Boundaries in Science Policy Making: Bovine Growth Hormone in the European Union

Sociological Quarterly

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2003, Pages

  Kleinman, Daniel Lee ^a   Kinchy, Abby J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1242292217     PISSN: 00380253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00526.x     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abels, Gabriele. 1998. "The European Community as an Ethical Actor? Policy Making on the Human Genome and the Role of the European Parliament. " Pp. 45-62 in The Social Management of Technology, edited by Peter Wheale, René von Schomberg, and Peter Glasner. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
3. "Agriculture: Commission Proposes to Outlaw BST Hormone Altogether." 1999. European Report, #2447, October 30 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
4. "BEUC and Campaign against r-BST Seek Indefinite Ban." 1994.AgriService International News-letter, #408, December 16 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bruce, Robert B. 1987. The Launching of Modern American Science, 1846-1876. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
7. "BST: European Interest Groups Urge EEC-Wide Ban." 1991. European Report, #1728, December 11 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
8. Collins, Harry. 1983. "An Empirical Relativist Programme in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge." Pp. 85-115 in Science Observed, edited by Karin Knorr Cetina and Michael Mulkay. London: Sage.
9. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 1989. "Proposal for a Council Decision Concerning the Administration of Bovine Somatotrophin (B.S.T.) and Report Concerning Bovine Somatotrophin (B.S.T.)." Brussels, September 27. COM (89) 379 final.
10. _. 1992. "Second Report from the Commission to the Council and to the Parliament Concerning Bovine Somatotropin (B.S.T.)." Brussels, January 16. SEC (91) 2521 final.
11. _. 1993. "Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament Concerning Bovine Somatotrophin (B.S.T.)." Brussels, September 16. COM (93) 331 final.
12. _. 1999. "Proposal for a Council Decision Concerning the Placing on the Market and Administration of Bovine Somatotrophin (BST) and Repealing Council Decision 90/218/EEC." Brussels, October 26. COM (99) 544 final.
13. "Commission Proposes Ban on Market Release and Use of BST in the Union as at 1 January 2000." 1999. Europe Daily Bulletins, October 27 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
14. "Conference Report: BST's 'Fourth Hurdle' Discussed." 1991. Biotechnology Business News, January 23 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
15. "Conference Report: UK Industry Group to Press for Government Support." 1991. Biotechnology Business News, February 22 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
16. "COPA and COGECA Call for Extended Ban on BST Dairy Hormones." 1994. European Report, #1990, November 5 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
17. "Council and Parliament Ban Use of BST in Dairy Farming." 1999. European Report, #2400, December 18 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
18. Court of First Instance (CFI). 1998. "Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-120/96, Lilly Industries v Commission." Press release, no. 42/98, June 25.
19. "Court Undermines E.U.'s Super-Cow Hormone Ban." 1998. The Grocer, July 4 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
20. Daniels, George H. 1967. "The Pure-Science Ideal and Democratic Culture." Science 156:1699-1705.
21. DiMaggio, Paul. 1992. "Cultural Boundaries and Structural Change: The Extension of the High Culture Model to Theater, Opera, and Dance, 1900-1940." Pp. 21-57 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by Michele Lament and Marcel Fournier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Economic and Social Committee (ESC). 1999. "Opinion on the Proposal for a Council Decision Concerning the Placing on the Market and Administration of Bovine Somatotrophin (BST) and Repealing Council Decision 90/218/EEC." CES 1137/99. December 8-9.
23. Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. European Council (EC). 1990. "Council Decision of 25 April 1990 Concerning the Administration of Bovine Somatotrophin (BST)." Brussels, April 25.90/218/EEC.
25. _. 1991. "Council Decision of 4 February 1991 Amending Decision 90/218/EEC Concerning the Administration of Bovine Somatotropin (BST)." Brussels, February 4. 91/61/EEC.
26. _. 1992. "Council Decision of 10 February 1992 Amending Decision 90/218/EEC Concerning the Placing on the Market and Administration of Bovine Somatotropin (BST)." Brussels, February 10.92/98/EEC.
27. _. 1993. "Council Decision of 22 December 1993 Amending Decision 90/218/EEC Concerning the Placing on the Market and Administration of Bovine Somatotropin (BST)." Brussels, December 22.93/718/EC.
28. _. 1994. "Council Decision of 20 December 1994 Amending Decision 90/218/EEC Concerning the Placing on the Market and Administration of Bovine Somatotrophin (BST)." Brussels, December 20.94/936/EC.
29. _. 1999. "Council Decision of 17 December 1999 Concerning the Placing on the Market and Administration of Bovine Somatotrophin (BST) and Repealing Decision 90/218/EEC." Brussels, December 17.99/879/EC.
30. European Parliament (EP). 1988a. "Hormones and the BST Hormone in the Dairy and Meat Industry." Debates of the European Parliament, No. 2-367:12-20.
31. _. 1988b. "Resolution on the Effects and Risks of Using Growth Hormones and the BST Hormone in Dairy and Meat Industries." Official Journal of the European Communities, C 235:41-44
