Distributive and procedural justice: Acceptability as solutions to social dilemmas

Handbook of Social Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 103-124

  Platow, Michael J ^a   OBrien, Léan V ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896563622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Azzi, A. (1992). Procedural justice and the allocation of power in intergroup relations: Studies in the U.S. and South Africa. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 736-747.
3. Azzi, A. E. (1993). Implicit and category-based allocations of decision-making power in majority-minority relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 203-228.
4. Bagarozzi, D. A. (1982). The effects of cohesiveness on distributive justice. The Journal of Psychology, 110, 267-273.
5. Beggan, J. K., Platow, M. J., & McClintock, C. G. (1990). Social interdependence. In R. Baron and W. Graziano (Eds.), Social Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 394-423). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6. Biel, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93-112.
7. Billig, M. (1991). Consistency and group ideology: Toward a rhetorical approach to the study of justice. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds.), Social justice in human relations: Societal and psychological origins of justice (Vol. 1, pp. 169-194). New York: Plenum Press.
8. Boldizar, J. P., & Messick, D. M. (1988). Intergroup fairness biases: Is ours the fairer sex? Social Justice Research, 2, 95-111.
9. Brockner, J., & Wisenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
10. Bruins, J. J., Platow, M. J., & Ng, S. H. (1995). Distributive and procedural justice in interpersonal and intergroup situations: Issues, solutions and extensions. Social Justice Research, 8, 103-121.
11. Clayton, S. (1994). Appeals to justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 13-27.
12. Cobb, A. T., & Frey, F. M. (1996). The effects of leader fairness and pay outcomes on superior/subordinate relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1401-1426.
13. Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Justice and power: An exchange Analysis. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.). Justice in social relations (pp. 19-43). New York: Plenum.
14. Cropanzano, R., Slaughter, J. E., & Bachiochi, P. D. (2005). Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1168-1184.
15. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
16. de la Rey, C., & Raju, P. (1996). Group relative deprivation: Cognitive versus affective components and protest orientation among Indian South Africans. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 579-588.
17. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-150.
18. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Deutsch, M. (1987). Experimental studies of the effects of different systems of distributive justice. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.). Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation (pp. 151-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Feather, N. T. (1994). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 129-151.
21. Foddy, M., Smithson, M., Schneider, S., & Hogg, M. (Eds.). (1999). Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup approaches. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
22. Giessner, S. R., Viki, G. T., Otten, S., Terry, D. J., & Täuber, S. (2006). The challenge of merging: Merger patterns, pre-merger status and merger support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 339-352
23. Goldman, B. M. (2003). The application of reference missions to theory to legal-claiming by terminated workers: the role of organisational justice and anger. Journal of Management, 29, 705-728.
24. Grant, P. R., & Brown, R. (1995). From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 195-211.
25. Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 54, 81-103.
26. Grover, S. L. (1991). Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 247-255.
27. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 165, 1243-1248.
28. Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Preferences for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experiemental Social Psychology, 14, 13-30.
29. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
30. Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2003). The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 2-19.
31. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relationships: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
32. Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. (1986). Social group identity and the emergence of cooperation in resource conservation dilemmas. In H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental studies of social dilemmas (pp. 205-234). Frankfort, Germany: Peter Lang.
33. Klein, O., & Azzi, A. E. (2001). Procedural justice in majority-minority relations: Studies involving Belgian linguistic groups. Social Justice Research, 14, 25-43.
34. Lawler, E. E. III (1968). Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 596-610.
35. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
36. Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wolters, F. J. (1986). Why we are fairer than others: A cross-cultural replication and extension. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 590-604.
37. Lind, E. A., & Earley, P. C. (1992). Procedural justice and culture. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 227-242.
38. Lind, E. A., Huo, Y. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1994). Any justice for all: Ethnicity, gender, and preferences for dispute resolution procedures. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 269-290.
39. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
40. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
41. Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., & Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 338-350.
42. Lupfer, M. B., Weeks, K. P., Doan, K. A., & Houston, D. A. (2000). Folk conceptions of fairness and unfairness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 405-428.
43. Martin, J. (1993). Inequality, distributive justice, and organizational illegitimacy. In J. K. Murninghan (Ed.) Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 296-321). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44. McClintock, C. G. (1972). Social motivation-A set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438-454.
45. McClintock, C. G. (1977). Social motivations in settings of outcome interdependence. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 49-77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46. McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121-137.
