Response to intervention: General or special education? who is responsible?

Educational Forum

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 17-25

  Hazelkorn, Michael ^a   Bucholz, Jessica L ^a   Goodman, Janet I ^b   Duffy, Mary Lou ^c   Brady, Michael P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Haralson County Schools   (United States)

^c FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Legal issues; Non G T; Response to Intervention; Special education

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551559908     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131725.2010.528552     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bradley, R., L. Danielson, and J. Doolittle. 2007. Responsiveness to intervention: 1997-2007. Teaching Exceptional Children 39(5): 8-12.
2. Bradley, R., L. Danielson, and D. Hallahan, eds. 2002. Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Brown-Chidsey, R. 2007. No more "waiting to fail": How Response to Intervention works and why it is needed. Educational Leadership 65(2): 40-46.
4. Dykeman, B. F. 2006. Alternative strategies in assessing special education needs. Education 127: 265-73.
5. Education for All Handicapped Children Act. 1975. Public Law 94-142. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress.
6. Ehren, T. C., and K. A.Whitmire. 2005. Leadership opportunities in the context of responsiveness to intervention activities. Topics in Language Disorders 25: 168-79.
7. Farstrup, A. E. 2006. Professional judgment versus mandated program fidelity. Reading Today 23(6): 14.
8. Fletcher, J. M., W. A. Coulter, D. J. Reschly, and S. Vaughn. 2004. Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia 54(2): 304-31.
9. Fuchs, D., and L. S. Fuchs. 2006. Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly 41(1): 93-99.
10. Fuchs, L. S., and D. Fuchs. 2007. A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children 39(5): 14-20.
11. Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, and K. N. Hollenbeck. 2007. Extending responsiveness-to-intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22(1): 13-24.
12. Gersten, R., and J. A. Dimino. 2006. RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly 41(1): 99-108.
13. Hale, J. B., A. Kaufman, J. A. Naglieri, and K. A. Kavale. 2006. Implementation of IDEA: Integrating Response to Intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools 43(7): 753-70.
14. Hammill, D. D., J. E. Leigh, G. McNutt, and S. C. Larsen. 1987. A new definition of learning disabilites. Journal of Learning Disabilities 20(2): 109-13.
15. Harry, B., and J. Klingner. 2007. Discarding the deficit model. Educational Leadership 64(5): 16-21.
16. Heritage, M. 2007. Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan 89(2): 140-45.
17. Hilton, A. 2007. Response to Intervention: Changing how we do business. Leadership 36(4): 16-19.
18. IDEA Regulations. 2006. Federal Register 46540, 71(156): August 14.
19. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Reauthorization. 2004. Public Law No. 108-446. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress.
20. Klingner, J. K., and P. A. Edwards. 2006. Cultural considerations with Response to Intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly 41(1): 108-17.
21. Mellard, D. F., S. E. Byrd, E. Johnson, J. M. Tollefson, and L. Boesche. 2004. Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to-intervention sites. Learning Disability Quarterly 27(4): 243-56.
22. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. 2005, June. Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Available at: http://www.ldonline.org/?module=uploads&func=download&fileId=461.
23. New report discusses Response to Intervention. 2005. Reading Today 23(1): 3.
24. No Child Left Behind Act. 2001. Public Law No. 107-110. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress.
25. Peck, A., and S. Scarpati. 2007. Special issue: Responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children 39(5): 4.
26. Silberglitt, B., and J. M. Hintze. 2007. How much growth can we expect? A conditional analysis of R-CBM growth rates by level of performance. Exceptional Children 74(1): 71-84.
27. Sloat, E. A., J. F. Beswick, and J. D. Willms. 2007. Using early literacy monitoring to prevent reading failure. Phi Delta Kappan 88(7): 523-29.
28. Stecker, P. M. 2007. Tertiary intervention: Using progress monitoring with intensive services. Teaching Exceptional Children 39(5): 50-57.
29. Zirkel, P. A. 2007. What does the law say? Teaching Exceptional Children 39(5): 65-67.