Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2274-2281

  Lee, Jeffrey H ^a   Stewart, John ^a   Ross, William A ^a   Anandasabapathy, Sharmila ^b   Xiao, Lianchun ^a   Staerkel, Gregg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

22 gauge; 25 gauge; Comparison; Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine needle aspiration; Prospective study

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON CARCINOMA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; GIANT CELL CARCINOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE NON SMALL CELL CARCINOMA; LYMPHADENOPATHY; METASTASIS; NEEDLE; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS BIOPSY; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STAINING; SUCTION; SYRINGE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CARCINOMA; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; NEEDLES; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 70149092514     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0906-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. L Fisher DS Segarajasingam C Stewart, et al. 2009 Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: performance and outcomes J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24 90 96
2. F Lin G Staerkel 2003 Cytologic criteria for well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens Cancer 99 44 50
3. JE Niederhuber MF Brennan HR Menck 1995 The national cancer data base report on pancreatic cancer Cancer 76 1671 1677
4. MB Cohen DP Egerter EA Holly DK Ahn TR Miller 1991 Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: regression analysis to identify improved cytologic criteria Diagn Cytopathol 7 341 345
5. ML Mitchell CN Carney 1985 Cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma Am J Clin Pathol 83 171 176
6. PS Fekete C Nunez DA Pitlik 1986 Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas: a study of 61 cases Diagn Cytopathol 2 301 306
7. N Al-Kaisi EE Siegler 1989 Fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas Acta Cytol 33 145 152
8. G Kocjan J Rode WR Lees 1989 Percutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas: advantage and pitfalls J Clin Pathol 42 341 347
9. DB Robins RL Katz DB Evans, et al. 1995 Fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. In quest of accuracy Acta Cytol 39 1 10
10. M Payne G Staerkel Y Gong 2009 Indeterminate diagnosis in fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: reasons and clinical implications Diagn Cytopathol 37 21 29
11. T Itoi F Itokawa A Sofuni 2005 Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Tru-Cut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles Endoscopy 37 362 366
12. H Sakamoto M Kitano T Komaki, et al. 2009 Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Tru-Cut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24 384 390
13. R Puri P Vilmann A Saftoiu, et al. 2008 Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis Scand J Gastroenterol 31 1 6
14. AM Afify BM al-Khafaji B Kim, et al. 2003 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. Diagnostic utility and accuracy Acta Cytol 47 341 348
15. MA Eloubeidi D Jhala DC Chieng, et al. 2003 Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma Cancer 99 285 292
16. M Tadic M Kujundzic T Stoos-Veic, et al. 2008 Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings Dig Dis 26 377 382