Mobility and Social Cohesion in the Splintered City: Challenging Technocentric Transport Research and Policy-making Practices

Urban Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1941-1957

  Miciukiewicz, Konrad ^a   Vigar, Geoff ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOBILITY; POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL PROBLEM; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN POLICY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EUROPE;

EID: 84862329684     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012444886     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Augé M.Non-lieux: Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Le Seuil; 1992:.
2. Baeten G.The tragedy of the highway: empowerment, disempowerment and the politics of sustainability discourses and practices.European Planning Studies. 2000;8 (1): 69-86.
3. Banister D.Unsustainable Transport. London: Spon; 2005:.
4. Beckmann K. J.,Bracher T.,Hesse M.Editorial: urban mobility and social inequity.Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften. 2007a;46 (2): 5-8.
5. Beckmann K. J.,Bracher T.,Hesse M.Mobility and deprived urban neighbourhoods in the focus of integrated urban development policy.Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften. 2007b;46 (2): 9-22.
6. Bertolini L.Fostering urbanity in a mobile society: linking concepts and practices.Journal of Urban Design. 2006;11 (3): 319-334.
7. Bissel D.Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport.Environment and Planning D. 2010;28:270-289.
8. Bonss W.,Kesselring S.Die Modernisierung der Moderne. Beck U.Bonss W., ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 2001:.
9. Bulkeley H.Urban sustainability: learning from best practice?.Environment and Planning A. 2006;38 (6): 1029-1044.
10. Bullard R.,Johnson S.,Torres A. O.Highway Robbery: Transportation Racism and New Routes to Equity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press; 2004:.
11. Canon D. T.Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
12. CAPTURE (1999) Cars to public transport in the urban environment. CAPTURE final summary report, EU-Transport RTD Programme.
13. Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001:.
14. Cervero R.Informal Transport in the Developing World. Nairobi: UN-HABITAT; 2000:.
15. Church A.,Frost M.,Sullivan K.Transport and social exclusion in London.Transport Policy. 2000;7:195-205.
16. White Paper: European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. Brussels: COM; 2001:.
17. Green Paper: towards a new culture for urban mobility. Brussels: COM; 2007:.
18. Cook I. R.,Swyngedouw E.Cities, social cohesion and the environment: towards a future research agenda.Urban Studies. 2012;49 (9): 1959-1979.
19. Concerted development of social cohesion indicators: methodological guide. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2005:.
20. Cresswell T.Towards a politics of mobility.Environment and Planning D. 2010;28:17-31.
21. Danyluk M.,Ley D.Modalities of the new middle class: ideology and behaviour in the journey to work from gentrified neighbourhoods in Canada.Urban Studies. 2007;44 (11): 2195-2210.
22. Review of social research in the Department for Transport. London: DfT; 2004:.
23. Implementing sustainable urban travel policies: final report. Paris: ECMT; 2002:.
24. Flamm M.Comprendre le choix modal: les déterminants des pratiques modales et des représentations individuelles des moyens de transport. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes; 2003:.
25. Flamm M.,Kaufmann V.Operationalising the concept of motility: a qualitative study.Mobilities. 2006;1 (2): 167-189.
26. Forckenbrock D. J.,Benshoff S.,Weisbrod G. E.Assessing the social and economic effects of transportation projects. Boston, MA: University of Iowa/Economic Development Research Group; 2001:.
27. Geels F. W.Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study.Research Policy. 2002;31 (8/9): 1257-1274.
28. Geurs K. T.,Wee B. van.Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions.Journal of Transport Geography. 2004;12:127-140.
29. Geurs K. T.,Boon W.,Wee B. van.Social impacts of transport: literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.Transport Reviews. 2009;29 (1): 69-90.
30. Götz K.Subject-oriented Approaches to Transport. Holz-Rau C.Scheiner J., ed. Dortmund: IRPUD; 2009:.
31. Graham S.Constructing premium network spaces: reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2000;24 (1): 183-200.
32. Graham S.,Marvin S.Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge; 2001:.
33. Grieco M.,Macdonald K.Accessibility, mobility and connectivity: the changing frontiers of everyday routine.Mobilities. 2007;2 (1): 1-14.
34. Güller P.Sustainable Transport in Central and Eastern European Cities. Paris: ECMT; 1996:16-43.
35. Hägerstrand T.The impact of transport on the quality of life. Lunds Universitets Kulturgeografiska Institution; 1974:.
36. Haq G.Towards sustainable transport planning. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1997:.
37. Harms L.Mobility among ethnic minorities in the urban Netherlands.Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften. 2007;46 (2): 78-94.
38. Häussermann H.Die Krise der sozialen Stadt.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte. 2000;B (10/11): 13-21.
39. Hine J.,Grieco M.Scatters and clusters in time and space: implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport.Transport Policy. 2003;10:299-306.
40. Hine J.,Mitchell F.Transport Disadvantage and Social Exclusion. Ashgate: Aldershot; 2003:.
41. Jain J.,Lyons G.The gift of travel time.Journal of Transport Geography. 2008;16 (2): 81-89.
42. Jarvis K.Moving to London time: household co-ordination and the infrastructure of everyday life.Time & Society. 2005;14 (1): 133-154.
43. Jensen O. B.Flows of meaning, cultures of movements: urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice.Mobilities. 2009;4 (1): 139-158.
