Teachers' perceptions and attitudes about Response to Intervention (RTI) in their schools: A qualitative analysis

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 40, Issue , 2014, Pages 104-112

  Castro Villarreal, Felicia ^a   Rodriguez, Billie Jo ^a   Moore, Staci ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Response to Intervention; Systems change; Teacher beliefs; Teacher perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896312631     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnes A.C., Harlacher J.E. Clearing the confusion: response-to-intervention as a set of principles. Education and Treatment of Children 2008, 31(3):417-431. West Virginia University Press. Retrieved October 8, 2012, from Project MUSE database.
2. Bean R., Lillenstein J. Response to interventions and the changing roles of schoolwide personnel. The Reading Teacher 2012, 65(7):491-501. 10.1002/TRTR.01073.
3. Chard D.J., Harn B.A., Sugai G., Horner R.H., Simmons D.C., Kame'enui E.J. Core features of multi-tiered systems of reading and behavioral support. Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools 2008, 31-58. (New York, NY). C.R. Greenwood, T.R. Kratochwill, M. Clements (Eds.).
4. Cohen J. Some statistical issues in psychological research. Handbook of clinical psychology 1965, 95-121. McGraw-Hill, New York. B.B. Wolman (Ed.).
5. Darling-Hammond L. Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment 2009, 3:1-24. Retrieved from. https://sites.google.com/site/tijepa2012/home.
6. Fixsen D.L., Blase K.A., Naoom S.F., Wallace F. Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice 2009, 19(3):531-540. 10.1177/1049731509335549.
7. Fuchs D., Fuchs L.S. Responsiveness-to-intervention: a blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teach Exceptional Children 2005, 38(1):57-61. Retrieved from. http://journals.cec.sped.org/.
8. Glaser B.G. Constructivist grounded theory?. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2002, 3(3). Retrieved from. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/index.
9. Greenfield R., Rinaldi C., Proctor C.P., Cardarelli A. Teachers' perceptions to a response to intervention (RTI) reform effort in an urban elementary school: a consensual qualitative analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 2010, 21(1):47-63. 10.1177/1044207310365499.
10. Grosche M., Volpe R.J. Response-to-intervention (RTI) as a model to facilitate inclusion for students with learning and behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education 2013, 28(3):254-269.
11. Haager D. Promises and cautions regarding using response to intervention with English language learners. Learning Disability Quarterly 2007, 30(3):213-218. 10.2307/30035565.
12. Hall G.E., Hord S.M. Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes 2006, Vol. xiv. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston. 2nd ed.
13. Hazelkorn M., Bucholz J., Goodman J., Duffy M., Brady M. Response to intervention: general or special education? Who is responsible?. The Educational Forum 2011, 75:17-25. 10.1080/00131725.2010.528552.
14. Hoover J.J., Love E. Supporting school-based response to intervention: a practitioner's model. Teaching Exceptional Children 2011, 43(3):40-48. Retrieved from. http://journals.cec.sped.org/tec/.
15. Horner R.H., Carr E.G., Halle J., McGee G., Odom S., Wolery M. The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children 2005, 71(2):165-179. Retrieved from. http://journals.cec.sped.org/ec/.
16. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. 2004 (Pub. L. No. 108-446), 20 U.S.C.1400 et seq. (reauthorization of the Individualswith Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
17. Kratochwill T.R., Volpiansky P., Clements M., Ball C. Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review 2007, 36(4):618-631. Retrieved from. http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/index-list.aspx.
18. LaRocco D.J., Murdica P. Understanding teachers' concerns about implementing response to intervention (RTI): practical implications for educational leaders. Paper presented at the 40th annual Northeast Educational Research Association conference, Rocky Hill, CT 2009, October.
19. Leech N.L., Onwuegbuzie A.J. An array of qualitative data analysis tools: a call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly 2007, 22(4):557-584. 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557.
20. Marston D., Meuystens P., Lau M., Canter A. Problem solving model for decision-making with high incidence disabilities: the Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice 2003, 18(3):187-200. 10.1111/1540-5826.00074.
21. Nastasi B.K., Schensul S.L. Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology 2005, 43(3):177-195. 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.003.
22. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2001).
23. Nunn G.D., Jantz P.B. Factors within response to intervention implementation training associated with teacher efficacy beliefs. Education 2009, 129(4):599-607. Retrieved from. http://www.projectinnovation.com/Education.html.
24. Nunn G.D., Jantz P.B., Butikofer C. Concurrent validity between teacher efficacy and perceptions of response to intervention outcome. Journal of Instructional Psychology 2009, 36(3):215-218. Retrieved from. http://projectinnovation.biz/journal_of_instructional_psychology.
25. Orosco M.J., Klingner J. One school's implementation of RTI with English language learners: "referring into RTI". Journal of Learning Disabilities 2010, 43(3):269-288. 10.1177/0022219409355474.
26. Reinke W.M., Stormont M., Herman K.C., Puri R., Goel N. Supporting children's mental health in schools: teacher perceptions of needs, roles, and barriers. School Psychology Quarterly 2011, 26(1):1-13. 10.1037/a0022714.
27. Reschly D.J., Bergstrom M.K. Response to intervention. Handbook of school psychology 2009, 434-460. Wiley, New York. 4th ed. T.B. Gutkin, C.R. Reynolds (Eds.).
28. Reynolds C.R., Shaywitz S.E. Response to intervention: ready or not? Or, from wait to fail to watch them fail. School Psychology Quarterly 2009, 24:130-145. 10.1037/a0016158.
29. Sanger D., Friedli C., Brunken C., Snow P., Ritzman M. Educators' year long reactions to the implementation of a response to intervention (RTI) model. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research 2012, 7:98-107.
30. Sansosti F., Goss S., Noltemeyer A. Perspectives of special education directors on response to intervention in secondary schools. Contemporary School Psychology 2011, 15:9-20. Retrieved from. http://www.casponline.org/.
31. Sansosti F., Telzrow C., Noltemeyer A. Barriers and facilitators to implementing response to intervention in secondary schools: qualitative perspectives of school psychologists. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice 2010, 4(1):1-21. Retrieved from. http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spf/index-list.aspx.
32. Stuart S., Rinaldi C., Higgins-Averill O. Agents of change: voices of teachers on response to intervention. International Journal of Whole Schooling 2011, 7(2):53-73. Retrieved from. http://www.wholeschooling.net/Journal_of_Whole_Schooling/IJWSIndex.html.
33. Sullivan A.L., Long L. Examining the changing landscape of school psychology practice: a survey of school-based practitioners regarding response to intervention. Psychology in the Schools 2010, 47(10):1059-1070. 10.1002/pits.20524.
34. Tillery A.D., Varjas K., Meyers J., Collins A.S. General education teachers' perceptions of behavior management and intervention strategies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2010, 12(2):86-102. 10.1177/1098300708330879.
35. Tilly D. Heartland area education agency's evolution from four to three tiers: our journey - our results. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO 2003, December.
36. Werts M.G., Lambert M., Carpenter E. What special education directors say about RTI. Learning Disability Quarterly 2009, 32(4):245-254. Retrieved from. http://ldq.sagepub.com/.
37. White J., Kumpke P., Kratochwill T.R. School psychologists' use and awareness of treatment guidelines: Present and future 2007, (Submitted for publication).
38. Zambrano E., Castro-Villarreal F., Sullivan J. School counselors and school psychologists: Partners in collaboration for student success within RTI and CDCGP frameworks. Journal of School Counseling 2012, 10(24). Retrieved from. http://www.jsc.montana.edu/articles/v10n24.pdf.