Patterns of social capital associated with transit oriented development

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 35, Issue , 2014, Pages 144-155

  Kamruzzaman, Md ^a   Wood, Lisa ^b   Hine, Julian ^c   Currie, Graham ^d   Giles Corti, Billie ^e   Turrell, Gavin ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Brisbane; Public transport accessibility level (PTAL); Social capital; Social sustainability; Transit adjacent development; Transit oriented development

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; NEIGHBORHOOD; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

AUSTRALIA; BRISBANE; QUEENSLAND;

EID: 84896134941     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004. Measuring Social Capital: An Australian Framework and Indicators. Information Paper, ABS, Catalogue No. 1378.0, Canberra.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010. Sport and Social Capital, Australia. (06.09.13). http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4917.0.
3. Bartholomew K., Ewing R. Hedonic price effects of pedestrian- and transit-oriented development. J. Plann. Lit. 2011, 26:18-34.
4. Basto M., Pereira J.M. An SPSS R-menu for ordinal factor analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 46:1-29.
5. Belzer D., Autler G. Transit Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality 2002, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
6. Bertolini L. Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Plann. Pract. Res. 1999, 14:199-210.
7. Bertolini L., Curtis C., Renne J.L. Introduction. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen 2009, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey. C. Curtis, J.L. Renne, L. Bertolini (Eds.).
8. Boarnet M.G. Planning, climate change, and transportation: thoughts on policy analysis. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2010, 44:587-595.
9. Bowes D.R., Ihlanfeldt K.R. Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. J. Urban Econ. 2001, 50:1-25.
10. Bowling A., Stafford M. How do objective and subjective assessments of neighbourhood influence social and physical functioning in older age? Findings from a British survey of ageing. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 64:2533-2549.
11. Brisbane City Council, 2013. Planning for the Future: The Draft New City Plan, Brisbane.
12. Buckner J.C. The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. Am. J. Community Psychol. 1988, 16:771-791.
13. Bullen, P., Onyx, J., 1998. Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities in New South Wales: with Neighbourhood and Community Centres. (30.06.13). http://www.mapl.com.au/A2.htm.
14. Burton N.W., Haynes M., Wilson L.-A.M., Giles-Corti B., Oldenburg B.F., Brown W.J., Giskes K., Turrell G. HABITAT: a longitudinal multilevel study of physical activity change in mid-aged adults. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:76.
15. Buys L., Godber A., Summerville J., Barnett K. Building community: collaborative individualism and the challenge for building social capital. Aust. J. Reg. Stud. 2007, 13:287-298.
16. Cerin E., Leslie E., Toitc L.d., Owen N., Frank L.D. Destinations that matter: associations with walking for transport. Health Place 2007, 13:713-724.
17. Cervero R., Gorham R. Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 1995, 61:210.
18. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 1997, 2:199-219.
19. Currie G., Stanley J. Investigating links between social capital and public transport. Transport Rev. 2008, 28:529-547.
20. De Vos J., Derudder B., Van Acker V., Witlox F. Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transport Geogr. 2012, 22:1-9.
21. Dempsey N., Brown C., Bramley G. The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Prog. Plann. 2012, 77:89-141.
22. du Toit L., Cerin E., Leslie E., Owen N. Does walking in the neighbourhood enhance local sociability?. Urban Stud. 2007, 44:1677-1695.
23. Duncan M. The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA. Urban Stud. 2011, 48:101-127.
24. Forrest R., Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Stud. 2001, 38:2125-2143.
25. Freeman C., Tranter P.J. Children and their Urban Environment: Changing Worlds 2011, Earthscan, Washington, DC, London.
26. Ganapati S. Critical appraisal of three ideas for community development in the United States. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 2008, 27:382-399.
27. General Household Survey, 2002. Living in Britain: Results from the 2000/01. Office for National Statistics.
28. Glaeser E.L., Gottlieb J.D. Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Stud. 2006, 43:1275-1299.
29. Gordon I. Density and the built environment. Energy Policy 2008, 36:4652-4656.
30. Gray D., Shaw J., Farrington J. Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas. Area 2006, 38:89-98.
31. Guo J.Y., Chen C. The built environment and travel behavior: making the connection. Transportation 2007, 34:529-533.
32. Halbur T. TOD's evil twin: transit-adjacent development. Mass Transit 2007, 4-7.
33. Harriss J., De Renzio P. 'Missing link' or analytically missing? The concept of social capital. J. Int. Dev. 1997, 9:919-937.
34. Hollenhorst, J., 2007. Thinking "Green". Mass, Transit, p. 3.
35. Johnson, D., Headey, B., Jensen, B., 2005. Communities, Social Capital and Public Policy: Literature Review. Australian Government: Department of Family and Community Services, Policy Research Paper No. 26, Canberra.
36. Kamruzzaman M., Hine J. Participation index: a measure to identify rural transport disadvantage?. J. Transport Geogr. 2011, 19:882-899.
37. Kamruzzaman M., Hine J. Self-proxy agreement and weekly school travel behaviour in a sectarian divided society. J. Transport Geogr. 2013, 29:74-85.
38. Kamruzzaman, M., Baker, D., Turrell, G., 2013a. Short and medium term travel behavioural outcomes of residential dissonance: implications for TOD. World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR), Rio-de-Janeiro.
39. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Washington S., Turrell G. Residential dissonance and mode choice. J. Transport Geogr. 2013, 33:12-28.
40. Kamruzzaman M., Washington S., Baker D., Turrell G. Does residential dissonance impact residential mobility?. Transport Res. Rec. 2013, 2344:59-67.
41. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Washington S., Turrell G. Advance transit oriented development typology: case study in Brisbane, Australia. J. Transport Geogr. 2014, 34:54-70.
42. Kim J., Kaplan R. Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: new Urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36:313-340.
43. Lau S.S.Y., Giridharan R., Ganesan S. Multiple and intensive land use: case studies in Hong Kong. Habitat Int. 2005, 29:527-546.
44. Leyden K.M. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am. J. Public Health 2003, 93:1546-1551.
45. Lund H. Pedestrian environments and sense of community. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 2002, 21:301-312.
46. Lund H. Testing the claims of New Urbanism. American Planning Association. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2003, 69:414-429.
47. Lund H. Reasons for living in a transit-oriented development, and associated transit use. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2006, 72:357-366.
48. Mason S.G. Can community design build trust? A comparative study of design factors in Boise, Idaho neighborhoods. Cities 2010, 27:456-465.
49. Masoud M., Rastbin S., Ardahaey F.T. Evaluation of social capital, considering sociability and walkability in urban fabrics: the case of Isfahan City, Iran. Asian Soc. Sci. 2011, 7:216-228.
50. Melia S., Parkhurst G., Barton H. The paradox of intensification. Transport Policy 2011, 18:46-52.
51. Miciukiewicz K., Vigar G. Mobility and social cohesion in the splintered city: challenging technocentric transport research and policy-making practices. Urban Stud. 2012, 49:1941-1957.
52. Miller D.S., Rivera J.D. Introduction: the unique opportunities and challenges from a social scientific perspective. Community Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: Exploring Global Opportunities and Challenges 2011, XXXV-li. CRC Press, London, New York. D.S. Miller, J.D. Rivera (Eds.).
53. Onyx J., Bullen P. Measuring social capital in five communities. J. Behav. Sci. 2001, 36:23-42.
54. Pargal, S., Gilligan, D., Huq, M., 2000. Private Provision of a Public GOOD: Social Capital and Solid Waste Management in Dhaka, Bangladesh, World Bank eLibrary. doi: doi:10.1596/1813-9450-2422.
55. Pinjari A., Pendyala R., Bhat C., Waddell P. Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impact of the built environment on commute mode choice. Transportation 2007, 34:557-573.
56. Poortinga W. Perceptions of the environment, physical activity, and obesity. Soc. Sci. Med. 2006, 63:2835-2846.
57. Putnam R. Making Democracy Work 1993, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
58. Putnam R. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community 2000, Simon & Schuster, New York.
59. Queensland Government, 2008. Toward Q2: Tomorrow's Queensland, Brisbane.
60. Queensland Government South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031 2009, Queensland Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Brisbane.
61. Queensland Government, 2010a. Connecting SEQ 2031 - An Integrated Regional Transport Plan for South East Queensland. Transport and Main Roads, Brisbane.
62. Queensland Government Transit Oriented Development: Guide for Practitioners in Queensland 2010, The Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Brisbane.
63. Queensland Government, 2013. State Planning Policy. The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, Brisbane.
64. Renne J.L. From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development. Local Environ. 2009, 14:1-15.
65. Roche M. Social policy and social capital: a clear case of putting merit before method?. Soc. Policy Soc. 2004, 3:97-111.
66. Rohe W.M. From local to global: one hundred years of neighborhood planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2009, 75:209-230.
67. Sharifi A., Murayama A. Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: a case study of Iranian cities. Habitat Int. 2013, 38:126-134.
68. Simpson E.H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949, 163:688.
69. Spinney J.E.L., Scott D.M., Newbold K.B. Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: a time-use perspective of elderly Canadians. Transport Policy 2009, 16:1-11.
70. Stangl P., Guinn J.M. Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction. Urban Des. Int. 2011, 16:285-296.
71. Stanley J., Stanley J., Vella-Brodrick D., Currie G. The place of transport in facilitating social inclusion via the mediating influence of social capital. Res. Transport. Econ. 2010, 29:280-286.
72. Stanley J., Stanley J., Hensher D. Mobility, social capital and sense of community: what value?. Urban Stud. 2012, 49:3595-3609.
73. Transport for London, 2010. Measuring Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTALs): Summary, London.
74. Transportation Research Board, 2001. Making Transit Work: Insight from Western Europe, Canada, and the United States. Transportation Research Board Special Report 257.
75. Transportation Research Board, 2004. Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. TCRP Report 102.
76. Turrell G., Haynes M., Burton N., Giles-Corti B., Oldenburg B., Wilson L.-A.M., Giskes K M., Brown W.J. Neighborhood disadvantage and physical activity: baseline results from the HABITAT multilevel longitudinal study. Ann. Epidemiol. 2010, 20:171-181.
77. Vallance S., Perkins H.C., Dixon J.E. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 2011, 42:342-348.
78. Wood L., Shannon T., Bulsara M., Pikora T., McCormack G., Giles-Corti B. The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: an exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents' perceptions of safety. Health Place 2008, 14:15-31.
79. Wood L., Giles-Corti B., Bulsara M. Streets apart: does social capital vary with neighbourhood design?. Urban Stud. Res. 2012, 10.1155/2012/507503.
80. Wood L., Boruff B., Smith H. When disaster strikes. .how communities cope and adapt: a social capital perspective. Social Capital: Theory, Measurement and Outcomes 2013, Nova, New York. C.D. Johnson (Ed.).
81. Wu B.M., Hine J. A PTAL approach to measuring the changes in bus service accessibility. Transport Policy 2003, 10:307-320.
82. Yang Y. A tale of two cities: physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2008, 74:307.
83. Ziersch A.M., Baum F.E., MacDougall C., Putland C. Neighbourhood life and social capital: the implications for health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2005, 60:71-86.