44. KaufmannC.RisserR. (2004) Synthesis report: social aspects. Planning and urban mobility in Europe (PLUME) (www.factum.at/PDFuDoc/SR_Social_aspects_v1.2.pdf).
45. Kaufmann V.,Bergman M. M.,Joye D.Motility: mobility as capital.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2004;28 (4): 745-756.
46. Kemming H.,Brinkmann W.Verkehrsverhalten sozialer Gruppen: Soziale Aspekte der Mobilität. Dortmund: Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung und Bauwesen des Landes NRW; 2007:.
47. Kesselring S.Bewegliche Identitäten: Chancen und Risiken der Mobilität.Durchblück: Zeitschrift für Ausbildung, Weiterbildung und berufliche Integration. 2004;4 (44):.
48. Kim J.,Kaplan R.Physical and psychological factors in sense of community.Environment and Behavior. 2004;36:313-340.
49. Latuso K., et alPROPOLIS: Planning and research for land use and transport for increasing urban sustainability: final report. Kuopio: LT Consultants Ltd; 2004:.
50. Law R.Beyond 'women and transport': towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility.Progress in Human Geography. 1999;23 (4): 567-588.
51. Lévy J.L'Espace Légitime. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques; 1994:.
52. Lévy J.Le tournant géographique. Paris: Armand Colin; 1999:.
53. Lin J.Gentrification and transit in north-west Chicago.Transportation Quarterly. 2002;56 (4): 175-191.
54. Low N.,Gleeson B.Making Urban Transport Sustainable. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2003:.
55. Lucas K.,Stanley J.International perspectives on transport and social exclusion.Transport Policy. 2003;10 (3): 89-142.
56. Lyons G.The reshaping of activities and mobility through new technologies.Journal of Transport Geography. 2009;17:81-82.
57. Maricato E.Urbanismo na periferia do mundo globalizado: metrópoles brasileiras.São Paulo em perspectiva. 2000;14 (4): 21-33.
58. Massey D.,Denton N.American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
59. Preparatory measures combating and preventing exclusion. Woodstock: Transport & Travel Research; 2003:.
60. Metz D.The myth of travel time saving.Transport Reviews. 2008;28 (3): 321-336.
61. Raport o stanie zagospodarowania przestrzennego kraju. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Infrastruktury; 2004:.
62. Montulet B.Les enjeux spatio-temporels du social: mobilité. Paris: L'Harmattan; 1998:.
63. Moulaert F.,Nussbaumer J.The social region: beyond the territorial dynamics of the learning economy.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2005;12 (1): 45-64.
64. Nasar J. L.Does neotraditional development build community?.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2003;23:58-68.
65. NICHES (New and Innovative Concepts for Helping European Transport Sustainability) (2005) Innovative urban transport concepts. Inception report, NICHES (http://www.niches-transport.org/).
66. Novy A.,Coimbra Swiatek D.,Moulaert F.Social cohesion: a conceptual and political elucidation.Urban Studies. 2012;49 (9): 1873-1889.
67. Park R. E.,Burgess E.,McKenzie R.The City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1925:.
68. Pearson M. A.,Dawson C.,Moore H.,Spencer S.Health on borrowed time? Prioritizing and meeting needs in low-income households.Health and Social Care in the Community. 2007;1 (1): 45-54.
69. Pflieger G.,Kaufmann V.,Pattaroni L.,Jemelin C.How does urban public transport change cities? Correlations between past and present transport and urban planning policies.Urban Studies. 2007;46 (7): 1421-1437.
70. Preston J.,Rajé F.Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion.Journal of Transport Geography. 2007;15:151-160.
71. Pucher J.,Peng Z.,Mittal N.,Zhu Y., et al.Urban transport trends and policies in China and India: impacts of rapid economic growth.Transport Reviews. 2007;27 (4): 379-410.
72. Rajé F.Transport, Demand Management and Social Inclusion: The Need for Ethnic Perspectives. Ashgate: Aldershot; 2004:.
73. Richardson T.,Jensen O. B.How mobility systems produce inequality: making mobile subject types on the Bangkok Skytrain.Built Environment. 2008;34 (2): 218-231.
74. Roth G.Basic Needs and the Urban Poor: The Provision of Communal Services. Richards P. J.Thomson A. M., ed. Beckenham: Croom Helm, Ltd; 1984:215-242.
75. Making the connections. London: SEU; 2003:.
76. Shaw J.,Hesse M.Transport, geography and mobilities.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2010;35 (3): 305-312.
77. Sheller M.The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment. Bergmann S.Sager T., ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2008:25-38.
78. Sheller M.,Urry J.The new mobilities paradigm.Environment and Planning A. 2006;38:207-226.
79. Stead D.,Jong M. de,Reinholde I.Urban transport policy transfer in central and eastern Europe.disP. 2007;172:62-73.
80. Terry F.What Works?: Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Davies H.Nutley S.Smith P., ed. Bristol: Policy Press; 2004:189-206.
81. Urry J.Mobilities. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press; 2007:.
82. Uteng T. P.The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment. Bergmann S.Sager T., ed. London: Ashgate; 2008:73-102.
83. Vasconcellos E. A.Urban Transport, Environment and Equity. London: Earthscan; 2001:.
84. Vigar G.The Politics of Mobility. London: Spon; 2002:.
85. Whitelegg J.Critical Mass. London: Pluto Press; 1997:.
86. Whitelegg J.,Haq G.The Earthscan Reader on World Transport Policy & Practice. Whitelegg J.Haq G., ed. London: Earthscan; 2003:275-296.
87. Williams R.The Country and the City. London: Chatto and Windus; 1973:.
88. Wirth L.The Ghetto. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1928:.
89. Cities on the Move: A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2002:.
90. Zinnbauer D.What can social capital and ICT do for inclusion?. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies; 2007:.