Evaluating differences of metabolic performances: Statistical methods and their application to animal cell cultivations

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 110, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2633-2642

  Hadicke O ^a   Lohr, V ^a   Genzel, Y ^a   Reichl, U ^a,b   Klamt, S ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal cell growth; Case study; Experimental setup planning; Metabolic rates; Statistical significance

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; GROWTH KINETICS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ANIMAL CELLS; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS; GROWTH CHARACTERISTIC; METABOLIC RATES; RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATIONS; SETUP PLANNING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT;

METABOLISM;

AMMONIA; GLUCOSE; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLUTAMINE; LACTIC ACID; CULTURE MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; METABOLIC RATE; NONHUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIRRED REACTOR; ANIMAL; ANIMAL CELL GROWTH; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CASE STUDY; CELL LINE; CULTURE MEDIUM; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DUCK; EXPERIMENTAL SETUP PLANNING; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; METABOLIC RATES; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

ANIMAL CELL GROWTH; CASE STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL SETUP PLANNING; METABOLIC RATES; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; CULTURE MEDIA; DUCKS; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; METABOLISM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84896413020     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24926     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arriaga EA. 2009. Determining biological noise via single cell analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 393(1):73-80.
2. Bonarius HP, Houtman JH, Schmid G, de Gooijer CD, Tramper J. 1999. Error analysis of metabolic-rate measurements in mammalian-cell culture by carbon and nitrogen balances. Cytotechnology 29(3):167-176.
3. Broadhurst DI, Kell DB. 2006. Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics 2(4):171-196.
4. Carinhas N, Bernal V, Monteiro F, Carrondo MJ, Oliveira R, Alves PM. 2010. Improving baculovirus production at high cell density through manipulation of energy metabolism. Metab Eng 12(1):39-52.
5. Carinhas N, Bernal V, Teixeira AP, Carrondo MJ, Alves PM, Oliveira R. 2011. Hybrid metabolic flux analysis: Combining stoichiometric and statistical constraints to model the formation of complex recombinant products. BMC Syst Biol 5:34.
6. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297(5584):1183-1186.
7. Fitzner K, Heckinger E. 2010. Sample size calculation and power analysis: A quick review. Diabetes Educ 36(5):701-706.
8. Gottwald W. 1999. Statistik für Anwender-Die Praxis der instrumentellen Analytik, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH. 226. p.
9. Goudar C, Biener R, Michaels J, Piret J, Konstantinov K. 2005. Error analysis during estimation of metabolic fluxes through metabolite balancing. Anim Cell Technol Meets Genomics 2:597-600.
10. Goudar CT, Biener R, Konstantinov KB, Piret JM. 2009. Error propagation from prime variables into specific rates and metabolic fluxes for mammalian cells in perfusion culture. Biotechnol Prog 25(4):986-998.
11. Hilfinger A, Paulsson J. 2011. Separating intrinsic from extrinsic fluctuations in dynamic biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(29):12167-12172.
12. Harmonised ICH Guideline, Tripartite. 2005. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology: ICH Q2(R1).
13. Jordan I, Vos A, Beilfuss S, Neubert A, Breul S, Sandig V. 2009. An avian cell line designed for production of highly attenuated viruses. Vaccine 27(5):748-756.
14. Llaneras F, Pico J. 2007. A procedure for the estimation over time of metabolic fluxes in scenarios where measurements are uncertain and/or insufficient. BMC Bioinformatics 8:421.
15. Lohr V, Rath A, Genzel Y, Jordan I, Sandig V, Reichl U. 2009. New avian suspension cell lines provide production of influenza virus and MVA in serum-free media: Studies on growth, metabolism and virus propagation. Vaccine 27(36):4975-4982.
16. Niklas J, Priesnitz C, Rose T, Sandig V, Heinzle E. 2012. Primary metabolism in the new human cell line AGE1.HN at various substrate levels: Increased metabolic efficiency and alpha1-antitrypsin production at reduced pyruvate load. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93(4):1637-1650.
17. Nyberg GB, Balcarcel RR, Follstad BD, Stephanopoulos G, Wang DI. 1999. Metabolism of peptide amino acids by Chinese hamster ovary cells grown in a complex medium. Biotechnol Bioeng 62(3):324-335.
18. Priesnitz C, Niklas J, Rose T, Sandig V, Heinzle E. 2012. Metabolic flux rearrangement in the amino acid metabolism reduces ammonia stress in the alpha1-antitrypsin producing human AGE1. HN cell line. Metab Eng 14(2):128-137.
19. Rausenberger J, Kollmann M. 2008. Quantifying origins of cell-to-cell variations in gene expression. Biophys J 95(10):4523-4528.
20. Sidorenko Y, Wahl A, Dauner M, Genzel Y, Reichl U. 2008. Comparison of metabolic flux distributions for MDCK cell growth in glutamine- and pyruvate-containing media. Biotechnol Prog 24(2):311-320.
21. van der Heijden RT, Romein B, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C, Luyben KC. 1994. Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems: II. Diagnosis and estimation of gross errors. Biotechnol Bioeng 43(1):11-20.
22. Wiechert W, Siefke C, de Graaf AA, Marx A. 1997. Bidirectional reaction steps in metabolic networks: II. Flux estimation and statistical analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 55(1):118-135.