Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: A systematic review

Breast

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 112-119

  Butler Henderson, Kerryn ^a   Lee, Andy H ^a   Price, Roger I ^b,d   Waring, Kaylene ^c  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c Armadale Health Service   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast surgery; Intraoperative; Margin; Review; Second operation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVING THERAPY; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER THERAPY; CYTOLOGY; ECHOGRAPHY; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE MARGIN ASSESSMENT; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; SURGERY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;

EID: 84895466204     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: 15323080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. National Breast Cancer Centre The clinical management of ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical hyperplasia of the breast 2003, National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW.
2. Kricker A., Armstrong B. Surgery and outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in Australia. Eur J Cancer 2004, 40(16):2396-2402.
3. Dillon M.F., Mc Dermott E.W., O'Doherty A., Quinn C.M., Hill A.D., O'Higgins N. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14(5):1618-1628.
4. Pinder S.E. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): pathological features, differential diagnosis, prognostic factors and specimen evaluation. Mod Pathol 2010, 23(Suppl.2):S8-S13.
5. Silverstein M.J., Buchanan C. Ductal carcinoma in situ: USC/Van Nuys prognostic index and the impact of margin status. Breast 2003, 12(6):457-471.
6. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010, 8(5):336-341.
7. STROBE Initiative Strobe statement 2013, Available from:. http://www.strobe-statement.org/.
8. Kim S.H.H., Cornacchi S.D., Heller B., Farrokhyar F., Babra M., Lovrics P.J. An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. Am J Surg 2013, 205(6):703.
9. Ramos M., Diaz J.C., Ramos T., Ruano R., Aparicio M., Sancho M., et al. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. Breast 2013, 22(4):520-524.
10. Rivera R.J., Holmes D.R., Tafra L. Analysis of the impact of intraoperative margin assessment with adjunctive use of MarginProbe versus standard of care on tissue volume removed. Int J Surg Oncol 2012, 2012:ID: 868623 [Epub].
11. Jorns J.M., Visscher D., Sabel M., Breslin T., Healy P., Daignaut S., et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. Am J Clin Pathol 2012, 138(5):657-669.
12. Sabel M.S., Jorns J.M., Wu A., Myers J., Newman L.A., Breslin T.M. Development of an intraoperative pathology consultation service at a free-standing ambulatory surgical center: clinical and economic impact for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg 2012, 204(1):66-77.
13. Thill M., Röder K., Diedrich K., Dittmer C. Intraoperative assessment of surgical margins during breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ by use of radiofrequency spectroscopy. Breast 2011, 20(6):579-580.
14. Olsha O., Shemesh D., Carmon M., Sibirsky O., Abu Dalo R., Rivkin L., et al. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18(2):447-452.
15. Martin D.T., Sandoval S., Ta C.N., Ruidiaz M.E., Cortes-Mateos M.J., Messmer D., et al. Quantitative automated image analysis system with automated debris filtering for the detection of breast carcinoma cells. Acta Cytol 2011, 55(3):271-280.
16. Doyle T.E., Factor R.E., Ellefson C.L., Sorensen K.M., Ambrose B.J., Goodrich J.B., et al. High-frequency ultrasound for intraoperative margin assessments in breast conservation surgery: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer 2011, 11:444.
17. Sumiyoshi K., Nohara T., Iwamoto M., Tanaka S., Kimura K., Takahashi Y., et al. Usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology in breast-conserving surgery. Exp Ther Med 2010, 1(4):641-645.
18. Nguyen F.T., Zysk A.M., Chaney E.J., Adie S.G., Kotynek J.G., Oliphant U.J., et al. Optical coherence tomography: the intraoperative assessment of lymph nodes in breast cancer. IEEE Eng Med Biol 2010, 29(2):63-70.
19. James T.A., Harlow S., Sheehey-Jones J., Hart M., Gaspari C., Stanley M., et al. Intraoperative ultrasound versus mammographic needle localization for ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16(5):1164-1169.
20. Dener C., Inan A., Sen M., Demirci S. Interoperative frozen section for margin assessment in breast conserving energy. Scand J Surg 2009, 98(1):34-40.
