Seeds, science, and struggle: The global politics of transgenic crops

Seeds, Science, and Struggle: The Global Politics of Transgenic Crops

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-219

  Kinchy, Abby ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895592829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (442)

1. Abergel, Elisabeth A. 2007. Trade, Science, and Canada's Regulatory Framework for Determining the Environmental Safety of GE Crops. In Genetically Engineered Crops: Interim Policies, Uncertain Legislation, ed. Iain E. P. Taylor, 173-206. New York: Haworth Food and Agricultural Products Press.
2. Abergel, Elisabeth A., and Katherine Barrett. 2002. Putting the Cart before the Horse: A Review of Biotechnology Policy in Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies; Revue d'Etudes Canadiennes 37 (6): 135-161.
3. Adams, John S. 2009. Critics Sow Doubt as "Farmer Protection Act" Hearing Nears. Great Falls Tribune. http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_17360.cfm (accessed June 21, 2011).
4. AFP y Notimex. 2005. Pide México oficialmente reconocer su cocina como patrimonio universal. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2005/09/20/a03n1gas.php (accessed June 5, 2007).
5. Ag Department Uproots Science; Vilsack Seeks Out Politically Congenial Scientific Opinion. 2010. Wall Street Journal, December 27. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703581204576033611631362824.html (accessed August 25, 2011).
6. Agrawal, Arun. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies ofGgovernment and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2010. Certified Organic Production in Canada 2008. http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1276033208 187&lang=eng#an1 (accessed July 12, 2011).
8. Aguirre González, Rosa Luz. 2004. La biotecnología agrícola en México: Efectos de la propiedad intelectual y la bioseguridad. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
9. AJAGI, CECCAM, CENAMI, CONTEC, Grupo ETC, GRAIN, UNOSJO, ORAB et al. 2005. Nuevas Evidencias de Contaminación Transgénica del Maíz Campesino. Collective Press Release, Red en Defensa del Maíz, December 8.
10. Alapekkala, Outi. 2011. Europe Paves Way for GM Crop Bans. Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jul/06/europe-gm-crop-bans (accessed August 25, 2011).
11. Alcántara, Cynthia Hewitt de, ed. 1994. Economic Restructuring and Rural Subsistence in Mexico: Corn and the Crisis of the 1980s. San Diego: Ejido Reform Research Project, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.
12. Altieri, Miguel A. 2004. Linking Ecologists and Traditional Farmers in the Search for Sustainable Agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2 (6): 35-42.
13. Altieri, Miguel A., and Peter Rosset. 1999a. Strengthening the Case for Why Biotechnology Will Not Help the Developing World: A Response to McGloughlin. AgBioForum 2 (6): 226-236.
14. Altieri, Miguel A., and Peter Rosset. 1999b. Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World. AgBioForum 2 (6): 155-162.
15. Alvarez-Buylla, Elena R. 2004. Ecological and Biological Aspects of the Impacts of Transgenic Maize, including Agro-Biodiversity (report prepared for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America). Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=2791 (accessed January 7, 2012).
16. Alvarez-Morales, Ariel. 1995. Implementation of Biosafety Regulations in a Developing Country: The Case of Mexico. African Crop Science Journal 3 (6): 309-314.
17. Alvarez-Morales, Ariel. 2000. Mexico: Ensuring Environmental Safety while Benefiting from Biotechnology. In Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor: Proceedings of an International Conference, ed. G. J. Persley and Manuel Montecer Lantin, 90-96. Washington, DC: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research.
18. Andow, David A., and Claudia Zwahlen. 2006. Assessing Environmental Risks of Transgenic Plants. Ecology Letters 9: 196-214.
19. Andrée, Peter. 2002. The Biopolitics of Genetically Modified Organisms in Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies; Revue d'Etudes Canadiennes 37: 162-191.
20. Andrée, Peter. 2007. Genetically Modified Diplomacy: The Global Politics of Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
21. Andrée, Peter. 2011. Civil Society and the Political Economy of GMO Failures in Canada: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis. Environmental Politics 20 (6): 173-191.
22. Andrée, Peter, and Lucy Sharratt. 2004. Genetically Modified Organisms and Precaution: Is the Canadian Government Implementing the Royal Society of Canada's Recommendations? A Report on the Canadian Government's Response to the Royal Society of Canada's Expert Panel Report Entitled "Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada." Ottawa: Polaris Institute.
23. Antal, Edit. 2006. Lessons from NAFTA: The Role of the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation in Conciliating Trade and Environment. Michigan State Journal of International Law 14: 167-189.
24. Antoniou, Michael, Mohamed Ezz El-Din Mostafa Habib, C. Vyvyan Howard, Richard C. Jennings, Carlo Leifert, Rubens Onofre Nodari, Claire Robinson, and John Fagan. 2011. Roundup and Birth Defects: Is the Public Being Kept in the Dark? http://earthopensource.org/index.php/reports/17-roundup-and-birthdefects-is-the-public-being-kept-in-the-dark (accessed January 6, 2012).
25. Armstrong, Elizabeth A., and Mary Bernstein. 2008. Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements. Sociological Theory 26 (6): 74-99.
26. Associated Press. 2005. Saving Seed Is Latest Tech Piracy. Wired, January 14. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2005/01/66282 (accessed August 8, 2011).
27. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2005. Canola GM Contamination Traced to Tas Trial. http://www.abc.net.au/rural/content/2005/s1496131.htm (accessed June 22, 2007).
28. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2006. Human Error "Probable Cause" of GM Canola Mix-up. http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/2006/s1735224.htm (accessed July 1, 2007).
29. Babb, Sarah. 2005. The Social Consequences of Structural Adjustment: Recent Evidence and Current Debates. Annual Review of Sociology 31: 199-222.
30. Baker, Lauren E. 2008. Local Food Networks and Maize Agrodiversity Conservation: Two Case Studies from Mexico. Local Environment 13 (6): 235-251.
31. Ban Terminator. n.d. The Campaign. http://www.banterminator.org/The-Campaign (accessed July 13, 2011).
32. Ban Terminator Campaign. 2006. Terminator Seed Battle Begins: Farmers Face Billions of Dollars in Potential Costs. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/23 (accessed July 13, 2011).
33. Barcenas, Arturo Cruz. 2005. Fallo en contra de la comida mexicana como patrimonio de la humanidad. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2005/11/26/a10n1gas. php (accessed June 5, 2007).
34. Barkan, Steven E. 1985. Protesters on Trial: Criminal Justice in the Southern Civil Rights and Vietnam Antiwar Movements. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35. Barkan, Steven E. 2006. Criminal Prosecution and the Legal Control of Protest. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11 (6): 181-194.
36. Barkin, David. 1987. The End to Food Self-sufficiency in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives 14 (6): 271-297.
37. Barkin, David. 2002. The Reconstruction of a Modern Mexican Peasantry. Journal of Peasant Studies 30 (6): 73-90.
38. Barlett, Donald L., and James B. Steele. 2008. Monsanto's Harvest of Fear. Vanity Fair, May. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto 200805?currentPage=1 (accessed August 8, 2011).
39. Barreda, Andrés. 2003. Biopiracy, Bioprospecting, and Resistance: Four Cases in Mexico. In Contronting Globalization, ed. Timothy A. Wise, Hilda Salazar, and Laura Carlsen, 101-128. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
40. Barrett, Katherine, and Elisabeth A. Abergel. 2000. Breeding Familiarity: Environmental Risk Assessment for Genetically Engineered Crops in Canada. Science and Public Policy 27 (6): 2-12.
41. Barrett, Katherine, and Elisabeth A. Abergel. 2002. Defining a Safe Genetically Modified Organism: Boundaries of Scientific Risk Assessment. Science and Public Policy 29 (6): 47-58.
42. Barry, Tom. 1995. Zapata's Revenge: Free Trade and the Farm Crisis in Mexico. Boston: South End Press.
43. Bartra, Armando. 2003. Milpas of the Millennium: Where Will the Excluded Ones Go If the System Is Global? Research in Rural Sociology and Development 9: 35-42.
44. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
45. Beck, Ulrich. 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
46. Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.
47. Beckie, Hugh J., Suzanne I. Warwick, Harikumar Nair, and Ginette Seguin-Swartz. 2003. Gene Flow in Commercial Fields of Herbicide-Resistant Canola (Brassica Napus). Ecological Applications 13 (6): 1276-1294.
48. Bellon, Mauricio R., and Julien Berthaud. 2006. Traditional Mexican Agricultural Systems and the Potential Impacts of Transgenic Varieties on Maize Diversity. Agriculture and Human Values 23: 3-14.
49. Belson, Ken. 2011. Doubting Assurances, Japanese Find Radioactivity on Their Own. New York Times, August 1, A1.
50. Benda, Stan. 2003. The Sui Generis System for Plants in Canada: Quirks and Quarks of Seeds, Suckers, Splicing, and Brown-Bagging for the Novice. Canadian Intellectual Property Review 20: 323.
51. Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-639.
52. Benveniste, Guy. 1973. The Politics of Expertise. Berkeley: Glendessary Press.
53. Bereano, Philip L. 1997. Reflections of a Participant-Observer: The Technocratic/Democratic Contradiction in the Practice of Technology Assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (6): 163-175.
