Life cycle cost impact of using prognostic health management (PHM) for helicopter avionics

Microelectronics Reliability

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1857-1864

  Scanff, E ^a   Feldman, K L ^b   Ghelam, S ^c   Sandborn, P ^b   Glade, M ^c   Foucher, B ^a  

^a AIRBUS GROUP INNOVATIONS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND GMBH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVIONICS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; HELICOPTERS; LIFE CYCLE; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE; LIFE CYCLE COST IMPACT; PROGNOSTIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT (PHM);

MICROELECTRONICS;

EID: 35648963611     PISSN: 00262714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2007.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Patankar M.S., and Taylor J.C. Risk management and error reduction in aviation maintenance. Ashgate (2003)
2. Wylie R., Orchard R., Halasz M., and Dubé F. IDS: improving aircraft fleet maintenance. Proceedings of the 14th national conference on artificial intelligence and innovative applications of AI (IAAI-97) (1997), Providence, RI 27-31
3. Goodman DL, Wood S, Turner A. Return on investment (ROI) for electronic prognostics in mil/aero systems. In: Proceedings IEEE AutoTest conference Orlando, FL; September 2005. p. 73-5.
4. Banks J., Reichard K., Crow E., and Nickell K. How engineers can conduct cost-benefit analysis for PHM systems. Proceedings IEEE aerospace conference (2005), Big Sky, MT 3958-3967
5. Hecht H. Prognostics for electronic equipment: an economic perspective. In: Proceedings of the RAMS Conference Newport Beach, CA; January 2006, p. 165-8.
6. Vachtsevanos G. Cost and complexity trade-offs in prognostics. Proceedings NDIA intelligent vehicles systems symposium (2003), Traverse City, MI
7. Land J.E. HUMS-the benefits-past, present and future. Proceedings of IEEE aerospace conference vol. 6 (2001), Big Sky, MT 3083-3094
8. Larder B. Assessing the benefit of helicopter health and usage monitoring systems. In: IEE seminar on aircraft airborne condition monitoring, 14 May 2003. p. 1-3.
9. Poradier JM, Trouve M. An assessment of Eurocopter experience in HUMS development and support. In: 57th AHS international annual forum, Washington, DC; May 2001.
10. Pipe K. Measuring the performance of a HUM system-features that count. In: 3rd DSTO international conference on health and usage monitoring, Melbourne; February 2003.
11. Operability in Systems Concept and Design: Survey, Assessment, and Implementation, Uwohali, Inc., 1996. Available from: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/nexgen/Nexgen_Downloads/Ops_Survey_o f_Tools_Report_by_MSFC_1996.pdf.
12. Sandborn P, Wilkinson C. A maintenance planning and business case development model for determining the applicability of prognostic health management (PHM) approaches to electronic systems. Microelectronic Reliab, this issue, doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2007.02.016.
13. Bernstein JB. Early end of life failures of electronics in avionic systems. AVSI Project No. 17: Methods to account for accelerated semiconductor device wear-out; May 2001.
14. Condra L. Integrated aerospace parts acquisition strategy. Technical committee GEL/107. Process management for Avionics, BSI Chiswick; 7 October 2002.
15. Kirkland L.V., Pombo T., Nelson K., and Berghout F. Avionics health management: searching for the prognostics grail. Proceedings of IEEE aerospace conference vol. 5 (2004), Big Sky, MT 3448-3454
16. Ramakrishnan A., and Pecht M. A life consumption monitoring methodology for electronic systems. IEEE transactions on components and packaging technologies September (2003) 625-634
17. Gopalan R., and Talluri K.T. The aircraft maintenance routing problem. Operations Res 46 2 (1998) 260-271