Optimal prognostic distance to minimize total maintenance cost: The case of the airline industry

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 151, Issue , 2014, Pages 76-88

  Fritzsche, R ^a   Gupta, J N D ^b   Lasch, R ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Airline industry; Preventive maintenance; Prognostic distance; Prognostic health management; Reliability; Spare parts; Total maintenance cost

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; FUNCTIONS; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; RELIABILITY; LIFE CYCLE; MAINTENANCE; OPTIMIZATION;

AIRLINE INDUSTRY; MAINTENANCE COST; PROGNOSTIC DISTANCE; PROGNOSTIC HEALTH MANAGEMENTS; SPARE PARTS;

OPTIMIZATION; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84896366796     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. B. Al-Najjar The lack of maintenance and not maintenance which costs a model to describe and quantify the impact of vibration-based maintenance on company's business Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107 1 2007 260 273
2. Armstrong J.; 2001. Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners. In: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. vol. 30, Springer, New York
3. C. Bucher, and D. Frangopol Optimization of lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures considering probabilities of violating safety, condition, and cost thresholds Probab. Eng. Mech. 21 1 2006 1 8
4. O. Candell, R. Karim, and P. Söderholm eMaintenance - information logistics for maintenance support Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25 6 2009 937 944
5. A. Certa, G. Galante, T. Lupo, and G. Passannanti Determination of pareto frontier in multi-objective maintenance optimization Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 7 2011 861 867
6. J. Coetzee Reliability-Centered Maintenance 1998 Maintenance Publishers Hatfield
7. R. Dekker Applications of maintenance optimization models a review and analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 51 3 1996 229 240
8. R. Dekker, C. Pinçe, R. Zuidwijk, and M. Jalil On the use of installed base information for spare parts logistics review of ideas and industry practice Int. J. Prod. Econ. 143 2013 536 545
9. K. Feldman, T. Jazouli, and P. Sandborn A methodology for determining the return on investment associated with prognostics and health management IEEE Trans. Reliab. 58 2 2009 305 316
10. Feldman, K.; Sandborn, P.; 2008. Analyzing the return on investment associated with prognostics and health management of electronic products, in: 2008 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE), Brooklyn, New York, USA, pp. 1-9.
11. R. Flage, D. Coit, J. Luxhøj, and T. Aven Safety constraints applied to an adaptive Bayesian condition-based maintenance optimization model Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 102 2012 16 26
12. R. Fritzsche Cost adjustment for single item pooling models using a dynamic failure rate a calculation for the aircraft industry Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. 48 6 2012 1065 1079
13. Fromm, H.; 2009. Bewertung innovativer Instandhaltungsszenarien in den frühen Phasen des Innovationsprozesses in der Luftfahrt, Shaker.
14. A. Garg, and S. Deshmukh Maintenance management literature review and directions J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 12 3 2006 205 238
15. Gould, E.; 2011. Diagnostics "after" prognostics: steps toward a prognostics-informed analysis of system diagnostic behavior. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), pp. 1-7.
16. Haddad, G.; Sandborn, P.; Pecht, M.; 2012. An Options Approach for Decision Support of Systems with Prognostic Capabilities.
17. Jazouli, T.; Sandborn, P.; 2010. A design for availability approach for use with PHM. In: Proceedings of the Prognostics and Health Management Conference, Portland, OR.
18. Jones, J.; Warrington, L.; Davis, N.; 2001. The use of a discrete event simulation to model the achievement of maintenance free operating time for aerospace systems. In: Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2001, pp. 170-175.
19. N. Julka, A. Thirunavukkarasu, P. Lendermann, B.P. Gan, A. Schirrmann, H. Fromm, and E. Wong Making use of prognostics health management information for aerospace spare components logistics network optimisation Comput. Ind. 62 2011 613 622
20. P. Kauffmann, E. Ozan, and Y. Sireli Feasibility of tamdar an aircraft-based weather data collection system J. Air Transp. Manag. 10 3 2004 207 215
21. V. Krishnamurthy, and D. Djonin Structured threshold policies for dynamic sensor scheduling-a partially observed Markov decision process approach IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 55 10 2007 4938 4957
