. Proteomics 4: 2707-21.
58. Wu CH, Tsai MH, Ho CC, Chen CY, et al. 2013. De novo transcriptome sequencing of axolotl blastema for identification of differentially expressed genes during limb regeneration. BMC Genomics 14: 434.
59. Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, et al. 2010. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464: 606-9.
60. Clark LD, Clark RK, Heber-Katz E. 1998. A new murine model for mammalian wound repair and regeneration. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 88: 35-45.
61. Meng F, Braasch I, Phillips JB, Lin X, et al. 2013. Evolution of the eye transcriptome under constant darkness in Sinocyclocheilus cavefish. Mol Biol Evol 30: 1527-43.
62. Ferreira PG, Patalano S, Chauhan R, Ffrench-Constant R, et al. 2013. Transcriptome analyses of primitively eusocial wasps reveal novel insights into the evolution of sociality and the origin of alternative phenotypes. Genome Biol 14: R20.
63. Peterson MP, Whittaker DJ, Ambreth S, Sureshchandra S, et al. 2012. De novo transcriptome sequencing in a songbird, the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis): genomic tools for an ecological model system. BMC Genomics 13: 305.
64. Knapp D, Schulz H, Rascon CA, Volkmer M, et al. 2013. Comparative transcriptional profiling of the axolotl limb identifies a tripartite regeneration-specific gene program. PLoS One 8: e61352.
65. Stewart R, Rascon CA, Tian S, Nie J, et al. 2013. Comparative RNA-seq analysis in the unsequenced axolotl: the oncogene burst highlights early gene expression in the blastema. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1002936.
66. Paps J, Baguna J, Riutort M. 2009. Bilaterian phylogeny: a broad sampling of 13 nuclear genes provides a new Lophotrochozoa phylogeny and supports a paraphyletic basal acoelomorpha. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2397-406.
67. Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2008. Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology. Trends Genet 24: 142-9.
68. Compeau PE, Pevzner PA, Tesler G. 2011. How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly. Nat Biotechnol 29: 987-91.
69. Gnerre S, Maccallum I, Przybylski D, Ribeiro FJ, et al. 2011. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 1513-8.
70. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E. 2012. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 28: 1086-92.
71. Korbel JO, Urban AE, Affourtit JP, Godwin B, et al. 2007. Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science 318: 420-6.
72. Francis WR, Christianson LM, Kiko R, Powers ML, et al. 2013. A comparison across non-model animals suggests an optimal sequencing depth for de novo transcriptome assembly. BMC Genomics 14: 167.
73. Böser A, Drexler HC, Reuter H, Guangming W, et al. 2013. SILAC proteomics of planarians identifies Ncoa5 as a conserved component of pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep 5: 1142-55.
74. Looso M, Michel CS, Konzer A, Bruckskotten M, et al. 2012. Spiked-in pulsed in vivo labeling identifies a new member of the CCN family in regenerating newt hearts. J Proteome Res 11: 4693-704.
75. Piatkowski T, Muhlfeld C, Borchardt T, Braun T. 2013. Reconstitution of the myocardium in regenerating newt hearts is preceded by transient deposition of extracellular matrix components. Stem Cells Dev 22: 1921-31.
76. Laube F, Heister M, Scholz C, Borchardt T, et al. 2006. Re-programming of newt cardiomyocytes is induced by tissue regeneration. J Cell Sci 119: 4719-29.
77. Witman N, Murtuza B, Davis B, Arner A, et al. 2011. Recapitulation of developmental cardiogenesis governs the morphological and functional regeneration of adult newt hearts following injury. Dev Biol 354: 67-76.
78. Yoshida Y, Togi K, Matsumae H, Nakashima Y, et al. 2007. CCN1 protects cardiac myocytes from oxidative stress via beta1 integrin-Akt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 355: 611-8.
79. Joung JK, Sander JD. 2013. TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 49-55.
80. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, et al. 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339: 819-23.
81. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, et al. 2013. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339: 823-6.
82. Ivics Z, Li MA, Mates L, Boeke JD, et al. 2009. Transposon-mediated genome manipulation in vertebrates. Nat Methods 6: 415-22.
83. Zheng B, Sage M, Sheppeard EA, Jurecic V, et al. 2000. Engineering mouse chromosomes with Cre-loxP: range, efficiency, and somatic applications. Mol Cell Biol 20: 648-55.
84. Parra G, Bradnam K, Ning Z, Keane T, et al. 2009. Assessing the gene space in draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 289-97.
85. Sandoval-Guzman T, Wang H, Khattak S, Schuez M, et al. 2013. Fundamental differences in dedifferentiation and stem cell recruitment during skeletal muscle regeneration in two salamander species. Cell Stem Cell, in press doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.007.