54. Bereano, Philip L., and Martin Phillipson. 2004. Goliath v. Schmeiser. Genewatch 17 (4).
55. Bernauer, Thomas. 2003. Genes, Trade, and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Bernhardt, Stephanie M. 2005. High Plains Drifting: Wind-Blown Seeds and the Intellectual Property Implications of the GMO Revolution. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 4 (6): 1-13.
57. Billings, Paul R., and Peter Shorett. 2007. Coping with Uncertainty: The Human Health Implications of GE Foods. In Genetically Engineered Crops: Interim Policies, Uncertain Legislation, ed. Iain E. P. Taylor, 75-90. New York: Haworth Food and Agricultural Products Press.
58. Bonanno, Alessandro, Lawrence Busch, William H. Friedland, Lourdes Gouveia, and Enzo Mingione, eds. 1994. From Columbus to ConAgra: The Globalization of Agriculture and Food. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
59. Bondera, Melanie, and Mark Query. 2006. Hawaiian Papaya: GMO Contaminated. http://www.hawaiiseed.org/downloads/publications-and-reports/Papaya-Contamination-Report.pdf/view (accessed August 25, 2011).
60. Boyd, William. 2003. Wonderful Potencies? Deep Structure and the Problem of Monopoly in Agricultural Biotechnology. In Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents, ed. Rachel A. Schurman and Dennis D. Takahashi Kelso, 24-62. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61. Brand, Ulrich, and Christoph Gorg. 2003. The State and the Regulation of Biodiversity: International Biopolitics and the Case of Mexico. Geoforum 34: 221-233.
62. Brookey, Robert Alan. 2002. Reinventing the Male Homosexual: The Rhetoric and Power of the Gay Gene. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
63. Brown, Jennifer. 2004. Ejidos and Comunidades in Oaxaca, Mexico: Impact of the 1992 Reforms. Reports on Foreign Aid and Development. Brandon, MB: Rural Development Institute.
64. Brown, Phil. 1987. Popular Epidemiology: Community Response to Toxic Waste-Induced Disease in Woburn, Massachusetts. Science, Technology, and Human Values 12 (6): 78-85.
65. Brown, Phil. 1992. Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 33 (6): 267-281.
66. Brown, Phil. 2007. Toxic Exposures: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Health Movement. New York: Columbia University Press.
67. Brown, Phil, Brian Mayer, Stephen Zavestoski, Theo Luebke, Joshua Mandelbaum, and Sabrina McCormick. 2003. The Health Politics of Asthma: Environmental Justice and Collective Illness Experience in the United States. Social Science and Medicine 57 (6): 453-464.
68. Brown, Phil, and Edwin J. Mikkelsen. 1990. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69. Brunk, Conrad G. 2006. Public Knowledge, Public Trust: Understanding the "Knowledge Deficit." Community Genetics 9: 178-183.
70. Brush, Stephen, and Michelle Chauvet. 2004. Assessment of Social and Cultural Effects Associated with Transgenic Maize Production. In Maize and Biodiversity: Background Volume. Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=2796 (accessed January 6, 2012).
71. Bullard, Robert D., ed. 2005. The Quest for Environmental Justice: Human Rights and the Politics of Pollution. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
72. Burdge, Rabel J. 2003. The Practice of Social Impact Assessment-Background. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21 (6): 84-88.
73. Burrell, Robert, and Stephen Hubicki. 2005. Patent Liability and Genetic Drift. Environmental Law Review 7 (6): 278-286.
74. Busch, Lawrence. 1991. Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic, and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
75. Busch, Lawrence, Valerie Gunter, Theodore Mentele, Masashi Tachikawa, and Keiko Tanaka. 1994. Socializing Nature: Technoscience and the Transformation of Rapeseed into Canola. Crop Science 34 (6): 607-614.
76. Busch, Lawrence, and Arunas Juska. 1997. Beyond Political Economy: Actor Networks and the Globalization of Agriculture. Review of International Political Economy 4 (6): 688-708.
77. Busch, Nathan A. 2002. Jack and the Beanstalk: Property Rights in Genetically Modified Plants. Minnesota Intellectual Property Review 3 (6): 1-235.
78. Buttel, Frederick H. 1995. The Global Impacts of Agricultural Biotechnology: A Post-Green Revolution Perspective. In Issues in Agricultural Bioethics, ed. T. B. Mepham, Gregory A. Tucker, and Julian Wiseman, 345-360. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
79. Buttel, Frederick H. 2005. The Environmental and Post-environmental Politics of Genetically Modified Crops and Foods. Environmental Politics 14 (6): 309-323.
80. Buttel, Frederick H., and Jill M. Belsky. 1987. Biotechnology, Plant Breeding, and Intellectual Property: Social and Ethical Dimensions. Science, Technology, and Human Values 12 (6): 31-49.
81. Buttel, Frederick H., J. Tadlock Cowan, Martin Kenney, and Jack Kloppenburg Jr. 1984. Biotechnology in Agriculture: The Political Economy of Agribusiness Reorganization and Industry-University Relationships. In Research in Rural Sociology and Development, ed. Harry Schwarzweller, 1: 315-348. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82. Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2001. Introduction: The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. In The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, ed. John L. Campbell and Ove K. Pedersen, 1-23. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83. Canola Council of Canada. 2008. Canola Socioeconomic Value Report. http://www.canolacouncil.org/canadian_canola_industry.aspx (accessed June 8, 2010).
84. Čapek, Stella M. 2000. Reframing Endometriosis: From "Career Woman's Disease" to Environment/Body Connections. In Illness and the Environment: A Reader in Contested Medicine, ed. Steve Kroll-Smith, Phil Brown, and Valerie J. Gunter, 345-363. New York: New York University Press.
85. Carolan, Michael S. 2008. From Patent Law to Regulation: The Ontological Gerrymandering of Biotechnology. Environmental Politics 17 (6): 749-765.
86. Carruthers, David V. 1996. Indigenous Ecology and the Politics of Linkage in Mexican Social Movements. Third World Quarterly 17 (6): 1007-1028.
87. Carruthers, David V. 1997. Agroecology in Mexico: Linking Environmental and Indigenous Struggles. Society & Natural Resources 10 (6): 259-272.
88. Castle, Linda A., Gusui Wu, and David McElroy. 2006. Agricultural Input Traits: Past, Present, and Future. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 17 (6): 105-112.
89. Caudill, David S., and Lewis H. LaRue. 2006. No Magic Wand: The Idealization of Science in Law. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
90. Center for Food Safety. 2000. The Hidden Health Hazards of Genetically Engineered Food. Food Safety Review. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/campaign/genetically-engineered-food/crops/other-resources (accessed May 18, 2011).
91. Center for Food Safety. 2005. Monsanto vs. U.S. Farmers. Washington, DC: Center for Food Safety.
92. Center for Food Safety. 2006. GE Alfalfa Lawsuit: Geertson Seed Farms, et al. v. Mike Johanns et al.-Executive Summary. http://www.centerforfoodsafety. org/campaign/genetically-engineered-food/crops/legal-actions (accessed May 18, 2011).
93. Center for Food Safety. 2007. Monsanto vs. U.S. Farmers: November 2007 Update. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/Monsanto%20November%20 2007%20update.pdf (accessed May 31, 2010).
94. Center for Food Safety. 2011a. Letter to Secretary Vilsack. http://www.centerforfoodsafety. org/campaign/genetically-engineered-food/crops/policy-comments (accessed May 18, 2011).
95. Center for Food Safety. 2011b. Press Release: Farmers and Consumer Groups File Lawsuit Challenging Genetically Engineered Alfalfa Approval. http://www. centerforfoodsafety.org/2011/03/18/farmers-and-consumer-groups-file-lawsuitchallenging-genetically-engineered-alfalfa-approval (accessed May 18, 2011).
96. Chandler, Jennifer A. 2007. The Autonomy of Technology: Do Courts Control Technology or Do They Just Legitimize Its Social Acceptance? Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society 27 (5): 339-348.
97. CIBIOGEM [Comisión Intersecretarial de Bioseguridad de los Organismos Genéticamente Modificados]. 2004. Comments by CIBIOGEM Technical Committee. In Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Montreal: Communications Department of the CEC Secretariat.
98. Clapp, Richard W. 2002. Popular Epidemiology in Three Contaminated Communities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584: 35.
99. Clark, E. Ann. 2004. So, Who Really Won the Schmeiser Decision. Paper presented to the National Farmers Union, June 10, Milverton, Ontario.
100. Cleveland, David A., Daniela Soleri, Flavio Aragón Cuevas, José Crossa, and Paul Gepts. 2005. Detecting (Trans)gene Flow to Landraces in Centers of Crop Origin: Lessons from the Case of Maize in Mexico. Environmental Biosafety Research 4: 197-208.
101. Cockrall-King, Jennifer. 2011. Bill C-474 Was Defeated in Canada and All I Got Was This Lousy Email from My MP. http://foodgirl.squarespace.com/book/2011/2/11/bill-c-474-was-defeated-in-canada-and-all-i-got-was-this-lou. html (accessed January 6, 2012).
102. Cohn, Avery, Jonathan Cook, Margarita Fernández, Rebecca Reider, and Corrina Steward, eds. 2006. Agroecology and the Struggle for Food Sovereignty in the Americas. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
103. Collier, George A., and Jane F. Collier. 2005. The Zapatista Rebellion in the Context of Globalization. Journal of Peasant Studies 32 (6): 450-460.
104. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2011a. About the Commission. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&SiteNodeID=310 (accessed May 22, 2011).
105. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2011b. Maize and Biodiversity. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&SiteNodeID=347 (accessed May 22, 2011).
106. Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on Guidelines for the Development of National Strategies and Best Practices to Ensure the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Farming. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/coexistence2/index_en.htm (accessed January 6, 2012).
107. Conko, Gregory, and Henry I. Miller. 2010. The Environmental Impact Subterfuge. Nature Biotechnology 28 (6): 1256-1258.
108. Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari, eds. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? New York: Zed Books.
109. Corburn, Jason. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
110. Cornelius, Wayne A., and David Myhre, eds. 1998. The Transformation of Rural Mexico: Reforming the Ejido Sector. San Diego: University of California Press.
111. Couch, Stephen R., and Steve Kroll-Smith. 2000. Environmental Movements and Expert Knowledge: Evidence for a New Populism. In Illness and the Environment: A Reader in Contested Medicine, ed. Steve Kroll-Smith, 384-408. New York: New York University Press.
112. Council of Canadians. 2003. Planting Seeds of Doubt. Canadian Perspectives. Spring. http://www.canadians.org/publications/CP/2003/spring/seeds.html (accessed June 28, 2007).
113. CP Wire. 2000. Monsanto Hired Saskatchewan Prof to See How Far Its Seeds Can Fly. June 8. http://www.biotech-info.net/monsanto_schmeiser.html (accessed June 28, 2007).
114. CropLife Canada. 2010. Canada's Plant Science Industry Decries Second Reading Passage of Bill C-474. http://www.croplife.ca/web/english/mediaroom/newsreleases/2010/2010april15.cfm (accessed June 8, 2010).
115. Cullet, Philippe. 2006. Liability and Redress for Modern Biotechnology. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 15: 165-195.
116. Dalton, Rex. 2001. Transgenic Corn Found Growing in Mexico. Nature 413 (6): 337.
117. de Beer, Jeremy. 2007. Rights and Responsibilities of Biotech Patent Owners. University of British Columbia Law Review 40: 343.
118. Delborne, Jason A. 2005. Pathways of Scientific Dissent in Agricultural Biotechnology. PhD diss., University of California at Berkeley.
119. Delborne, Jason A. 2008. Transgenes and Transgressions: Scientific Dissent as Heterogeneous Practice. Social Studies of Science 38 (6): 509-541.
120. DeSantis, S'ra. 2003. Control through Contamination: US Forcing GMO Corn and Free Trade on Mexico and Central America. Institute for Social Ecology Biotechnology Project and ACERCA. http://www.iatp.org/files/Control_Through_ Contamination.pdf (accessed January 6, 2012).
121. Desmarais, Annette-Aurélie. 2002. The Vía Campesina: Consolidating an International Peasant and Farm Movement. Journal of Peasant Studies 29 (6): 91-124.
122. Dona, Artemis, and Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis. 2009. Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 49 (6): 164-175.
123. Douglas, Mary. (1966) 1978. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
124. Downey, R. Keith. 2001. Scientific Societies Should Know Better. National Post (Canada), June 13, C19.
125. Downey, R. Keith, and Hugh J. Beckie. n.d. Report on Project Entitled Isolation Effectiveness in Canola Pedigree Seed Production. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
126. Dreifus, Claudia. 2008. A Conversation with Nina V. Fedoroff, an Advocate for Science Diplomacy. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/science/19conv.html (accessed August 25, 2011).
127. Drori, Gili S., and John W. Meyer. 2006. Global Scientization: An Environment for Expanded Organization. In Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, ed. Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang, 50-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128. Drori, Gili S., John W. Meyer, Francisco O. Ramirez, and Evan Schofer. 2003. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
129. Dunlap, Riley E., and Angela G. Mertig. 1992. The Evolution of the U.. Environmental Movement from 1970-1990: An Overview. Society and Natural Resources 4: 209-218.
130. Dyer, George A., J. Antonio Serratos-Hernández, Hugh R. Perales, Paul Gepts, Alma Piñeyro-Nelson, Angeles Chávez, Noé Salinas-Arreortua, Antonio Yúnez-Naude, J. Edward Taylor, and Elena R. Alvarez-Buylla. 2009. Dispersal of Transgenes through Maize Seed Systems in Mexico. PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5734.
131. Eaton, Emily. 2009. Getting behind the Grain: The Politics of Genetic Modification on the Canadian Prairies. Antipode 41 (6): 256-281.
132. Eaton, Emily. 2011. Let the Market Decide? Canadian Farmers Fight the Logic of Market Choice in GM Wheat. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 10 (6): 107-131.
133. Efe News Services. 2003. ONG encuentran maiz de variedad "Starlink" en campos mexicanos. October 9. www.lexisnexis.com (accessed January 7, 2012).
134. Elliott, Charlene D. 2006. Unlabelled: Law, Language, and Genetically Modified Foods in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication 31 (6): 247-254.
135. Ellstrand, Norman C. 2003. Dangerous Liaisons? When Cultivated Plants Mate with Their Wild Relatives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
136. Endres, A. Bryan, and Thomas P. Redick. 2006. Agricultural Regulatory Update: EPA Seeks CAFO Rule Comment and States Preempt Establishment of GM-Free Zones. Agricultural Management Committee Newsletter 10 (6): 2-6.
137. Environment Canada. 2004. Canadian Comments on the CEC Secretariat's Article 13 Report. In Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Montreal: Communications Department of the CEC Secretariat.
138. Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
139. Escobar, Arturo. 1998. Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements. Journal of Political Economy 5: 53-82.
140. Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
141. Esteva, Gustavo, and Catherine Marielle. 2003. Sin Maíz No Hay País. Mexico City: Museo Nacional de Culturas Populares.
142. ETC Group. 2003. Nine Mexican States Found to Be GM Contaminated. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/145 (accessed June 28, 2007).
143. ETC Group. 2004. Canadian Supreme Court Tramples Farmers' Rights-Affirms Corporate Monopoly on Higher Life Forms. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/106 (accessed June 11, 2010).
144. ETC Group. 2005. The Genetic Shell Game, or Now You See It! Now You Don't! http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/50/01/etcmaizenrfinal.pdf (accessed June 28, 2007).
145. ETC Group. n.d. ETC Group: A Brief History. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/about/History_of_etcgroup_page (accessed May 21, 2011).
146. European Stance on GMOs Condemned by the WTO. 2006. European Report, October 3, 61460. Academic One File (accessed March 14, 1012).
147. Ewen, Stanley W. B., and Arpad Pusztai. 1999. Effect of Diets Containing Genetically Modified Potatoes Expressing Galanthus Nivalis Lectin on Rat Small Intestine. Lancet 354 (6): 1353-1354.
148. Expert Panel of the Royal Society of Canada. 2001. Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada.
149. Eyerman, Ron, and Andrew Jamison. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
150. Ezcurra, Exequiel, and Jorge Soberón Mainero. 2002. Evidence of Gene Flow from Transgenic Maize to Local Varieties in Mexico. In LMOs and the Environment: Proceedings of an International Conference, ed. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 289-295. Paris: OECD.
151. Fairhead, James, and Melissa Leach. 2003. Science, Society, and Power: Environmental Knowledge and Policy in West Africa and the Caribbean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. Farnham, Timothy J. 2007. Saving Nature's Legacy: Origins of the Idea of Biological Diversity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
153. Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
154. Fitting, Elizabeth. 2006a. Importing Corn, Exporting Labor: The Neoliberal Corn Regime, GMOs, and the Erosion of Mexican Biodiversity. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (6): 15-26.
155. Fitting, Elizabeth. 2006b. The Political Uses of Culture: Maize Production and the GM Corn Debates in Mexico. Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 48: 17-34.
156. Fitting, Elizabeth. 2011. The Struggle for Maize: Campesinos, Workers, and Transgenic Corn in the Mexican Countryside. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
157. Fox, Jonathan. 1993. The Politics of Food in Mexico: State Power and Social Mobilization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
158. Freudenburg, William R. 1986. Social Impact Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 12: 451-478.
159. Frickel, Scott. 2004a. Building an Interdiscipline: Collective Action Framing and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology. Social Problems 51 (6): 269-287.
160. Frickel, Scott. 2004b. Chemical Consequences: Environmental Mutagens, Scientist Activism, and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
161. Frickel, Scott, Sahra Gibbon, Jeff Howard, Joanna Kempner, Gwen Ottinger, and David Hess. 2010. Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6): 444-473.
162. Friedmann, Harriet. 1982. The Political Economy of Food: The Rise and Fall of the Postwar International Food Order. American Journal of Sociology 88: S248-S286.
163. Friesen, Lyle F., Alison G. Nelson, and Rene C. Van Acker. 2003. Evidence of Contamination of Pedigreed Canola (Brassica Napus) Seedlots in Western Canada with Genetically Engineered Herbicide Resistance Traits. Agronomy Journal 95 (6): 1342-1347.
164. Furlanetto, Angela. 2003. The Harvard Mouse Case: Developments in the Patentability of Life Forms. June. http://www.cba.org/CBA/newsletters/ip-2003/ip2. aspx (accessed June 28, 2007).