21. Weber W.P., Engelberger S., Viehl C.T., Zanetti-Dallenbach R., Kuster S., Dirnhofer S., et al. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg 2008, 32(12):2599-2606.
22. Allweis T.M., Kaufman Z., Lelcuk S., Pappo I., Karni T., Schneebaum S., et al. Aprospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2008, 196(4):483-489.
23. Paredes P., Vidal-Sicart S., Zanon G., Roe N., Rubi S., Lafuente S., et al. Radioguided occult lesion localisation in breast cancer using an intraoperative portable gamma camera: first results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008, 35(2):230-235.
24. Duarte G.M., Cabello C., Torresan R.Z., Alvarenga M., Telles G.H., Bianchessi S.T., et al. Radioguided intraoperative margins evaluation (RIME): preliminary results of a new technique to aid breast cancer resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007, 33(10):1150-1157.
25. Karni T., Pappo I., Sandbank J., Lavon O., Kent V., Spector R., et al. Adevice for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. Am J Surg 2007, 194(4):467-473.
26. Olson T.P., Harter J., Muñoz A., Mahvi D.M., Breslin T. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14(10):2953-2960.
27. Cabioglu N., Hunt K.K., Sahin A.A., Kuerer H.M., Babiera G.V., Singletary S.E., et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14(4):1458-1471.
28. Kaufman C.S., Jacobson L., Bachman B.A., Kaufman L.B., Mahon C., Gambrell L.-J., et al. Intraoperative digital specimen mammography: rapid, accurate results expedite surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14(4):1478-1485.
29. Fleming F.J., Hill A.D.K., Mc Dermott E.W., O'Doherty A., O'Higgins N.J., Quinn C.M. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30(3):233-237.
30. McCormick J.T., Keleher A.J., Tikhomirov V.B., Budway R.J., Caushaj P.F. Analysis of the use of specimen mammography in breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2004, 188(4):433-436.
31. Chagpar A., Yen T., Sahin A., Hunt K.K., Whitman G.J., Ames F.C., et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2003, 186(4):371-377.
32. Rahusen F.D.M.D., Bremers A.J., A M.D., Fabry H.F., J M.D., Taets van Amerongen A.H., et al. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9(10):994-998.
33. Creager A.J., Shaw J.A., Young P.R., Geisinger K.R. Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation: a community hospital experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002, 126(7):846-848.
34. Moore M.M., Whitney L.A., Cerilli L., Imbrie J.Z., Bunch M., Simpson V.B., et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. Ann Surg 2001, 233(6):761-768.
35. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Australasian Association of Cancer Registries Cancer in Australia: an overview 2012, 2012 Issue Cat. no. CAN 70, AIHW, Canberra.
36. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Cancer Australia Breast cancer in Australia: an overview 2012, Issue Cat. no. CAN 67, AIHW, Canberra.
37. Morrow M., O'Sullivan M.J. The dilemma of DCIS. Breast 2007, 16(Suppl.2):59-62.
38. Sakorafas G.H., Farley D.R. Optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Surg Oncol 2003, 12(4):221-240.
39. Hughes L.L., Wang M., Page D.L., Gray R., Solin L.J., Davidson N.E., et al. Local excision alone without irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. JClin Oncol 2009, 27(32):5319-5324.
40. Huston T.L., Simmons R.M. Locally recurrent breast cancer after conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2005, 189(2):229-235.
41. Sigal-Zafrani B., Lewis J.S., Clough K.B., Vincent-Salomon A., Fourquet A., Meunier M., et al. Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications. Mod Pathol 2004, 17(1):81-88.
42. Cendan J.C., Coco D., Copeland E.M. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. JAm Coll Surg 2005, 201(2):194-198.
43. Esbona K., Li Z., Wilke L.G. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2012, 19(10):3236-3245.
44. Klimberg V.S., Harms S., Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 1999, 8(2):77-84.
45. D'Halluin F., Tas P., Rouquette S., Bendavid C., Foucher F., Meshba H., et al. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures. Breast 2009, 18(4):248-253.
46. Jeong J.W., Shin D.C., Do S.H., Blanco C., Klipfel N.E., Holmes D.R., et al. Differentiation of cancerous lesions in excised human breast specimens using multiband attenuation profiles from ultrasonic transmission tomography. JUltrasound Med 2008, 27(3):435-451.
47. ®): intraoperative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery by using radiofrequency spectroscopy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013, 10(3):301-315.