Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 445-450

  Bang, J Y ^a   Magee, S H ^b   Ramesh, J ^a   Trevino, J M ^a   Varadarajulu, S ^c  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^c FLORIDA HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATITIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84878529692     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326268     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dumonceau J-M, Polkowski M., Larghi A. et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 897 909
2. Eloubeidi M. A., Jhala D., Chhieng D. C. et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer: 2003; 99 285 292
3. Savides T. J., Donohue M., Hunt G. et al. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 66 277 282 (Pubitemid 47079034)
4. Fisher L., Segarajasingam D. S., Stewart C. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: performance and outcomes. J Gastroent Hepatol: 2009; 24 90 96
5. Turner B. G., Cizginer S., Agarwal D. et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 91 98
6. Hawes R. H. The evolution of endoscopic ultrasound: improved imaging, higher accuracy for fine needle aspiration and the reality of endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol: 2010; 26 436 444
7. Harewood G. C., Wiersema L. M., Halling A. C. et al. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc: 2002; 55 669 673 (Pubitemid 41123468)
8. Mertz H., Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc: 2004; 59 33 37 (Pubitemid 38095504)
9. Eloubeidi M. A., Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 61 700 708 (Pubitemid 40603039)
10. LeBlanc J. K., Ciaccia D., Al-Assi M. T. et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc: 2004; 59 475 481 (Pubitemid 38437085)
11. Ekberg O., Bergenfeldt M., Aspelin P. et al. Reliability of ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of pancreatic masses. Acta Radiol: 1988; 29 535 539
12. Wyse J. M., Paquin S. C., Joseph L. et al. EUS-FNA without the stylet: the yield is comparable to that with the stylet and sampling of multiple sites during the same pass may improve sample quality and yield. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 AB330 AB331
13. Varadarajulu S., Blakely J., Latif S. et al. Quality assessment of current EUS-FNA assembly performance: adequate for use or opportunity for improvement? Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 AB174 AB175
14. Polkowski M., Larghi A., Weynand B. et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technical guideline. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 190 206
15. Sepe P. S., Moparty B., Pitman M. B. et al. EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 70 254 261
16. Sahai A. V., Paquin S. C., Gariépy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy: 2010; 42 900 903
17. Kundu S., Conway K., Gilbert K. et al. Suction or no suction? Interval results from an ongoing prospective, partially blinded, randomized trial of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle sampling of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 248 S249