165. Garforth, Kathryn, and Paige Ainslie. 2006. When Worlds Collide: Biotechnology Meets Organic Farming in Hoffman v Monsanto. Journal of Environmental Law 18 (6): 459-477.
166. Garforth, Kathryn, Hari Subramaniam, Aseet Dalvi, and Barbara Cuber. 2004. Case Note: Percy Schmeiser and Schmeier Enterprises Ltd. v. Monsanto Canada Inc. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 13 (3): 340-346.
167. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
168. Gilbreth, Chris, and Gerardo Otero. 2001. Democratization in Mexico: The Zapatista Uprising and Civil Society. Latin American Perspectives 28 (6): 7-29.
169. Glenn, Jane Matthews. 2004. Footloose: Civil Responsibility for GMO Gene Wandering in Canada. Washburn Law Journal 43: 547-573.
170. Goldman, Michael. 2004. Imperial Science, Imperial Nature: Environmental Knowledge for the World (Bank). In Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, ed. Sheila Jasanoff and Marybeth Long Martello, 55-80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
171. Gómez Alarcón, Tonantzin. 2000. Los OGTs Llegaron Ya: Los Organismos Geneticamente Transformados: un asunto ambiental, politico, social, etico y de salud. Mexico City: Grupo de Estudios Ambientales A.C.
172. González, Roberto J. 2001. Zapotec Science: Farming and Food in the Northern Sierra of Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.
173. González, Roberto J. 2006. GM Maize as Cultural Crisis: Reactions among Zapotec Farmers to Transgenic Crops. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Vancouver.
174. Goodman, David. 2000. Regulating Organic: A Victory of Sorts. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 211-213.
175. Goodman, David. 2003. The Brave New Worlds of Agricultural Technoscience: Changing Perspectives, Recurrent Themes, and New Research Directions in Agro-Food Studies. In Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents, ed. Rachel A. Schurman and Dennis Doyle Takahashi Kelso, 218-238. Berkeley: University of California Press.
176. Goodman, David, Bernardo Sorj, and John Wilkinson. 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development. New York: Basil Blackwell.
177. Goodman, David, and Michael J. Watts, eds. 1997. Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring. New York: Routledge.
178. Greenpeace International. 1999. Press Release: Greenpeace Confirms USA Is Introducing Transgenic Maize into Mexico (May 25, 1999). http://78.47.137.204/genet/1999/May/msg00104.html (accessed September 24, 2008).
179. Greenpeace International. 2004. Monsanto Wins Right to Genetic Pollution. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/features/monsanto-wins-rightto-pollute (accessed June 11, 2010).
180. Greenpeace International. 2006. Biggest Russian Food and Feed Importers Adopt GE Free Policy. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/press/releases/biggest-russian-food-and-fee (accessed July 7, 2011).
181. Greenpeace International. 2007. Say No to Genetic Engineering. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/agriculture/problem/genetic-engineering (accessed June 25, 2007).
182. Greenpeace International and GeneWatch UK. 2009. FP967 ("Triffid") Flax Has Been Grown Illegally in Canada and Exported around the Globe. http://www .gmcontaminationregister.org/index.php?content=nw_detail1 (accessed January 20, 2010).
183. Greenpeace International and GeneWatch UK. 2011. GM Contamination Register. http://gmcontaminationregister.org (accessed August 3, 2011).
184. Greenpeace México. 2001. Boletín 0194: Científicos de todo el mundo llaman a tomar medidas para detener la contaminación genética del maíz mexicano. November 29. Mexico City: Greenpeace Mexico.
185. Greenpeace México. 2005. Bolívar Zapata se burla de la Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. February 3. http://www.greenpeace.org/mexico/news/bol-var-zapata-seburla-de-la (accessed July 1, 2007).
186. Greenpeace México. 2007. Sin maíz no hay país... ¡Pon a México en tu boca! http://www.greenpeace.org/mexico/es/Noticias/2007/Julio/sin-ma-z-no-hay-pa-spon (accessed January 6, 2012).
187. Greenpeace México. 2011. Logros de Greenpeace México. http://www.green peace.org/mexico/es/Quienes-somos/Logros-de--Greenpeace--Mexico (accessed May 21, 2011).
188. Greenpeace México, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, and UNORCA. 2004. Boletín 0419: Avalan Comunidades Oaxaqueñas y ONG la Recomendación del Comité Público de la CCA sobre la Contaminación del Maíz. April 21. Mexico City: Greenpeace México.
189. Gruszczynski, Lukasz A. 2006. The Role of Science in Risk Regulation under the SPS Agreement. http://works.bepress.com/lukasz_gruszczynski/2 (accessed August 25, 2011).
190. Gupta, Aarti, and Robert Falkner. 2006. The Influence of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Comparing Mexico, China, and South Africa. Global Environmental Politics 6 (6): 23-55.
191. Guthman, Julie. 2004. Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
192. Guthman, Julie. 2007. The Polanyian Way? Voluntary Food Labels as Neoliberal Governance. Antipode 39 (6): 456-478.
193. Gutiérrez González, Alicia. 2010. The Protection of Maize under the Mexican Biosafety Law: Environment and Trade. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
194. Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
195. Hall, Linda. 2000. Pollen Flow between Herbicide-Resistant Brassica Napus Is the Cause of Multiple-Resistant B-Napus Volunteers. Weed Science 48 (6): 688-694.
196. Hartley, Matt. 2008. Grain Farmer Claims Moral Victory in Seed Battle Against Monsanto. The Globe and Mail (Canada). March 20. http://www.common dreams.org/archive/2008/03/20/7784 (accessed January 6, 2012).
197. Hartley, Sarah, and Grace Skogstad. 2005. Regulating Genetically Modified Crops and Foods in Canada and the United Kingdom: Democratizing Risk Regulation. Canadian Public Administration 48 (6): 305-327.
198. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
199. Harvey, Neil. 1998. The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land and Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
200. Hayden, Cori. 2003. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
201. Hays, Samuel P. 1987. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
202. Heffernan, William. 2000. Concentration of Ownership and Control in Agriculture. In Hungry for Profit: The Agribusiness Threat to Farmers, Food, and the Environment, ed. Fred Magdoff, John B. Foster, and Frederick H. Buttel. New York: Monthly Review Press Books.
203. Heller, Chaia. 2001. From Risk to Globalization: Discursive Shifts in the French Debate about GMOs. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (6): 25-28.
204. Heller, Chaia. 2004. Risky Science and Savoir Faire: Peasant Expertise in the French Debate over Genetically Modified Crops. In The Politics of Food, ed. Marianne Lien and Brigitte Nerlich, 81-99. New York: Berg.
205. Henriques, Gisele, and Raj Patel. 2003. Policy Brief No. 7: Agricultural Trade Liberalization and Mexico. Oakland, CA: Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy.
206. Henriques, Gisele, and Raj Patel. 2004. NAFTA, Corn, and Mexico's Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Oakland, CA: Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy.
207. Herbert, Martha R. 2005. Food Free of Genetic Engineering: More Than a Right. In Rights and Liberties in the Biotech Age: Why We Need a Genetic Bill of Rights, ed. Sheldon Krimsky and Peter Shorett, 57-70. Rowman and Littlefield.
208. Hess, David J. 1995. Science and Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts and Artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press.
209. Hess, David J. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Technology: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
210. Hess, David J. 2009. The Potentials and Limitations of Civil Society Research: Getting Undone Science Done. Sociological Inquiry 79 (6): 306-327.
211. Hess, David J., Steve Breyman, Nancy Campbell, and Brian Martin. 2008. Science, Technology, and Social Movements. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 473-498. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
212. Higgins, Vaughan, and Geoffrey A. Lawrence. 2005. Introduction: Globalization and Agricultural Governance. In Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation, ed. Vaughan Higgins and Geoffrey Lawrence. London: Routledge.
213. Hill, Stuart B., and Rod J. MacRae. 1992. Organic Farming in Canada. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 39 (6): 71-84.
214. Hoffman et al. v. Monsanto Canada Inc. et al. 2002. Affidavit of Dr. Rene Van Acker, Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Q.B. No. 67 of A.D. 2002.
215. Hoffman et al. v. Monsanto Canada Inc. et al. 2005a. Memorandum of Law on Behalf of the Prospective Appellants, Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, No. 1148.
216. Hoffman et al. v. Monsanto Canada Inc. et al. 2005b. Ruling of Judge G. A. Smith, Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan, 2005 SKQB 225.
217. Hoffman et al. v. Monsanto Canada Inc. et al. 2006. Factum on Behalf of the Appellants, Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, No. 1148.
218. Holbach, Martina, and Lindsay Keenan. 2005. No Market for GM Labelled Food in Europe. Greenpeace International. http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/Global/euunit/reports-briefings/2009/3/no-market-for-gm-labelled-food.pdf (accessed January 6, 2012).
219. Holt-Gimenez, Eric. 2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America's Farmer to Farmer Movement for Sustainable Agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
220. House Committee on Agriculture, US Congress. 2011. Press Release: Lucas, Chambliss, Roberts: USDA Sending Mixed Signals on Genetically Engineered Alfalfa. http://agriculture.house.gov/press/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1293 (accessed May 18, 2011).
221. Hubbard, Kristina, and Farmer to Farmer Campaign on Genetic Engineering. 2009. Out of Hand: Farmers Face the Consequences of a Consolidated Seed Industry. Stoughton, WI.
222. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. 2002. Position on Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms. http://www.ifoam.org/press/positions/ge-position.html (accessed June 9, 2010).
223. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. 2009. Principles of Organic Agriculture. http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/principles/index.html (accessed July 12, 2011).
224. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. 1997. The Indigenous World, 1996-97. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
225. Jackson, John P., Jr. 2001. Social Scientists for Social Justice: Making the Case against Segregation. New York: New York University Press.
226. James, Clive. 2009. ISAAA Brief 41-2009: Highlights-Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/41/highlights/default.asp (accessed June 8, 2010).
227. James, Clive. 2010a. Biotech Facts and Trends: Mexico. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/biotech_country_facts_and_trends/default.asp (accessed August 12, 2011).
228. James, Clive. 2010b. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2010-Executive Summary. ISAAA brief no. 42. Ithaca, NY.
229. Jamison, Andrew. 1996. The Shaping of the Global Environmental Agenda: The Role of Non-Governmental Organisations. In Risk, Environment, and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, ed. Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski, and Brian Wynne, 224-245. London: Sage Publications.
230. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
231. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
232. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva 41 (6): 223-244.
233. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
234. Jenkins, Craig, and Charles Perrow. 1977. Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972). American Sociological Review 42: 249-268.
235. Joint Public Advisory Committee. 2004. Re: Maize and Biodiversity Symposium of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp ?PageID=30101&ContentID=16038&SiteNodeID=282 (accessed January 6, 2012).
236. Jungcurt, Stefan, and Nicole Schabus. 2010. Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 19 (6): 197-206.
237. Juska, Arunas, and Lawrence Busch. 1994. The Production of Knowledge and the Production of Commodities: The Case of Rapeseed Technoscience. Rural Sociology 59 (6): 581-597.
238. Kaiser, Jocelyn. 2008. Is the Drought Over for Pharming? Science 320 (5875): 473.
239. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
240. Kenney, Martin, and Frederick H. Buttel. 1985. Biotechnology: Prospects and Dilemmas for Third World Development. Development and Change 16 (6): 61-91.
241. Khagram, Sanjeev. 2004. Dams and Development: Transnational Struggles for Water and Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
242. Khoury, Lara, and Stuart J. Smyth. 2005. Reasonable Foreseeability and Liability in Relation to Genetically Modified Organisms. Paper presented at the Ninth International Consortium of Applied Bioeconomy Research International Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology: Ten Years Later, July 6-10, Ravello, Italy.
243. Kinchy, Abby J. 2006. On the Borders of Post-War Ecology: Struggles over the Ecological Society of America's Preservation Committee, 1917-1946. Science as Culture 15: 23-44.
244. Kinchy, Abby J., and Daniel Lee Kleinman. 2003. Organizing Credibility: Discursive and Organizational Orthodoxy on the Borders of Ecology and Politics. Social Studies of Science 33 (6): 869-896.
245. Kinchy, Abby J., Daniel Lee Kleinman, and Robyn Autry. 2008. Against Free Markets, against Science? Regulating the Socioeconomic Effects of Biotechnology. Rural Sociology 73 (6): 147-179.
246. Kleinman, Daniel Lee, and Abby J. Kinchy. 2003. Boundaries in Science Policy Making: Bovine Growth Hormone in the European Union. Sociological Quarterly 44 (6): 577-595.
247. Kleinman, Daniel Lee, and Abby J. Kinchy. 2007. Against the Neoliberal Steamroller? The Biosafety Protocol and the Social Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnologies. Agriculture and Human Values 24 (6): 195-206.
248. Kleinman, Daniel Lee, Abby J. Kinchy, and Robyn Autry. 2009. Local Variation or Global Convergence in Agricultural Biotechnology Policy? A Comparative Analysis. Science and Public Policy 36 (6): 361-371.
249. Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph. (1988) 2005. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492-2000. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
250. Kloppenburg, Jack R. 2010. Impeding Dispossession, Enabling Repossession: Biological Open Source and the Recovery of Seed Sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (6): 367-388.
251. Kneen, Brewster. 1992. The Rape of Canola: The Social Construction of Canola, 1950-1992. Toronto: Dundurn Press Limited.
252. Kneen, Brewster. 2004. Court Confusion. Ram's Horn 221. http://ramshorn.ca/issue-221-june-2004 (accessed June 20, 2011).
253. Knuttila, Murray. 2003. Globalization, Economic Development, and Canadian Agricultural Policy. In Farm Communities at the Crossroads: Challenge and Resistance, ed. Harry P. Diaz, Joann Jaffe, and Robert Stirling, 289-302. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.
254. Kuyek, Devlin. 2002. The Real Board of Directors: The Construction of Biotechnology Policy in Canada, 1980-2002. Sorrento, BC: Ram's Horn.
255. Kuyek, Devlin. 2004. Stolen Seeds: The Privatisation of Canada's Agricultural Biodiversity. Sorrento, BC: Ram's Horn.
256. Kuyek, Devlin. 2007a. Good Crop/Bad Crop: Seed Politics and the Future of Food in Canada. Toronto: Between the Lines.
257. Kuyek, Devlin. 2007b. Sowing the Seeds of Corporate Agriculture: The Rise of Canada's Third Seed Regime. Studies in Political Economy 80: 31-54.
258. Law, Grace S., and Jennifer A. Marles. 2004. Monsanto v. Schmeiser: Patent Protection for Genetically Modified Genes and Cells in Canada. Health Law Review 13 (6): 44-47.
259. Leach, Melissa, and Ian Scoones. 2005. Science and Citizenship in a Global Context. In Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, ed. Melissa Leach, Ian Scoones, and Brian Wynne, 15-38. London: Zed Books.
260. Levidow, Les. 1998. Democratizing Technology-or Technologizing Democracy? Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe. Technology in Society 20 (6): 211-226.
261. Levidow, Les. 1999. Britain's Biotechnology Controversy: Elusive Science, Contested Expertise. New Genetics and Society 18 (6): 47-64.
262. Levidow, Les. 2001. The GM Crops Debate: Utilitarian Bioethics? Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 12 (1): 44-55.
263. Levidow, Les. 2002. Ignorance-Based Risk Assessment? Scientific Controversy over GM Food Safety. Science as Culture 11 (6): 61-67.
264. Levidow, Les. 2003. Precautionary Risk Assessment of Bt Maize: What Uncertainties? Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 83 (2): 113-117.
265. Levidow, Les, and Susan Carr. 1997. How Biotechnology Regulation Sets a Risk/Ethics Boundary. Agriculture and Human Values 14 (6): 29-43.
266. Levidow, Les, Joseph Murphy, and Susan Carr. 2007. Recasting "Substantial Equivalence": Transatlantic Governance of GM Food. Science, Technology, and Human Values 32: 26-64.
267. Lezaun, Javier. 2004. Pollution and the Use of Patents: A Reading of Monsanto v. Schmeiser. In Biotechnology: Between Commerce and Civil Society, ed. Nico Stehr, 135-158. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
268. Lezaun, Javier. 2006. Creating a New Object of Government: Making Genetically Modified Organisms Traceable. Social Studies of Science 36: 499-531.
269. Lind, David, and Elizabeth Barham. 2004. The Social Life of the Tortilla: Food, Cultural Politics, and Contested Commodification. Agriculture and Human Values 21 (6): 47-60.
270. Lockie, Stewart. 2001. SIA in Review: Setting the Agenda for Impact Assessment in the 21st Century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19 (6): 277-287.
271. Lynch, Michael, and Simon Cole. 2005. Science and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise. Social Studies of Science 35 (6): 269-311.
272. Maasen, Sabine, and Peter Weingart, eds. 2005. Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Dordrecht: Springer.
273. Magnan, Andre. 2007. Strange Bedfellows: Contentious Coalitions and the Politics of GM Wheat. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology/La Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d'Anthropologie 44 (6): 289-317.
274. Marielle, Catherine, and Lizy Peralta. 2007. La Contaminación Transgénica del Maíz en México: Luchas Civiles en Defensa del Maíz y de la Soberanía Alimentaria. Mexico City: Grupo de Estudios Ambientales.
275. Martinez Gómez, Francisco, and Robert Torres. 2001. Hegemony, Commodification, and the State: Mexico's Shifting Discourse on Agricultural Germplasm. Agriculture and Human Values 18 (6): 285-294.
276. Mascarenhas, Michael. 2007. Where the Waters Divide: First Nations, Tainted Water, and Environmental Justice in Canada. Local Environment 12 (6): 565-577.
277. Mascarenhas, Michael, and Lawrence Busch. 2006. Seeds of Change: Intellectual Property Rights, Genetically Modified Soybeans and Seed Saving in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis 46 (6): 122-138.
278. Masood, Ehsan. 1996. Liability Clause Blocks Talks on Biosafety Protocol. Nature 382 (6): 384.
279. Massieu Trigo, Yolanda Cristina, and San Vicente Tello Adelita. 2006. El proceso de aprobación de la ley de bioseguridad: Política a la mexicana e interés nacional. El Cotidiano 21 (6): 39-51.
280. Mauro, Ian J., and Stéphane M. McLachlan. 2008. Farmer Knowledge and Risk Analysis: Postrelease Evaluation of Herbicide Tolerant Canola in Western Canada. Risk Analysis 28 (6): 463-476.
