Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens' perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services

Public Management Review

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 358-382

  van Eijk, C J A ^a   Steen, T P S ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

citizen motivation; co planning; Co production; health care organizations; public service motivation; Q methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896492364     PISSN: 14719037     EISSN: 14719045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841458     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abdi, H. (2003) 'Factor Rotations in Factor Analyses' in M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Alford, J. (2002a) Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society, 34:1 pp32-56.
3. Alford, J. (2002b) Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social-Exchange Perspective. Public Administration Review, 62:3 pp337-46.
4. Alford, J. (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients. From Service-Delivery to Co-Production. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Amnå, E. (2010) 'Active, Passive, or Stand-by Citizens? Latent and Manifest Political Participation' in E. Amna (ed.) New Forms of Citizen Participation. Normative Implications. Nomos: Baden-Baden, pp191-203.
6. Andersen, L. B., Kristensen, N. and Pedersen, L. H. (2011) 'Public Service Efficacy'. Paper presented at the 33rd EGPA Conference, Bucharest. Available at http://soc.kuleuven.be/io/egpa/HRM/bucharest/Andersen-Kristensen&Pedersen2011.pdf
7. Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, September/October pp846-60.
8. Bovaird, T. and Löfffler, E. (2012) 'From Engagement to Co-Production: How Users and Communities Contribute to Public Services' in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York, NY: Routledge, pp35-60.
9. Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V. and Verschuere, B. (2012) 'Co-Production as a Maturing Concept' in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York, NY: Routledge, pp1-9.
10. Brandsen, T. and Van Hout, E. (2006) Co-Management in Public Service Networks. The Organizational Effects. Public Management Review, 8:4 pp537-49.
11. Brewer, G. A. (2003) Building Social Capital: Civic Attitudes and Behavior of Public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13:1 pp5-26.
12. Brewer, G. A., Selden, S. C. and Facer II, R. L. (2000) Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 60:May/June pp254-64.
13. Brown, S. R. (1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Brown, S. R. (1993) A Primer on Q Methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16 pp91-138.
15. Brown, S. R. (1996) Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 6:4 pp561-7.
16. Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G. and Silver, G. E. (1990) Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items. Political Behavior, 12:3 pp289-314.
17. Dees, J. G. (2001) 'The Meaning of "Social Entrepreneurship"'. Paper published by the Centre for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University, Durham, NC. Available at http://www.docstoc.com/docs/46020012/The-Meaning-of-Social-Entrepreneurship-J-Gregory-Dees
18. Dekker, P. and Halman, L. (2003) 'Volunteering and Values: An Introduction' in P. Dekker and L. Halman (eds) The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic, pp1-17.
19. Dryzek, J. S. and Berejikian, J. (1993) Reconstructive Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 87:1 pp48-60.
20. Heemhaven. (2009) Nieuws van de cliëntenraad, September 2009, Heemstede: Zorgbalans Heemhaven.
21. Ishkanian, A. and Szreter, S. eds (2012) The Big Society Debate. A New Agenda for Social Welfare?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
22. Joshi, A. and Moore, M. (2004) Institutionalised Co-Production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40:4 pp31-49.
23. Marinetto, M. (2003) Who Wants To Be an Active Citizen? The Politics and Practice of Community Involvement. Sociology, 37:1 pp103-20.
24. Osborne, S. (2010) Delivering Public Services: Time for a New Theory? Public Management Review, 12:1 pp1-10.
25. Overheid.nl. (2012) Wet medezeggenschap cliënten zorginstellingen. Available at www.wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007920/. Consulted March 2012.
26. Pandey, S. K., Wright, B. E. and Moynihan, D. P. (2008) Public Service Motivation and Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior in Public Organizations: Testing a Preliminary Model. International Public Management Journal, 11:1 pp89-108.
27. Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wilson, R. (1981) Consumers as Co-Producers of Public Services. Some Institutional and Economic Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9:7 pp1001-11.
28. Perry, J. L. and Hondeghem, A. eds (2008) Motivation in Public Management. The Call of Public Service, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Pestoff, V. (2012) 'Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe' in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York, NY: Routledge, pp13-34.
30. Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. eds (2012) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York/London: Routledge.
31. Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Reed, P. and Selbee, L. K. (2003) 'Do People Who Volunteer Have a Dinstinctive Ethos? A Canadian Study' in P. Dekker and L. Halman (eds) The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp91-109.
33. Rijksoverheid [National Government]. (2011) Wat zijn de bevoegdheden van een cliëntenraad in een zorginstelling? Available at http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/goed-bestuur-in-de-zorg/vraag-enantwoord/wat-zijn-de-bevoegdheden-van-een-clientenraad-in-eenzorginstelling.html. Consulted October 2011.
34. Santos, F. M. (2012) A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111 pp335-51.
35. Sharp, E. (1978) 'Citizen Organizations and Participation in Law Enforcement Advocacy and Coproduction: The Role of Incentives'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
36. Sharp, E. B. (1984) Citizen-Demand Making in the Urban Context. American Journal of Political Science, 28:4 pp654-70.
37. Steen, T. (2006) Public Sector Motivation: Is There Something to Learn from the Study of Volunteerism? Public Policy and Administration, 21:1 pp49-62.
38. Timpone, R. J. (1998) Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States. The American Political Science Review, 92:1 pp145-58.
39. Van de Bovenkamp, H. M. (2010) The Limits of Patient Power. Examining Active Citizenship in Dutch Health Care, Rotterdam: Optima Grafische Communicatie.
40. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. and Verhoef, P. C. (2010) Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. Journal of Service Research, 13:3 pp253-66.
41. Van Eijk, C. and Steen, T. (2012) 'Motivated for Active Citizenship. Comprehending Citizens' Motivation to Participate in Coproduction of Public Services by Bringing in the Concept of Public Service Motivation'. Paper presented at the Winelands Conference, Stellenboschs, 2-4 April 2012.
42. Van Exel, N. J. A. and de Graaf, G. (2005) 'Q methodology: A Sneak Preview'. Electronic article published on Qmethodology.net: Q-methodology Tutorial, Studies, Literature, Data and Links to Web Resources. Available at http://www.qmethodology.net/index.php?page=1&year=2005
43. Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36:1 pp1-10.
44. Verhoeven, I. (2009) Burgers tegen beleid. Een analyse van dynamiek in politieke betrokkenheid, Amsterdam: Aksant.
45. Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. (2012) Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20:1 pp1-19.
46. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid [Scientific Council for Government Policy] (WRR). (2004) Bewijzen van goede dienstverlening. Rapport nr. 70, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
47. Zuidgeest, M., Luijkx, K. G., Westert, G. P. and Delnoij, D. M. J. (2011) Legal Rights of Client Councils and Their Role in Policy of Long-Term Care Organisations in the Netherlands. BMC Health Services Research, 11 pp215-20.