47. McClintock, C. G., Kramer, R. M., & Keil, L. J. (1984). Equity and social exchange in human relationships. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 183-228). New York: Academic Press.
48. Messick, D. M. (1991). Social dilemmas, shared resources, and social justice. In H. Steensma & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Social justice in human relations: Societal and psychological consequences of justice (Vol. 2, pp. 49-69). New York: Plenum Press.
49. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 11-44.
50. Messick, D. M., & McClelland, C. L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 105-110.
51. Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418-434.
52. Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P., & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480-500.
53. Mikula, G., & Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and social conflict: The impact of ideas of justice, perceptions of injustice, and justice arguments on the emergence, course, and resolution of social conflicts. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 126-135.
54. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
55. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1996). The power of the myth of self-interest. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 25-48). New York: Plenum Press.
56. Montada, L. (1996). Trade-offs between justice and self-interest. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 259-275). New York: Plenum Press.
57. Ng, S. H. (1982). Power and intergroup discrimination. In H. Tajfel (Ed.). Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 179-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. O'Brien, L. V. (2009). Subjective Justice: A social identity perspective. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
59. O'Brien, L. V. & McGarty, M. (2009). Political disagreement in intergroup terms: Contextual variation and the influence of power. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 77-98.
60. Peate, V. G., Platow, M. J., & Eggins, R. A. (2008). Collective voice and support for social protest among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians: considering the role of procedural fairness in an intergroup conflict of interest. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 175-185.
61. Platow, M. J., Brewer, G., & Eggins, R. A. (2008). Authorities' knowledge of shared group membership and its effects on the respect-informing properties of procedural fairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 743-750.
62. Platow, M. J., Eggins, R. A., Chattopadhyay, R., Brewer, G., Hardwick, L., Milsom, L., Brocklebank, J., Lalor, T., Martin, R., Quee, M., Vassallo, S., & Welsh, J. (2007). Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: Authority group membership, non-instrumental voice and group belongingness. Unpublished Manuscript, The Australian National University.
63. Platow, M. J., Filardo, F., Troselj, L., Grace, D. M., & Ryan, M. K. (2006). Non-instrumental voice and extra-role behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 135-146.
64. Platow, M. J., & Hunter, J. A. (2001). Realistic intergroup conflict: Prejudice, power, and protest. In M. Augoustinos & K. J. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 195-214) London: Sage.
65. Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494.
66. Platow, M. J., O'Connell, A., Shave, R., & Hanning, P. (1995). Social evaluations of fair and unfair allocators in interpersonal and intergroup situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 363-381.
67. Platow, M. J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behaviour in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 35-47.
68. Platow, M. J., Wenzel, M., & Nolan, M. A. (2003). The importance of social identity and self categorisation processes for creating and responding to fairness. In S.A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M.J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: developing theory for organisational practice (pp. 261-276). New York: Psychology Press.
69. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Justice in teams: The activation and role of sense-making in the emergence of justice climates. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 100, 177-192.
71. Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564-596). New York: Guilford Press.
72. Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94-104.
73. Schroeder, D. A., Steel, J.E., Woodell, A. J., & Bembenek, A. F. (2003). Justice within social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 374-387.
74. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, anticorruption all justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
75. Tajfel, H. (1982). Psychological conceptions of equity: The present and the future. In P. Fraisse (Ed.). Psychologie de demain (pp. 149-166). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
76. Tajfel, H. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 695-715). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
79. Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 176-197.
80. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.
81. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345.
82. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
83. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
84. Tyler, T., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
85. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
86. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-192). New York: Academic Press.
87. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.
88. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2004). The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice: Towards theoretical integration. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 33-58). Hove England: Psychology Press.
89. van Vugt, M., & de Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
90. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Egocentric interpretations of fairness in asymmetric, environmental social dilemmas: Explaining harvesting behavior and the role of communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67, 111-126.
91. Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275-283.
92. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 1-42). New York: Academic Press.
93. Wenzel, M. (2001). A social categorisation approach to distributive justice: social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 315-335.
94. Wenzel, M. (2002). What is social about justice? Inclusive identity and group values as the basis of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 205-218.
95. Wenzel, M. (2004). A social categorisation approach to distributive justice. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 219-257.
96. Wit, A., & Wilke, H. (1988). Subordinates' endorsement of an allocating leader in a commons dilemma: An equity theoretical approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 151-168.