281. Mauro, Ian J., Stéphane M. McLachlan, and Rene C. Van Acker. 2009. Farmer Knowledge and A Priori Risk Analysis: Pre-release Evaluation of Genetically Modified Roundup Ready Wheat across the Canadian Prairies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 16 (6): 689-701.
282. McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
283. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
284. McAfee, Kathleen. 2003. Corn Culture and Dangerous DNA: Real and Imagined Consequences of Maize Transgene Flow in Oaxaca. Journal of Latin American Geography 2 (6): 18-42.
285. McAfee, Kathleen. 2008. Beyond Techno-Science: Transgenic Maize in the Fight over Mexico's Future. Geoforum 39 (6): 148-160.
286. McCann, Michael. 2006. Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives. American Review of Law and Social Science 2: 17-38.
287. McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212-1241.
288. McCormick, Sabrina. 2006. The Brazilian Anti-Dam Movement: Knowledge Contestation as Communicative Action. Organization and Environment 19 (6): 321-346.
289. McCormick, Sabrina, Phil Brown, and Stephen Zavestoski. 2003. The Personal Is Scientific, the Scientific Is Political: The Public Paradigm of the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement. Sociological Forum 18 (6): 545-576.
290. McGloughlin, Martina. 1999. Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World. AgBioForum 2 (6): 163-174.
291. McLeod-Kilmurray, Heather. 2007. Hoffman v. Monsanto: Courts, Class Actions, and Perceptions of the Problem of GM Drift. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society 27 (6): 188-201.
292. McMichael, Philip, ed. 1995. Food and Agrarian Orders in the World-Economy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
293. McMichael, Philip. 2007. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
294. Mellon, Margaret. 2004. Seeds of Doubt. Catalyst: The Magazine of the Union of Concerned Scientists 3 (1): 5-6, 12.
295. Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
296. Mercer, Kristin L., and Joel D. Wainwright. 2008. Gene Flow from Transgenic Maize to Landraces in Mexico: An Analysis. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 123 (6): 109-115.
297. Mezzalama, Monica, Jonathan H. Crouch, and Rodomiro Ortiz. 2010. Monitoring the Threat of Unintentional Transgene Flow into Maize Gene Banks and Breeding Materials. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 13 (6): 6-7.
298. Miller, Clark A. 2001. Challenges in the Application of Science to Global Affairs: Contingency, Trust, and Moral Order. In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, ed. Clark A. Miller and Paul N. Edwards, 247-285. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
299. Mills, Lisa N. 2002. Science and Social Context: The Regulation of Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone in North America. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
300. Millstone, Erik, Eric Brunner, and Sue Mayer. 1999. Beyond "Substantial Equivalence." Nature 401 (6753): 525-526.
301. Mohammed, Emir Aly Crowne. 2006. Rounding Up Plant Patents and Other Growing Patent Concerns: The Canadian Teachings of Monsanto v. Schmeiser. Social Science Research Network, July 11.
302. Monsanto. 2004. Monsanto to Realign Research Portfolio, Development of Roundup Ready Wheat Deferred. May 10. http://monsanto.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=241 (accessed June 28, 2007).
303. Monsanto. 2011a. Dave Runyon. http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/Pages/dave-runyon.aspx (accessed June 21, 2011).
304. Monsanto. 2011b. Monsanto's Commitment: Farmers and Patents. http://www .monsanto.com/newsviews/Pages/commitment-farmers-patents.aspx (accessed June 16, 2011).
305. Monsanto v. Schmeiser. 2000. Trial Brief on Behalf of the Defendants, Percy Schmeiser and Schmeiser Enterprises Ltd., Federal Court, Trial Division, Court File No. T-1593-98.
306. Monsanto v. Schmeiser. 2001. Reasons for Judgment, Judge W. Andrew MacCay, FCT 256.
307. Monsanto v. Schmeiser. 2004. Supreme Court of Canada, Judgment of 21 May, SCC 34.
308. Mooney, Pat Roy. 1979. Seeds of the Earth: A Private or Public Resource? Ottawa: Inter Pares.
309. Moore, Kelly. 1996. Organizing Integrity: American Science and the Creation of Public Interest Organizations, 1955-1975. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1592-1627.
310. Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
311. Moore, Kelly, Daniel Lee Kleinman, David Hess, and Scott Frickel. 2010. Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach. Theory and Society 40 (6): 505-532.
312. Morello-Frosch, Rachel, Stephen Zavestoski, Phil Brown, Rebecca Gasior Altman, Sabrina McCormick, and Brian Mayer. 2006. Embodied Health Movements: Responses to a "Scientized" World. In The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power, ed. Scott Frickel and Kelly Moore, 244-271. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
313. Morrow, A. David, and Colin B. Ingram. 2005. Of Transgenic Mice and Roundup Ready Canola: The Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada in Harvard College v. Canada and Monsanto v. Schmeiser. UBC Law Review 38 (6): 189-222.
314. Morton, Roger. 2005. Mexican Government Studies on Transgenes in Mexican Maize? AgBioView. http://www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index. php?caseid=archive&newsid=2435 (accessed January 6, 2012).
315. Müller, Birgit. 2006. Infringing and Trespassing Plants: Patented Seeds at Dispute in Canada's Courts. Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 48: 83-98.
316. Murphy, Joseph, and Les Levidow. 2006. Governing the Transatlantic Conflict over Agricultural Biotechnology: Contending Coalitions, Trade Liberalisation, and Standard Setting. New York: Routledge.
317. Nadal, Alejandro. 2002. Corn in NAFTA: Eight Years After-A Research Report Prepared for the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation. http://www.cec.org/files/pdf/ECONOMY/Corn-NAFTA_en.pdf (accessed June 26, 2007).
318. Nadal, Alejandro. 2003. Corn in NAFTA Eight Years After: Effects on Mexican Biodiversity. In Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, ed. David L. Markell and John H. Knox, 152-172. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
319. Nadal, Alejandro. 2006. Ventana de oportunidad. http://www.jornada.unam. mx/2006/10/18/index.php?section=opinion&article=033a1eco (accessed January 6, 2012).
320. National Farmers Union. 2000. National Farmers Union Policy on Genetically Modified (GM) Foods. http://www.nfu.ca/policy/GM_FOOD_POLICY.misc.pdf (accessed June 26, 2007).
321. National Research Council. 2004. Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
322. Nickel, Rod. 2010. Canada Moves to Revive Flax Exports after GMO Flap. January 8. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2010/01/08/flax-canada-gmoidUKN0824305620100108 (accessed January 6, 2012).
323. NGO/CSO Forum for Food Sovereignty. 2002. Food Sovereignty: A Right for All. http://www.foodsovereignty.org/Resources/Archive/Forum.aspx (accessed January 6, 2012).
324. O'Brien, Amanda. 2011. Farmer Sues over GM Taint. The Australian, July 28. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/farmer-sues-over-gm-taint/storye6frg6nf-1226103022356 (accessed January 6, 2012).
325. O'Rourke, Dara, and Gregg P. Macey. 2003. Community Environmental Policing: Assessing New Strategies of Public Participation in Environmental Regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22 (6): 383-414.
326. Ochoa, Enrique C. 2000. Feeding Mexico: The Political Uses of Food since 1910. Wilmington, DE: SR Books.
327. Offe, Claus. 1985. New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics. Sociological Research 52: 817-868.
328. Oliver, Pamela E. 2008. Repression and Crime Control: Why Social Movement Scholars Should Pay Attention to Mass Incarceration as a Form of Repression. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 13 (6): 1-24.
329. Olson, R. Dennis. 2005. Hard Red Spring Wheat at a Genetic Crossroad: Rural Prosperity or Corporate Hegemony? In Controversies in Science and Technology: From Maize to Menopause, ed. Daniel Lee Kleinman, Abby J. Kinchy and Jo Handelsman, 150-168. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
330. Organic Agriculture Protection Fund. 2002. Organic Farmers Gain Key Piece of Evidence in Class Action. http://oapf.saskorganic.com/news.html (accessed January 6, 2012).
331. Organic Agriculture Protection Fund. 2008. Individual Action Not the Way to Go. http://oapf.saskorganic.com (accessed July 13, 2011).
332. Ortiz-García, Sol, Exequiel Ezcurra, B. Schoel, Francisca Acevedo, Jorge Soberón Mainero, and Allison A. Snow. 2005. Absence of Detectable Transgenes in Local Landraces of Maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 12338-12343.
333. Ottinger, Gwen. 2010. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6): 244-270.
334. Overdevest, Christine, and Brian Mayer. 2008. Harnessing the Power of Information through Community Monitoring: Insights from Social Science. Texas Law Review 86 (6): 1493-1526.
335. Paarlberg, Robert L. 2002. The Real Threat to GM Crops in Poor Countries: Consumer and Policy Resistance to GM Foods in Rich Countries. Food Policy 27 (6): 247-250.
336. Paarlberg, Robert L. 2008. Starved for Science: How Biotechnology Is Being Kept Out of Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
337. Parthasarathy, Shobita. 2010. Breaking the Expertise Barrier: Understanding Activist Strategies in Science and Technology Policy Domains. Science and Public Policy 37 (6): 355-367.
