Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing

Pancreas

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1225-1229

  Yamaguchi, Taketo ^a   Shirai, Yoshihiko ^b   Nakamura, Nami ^a   Sudo, Kentaro ^a   Nakamura, Kazuyoshi ^a   Hironaka, Shuichi ^a   Hara, Taro ^a   Denda, Tadamichi ^a  

^a CHIBA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

^b Funabashi Municipal Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

brush cytology; chronic pancreatitis; combination cytology; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic duct stricture; pancreatic juice cytology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRUSH CYTOLOGY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS DUCT STENOSIS; PANCREAS JUICE; PANCREATIC JUICE CYTOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC JUICE; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84868281783     PISSN: 08853177     EISSN: 15364828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31825d60fc     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ogawa Y, Tanaka M, Inoue K, et al. A prospective pancreatographic study of the prevalence of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cancer. 2002;94:2344-2349.
2. Canto MI, Goggins M, Hruban RH, et al. Screening for early pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: a prospective controlled study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:766-781.
3. Slater GJ, Schapiro RH, O'Neill MJ, et al. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1181-1186.
4. Kalady MF, Peterson B, Baillie J, et al. Pancreatic duct strictures: identifying risk of malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:581-588.
5. Sugumar A, Levy MJ, Kamisawa T, et al. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography criteria to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis: an international multicentre study. Gut. 2011;60:666-670.
6. Goodale RL, Gajl-Peczalska K, Dressel T, et al. Cytologic studies for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1981;47:1652-1655.
7. Govil H, Reddy V, Kluskens L, et al. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;26:273-277.
8. Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Ishihara T, et al. Pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: significance of sampling by peroral pancreatoscopy. Cancer. 2005;104:2830-2836.
9. Tada M, Omata M, Kawai S, et al. Detection of ras gene mutations in pancreatic juice and peripheral blood of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 1993;53:2472-2474.
10. Kondo H, Sugano K, Fukayama N, et al. Detection of point mutations in the K-ras oncogene at codon 12 in pure pancreatic juice for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;73:1589-1594.
11. Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Ishikawa N, et al. A highly sensitive and quantitative telomerase activity assay with pancreatic juice is useful for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma without problems due to polymerase chain reaction inhibitors: analysis of 100 samples of pancreatic juice from consecutive patients. Cancer. 2004;101:2309-2317.
12. Hashimoto Y, Murakami Y, Uemura K, et al. Detection of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression in tissue and pancreatic juice from pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2008;143:113-125.
13. Krishnamurthy S, Katz RL, Shumate A, et al. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing. Cancer. 2001;93:229-235.
14. Moreno Luna LE, Kipp B, Halling KC, et al. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1064-1072.
15. Athanassiadou P, Grapsa D. Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyYguided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures: what's new? Acta Cytol. 2008;52:24-34.
16. Fritcher EG, Kipp BR, Halling KC, et al. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2180-2186.
17. Uehara H, Tatsumi K, Masuda E, et al. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:52-59.
18. Ryan ME. Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:139-142.
19. Ferrari Júnior AP, Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A, et al. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:140-145.
20. Parsi MA, Deepinder F, Lopez R, et al. Factors affecting the yield of brush cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary cancers. Pancreas. 2011;40:52-54.
21. Mohandas KM, Swaroop VS, Gullar SU, et al. Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:150-154.
22. McGuire DE, Venu RP, Brown RD, et al. Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:300-304.
23. Van Laethem JL, Bourgeois V, Parma J, et al. Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:479-485.