Palatability: Principles, methodology and practice for farm animals

CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources

Volumn 5, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Michael Forbes, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cattle; Food composition; Food flavour; Palatability; Pigs; Poultry; Sheep

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS; OVIS ARIES; SUIDAE;

EID: 80052505091     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20105052     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Rook AJ, Penning PD, Rutter SM. Limitations of palatability as a concept in food intake and diet selection studies. In: Forbes JM, Lawrence TLJ, Rodway RG, Varley MA, editors. Animal Choices. British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh; 1997. p. 75-6.
2. Forbes JM. Voluntary Food Intake and Diet Selection in Farm Animals. 2nd ed. CAB International, Wallingford; 2007.
3. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs. 2008. No. 2009. Available from: URL: http://www.omafra.gov. on. ca/english/livestock/dairy/ facts/08-039.htm (accessed 16th December 2009).
4. Wikipedia. 2009. No. 2009. Available from: URL: http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatability (accessed 16th December 2009).
5. Grill HJ, Berridge KC. Taste reactivity as a measure of the neural control of palatability. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology 1985;11:1-61.
6. Marten GC. The animal-plant complex in forage palatability phenomena. Journal of Animal Science 1978;46:1470-7.
7. Yeomans MR. Taste, palatability and the control of appetite. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1998;57:609-15. (Pubitemid 128737135)
8. Koster EP. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: a psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 2009;20:70-82.
9. Blair R, Fitzsimons J. A note on the voluntary feed intake and growth of pigs given diets containing an extremely bitter compound. Animal Production 1970;12:529-30.
10. Roura E, Tedo G. Feed appetence in pigs: an oronasal perspective. In: Torrallardona D, Roura E, editors. Voluntary Food Intake in Pigs. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 2009. p. 105-140.
11. Torrallardona D, Sola-Oriol D. Evaluation of free-choice feedstuffs preferences by pigs. In: Torrallardona D, Roura E, editors. Voluntary Feed Intake in Pigs. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 2009. p. 215-42.
12. Baumont R. Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants: a review. Annales de Zootechnie 1996;45:385-400.
13. Meunier-Salaun MC, Picard M. Factors involved in feed choices in pigs and poultry. Productions Animales 1996;9:339-48. (Pubitemid 126332008)
14. Auffray P, Marcilloux JC. Studies of feeding behaviour in the adult pig. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 1983;23:517-24.
15. Baumont R, Brun JP, Dulphy JP. Influence of the nature of hay on its ingestibility and the kinetics of intake during large meals in sheep and cows. In: XVI International Grassland Congress, Nice, France; 1989. p. 788-9.
16. Faverdin P. Regulation of food intake in lactating cows in early lactation: Studies of the role of insulin [PhD thesis]. Institut National Agronomique, Paris, France; 1985.
17. Masic B, Wood-Gush DGM, Duncan IJH, McCorquodale C, Savory CJ. A comparison of feeding behaviours of young broiler and layer males. British Poultry Science 1974;15:499-505.
18. Harrison S, Romney DL, Phipps RH, Owen E. Short term intake rate (stir) as a method of ranking the intake potential of forage mixtures by dairy cows. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 1998;193 (abstract).
19. Villalba JJ, Provenza FD. Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch. British Journal of Nutrition 1997;77:287-97. (Pubitemid 27271807)
20. Colebrook WF, Black JL, Kenney PA. Effect of sensory factors on diet selection by sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 1985;10:99-102.
21. Kenney P, Black JL. Factors affecting diet selection by sheep. I. Potential intake rate and acceptability of food. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1984;35:5511-63.
22. Reynolds FH, Forbes JM, Miller HM. Does the newly weaned piglet select a zinc oxide supplemented feed, when given the choice? Animal 2010;4:1359-67.
23. Favreau A, Baumont R, Duncan AJ, Ginane C. Sheep use preingestive cues as indicators of postingestive consequences to improve food learning. Journal of Animal Science 2010;88:1535-44.
24. Bruneau CD, Chavez ER. Dietary preference for cereals of nursing and weaned piglets. Livestock Production Science 1995;41:225-31.
25. Sola-Oriol D, Pujol S, van Kempen T, Roura E, Torrallardona D. Glucose release correlates with piglet's preference for cereal based feeds. Journal of Animal Science 2008;86 Suppl.: 97.