338. Parthasarathy, Shobita. 2011. Whose Knowledge? What Values? The Comparative Politics of Patenting Life Forms in the United States and Europe. Policy Sciences 44 (6): 267-288.
339. Pearson, Thomas. 2009. On the Trail of Living Modified Organisms: Environmentalism within and against Neoliberal Order. Cultural Anthropology 24 (6): 712-745.
340. Pechlaner, Gabriela, and Gerardo Otero. 2008. The Third Food Regime: Neoliberal Globalism and Agricultural Biotechnology in North America. Sociologia Ruralis 48 (6): 351-371.
341. Pelletier, David L. 2005. Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties. Nutrition Reviews 63 (6): 210-223.
342. Pelletier, David L. 2006. FDA's Regulation of Genetically Engineered Foods: Scientific, Legal, and Political Dimensions. Food Policy 31 (6): 570-591.
343. Perez, U. Matilde. 2003. Transgénico prohibido para consumo humano contaminó maíz en 9 estados. La Jornada, October 9. http://www.jornada.unam. mx/2003/10/09/044n1soc.php?origen=index.html&fly=2 (accessed January 6, 2012).
344. Phillips, Catherine. 2009. Canada's Evolving Seed Regime: Relations of Industry, State, and Seed Savers. Environments: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 36 (6): 5-18.
345. Phillips, Peter W. B. 2003. The Economic Impact of Herbicide Tolerant Canola in Canada. In The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective, ed. Nicholas G. Kalaitzandonakes, 119-139. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
346. Phillips, Peter W. B., and Grant E. Isaac. 2001. Regulating International Trade in Knowledge-Based Products. In The Biotechnology Revolution in Global Agriculture: Invention, Innovation, and Investment in the Canola Sector, ed. Peter W. B. Phillips and George G. Khachatourians. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
347. Phillips, Peter W. B., and Stuart J. Smyth. 2004. Managing the Value of New-Trait Varieties in the Canola Supply Chain in Canada. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 9 (6): 313-322.
348. Phillipson, Martin. 2001. Agricultural Law: Containing the GM Revolution. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 48: 2-5. http://www.biotech-monitor. nl/4802.htm (accessed January 6, 2012).
349. Piñeyro-Nelson, Alma, Joost Van Heerwaarden, Hugo R. Perales, J. Antonio Serratos-Hernández, A. Rangel, M. B. Hufford, Paul Gepts, A. Garay Arroyo, R. Rivera Bustamante, and Elena R. Álvarez-Buylla. 2009a. Resolution of the Mexican Transgene Detection Controversy: Error Sources and Scientific Practice in Commercial and Ecological Contexts. Molecular Ecology 18 (6): 4145-4150.
350. Piñeyro-Nelson, Alma, Joost Van Heerwaarden, Hugo R. Perales, J. Antonio Serratos-Hernández, A. Rangel, M. B. Hufford, Paul Gepts, A. Garay Arroyo, R. Rivera Bustamante, and Elena R. Álvarez-Buylla. 2009b. Transgenes in Mexican Maize: Molecular Evidence and Methodological Considerations for GMO Detection in Landrace Populations. Molecular Ecology 18 (6): 750-761.
351. Poitras, Manuel. 2008a. Social Movements and Techno-Democracy: Reclaiming the Genetic Commons. In Food for the Few: Neoliberal Globalism and Biotechnology in Latin America, ed. Gerardo Otero, 267-287. Austin: University of Texas Press.
352. Poitras, Manuel. 2008b. Unnatural Growth: The Political Economy of Biotechnology in Mexico. In Food for the Few: Neoliberal Globalism and Biotechnology in Latin America, ed. Gerardo Otero, 115-133. Austin: University of Texas Press.
353. Prakash, Aseem, and Kelly Kollman. 2003. Biopolitics in the EU and the US: A Race to the Bottom or Convergence to the Top? International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 617-641.
354. Prakash, C. S. 2005. Duh... No GM Genes in Mexican Corn. AgBioView, August 9. http://www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index.php?caseid=archive&newsid =2398 (accessed January 6, 2012).
355. Preibisch, Kerry L., Gladys Rivera Herrejon, and Steve L. Wiggins. 2002. Defending Food Security in a Free-Market Economy: The Gendered Dimensions of Restructuring in Rural Mexico. Human Organization 61 (6): 68-79.
356. Price, Don K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
357. Provincial Court of Saskatchewan. 2005. Schmeiser v. Monsanto SC 18/04.
358. Prudham, Scott. 2007. The Fictions of Autonomous Invention: Accumulation by Dispossession, Commodification and Life Patents in Canada. Antipode 39 (6): 406-429.
359. Prudham, Scott, and Angela Morris. 2006. "Making the Market Safe" for GM Foods: The Case of the Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee. Studies in Political Economy 78: 145-175.
360. Public Patent Foundation. 2011. First Amended Complaint: Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, et al. v. Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology. http://www.pubpat.org/monsanto-seed-patents.htm (accessed January 6, 2012).
361. Puricelli, Sonia. 2010. El Movimiento el Campo No Aguanta Más: Auge, Contradicciones y Declive (México 2002-2004). Mexico: Plaza y Valdés.
362. Qualman, Darrin. 2001. The Farm Crisis and Corporate Power. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
363. Qualman, Darrin, and Nettie Wiebe. 2002. The Structural Adjustment of Canadian Agriculture. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
364. Quist, David, and Ignacio H. Chapela. 2001. Transgenic DNA Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414 (6): 541-543.
365. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (6): 277-309.
366. Red en Defensa del Maíz. 2009. No to Transgenic Maize! (English Version). http://endefensadelmaiz.org/No-to-transgenic-maize.html (accessed January 6, 2012).
367. Redlin, David. 2003. Rationale for U.S. Changes to the Terms of Reference. Comments on the Terms of Reference and Provisional Outline for the CEC Secretariat's Article 13 Report Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=2791 (accessed January 6, 2012).
368. Reuters. 2003. La batalla en México vs. maíz transgénico. El Universal, October 23, 2-B.
369. Ribeiro, Silvia. 2009. Monitoreo Infecto. La Jornada, August 1. http://www .jornada.unam.mx/2009/08/01/index.php?section=opinion&article=025a1eco (accessed June 3, 2011).
370. Rieger, Mary A., Michael Lamond, Christopher Preston, Stephen B. Powles, and Richard T. Roush. 2002. Pollen-Mediated Movement of Herbicide Resistance between Commercial Canola Fields. Science 296 (6): 2386-2388.
371. Right Livelihood Award Foundation. 2007. Percy and Louise Schmeiser. http://www.rightlivelihood.org/schmeiser.html (accessed June 11, 2010).
372. Robertson, Sean. 2005. Re-Imagining Economic Alterity: A Feminist Critique of the Juridical Expansion of Bioproperty in the Monsanto Decision at the Supreme Court of Canada. University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal 2 (6): 227-253.
373. Rodgers, Christopher P. 2003. Liability for the Release of GMOs into the Environment: Exploring the Boundaries of Nuisance. Cambridge Law Journal 62 (6): 371-402.
374. Rosenburg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
375. Sanchez Albarrán, Armando. 2004. Del movimiento ¡El campo no aguanta más! a las movilizaciones sociales en la cumbre de la OMC en Cancún. Dependencia o soberanía alimentaria: ésa es la cuestión... agraria. El Cotidiano 124.
376. Sarewitz, Daniel. 2004. How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse. Environmental Science and Policy 7 (6): 385-403.
377. Saskatchewan Organic Directorate. 2006. Recent Activities and Achievements Report. http://saskorganic.com/article/recent-activities-and-achievements-report (accessed January 6, 2012).
378. Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
379. Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
380. Schurman, Rachel A. 2003. Introduction: Biotechnology in the New Millennium. In Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents, ed. Rachel A. Schurman and Dennis Doyle Takahashi Kelso, 1-23. Berkeley: University of California Press.
381. Schurman, Rachel. 2004. Fighting "Frankenfoods": Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe. Social Problems 51 (6): 243-268.
382. Schurman, Rachel A., and William Munro. 2006. Ideas, Thinkers, and Social Networks: The Process of Grievance Construction in the Anti-Genetic Engineering Movement. Theory and Society 35 (6): 1-38.
383. Schurman, Rachel A., and William A. Munro. 2010. Fighting for the Future of Food: Activists versus Agribusiness in the Struggle over Biotechnology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
384. Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation [CEC]. 2004. Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Montreal: Communications Department of the CEC Secretariat.
385. Seidman, Gay W. 2007. Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
386. Serratos-Hernández, José-Antonio, José-Luis Gómez-Olivares, Noé Salinas-Arreortua, Enrique Buendía-Rodríguez, Fabián Islas-Gutiérrez, and Ana de-Ita. 2007. Transgenic Proteins in Maize in the Soil Conservation Area of Federal District, México. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (5): 247-252.
387. Shane, Kristen. 2010. Biotechnology Agriculture Industry Lobbies Hard against Atamanenko's Private Member's Bill. http://gefreebc.wordpress.com/2010/10/01/bill-c-474-alex-atamanenko-cban (accessed July 10, 2011).
388. Sharratt, Lucy. 2001. No to Bovine Growth Hormone: Ten Years of Resistance in Canada. In Redesigning Life?: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, ed. Brian Tokar. London: Zed Books.