22. U. Kumar New trends in aircraft reliability and maintenance measures J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 5 4 1999 287 295
23. M. Liu, and D. Frangopol et al. Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety, and life-cycle cost J. Struct. Eng. 131 2005 833 834
24. Luna, J.; Kolodziejski, P.; Frankle, N.; Conroy, D.; Shroder, R.; 2009. Strategies for optimizing the application of prognostics health management to complex systems. In: Machinery Failure Prevention Technology Conference.
25. S. Makridakis, A. Andersen, R. Carbone, R. Fildes, M. Hibon, R. Lewandowski, and R. Winkler The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: results of a forecasting competition J. Forecast. 1 2 1982 111 153
26. K. Marais, and J. Saleh Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance an analytical framework for capturing its net present value Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 2 2009 644 657
27. S. Martorell, J. Villanueva, S. Carlos, Y. Nebot, A. Sanchez, J. Pitarch, and V. Serradell Rams+ c informed decision-making with application to multi-objective optimization of technical specifications and maintenance using genetic algorithms Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87 1 2005 65 75
28. Nicolai, R.; Dekker, R.; 2006. Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review, Econometric Institute Report EI 2006-29, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute.
29. T. Nowakowski, and S. Werbińka On problems of multicomponent system maintenance modelling Int. J. Autom. Comput. 6 2009 364 378
30. Pecht, M.; Dasgupta, A.; 1995. Physics-of-failure: An Approach to Reliable Product Development, Integrated Reliability Workshop, 1995. Final Report, International, IEEE, pp. 1-4.
31. M. Pecht, and J. Gu Physics-of-failure-based prognostics for electronic products Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 31 3-4 2009 309 322
32. G. Quan, G. Greenwood, D. Liu, and S. Hu Searching for multiobjective preventive maintenance schedules combining preferences with evolutionary algorithms Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177 3 2007 1969 1984
33. Sandborn, P.; 2005. A decision support model for determining the applicability of prognostic health management (PHM) approaches to electronic systems. In: Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS).
34. P.A. Sandborn, and C. Wilkinson A maintenance planning and business case development model for the application of prognostics and health management (PHM) to electronic systems Microelectron. Reliab. 47 12 2007 1889 1901
35. Saxena, A.; Celaya, J.; Balaban, E.; Goebel, K.; Saha, B.; Saha, S.; Schwabacher, M.; 2008. Metrics for evaluating performance of prognostic techniques. In: International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 2008 (PHM 2008), pp. 1-17.
36. Saxena, A.; Celaya, J.; Saha, B.; Saha, S.; Goebel, K.; 2009a. Evaluating algorithm performance metrics tailored for prognostics. In: 2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1-13.
37. Saxena, A.; Celaya, J.; Saha, B.; Saha, S.; Goebel, K.; 2009b. On applying the prognostic performance metrics. In: Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2009, pp. 1-16.
38. E. Scanff, K. Feldman, S. Ghelam, P. Sandborn, M. Glade, and B. Foucher Life cycle cost impact of using prognostic health management (phm) for helicopter avionics Microelectron. Reliab. 47 12 2007 1857 1864
39. P. Scarf On the application of mathematical models in maintenance Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99 3 1997 493 506
40. G. Stone, and R. Van Heeswijk Parameter estimation for the Weibull distribution IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 4 1977 253 261
41. B. Sun, S. Zeng, R. Kang, and M. Pecht Benefits and challenges of system prognostics IEEE Trans. Reliab. 61 2 2012 323 335
42. A. Van Horenbeek, L. Pintelon, and P. Muchiri Maintenance optimization models and criteria Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 1 2010 189 200
43. N. Vichare, and M. Pecht Prognostics and health management of electronics IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 29 1 2006 222 229
44. Wheeler, K.; Kurtoglu, T.; Poll, S.; 2010. A survey of health management user objectives in aerospace systems related to diagnostic and prognostic metrics. Int. J. Progn. Health Manag. 1-19.
45. R. Zequeira, J. Valdes, and C. Berenguer Optimal buffer inventory and opportunistic preventive maintenance under random production capacity availability Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111 2 2008 686 696