Techniques for cytologic sampling of pancreatic and bile duct lesions

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 333-337

  Brugge, William ^a   Dewitt, John ^b   Klapman, Jason B ^c   Ashfaq, Raheela ^d   Shidham, Vinod ^e   Chhieng, David ^f   Kwon, Richard ^g   Baloch, Zubair ^h   Zarka, Matthew ⁱ   Staerkel, Gregg ^j  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d CARIS LIFE SCIENCES   (United States)

^e WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

ⁱ MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

bile duct; cytology; FNA; pancreas; techniques

Indexed keywords

K RAS PROTEIN; PROTEIN P53;

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; ASPIRATION NEEDLE; AUTOIMMUNE PANCREATITIS; BILE DUCT; BILE DUCT BRUSHING; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILIARY STENT; BILIARY TRACT DRAINAGE; BILIARY TRACT ENDOSCOPY; BIOPSY FORCEPS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CHOLESTASIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORE BIOPSY NEEDLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMAGING; DRAINAGE CATHETER; DUODENOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPIC CHOLANGIOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; ENDOSCOPIC FORCEPS BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GALLBLADDER CANCER; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM EXAMINATION; HISTOGRAM; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFLAMMATION; MUTATION; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS DUCT LESION; PANCREAS JUICE; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BILE DUCT; CYTOLOGY; FNA; PANCREAS; TECHNIQUES;

BILE DUCTS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; HUMANS; PANCREAS;

EID: 84896395593     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.23096     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Yoon WJ, Brugge WR,. Endoscopic evaluation of bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2013; 23: 277-293.
2. Kurzawinski TR, Deery A, Dooley JS, et al. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1993; 18: 1399-1403.
3. Fogel EL, Sherman S,. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 758-760.
4. Hattori M, Nagino M, Ebata T, et al. Prospective study of biliary cytology in suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 704-709.
5. Ung KA, Ljung A, Wagermark J, et al. Brush cytology is superior to biopsies obtained by a new device in bile duct strictures. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54: 664-668.
6. Mohandas KM, Swaroop VS, Gullar SU, et al. Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: Results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40 (Part 1): 150-154.
7. Ornellas LC, Santos Gda C, Nakao FS, et al. Comparison between endoscopic brush cytology performed before and after biliary stricture dilation for cancer detection. Arq Gastroenterol 2006; 43: 20-23.
8. de Bellis M, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 176-182.
9. Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, et al. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut 1997; 40: 671-677.
10. Ferrari Junior AP, Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A, et al. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40 (Part 1): 140-145.
11. Vadmal MS, Byrne-Semmelmeier S, Smilari TF, et al. Biliary tract brush cytology. Acta Cytol 2000; 44: 533-538.
12. Fogel EL, deBellis M, McHenry L, et al. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 71-77.
13. Van Laethem JL, Bourgeois V, Parma J, et al. Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 479-485.
14. Stewart CJ, Burke GM,. Value of p53 immunostaining in pancreatico-biliary brush cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 308-313.
15. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Rumalla A, et al. A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 214-219.
16. Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton AC, et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1263-1273.
17. Jailwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51 (Part 1): 383-390.
18. Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: A prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 347-353.
19. Wright ER, Bakis G, Srinivasan R, et al. Intraprocedural tissue diagnosis during ERCP employing a new cytology preparation of forceps biopsy (Smash protocol). Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 294-299.
20. Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W, et al. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 712-717.
21. Howell DA, Beveridge RP, Bosco J, et al. Endoscopic needle aspiration biopsy at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 531-535.
22. Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Davidson BR,. Diagnostic value of cytology for biliary stricture. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 414-421.
23. Farrell RJ, Jain AK, Brandwein SL, et al. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 587-594.
24. Pugliese V, Pujic N, Saccomanno S, et al. Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: Cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in 47 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 595-599.
25. DeWitt J, Misra VL, Leblanc JK, et al. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 325-333.
26. Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt JM, Sherman S, et al. Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: A large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 71-78.
27. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Montes H, et al. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49 (Part 1): 322-327.
28. Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Nakamura N, et al. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing. Pancreas 2012; 41: 1225-1229.
29. Vilmann P, Saftoiu A,. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: Equipment and technique. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 1646-1655.
30. Lee JH, Stewart J, Ross WA, et al. Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 2274-2281.
31. Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi A, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 86-92.
32. Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 445-450.
33. Collins BT, Murad FM, Wang JF, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures. Cancer Cytopathol 2013; 121: 518-524.
34. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 475-481.
35. Gleeson FC, Kipp BR, Caudill JL, et al. False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: Incidence and risk factors. Gut 2010; 59: 586-593.
36. Rogart JN, Loren DE, Singu BS, et al. Cyst wall puncture and aspiration during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration may increase the diagnostic yield of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 164-169.