389. Shiva, Vandana. 1995. Biotechnological Development and the Conservation of Biodiversity. In Biopolitics: A Feminist and Ecological Reader on Biotechnology, ed. Vandana Shiva and Ingunn Moser, 193-213. London: Zed Books.
390. Smits, Martijntje. 2006. Taming Monsters: The Cultural Domestication of New Technology. Technology in Society 28: 489-504.
391. Smyth, Stuart J., and Drew L. Kershen. 2006. Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives. Global Jurist Advances 6 (6): 1-78.
392. Snow, Allison. 2009. Unwanted Transgenes Re-discovered in Oaxacan Maize. Molecular Ecology 18 (6): 569-571.
393. Snow, Allison A., David A. Andow, Paul Gepts, Eric M. Hallerman, A. Power, James M. Tiedje, and L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger. 2005. Genetically Engineered Organisms and the Environment: Current Status and Recommendations. Ecological Applications 15 (6): 377-404.
394. Soleri, Daniela, David A. Cleveland, and Flavio Aragón Cuevas. 2006. Transgenic Crops and Crop Varietal Diversity: The Case of Maize in Mexico. Bioscience 56 (6): 503-513.
395. Stabinsky, Doreen. 2000. Bringing Social Analysis into a Multilateral Environmental Agreement: Social Impact Assessment and the Biosafety Protocol. Journal of Environment and Development 9 (6): 260.
396. Stokstad, Erik. 2002. A Little Pollen Goes a Long Way. Science 296, June 28, 2314.
397. Straka, Allison M. 2010. Geertson Seed Farms v. Johanns: Why Alfalfa Is Not the Only Little Rascal for Bio-Agriculture Law. Villanova Environmental Law Journal 21: 383-407.
398. Stringam, G. R., and R. K. Downey. 1982. Effectiveness of Isolation Distances in Seed Production of Rapeseed (Brassica napus). Agronomy Abstracts: 136-137.
399. Suzuki, David. 2000. Experimenting with Life. http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/food-for-life/356 (accessed January 6, 2012).
400. Swenarchuk, Michelle, and Canadian Environmental Law Association. 2003. The Harvard Mouse and All That: Life Patents in Canada: CELA Publication no. 454.
401. Takacs, David. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
402. Tanaka, Keiko, Arunas Juska, and Lawrence Busch. 1999. Globalization of Agricultural Production and Research: The Case of the Rapeseed Subsector. Sociologia Ruralis 39 (6): 54.
403. Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
404. Taverne, Dick. 2005. The March of Unreason: Science, Democracy, and the New Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
405. Taylor, Arnold. 2010. Submission on Bill C-474 from Organic Farmer Arnold Taylor, addressed to Alex Atamanenko, MP for BC Southern Interior. http://oapf. saskorganic.com/pdf/Arnold_Taylor_C-474.pdf (accessed July 10, 2011).
406. Taylor, Michael R., and Jody S. Tick. 2001. The StarLink Case: Issues for the Future. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future/Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology.
407. Tesh, Sylvia Noble. 2000. Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
408. Third World Network. 2002. Sustainability at the Crossroads: Which Way Forward? http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/twr145h.htm (accessed June 11, 2010).
409. Thompson, C. E., G. Squire, G. R. Mackay, J. E. Bradshaw, J. Crawford, and G. Ramsay. 1999. Regional Patterns of Gene Flow and Its Consequences for GM Oilseed Rape. In Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, ed. P. J. W. Lutman, 95-100. British Crop Protection Council Conference Proceedings 72. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council.
410. Tickell, Adam, and Jamie Peck. 2003. Making Global Rules: Globalisation or Neoliberalisation? In Remaking the Global Economy: Economic-Geographical Perspectives, ed. Jamie Peck and Henry Wai-Chung Yeung, 163-181. London: Sage.
411. Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
412. Touraine, Alain. 1981. The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
413. Turner, R. Stephen. 2001. On Telling Regulatory Tales: rBST Comes to Canada. Social Studies of Science 31 (6): 475-506.
414. Turnley, Jessica Glicken. 2002. Social, Cultural, Economic Impact Assessments: A Literature Review Prepared for the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/commu nity/involvement.htm (accessed January 6, 2012).
415. Turrent, Antonio, and Jose Antonio Serratos. 2004. Context and Background on Maize and Its Wild Relatives in Mexico. In Maize and Biodiversity: Background Volume. Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. http://www.cec. org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=2796 (accessed January 6, 2012).
416. UNEP Biosafety Working Group. 1997. Compilation of Government Submissions of Draft Text on Selected Items. UNEP/CBD/BSWG/3/3, August 15.
417. Unión de Científicos Comprometidos con la Sociedad. 2009. Letter Addressed to President of Mexico, Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa (English Translation). http://www.uccs.mx/doc/g/sciencetrmaize (accessed June 3, 2011).
418. Union of Concerned Scientists. 2002. Risks of Genetic Engineering. http://www .ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/impacts_genetic_engi neering/risks-of-genetic-engineering.html (accessed May 18, 2011).
419. Union of Concerned Scientists. 2003. Genetic Engineering Techniques. http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/science/genetic-en gineering-techniques.html (accessed May 18, 2011).
420. US Department of Agriculture. 2010. Glyphosate-Tolerant Alfalfa Events J101 and J163: Request for Nonregulated Status-Final Environmental Impact Statement. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/alfalfa/gt_alfalfa%20_feis. pdf (accessed January 6, 2012).
421. Van Acker, Rene C. 2004. Letter from Dr. Rene Van Acker to the Chief Justice of Canada regarding the Supreme Court of Canada's Ruling on the Case of Schmeiser vs. Monsanto. GRAIN. http://www.grain.org/research/contamination. cfm?id=172 (accessed May 31, 2010).
422. Vanclay, Frank. 2006. Principles for Social Impact Assessment: A Critical Comparison between the International and US Documents. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (6): 3-14.
423. Vera Herrera, Ramón. 2004. En Defensa del Maíz (y el Futuro): Una Autogestión Invisible. Citizen Action in the Americas Series 13. Program of the Americas, Interhemispheric Resource Center. http://www.cipamericas.org/archives/1020 (accessed January 6, 2012).
424. Villar, Juan Lopez. 2001. Hands Off Our Seeds! Farmers' Rights Threatened by Biotech Industry. Link 97. http://www.foei.org/en/resources/link/97/e9717. html/?searchterm=percy%20schmeiser (accessed June 11, 2010).
425. Vilsack, Thomas J. 2010. Open Letter to Stakeholders. US Department of Agriculture. http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true &contentid=2010/12/0674.xml (accessed January 6, 2012).
426. Wainwright, Joel D., and Kristin L. Mercer. 2011. Transnational Transgenes: The Political Ecology of Maize in Mexico. In Global Political Ecology, ed. Richard Peet, Paul Robbins, and Michael J. Watts, 412-430. New York: Routledge.
427. Warick, Jason. 2001. GM Flax Seed Yanked Off Canadian Market-Rounded Up, Crushed. StarPhoenix, June 23. http://www.rense.com/general11/gm.htm (accessed July 6, 2011).
428. Warick, Jason. 2003. Lining Up against GM Wheat. Saskatoon StarPhoenix, August 9, E1.
429. Weber, Max. 1991. Science as a Vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans Heinrich Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press. Originally published in 1919.
430. Willer, Helga, and Lukas Kilcher, eds. 2011. The World of Organic Agriculture-Statistics and Emerging Trends 2011. Bonn: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements.
431. Winickoff, David E., and Douglas M. Bushey. 2010. Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius. Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6): 356.
432. Winickoff, David, Sheila Jasanoff, Lawrence Busch, and Robin Grove-White. 2005. Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law. Yale Journal of International Law 30: 81.
433. Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
434. Wirth, John D. 2003. Perspectives on the Joint Public Advisory Committee. In Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, ed. David L. Markell and John H. Knox, 199-215. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
435. Wise, Timothy A. 2007. Policy Space for Mexican Maize: Protecting Agro-Biodiversity by Promoting Rural Livelihoods (Working Paper No. 07-01). Global Development and Environment Institute: Tufts University.
436. Woodhouse, Edward, David Hess, Steve Breyman, and Brian Martin. 2002. Science Studies and Activism: Possibilities and Problems for Reconstructivist Agendas. Social Studies of Science 32 (6): 297-319.
437. Wu, Felicia, and William P. Butz. 2004. The Future of Genetically Modified Crops: Lessons from the Green Revolution. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
438. Wynne, Brian. 2007. Risky Delusions: Misunderstanding Science and Misperforming Publics in the GE Crops Issue. In Genetically Engineered Crops: Interim Policies, Uncertain Legislation, ed. Iain E. P. Taylor, 341-372. New York: Haworth Food and Agricultural Products Press.
439. Yashar, Deborah J. 1998. Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics 31 (6): 23-42.
440. Yearley, Steven. 1992. Green Ambivalence about Science: Legal-Rational Authority and the Scientific Legitimation of a Social Movement. British Journal of Sociology 43 (6): 511-532.
441. Yoon, Carol Kaesuk. 2001. Genetic Modification Taints Corn in Mexico. New York Times, October 2, F7.
442. Ziff, Bruce. 2005. Travels with My Plant: Monsanto v. Schmeiser Revisited. University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal 2 (6): 493-509.