32. _. 1991a. "Report of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development on the Commission Proposal for a Council Decision Amending Decision 90/218/EEC Concerning the Administration of Bovine Somatotropin (BST)." Brussels, January 14. PE 146.321 final.
33. _. 1991b. "Bovine Somatotropin (BST)." Debates of the European Parliament, No. 3-398:292-295.
34. _. 1996. "Resolution on the Impact of the Conclusions of the Commission's Scientific Conference on Growth Promoters in Meat Production. " Official Journal C 032: p. 0081.
35. "FEDESA: Veterinary Drugs Producers Warn Against Use of Non-Scientific Criteria." 1991. European Report, #1665, April 4 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
36. Fetrow, John. 1999. "Economics of Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin on U.S. Dairy Farms." AgBioForum 2(2):103-110.
37. Gieryn, Thomas. 1995. "Boundaries of Science." Pp. 393-443 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. _. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Guston, David. 1999. "Stabilizing the Boundary between U.S. Politics and Science: The Role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization." Social Studies of Science 29:87-111.
40. Hallberg, Milton C., ed. 1991. Bovine Somatotropin and Emerging Issues. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General (HCP). 1999. "Scientists: BST Use Causes Animal Welfare Problems." Press release. March 18.
42. Holmquest, Anne. 1990. "The Rhetorical Strategy of Boundary-Work." Argumentation 4:235-258.
43. "Hormones: European Industry Protests Sparked by U.S. Approval of BST." 1993. Europe Environment, #421, November 30 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
44. "Hormones: Move to Strengthen Controls amidst New Anti-BST Campaign." 1994. European Report, #1977, September 21 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
45. "Hormones/Veterinary Drug: Controversial Proposal on Fourth Criterion in Commission Pipeline." 1991. Europe Environment, #358, February 5 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
46. Horton, Giles. 1999. "E.U. Ends Prospect of Lifting its Ban on Milk Hormone." Western Daily Press, March 20, page 42 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
47. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1987. "Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science." Social Studies of Science 17:195-230.
48. Kerr, Anne, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, and Amanda Amos. 1997. "The New Genetics: Professionals' Discursive Boundaries." The Sociological Review 45:279-304.
49. Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1995. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50. _. 1998. "Untangling Context: Understanding a University Laboratory in the Commercial World." Science, Technology and Human Values 23:285-314.
51. _. 2003. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
52. Kleinman, Daniel Lee, and Abby J. Kinchy. 2003 "Why Ban Bovine Growth Hormone? Science, Social Welfare, and the Divergent Biotech Policy Landscapes in Europe and the United States," Science as Culture 12:375-414.
53. Lamont, Michele, and Virag Molnar. 2002. "The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences." Annual Review of Sociology 28:167-195.
54. Levidow, Les, and Susan Carr. 1997. "How Biotechnology Regulation Sets a Risk/Ethics Boundary." Agriculture and Human Values 14:29-43.
55. Moore, Kelly. 1996. "Organizing Integrity: American Science and the Creation of Public Interest Organizations, 1955-1975." American Journal of Sociology 101:1592-1627.
56. Nelkin, Dorothy. 1995. "Scientific Controversies: The Dynamics of Public Disputes in the United States." Pp. 444-456 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value Free Science?: Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Rieger, Elmar. 1996. "The Common Agricultural Policy: External and Internal Dimensions." Pp. 97-123 in Policymaking in the European Union, edited by Helen Wallace and William Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Riley, Jonathon. 1999. "E.U.'s Hormone Ban Backed Up by Two Reports." Farmers Weekly, News, March 26, page 7 (available on www.lexisnexis.com/universe).
60. Roush, Wade. 1991. "Who Decides about Biotech? The Clash over Bovine Growth Hormone." Technology Review 94(5):28.
61. Schweiger, Thomas G. 2001. "Europe: Hostile Lands for GMOs." Pp. 361-372 in Redesigning Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, edited by Brian Tokar. New York: Zed Books.
62. Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW). 1999. "Animal Welfare Aspects of the Use of Bovine Somatotrophin." (available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scah/out21-en.html).
63. Skocpol, Theda. 1985. "Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research." Pp. 3-37 in Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Solomon, Shana, and Edward Hackett. 1996. "Setting Boundaries between Science and Law: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc." Science, Technology & Human Values 21:131-156
66. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (USC-OTA). 1991. "U.S. Dairy Industry at a Crossroad: Biotechnology and Policy Choices - Special Report. OTA-F-470." Washington, DC: GPO.
67. Weir, Margaret, and Theda Skocpol. 1985. "State Structures and the Possibilities for 'Keynesian' Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States." Pp. 107-163 in Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Ziegler, Jay. 1998. "Appellate Body Finds EC Hormone Ban Inconsistent with WTO Obligations." U.S. Department of Agriculture, press release. January 15.