Influence of the protein status of piglets on their ability to select and prefer protein sources

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 129, Issue , 2014, Pages 43-49

  Guzmán Pino, Sergio A ^a   Solà Oriol, David ^a   Figueroa, Jaime ^a   Pérez, José F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Learning; Pig; Preference; Protein deficiency; Protein source

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; GLUTAMIC ACID; MALTODEXTRIN; PROTEIN; SUCROSE; WATER; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; POLYSACCHARIDE; PROTEIN INTAKE; SUGAR INTAKE;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD PREFERENCE; MALE; MALNUTRITION; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PIGLET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONTENT; PROTEIN DIET; PROTEIN RESTRICTION; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; WEANING; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; DECISION MAKING; EATING; LEARNING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN INTAKE; SUGAR INTAKE; SWINE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DIET, PROTEIN-RESTRICTED; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIETARY PROTEINS; DIETARY SUCROSE; EATING; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; MALE; POLYSACCHARIDES; SWINE; WATER;

EID: 84896057989     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.029     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kyriazakis I., Emmans G.C., Whittemore C.T. Diet selection in pigs: choices made by growing pigs given foods of different protein concentrations. Anim Prod 1990, 51:189-199.
2. Kyriazakis I., Emmans G.C., Whittemore C.T. The ability of pigs to control their protein intake when fed in three different ways. Physiol Behav 1991, 50:1197-1203.
3. Kyriazakis I., Emmans G.C. Diet selection in pigs: dietary choices made by growing pigs following a period of underfeeding with protein. Anim Prod 1991, 52:337-346.
4. Kyriazakis I., Stamataris C., Emmans G.C., Whittemore C.T. The effects of food protein content on the performance of pigs previously given foods with low or moderate protein contents. Anim Prod 1991, 52:165-173.
5. Kirchgessner M., Stangl G.I., Roth F.X. Evidence of a specific dietary selection for lysine by the piglet. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 1999, 81:124-131.
6. Roth F.X., Meindl C., Ettle T. Evidence of a dietary selection for methionine by the piglet. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:379-386.
7. Ettle T., Roth F.X. Dietary preferences for feeds varying in threonine concentration by the piglet. Physiol Behav 2005, 85:289-295.
8. Ettle T., Roth F.X. Specific dietary selection for tryptophan by the piglet. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:1115-1121.
9. Kyriazakis I., Emmans G.C. The immediate effects of abrupt diet composition changes in young pigs. Br J Nutr 1990, 64:619-623.
10. Staddon J.E.R. Adaptive behaviour and learning 1983, Cambridge University Press, New York. 1st ed.
11. Solà-Oriol D., Roura E., Torrallardona D. Feed preference in pigs: effect of cereal sources at different inclusion rates. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:562-570.
12. Figueroa J., Solà-Oriol D., Guzmán-Pino S.A., Borda E., Pérez J.F. Flavor preferences conditioned by postingestive effect of sucrose and porcine digestive peptides in postweaning pigs. J Anim Sci 2012, 90:381-383.
13. Figueroa J., Solà-Oriol D., Borda E., Sclafani A., Pérez J.F. Flavour preferences conditioned by protein solutions in post-weaning pigs. Physiol Behav 2012, 107:309-316.
14. Solà-Oriol D., Roura E., Torrallardona D. Feed preference in pigs: effect of selected protein, fat, and fiber sources at different inclusion rates. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:3219-3227.
15. Dulac C. The physiology of taste, vintage 2000. Cell 2000, 100:607-610.
16. Glaser D., Wanner M., Tinti J.M., Nofre C. Gustatory responses of pigs to various natural and artificial compounds known to be sweet in man. Food Chem 2000, 68:375-385.
17. Beauchamp G. Sensory and receptor responses to umami: an overview of pioneering work. Am J Clin Nutr 2009, 90:723S-727S.
18. Cabanac M. Physiological role of pleasure. Science 1971, 173:1103-1107.
19. National Research Council Nutrient requirements of swine: eleventh revised edition 2012, The National Academy Press, Washington. 11th ed.
20. Kennedy J.M., Baldwin B.A. Taste preferences in pigs for nutritive and non-nutritive sweet solutions. Anim Behav 1972, 20:706-718.
21. Baldwin B.A. Postingestive factors influencing operant sugar intake in pigs. Physiol Behav 1996, 60:283-286.
22. Roura E., Shrestha B., Diffey S. Pigs show high sensory-motivated intake for low levels of dextrose but not for low levels of maltodextrin. Manipulating Pig Production XIV: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Biennial Conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association (APSA) 2013, 42. UniPrint, Crawley. J.R. Pluske, J.M. Pluske (Eds.).
23. Clouard C., Chataignier M., Meunier-Salaün M., Val-Laillet D. Flavour preference acquired via a beverage-induced conditioning and its transposition to solid food: sucrose but not maltodextrin or saccharin induced significant flavour preferences in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012, 136:26-36.
24. Guzmán-Pino S.A., Solà-Oriol D., Figueroa J., Borda E., Pérez J.F. Dietary energy density affects the preference for protein or carbohydrate solutions and piglet performance after weaning. J Anim Sci 2012, 90:71-73.
25. Blair-West J.R., Denton D.A., McKinley M.J., Radden B.G., Ramshaw E.H., Wark J.D. Behavioural and tissue responses to severe phosphorus depletion in cattle. Am J Physiol 1992, 263:656-663.
26. Denton D.A. The hunger for salt 1982, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
27. Leshem M. The ontogeny of salt hunger in the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1999, 23:649-659.
28. Deutsch J.A., Moore B.O., Heinrichs S.C. Unlearned specific appetite for protein. Physiol Behav 1989, 46:619-624.
29. Heinrichs S.C., Deutsch J.A., Moore B.O. Olfactory self-selection of protein-containing foods. Physiol Behav 1990, 47:409-413.
30. Torii K., Mimura T., Yugari Y. Effects of dietary protein on the taste preference for amino acids in rats. Interaction of the chemical senses with nutrition 1986, 45-69. Academic, Orlando. M.R. Kare, J.G. Brand (Eds.).
31. Galef B.G. Is there a specific appetite for protein?. Neural and metabolic control of macronutrient intake 1999, 19-28. CRC, Boca Raton. H.-R. Berthoud, R. Seeley (Eds.).
32. Morgan C.A., Kyriazakis I., Lawrence A.B., Chirnside J., Fullam H. Diet selection by groups of pigs: effect of a trained individual on the rate of learning about novel foods differing in protein content. Anim Sci 2003, 76:101-109.
33. Forbes J.M. Palatability: principles, methodology and practice for farm animals. CAB Rev 2010, 5:1-15.
34. Dwyer D.M. Licking and liking: the assessment of hedonic responses in rodents. Q J Exp Psychol 2012, 65:371-394.
35. DiBattista D., Mercier S. Role of learning in the selection of dietary protein in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Behav Neurosci 1999, 113:574-586.
36. Gibson E.L., Wainwright C.J., Booth D.A. Disguised protein in lunch after low-protein breakfast conditions food-flavor preferences dependent on recent lack of protein intake. Physiol Behav 1995, 58:363-371.
37. Kyriazakis I., Tolkamp B.J., Emmans G.C. Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework. Proc Nutr Soc 1999, 58:765-772.
38. Forbes J.M. Integration of pre- and post-absorptive factors in feed intake regulation and prediction with particular respect to the pig. Voluntary feed intake in pigs 2009, 61-86. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. D. Torrallardona, E. Roura (Eds.).