26. Sola-Oriol D, Roura E, Torrallardona D. Use of double-choice feeding to quantify feed ingredient preferences in pigs. Livestock Science 2009;123:129-37.
27. Nelson SL, Sanregret JD. Response of pigs to bitter-tasting compounds. Chemical Senses 1997;22:129-32. (Pubitemid 27171028)
28. Kennedy JM, Baldwin BA. Taste preferences in pigs for nutritive and non-nutritive sweet solutions. Animal Behaviour 1972;20:706-18.
29. Glaser D, Wanner M, Tinti JM, Nofre C. Gustatory responses of pigs to various natural and artificial compounds known to be sweet to man. Food Chemistry 2000;68:375-85.
30. Tedo G. The umami taste in pigs: L-amino acid preferences and in vitro recognition by the receptor dimer pt1r1/pt1r3 expressed in taste and non-taste tissues [PhD thesis]. University Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 2009.
31. Hellekant G, Danilova V. Taste in domestic pig, Sus scrofa. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 1999;82:8-24. (Pubitemid 129490986)
32. Hellekant G, Roberts T, Elmer D, Cragin T, Danilova V. Responses of single chorda tympani taste fibers of the calf (Bos taurus). Chemical Senses Advance Access 2010:35(5):383-94.
33. Oregon. 2010. The arcsine transformation. Available from: URL: http://darkwing.uoregon. edu/~robinh/arcsin. txt (accessed 5th January 2010).
34. Kyriazakis I, Emmans GC, Whittemore CT. Diet selection in pigs: choices made by growing pigs given foods of different protein concentrations. Animal Production 1990;51:189-99.
35. Lawson RE, Redfern EJ, Forbes JM. Choices by lactating cows between concentrates high and low in digestible undegraded protein. Animal Science 2000;70:515-25.
36. Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates. Nutrition Research Reviews 1997;10:151-79. (Pubitemid 127525971)
37. Forbes JM. A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: Minimal total discomfort. Nutrition Research Reviews 2007;20:132-46.
38. Kyriazakis I, Anderson DH, Duncan AJ. Conditioned flavour aversions in sheep: The relationship between the dose rate of a secondary plant compound and the acquisition and persistence of aversions. British Journal of Nutrition 1998;79:55-62. (Pubitemid 28058595)
39. Covasa M, Forbes JM. Exogenous cholecystokinin octapeptide in broiler chickens: Satiety, conditioned colour aversion and vagal mediation. Physiology and Behavior 1994;56:39-49. (Pubitemid 24223340)
40. Jackson RE, Waran NK, Cockram MS. Effect of different lengths of food deprivation on the feeding motivation of sheep. In: Forbes JM, Lawrence TLJ, Rodway RG, Varley MA, editors. Animal Choices. British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh; 1997. p. 88-9.
41. Hutson GD, Van Mourik SC. Food preferences of sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1981;21:575-82.
42. Dumont B, Petit M. An indoor method for studying the preferences of sheep and cattle at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1995;46:67-80. (Pubitemid 26477309)
43. Hou XZ, Emmans GC, Anderson D, Illius AW, Oldham JD. The effect of different pairs of feeds offered as a choice on food selection by sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1991;50:94A.
44. Day JEL, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB. The use of a 2nd-order schedule to measure feeding motivation in the pig. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1996;50:15-31. (Pubitemid 26353751)
45. Day JEL, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB. The use of a second-order schedule to assess the effect of food bulk on the feeding motivation of growing pigs. Animal Science 1996;63:447-55. (Pubitemid 126173762)
46. Araujo JA, Milgram NW. A novel cognitive palatability assessment protocol for dogs. Journal of Animal Science 2004;82:2200-8.
47. Araujo J, Studzinski C, Larson B, Milgram N. Comparison of the cognitive palatability assessment protocol and the two-pan test for use in assessing palatability of two similar foods in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2004;65:1490-6. (Pubitemid 39561989)
48. Grovum WL, Chapman HW. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by sheep. 4. The effect of additives representing the primary tastes on sham intakes by oesophageal-fistulated sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 1988;59:63-72. (Pubitemid 18032911)
49. Buchanan-Smith JG. An investigation into palatability as a factor responsible for reduced intake of silage by sheep. Animal Production 1990;50:253-60.
