Flavor preferences conditioned by postingestive effect of sucrose and porcine digestive peptides in postweaning pigs

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 90, Issue SUPPL4, 2012, Pages 381-383

  Figueroa, J ^a   Sola Oriol D ^a   Guzman Pino S ^a   Borda, E ^b   Perez J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b Palafolls ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Conditioning; Learning; Postingestive

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIET; DIGESTION; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; DRUG EFFECT; FOOD PREFERENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SWINE; TASTE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DIET; DIGESTION; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FOOD PREFERENCES; PEPTIDES; SUCROSE; SWINE; TASTE;

EID: 84882655115     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.51308     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ackroff, K., and A. Sclafani. 2011. Flavor preferences conditioned by post-oral infusion of monosodium glutamate in rats. Physiol. Behav. 104:488-494.
2. Dwyer, D., H. Pincham, T. Thein, and J. Harris. 2009. A learned flavor preference persists despite the extinction of conditioned hedonic reactions to the cue flavors. Learn. Behav. 37:305-310.
3. Hellekant, G., and V. Danilova. 1999. Taste in domestic pig, Sus scrofa. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 82:8-24.
4. Miller, R. R., and A. D. Holzman. 1981. Neophobia: Generality and function. Behav. Neural Biol. 33:17-44.
5. Rolls, E. T. 2009. Functional neuroimaging of umami taste: What makes umami pleasant? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 90:804S-813S.
6. Sclafani, A. 2004. Oral and postoral determinants of food reward. Physiol. Behav. 81:773-779.
7. Warwick, Z. S., and H. P. Weingarten. 1994. Dissociation of palatability and calorie effects in learned flavor preferences. Physiol. Behav. 55:501-504.