Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures

Cancer Cytopathology

Volumn 121, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 518-524

  Collins, Brian T ^a   Murad, Faris M ^a   Wang, Jeff F ^a   Bernadt, Cory T ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine needle aspiration; Neoplasm; Pancreas; Rapid on site evaluation (ROSE)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS BIOPSY; PANCREAS CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID ON SITE EVALUATION; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SOLID TUMOR; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 84887550744     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19346638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21340     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Harris MD, Buscaglia JM. How to do pancreatic mass FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71: 825-826.
2. Tadic M, Kujundzic M, Stoos-Veic T, Kaic G, Vukelic-Markovic M. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings. Dig Dis. 2008;26: 377-382.
3. Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP, Barraza G, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;58: 872-882.
4. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of onsite cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98: 1289-1294.
5. Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist's perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120: 351-367.
6. Chen J, Yang R, Lu Y, Xia Y, Zhou H. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 138: 1433-1441.
7. Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Yoshida M, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28: 656-663.
8. Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Elwassief A. How to improve the success of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012;2: 31-36.
9. Dumonceau JM, Koessler T, van Hooft JE, Fockens P. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18: 2357-2363.
10. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106: 1705-1710.
11. Cleveland P, Gill KR, Coe SG, et al. An evaluation of risk factors for inadequate cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tumors and lymph nodes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71: 1194-1199.
12. Cermak TS, Wang B, DeBrito P, Carroll J, Haddad N, Sidawy MK. Does on-site adequacy evaluation reduce the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions? Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2012;120: 319-325.
13. Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, Sandha GS. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23: 26-30.
14. Witt BL, Schmidt RL. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) improves the adequacy of fine needle aspiration for thyroid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2012;23: 428-435.
15. Wohlschlager J, Darwiche K, Ting S, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in cytological diagnostics of pulmonary and mediastinal diseases [in German]. Pathologe. 2012;33: 308-315.
16. Fassina A, Corradin M, Zardo D, Cappellesso R, Corbetti F, Fassan M. Role and accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation of CTguided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules. Cytopathology. 2011;22: 306-312.
17. Tournoy KG, Praet MM, Van Maele G, Van Meerbeeck JP. Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration with an on-site cytopathologist: high accuracy for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Chest. 2005;128: 3004-3009.
18. Diacon AH, Schuurmans MM, Theron J, et al. Utility of rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial needle aspirates. Respiration. 2005;72: 182-188.
19. Davenport RD. Rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial aspirates. Chest. 1990;98: 59-61.
20. Diette GB, White P Jr, Terry P, Jenckes M, Rosenthal D, Rubin HR. Utility of on-site cytopathology assessment for bronchoscopic evaluation of lung masses and adenopathy. Chest. 2000;117: 1186-1190.
21. Chin R Jr, McCain TW, Lucia MA, et al. Transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing and staging lung cancer: how many aspirates are needed? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166: 377-381.
22. Factor R, Layfield LJ. Intraprocedural evaluation of fine-needle aspiration smears: how good are we? Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;40: 760-763.
23. Woon C, Bardales RH, Stanley MW, Stelow EB. Rapid assessment of fine needle aspiration and the final diagnosis-how often and why the diagnoses are changed. Cytojournal. 2006;3: 25.
24. Eapen GA, Shah AM, Lei X, et al;American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education. Complications, consequences, and practice patterns of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the AQuIRE registry. Chest. 2013;143: 1044-1053.
25. Trisolini R, Cancellieri A, Tinelli C, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial aspirates in the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal adenopathy: a randomized trial. Chest. 2011;139: 395-401.
26. Griffin AC, Schwartz LE, Baloch ZW. Utility of on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens. Cytojournal. 2011;8: 20.
27. Gupta PK. Progression from on-site to point-of-care fine needle aspiration service: opportunities and challenges. Cytojournal. 2010; 7: 6. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.63195.
28. Layfield LJ, Bentz JS, Gopez EV. Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis. Cancer. 2001;93: 319-322.
29. Al-Abbadi MA, Bloom LI, Fatheree LA, et al. Adequate reimbursement is crucial to support cost-effective rapid on-site cytopathology evaluations. Cytojournal. 2010;7: 22.
30. Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA, Lane CJ, et al. Dynamic telecytology compares favorably to rapid onsite evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirates. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57: 3092-3097.
31. Marotti JD, Johncox V, Ng D, Gonzalez JL, Padmanabhan V. Implementation of telecytology for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations compared to conventional on-site evaluation: analysis of 240 consecutive cases. Acta Cytol. 2012;56: 548-553.