50. Greenhalgh JFD, Reid GW. Relative palatability to sheep of straw, hay and dried grass. British Journal of Nutrition 1971;26:107-16.
51. Van Niekerk AI, Greenhalgh JFD, Reid GW. Importance of palatability in determining the feed intake of sheep offered chopped and pelleted hay. British Journal of Nutrition 1973;30:95-105.
52. Favreau A, Ginane C, Baumont R. Feeding behaviour of sheep fed lucerne v. grass hays with controlled post-ingestive consequences. Animal 2010;4:1368-77.
53. Favreau A, Baumont R, Ferreira G, Dumont B, Ginane C. Do sheep use umami and bitter tastes as cues of post-ingestive consequences when selecting their diet? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2010;125:115-23.
54. Cadirci S, Smith WK, Mc Devitt RM. Determination of the appetite of laying hens for methionine in drinking water by using colour cue. Archivs Fur Geflugelkunde 2009;73:21-8.
55. Kutlu HR, Forbes JM. Self-selection of ascorbic acid in coloured foods by heat-stressed broiler chicks. Physiology and Behavior 1993;53:103-10. (Pubitemid 23026687)
56. Mastika IM, Cumming RB. Effect of previous experience, and environmental variations on the performance and pattern of feed intake of choice fed and complete fed broilers. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 1987:260-82.
57. Bolhuis JE, Ostindjer M, Van den Brand H, Gerrits WJJ, Kemp B. Voluntary feed intake in piglets: potential impact of early experience with flavours derived from the maternal diet. In: Torrallardona D, Roura E, editors. Voluntary Feed Intake in Pigs. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 2009. p. 37-60.
58. Simitzis PE, Deligeorgis SG, Bizelis JA, Fegeros K. Feeding preferences in lambs influenced by prenatal flavour exposure. Physiology and Behavior 2008;93:529-36. (Pubitemid 351208434)
59. Campbell RG. A note on the use of feed flavour to stimulate the feed intake of weaner pigs. Animal Production 1976;23:417-9.
60. Covasa M, Forbes JM. The effects of social interaction on selection of feeds by broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 1994;35:817.
61. Morgan CA, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB, Chirnside J, Fullam H. Diet selection by groups of pigs: Effect of a trained individual on the rate of learning about novel foods differing in protein content. Animal Science 2003;76:101-9. (Pubitemid 36178339)
62. Rioja-Lang FC, Roberts DJ, Healy SD, Lawrence AB, Haskell MJ. Dairy cows trade-off feed quality with proximity to a dominant individual in y-maze choice tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2009;117:159-64.
63. Steinruck U, Kirchgessner M, Roth FX. Selective methionine intake of broilers by changing the position of the diets. Archivs fur Geflugelkunde 1990;54:245-50.
64. Ettle T, Roth FX. Dietary selection for lysine by piglets at differing feeding regimen. Livestock Science 2009;122:259-63.
65. Kyriazakis I, Emmans GC. Diet selection in pigs: Dietary choices made by growing pigs following a period of underfeeding with protein. Animal Production 1991;52:337-46.
66. Shariatmadari F, Forbes JM. The effect of force-feeding various levels of protein on diet selection and growth of broiler chickens. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1992;51:56A.
67. Tolkamp BJ, Kyriazakis I, Oldham JD, Lewis M, Dewhurst RJ, Newbold JR, et al. Diet choice by dairy cows. 2. Selection for metabolizable protein or for ruminally degradable protein? Journal of Dairy Science 1998;81:2670-80. (Pubitemid 128444936)
68. Forbes JM. Integration of absorptive and post-absorptive factors in feed intake regulation and prediction with particular respect to the pig. In: Torrallardona D, Roura E, editors. Voluntary feed Intake in Pigs. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 2009. p. 61-86.
69. Roth FX, Meindl C, Ettle T. Evidence of a dietary selection for methionine by the piglet. Journal of Animal Science 2006;84:379-86. (Pubitemid 44405707)
70. Riley AL, Freeman KB. Conditioned flavor aversions: assessment of drug-induced suppression of food intake. In: Crawley J, et al. editors. Current Protocols in Neuroscience. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 2004. p. 1-12.