Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 169-176

  Vreven, Thom ^a   Hwang, Howook ^a,b   Pierce, Brian G ^a   Weng, Zhiping ^c  

^a Zhiping Weng's lab ^*  (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

COTH; PRISM; Protein protein docking; Protein protein structure; Template based prediction; ZDOCK

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84896466868     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbt047     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, et al. Molecularsurface recognition - determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. ProcNatl Acad SciUSA 1992;89:2195-9.
2. Vakser IA. Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng 1995;8:371-7.
3. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, et al. Molecular-surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces-the critical role played by surface normals at well places, sparse, points in docking. JMol Biol 1995;252:263-73.
4. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. JMol Biol 1997;272:106-20.
5. Vakser IA, Matar OG, Lam CF. A systematic study of lowresolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 1999;96:8477-82.
6. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, et al. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. ProteinEng 2001;14:105-13.
7. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 2002;47:281-94.
8. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin A. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125: 1731-7.
9. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage proteindocking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-7.
10. Andrusier N, Mashiach E, Nussinov R, et al. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008;73:271-89.
11. Lyskov S, Gray JJ. The RosettaDock server for local proteinprotein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:W233-8.
12. Ritchie DW, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions. Bioinformatics 2008;24:1865-73.
13. Lu L, Lu H, Skolnick J. MULTIPROSPECTOR: an algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by multimeric threading. Proteins 2002;49:350-64.
14. Aloy P, Russell RB. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5896-901.
15. Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures. Proteins 2004;56:143-56.
16. Aloy P, Bottcher B, Ceulemans H, et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 2004;303: 2026-9.
17. Aytuna AS, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Prediction of proteinprotein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2005;21: 2850-5.
18. Gunther S, May P, Hoppe A, et al. Docking without docking: ISEARCH-Prediction of interactions using known interfaces. Proteins 2007;69:839-44.
19. Launay G, Simonson T. Homology modelling of proteinprotein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:427.
20. Kundrotas PJ, Lensink MF, Alexov E. Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. Int J Biol Macromol 2008;43:198-208.
21. Chen HL, Skolnick J. M-TASSER: an algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction. Biophys J 2008;94: 918-28.
22. Sinha R, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Docking by structural similarity at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010;78: 3235-41.
23. Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Accuracy of protein-protein binding sites in high-throughput template-based modeling. Plos Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000727.
24. Ghoorah AW, Devignes MD, Smail-Tabbone M, et al. Spatial clustering of protein binding sites for template based protein docking. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2820-7.
25. Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Nussinov R, et al. Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM. Nat Protoc 2011;6:1341-54.
26. Mukherjee S, Zhang Y. Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination. Structure 2011;19:955-66.
27. Tuncbag N, Keskin O, Nussinov R, et al. Fast and accurate modeling of protein-protein interactions by combining template-interface-based docking with flexible refinement. Proteins 2012;80:1239-49.
28. Sinha R, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Protein docking by the interface structure similarity: how much structure is needed? Plos One 2012;7:e31349.
29. Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Prediction of proteinprotein interactions: unifying evolution and structure at protein interfaces. Phys Biol 2011;8:035006.
30. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, et al. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007;69:511-20.
31. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-42.
32. Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, et al. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. JMol Biol 2003;332:989-98.
33. Garma L, Mukherjee S, Mitra P, et al. How many proteinprotein interactions types exist in nature? Plos One 2012;7: e38913.
34. Kundrotas PJ, Zhu ZW, Janin J, et al. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. ProcNatl Acad SciUSA 2012;109:9438-41.
35. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010;78:3111-14.
36. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, et al. SCOP-a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. JMol Biol 1995;247:536-40.
37. Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FiberDock: a web server for flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:W457-61.
38. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85: 2444-8.
39. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. 'NACCESS computer program', 1993. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College of London, UK. Program is available at: http://www.bioinf.manchester.ac. uk/naccess/ (11 May 2004, date last accessed).
40. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. JMol Biol 1990;215:403-10.
41. Zhu JH, Weng Z. FAST: a novel protein structure alignment algorithm. Proteins 2005;58:618-27.
42. Gao M, Skolnick J. New benchmark metrics for protein-protein docking methods. Proteins 2011;79: 1623-34.
43. Hwang H, Vreven T, Whitfield TW, et al. A machine learning approach for the prediction of protein surface loop flexibility. Proteins 2011;79:2467-74.
44. Pierce B, Weng Z. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 2007;67:1078-86.
45. Vreven T, Hwang H, Weng Z. Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2011;20:1576-86.
46. Pierce B, Weng Z. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance. Proteins 2008;72:270-9.
47. Vreven T, Hwang H, Weng Z. Exploring angular distance in protein-protein docking algorithms. PLoS ONE 2013;8: e56645.