From patent law to regulation: The ontological gerrymandering of biotechnology

Environmental Politics

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 749-765

  Carolan, Michael S ^a  

^a Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; BIOTECHNOLOGY; REGULATORY APPROACH;

EID: 55949132902     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644010802421505     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aoki, K. (1996) Intellectual property and sovereignty. Stanford Law Review, 48:5, pp. 1293-1355.
2. Bozicevic, K. (1987) Distinguishing 'products of nature' from products derived from nature. Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, 69:8, pp. 415-437.
3. Bradford, K., Van Deynze, A., Gutterson, N., Parrott, W. and Stauss, S. (2005) Regulating transgenic crops sensibly. Nature Biotechnology, 23:4, pp. 439-444.
4. Carpenter, E., Sankula, S., Silvers, S. and Gianessi, L. (2004) Insecticidal bacillus thurgingiensis plants versus chemical insecticides. Agricultural biotechnology, pp. 37-52. Oxford University Press, Washington, DC
5. Ceccarelli, L. (2004) Neither confusing cacophony nor culinary complements. Written Communication, 21:1, pp. 92-105.
6. Colfer, C., Sheil, D. and Kishi, M. (2006) Forest and human health [online]
7. Conley, J. and Makowski, R. (2004) Rethinking the product of nature doctrine as a barrier to biotechnology patents in the United States. Information and Communication Technology Law, 13:3, pp. 3-40.
8. Dear, P. (2006) The intelligibility of nature, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
9. DeGregori, T. (2002) Bountiful harvest, The Cato Institute, Washington, DC
10. Demaine, L. and Fellmeth, A. (2002) Reinventing the double helix. Stanford Law Review, 55:5, pp. 303-462.
11. Dietrich, H. and Schibeci, R. (2003) Beyond public perceptions of gene technology. Public Understanding of Science, 12:4, pp. 381-401.
12. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and danger, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
13. Drahos, P. (1996) A philosophy of intellectual property, Dartmouth, Aldershot
14. Gordon, W. (1993) A property right in self-expression. Yale Law Journal, 102:7, pp. 1533-1609.
15. Griffiths, P. (2001) Genetic information. Philosophy of Science, 68:33, pp. 394-412.
16. Haas, A. (2001) The welcome trust's disclosures of gene sequences data into the public domain and the potential for proprietary rights in the human genome. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 145:16, pp. 233-267.
17. Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women, Routledge, New York
18. Heller, C. (2001) From scientific risk to paysan savoir-faire. Science as Culture, 11, pp. 5-37.
19. Heller, C. (2006) Post-industrial 'quality agricultural discourse'. Social Anthropology, 14:3, pp. 319-334.
20. Jasanoff, S. (2000) Commentary: Between risk and precaution. Journal of Risk Research, 3:3, pp. 277-282.
21. Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
22. Joergensen, S. (1990) Ecosystem theory, ecological buffer capacity, uncertainty and complexity. Ecological Modelling, 52:1, pp. 125-133.
23. Kay, L. (1995) Who wrote the book of life?. Science in Context, 8:4, pp. 609-634.
24. Kloppenburg, J. (1988) First the seed, Cambridge University Press, New York
25. Latour, B. (1987) Science in action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Latour, B. (1993) We have never been modern, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York
27. Latour, B. (2004) Politics of nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
28. Lezaun, J. (2006) Creating a new object of government. Social Studies of Science, 36:4, pp. 499-531.
29. McAfee, K. (1999) Selling nature to save it?. Environmental and Planning D, 17:2, pp. 133-154.
30. McAfee, K. (2003) Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Geoforum, 34:2, pp. 203-219.
31. Merry, U. (1995) Coping with uncertainty, Greenwood, Portsmouth, NH
32. Novak, W. and Haslberger, A. (2000) Substantial equivalence of antinutrients and inherent plant toxins in genetically modified novel foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 38:6, pp. 473-483.
33. OECD (1993) Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
34. OECD (2004) Patents, innovation and economic performance: OECD conference proceedings [online]
35. Padma, T. (2005) Digital library to protect indigenous knowledge [online].
36. Parry, B. (2004) Trading the genome, Columbia University Press, New York
37. Pottage, A. (1998) The inscription of life in law. The Modern Law Review, 61:5, pp. 740-765.
38. Pouteau, S. (2000) Beyond substantial equivalence. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 13:3, pp. 273-291.
39. Reed, M. (2002) Rebels from the crown down. Science as Culture, 11:4, pp. 481-504.
40. Roberston, M. (2006) The nature that capital can see. Environment and Planning D, 24, pp. 367-387.
41. Shiva, V. (2000) Stolen harvest, South End Press, Cambridge, MA
42. Smith, N. (1990) Uneven development, Blackwell, Malden, MA
43. Stephanopoulos, G., Alper, H. and Moxely, J. (2004) Exploiting biological complexity for strain improvement through systems biology. Nature Biotechnology, 22:10, pp. 1261-1267.
44. Strathern, M. (1996) Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2, pp. 517-535.
45. Thacker, E. (2005) The global genome, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
46. Trewavas, A. and Leaver, C. (2001) Is opposition to GM crops science or politics?. EMBO Reports, 2:6, pp. 455-459.
47. Whatmore, S. (2002) Hybrid geographies, Sage, London
48. Wynne, B. (2005) Reflexing complexity. Theory, Culture, and Society, 22:5, pp. 67-94.