Improvement in low-homology template-based modeling by employing a model evaluation method with focus on topology

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Dai, Wentao ^a,b   Song, Tingrui ^a,b   Wang, Xuan ^a,b   Jin, Xiaoyang ^a,b   Deng, Lizong ^a,b   Wu, Aiping ^a   Jiang, Taijiao ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TEMPLATE BASED MODELING METHOD; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84896324394     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089935     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Rice DW, Eisenberg D (1997) A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. J Mol Biol 267: 1026-1038. (Pubitemid 27192670)
2. Jones DT (1999) GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 287: 797-815.
3. Xu J, Li M, Kim D, Xu Y (2003) RAPTOR: optimal protein threading by linear programming. J Bioinform Comput Biol 1: 95-117.
4. Zhou HY, Zhou YQ (2004) Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 55: 1005-1013.
5. Zhang W, Liu S, Zhou YQ (2008) SP5: Improving Protein Fold Recognition by Using Torsion Angle Profiles and Profile-Based Gap Penalty Model. PLoS One 3: e2325.
6. Wu ST, Zhang Y (2008) MUSTER: Improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 72: 547-556.
7. Hu Y, Dong XX, Wu AP, Cao Y, Tian LQ, et al. (2011) Incorporation of Local Structural Preference Potential Improves Fold Recognition. Plos ONE 6: e17215.
8. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Söding J (2011) HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nature Methods 9: 173-175.
9. Yang YD, Faraggi E, Zhao HY, Zhou YQ (2011) Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates. Bioinformatics 27: 2076-2082.
10. Ma JZ, Wang S, Zhao F, Xu J (2013) Protein threading using context-specific alignment potential. Bioinformatics 29: i257-i265.
11. Sali A, Blundell T (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234: 779-815. (Pubitemid 24007801)
12. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22: 195-201. (Pubitemid 43205406)
13. Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999) Discrimination of the native from mis- folded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 288: 477-487. (Pubitemid 29221815)
14. Zhou HY, Zhou YQ (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11: 2714-2726.
15. Wallner B, Elofsson A (2003) Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci 12: 1073-1086. (Pubitemid 36505441)
16. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004) SPICKER: A clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem. 25: 865-871.
17. Shen M, Sali A (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15: 2507-2524. (Pubitemid 44771688)
18. Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schomburg D (2008) QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins 71: 261-277. (Pubitemid 351358609)
19. Qiu J, Sheffler W, Baker D, Noble W (2008) Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression. Proteins 71: 1175-1182. (Pubitemid 351564044)
20. Yang YD, Zhou YQ (2008) Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins 72: 793-803.
21. Wang Z, Tegge A, Cheng JL (2009) Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines. Proteins 75: 638-647.
22. Zhang J, Zhang Y (2010) A Novel Side-Chain Orientation Dependent Potential Derived from Random-Walk Reference State for Protein Fold Selection and Structure Prediction. Plos ONE 5: e15386.
23. Zhou HY, Skolnick J (2011) GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction. J Biophysical 101: 2043-2052.
24. Zhao F, Xu J (2012) A position-specific distance-dependent statistical potential for protein structure and functional study. Structure 20: 1118-1126.
25. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005) TM-align: A protein structure alignment algorithm based on TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2302-2309. (Pubitemid 41439897)
26. Xu X, Dong GX, Hu XS, Miao L, Zhang XL, et al. (2013) The genetic basis of white tigers. Current Biol 23: 1031-1035.
27. Murzin A, Brenner S, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247: 536-540.
28. Cheng JL, Randall A, Sweredoski M, Baldi P (2005) SCRATCH: a Protein Structure and Structural Feature Prediction Server. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(Web Server issue): W72-76.
29. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
30. Lobanov M., Bogatyreva N, Galzitskaia O (2008) Radius of gyration as an indicator of protein structure compactness. Molecular Biology 42: 623-628.
31. Tian LQ, Wu AP, Cao Y, Dong XX, Hu Y, et al. (2011) NCACO-score: an effective main-chain dependent scoring function for structure modeling. BMC bioinformatics 12: 208.
32. Drucker H, Burges C, Kaufman L, Smola A, Vapnik V (1997) Support vector regression machines. In: Mozer MC, Jordan MI, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems: Cambridge. 155-161.
33. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2: 1-27.
34. Xu JR, Zhang Y (2010) How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? Bioinformatics 26: 889-895.