Folk conceptions of fairness and unfairness

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 405-428

  Lupfer, Michael B ^a   Weeks, Kelly P ^b   Doan, Kelly A ^b   Houston, David A ^b  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034178216     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<405::AID-EJSP997>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams JS. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Berkowitz L (ed.); Academic Press: New York; 267-299.
2. Batson CD. 1995. Prosocial motivation: Why do we help others? In Advanced Social Psychology, Tesser A (ed.); McGraw-Hill: New York; 333-381.
3. Bies RJ. 1987. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, Cummings LL, Shaw BM (eds); JAI Press: London; 289-319.
4. Brackett C, Wilder B, Reisch W. 1939. Screenplay for Ninotchka. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer: Burbank, CA.
5. Brockner J, Wiesenfield BM. 1996. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120: 189-208.
6. Deutsch M. 1983. Current social psychological perspectives on justice. European Journal of Social Psychology 13: 305-319.
7. Deutsch M. 1985. Distributive Justice. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
8. Deutsch M. 1987. Experimental studies of the effects of different systems of distributive justice. In Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation, Masters JC, Smith WP (eds); Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 151-164.
9. Finkel NJ. 1998. But it's not fair! - Commonsense notions of unfairness. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of American Psychology-Law Society, Redondo Beach, CA. (March).
10. Fleiss JL. 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, (2nd edn). Wiley: New York.
11. Greenberg J. 1986. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 340-342.
12. Greenberg J. 1987. Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology 72: 55-61.
13. Greenberg J. 1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management 16: 399-432.
14. Hogan R, Emler NP. 1981. Retributive justice. In The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change, Lerner MJ, Lerner SC (eds); Academic Press: New York; 125-144.
15. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291.
16. Kanouse DE, Hanson LR Jr. 1972. Negativity in Evaluation. General Learning Press: Morristown, NJ.
17. Leventhal GS. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relations. In Social Exchange, Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (eds); Plenum: New York; 27-55.
18. Lind EA, Tyler TR. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum: New York.
19. Lupfer MB, Doan K, Houston DA. 1998. Explaining unfair and fair outcomes: The therapeutic value of attributional analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology 37: 495-511.
20. Masters RD. 1991. Naturalistic approaches to the concept of justice. American Behavioral Scientist 34: 289-313.
21. Messick DM. 1993. Equality as a decision heuristic. In Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications, Mellers B, Baron J (eds); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 11-31.
22. Messick DM, Bloom S, Boldizar JP, Samuelson CD. 1985. Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 84-93.
23. Mikula G. 1986. The experience of injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In Justice in Social Relations, Bierhoff HW, Cohen RL, Greenberg J (eds); Plenum: New York; 103-123.
24. Mikula G. 1987. Exploring the experience of injustice. In Issues in Contemporary German Social Psychology, Semin GR, Krahe B (eds); Sage: London; 74-96.
25. Mikula G. 1993. On the experience of injustice. In European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 4, Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds); Wiley: Chichester; 223-244.
26. Mikula G, Petri B, Tanzer N. 1990. What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology 20: 133-149.
27. Mikula G, Schlamberger K. 1985. What people think about an unjust event: Toward a better understanding of the phenomenology of experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology 15: 37-49.
28. Plato. 1952. The Republic, Vol. 7. (translated by Jowett, B) (Written about 375 BC). Encyclopaedia Britannica Great Books: Chicago; 295-441.
29. Rasinski K. 1987. What's fair is fair . . . or is it? Value differences in public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 201-211.
30. Shaver KC. 1985. The Attribution of Blame: Causality, responsibility and blameworthiness. Springer-Verlag: New York.
31. Sheppard BH, Lewicki RJ. 1987. Toward general principles of management fairness. Social Justice Research 1: 161-176.
32. Shklar JN. 1990. The Faces of Injustice. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
33. Taylor SE, Fiske ST. 1978. Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11, Berkowitz L (ed.); Academic Press: New York.
34. Thibaut J, Walker L. 1975. Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
35. Tyler TR. 1994. Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 850-863.
36. Tyler TR, Degoey P, Smith H. 1996. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 913-930.
37. Tyler TR, Lind EA. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Zanna M (ed.); Academic Press: New York; 115-192.
38. Tyler TR, Smith HJ. 1998. Social justice and social movements. In Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, (4th edn), Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds); McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA; 595-629.
39. Van den Bos K, Vermunt R, Wilke HAM. 1997a. Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 95-104.
40. Van den Bos K, Lind EA, Vermunt R, Wilke HAM. 1997b. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 1034-1046.
41. Walster E, Walster GW, Berscheid E. 1978. Equity: Theory and research. Allyn Bacon: Boston, MA.