Prospective study of biliary cytology in suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 704-709

  Hattori, M ^a   Nagino, M ^a   Ebata, T ^a   Kato, K ^a   Okada, K ^a   Shimoyama, Y ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT TUMOR; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WOUND DRAINAGE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79953674789     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7412     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Nakayama A, Imamura H, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S,. Proximal bile duct stricture diagnosed as malignant neoplasm. Surgery 1999; 125: 514-521. (Pubitemid 29226923)
2. Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Darvishian F, Klimstra DS, DeMatteo R, Fong Y, et al., Clinical and pathologic features of proximal biliary strictures masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 862-869. (Pubitemid 41689315)
3. Koea J, Holden A, Chau K, McCall J,. Differential diagnosis of stenosing lesions at the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 2004; 28: 466-470. (Pubitemid 38668477)
4. Iitsuka Y, Hiraoka H, Kimura A, Kodoh H, Koga S,. Diagnostic significance of bile cytology in obstructive jaundice. Jpn J Surg 1984; 14: 207-211. (Pubitemid 14009130)
5. Davidson B, Varsamidakis N, Dooley J, Deery A, Dick R, Kurzawinski T, et al., Value of exfoliative cytology for investigating bile duct strictures. Gut 1992; 33: 1408-1411.
6. Mohandas KM, Swaroop VS, Gullar SU, Dave UR, Jagannath P, DeSouza LJ,. Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 150-154. (Pubitemid 24129189)
7. Kawai T, Fujii T, Sakurai S, Chong JM, Kuriki K, Kaizaki Y, et al., [Significant factors influencing the accuracy of PTCD bile cytology for bile duct lesions.] J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol 1998; 37: 156-161.
8. Foutch PG, Kerr DM, Harlan JR, Kummet TD,. A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 577-580.
9. Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Dooley J, Dick R, Hobbs K, Davidson B,. A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures. Gut 1992; 33: 1675-1677.
10. Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Dooley J, Dick R, Hobbs K, Davidson BR,. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1993; 18: 1399-1403. (Pubitemid 23348428)
11. Venu RP, Geenen JE, Kini M, Hogan WJ, Payne M, Johnson GK, et al., Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology: a new technique. Gastroenterology 1990; 99: 1475-1479. (Pubitemid 20381887)
12. Rabinovitz M, Zajko AB, Hassanein T, Shetty B, Bron KM, Schade RR, et al., Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1990; 12: 747-752. (Pubitemid 20349261)
13. Ferrari JÃnior AP, Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A, Chang C, Carr-Locke DL,. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 140-145. (Pubitemid 24129187)
14. Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F, Labadie M, Liaras A, Chavaillon A, et al., Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 565-572.
15. Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolo G, Saccomanno S, Gatteschi B,. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 520-526.
16. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N, Kuroda A, Muto T,. Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 465-467. (Pubitemid 26083547)
17. Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, Matthewson K,. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut 1997; 40: 671-677. (Pubitemid 27278338)
18. Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F, Pfeffel F, Stain C, Poetzi R, et al., Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 363-368. (Pubitemid 27156174)
19. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Montes H, Lichtenstein DR, Dam J, Ruymann FW, et al., Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 322-327. (Pubitemid 29135224)
20. Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W, Preclik G, Möller P, Adler G,. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 712-717.
21. Jaiwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Gottlieb K, Flueckiger J, Bucksot LG, et al., Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 383-390. (Pubitemid 30204754)
22. Stewart CJ, Mills PR, Carter R, O'Donohue J, Fullarton G, Imrie CW, et al., Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 449-455. (Pubitemid 32531094)
23. Xing GS, Geng JC, Han XW, Dai JH, Wu CY,. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2005; 4: 98-103.
24. Fogel EL, de Bellis M, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Chappo J, Cramer H, et al., Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 71-77. (Pubitemid 41827780)
25. Kitajima Y, Ohara H, Nakazawa T, Ando T, Hayashi K, Takada H, et al., Usefulness of transpapillary bile duct brushing cytology and forceps biopsy for improved diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 1615-1620. (Pubitemid 47383339)
26. Weber A, von Weyhern C, Fend F, Schneider J, Neu B, Meining A, et al., Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 1097-1101. (Pubitemid 351325011)
27. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Routbort MJ, Creager AJ,. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods. Cancer 2006; 108: 231-238. (Pubitemid 44835770)
28. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, (eds). UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (6th edn). Wiley-Liss: New York, 2002.
29. Raskin HF, Wenger J, Sklar M, Pleticka S, Yarema W,. The diagnosis of cancer of the pancreas, biliary tract, and duodenum by combined cytologic and secretory methods. I. Exfoliative cytology and a description of a rapid method of duodenal intubation. Gastroenterology 1958; 34: 996-1008.
30. Kamiya S, Nagino M, Kanazawa H, Komatsu S, Mayumi T, Takagi K, et al., The value of bile replacement during external biliary drainage: an analysis of intestinal permeability, integrity, and microflora. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 510-517. (Pubitemid 38372767)