Intraoperative digital specimen mammography: Rapid, accurate results expedite surgery

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1478-1485

  Kaufman, Cary S ^a,b   Jacobson, Leslie ^b   Bachman, Barbara A ^b   Kaufman, Lauren B ^b   Mahon, Carol ^b   Gambrell, Laura Jane ^b   Seymour, Roger ^b   Briscoe, Jennifer ^b   Aulisio, Karen ^b   Cunningham, Angi ^b   Opstad, Francis ^b   Schnell, Nancy ^b   Robertson, Jan ^b   Oliver, Lynne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Bellingham Breast Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast surgeon; Cost efficiency in breast surgery; Digital mammogram; Image guided breast biopsy; Specimen mammography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; RADIOLOGIST; SURGEON; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST DISEASES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34047231250     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9126-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cooperman AM, Cook SA, Hermann RE, Esselstym CB Jr. Preoperative localization of occult lesions of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 142:917-9.
2. Holland R. The role of specimen x-ray in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Diagn Imaging. Clin Med 1985; 54:178-85.
3. Rosen PP.. Specimen radiography and the diagnosis of clinically occult mammary carcinoma: a brief historical review. Pathol Annu 1980; 15:225-37.
4. McGivney WT. The role of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in quality improvement in cancer care. Presented at Better Care for Cancer: A Symposium on the Quality of Cancer Care, Seattle, Washington, January 20, 2006. Available at: http://videomedia.swedish.org/Mediasite/Viewer/?cid=2193cdd8-4e3f- 4b33-bca5-86bd49c2a6e8. Accessed March 4, 2006.
5. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Recht A, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:586-97.
6. Cady B. How to perform adequate local excision of mammographically detected lesions. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1997; 6:315-34.
7. Bimston DN, Bebb GG, Wagman LD.. Is specimen mammography beneficial?. Arch Surg 2000; 135:1083-6; discussion 1086-9.
8. Faxitron X-ray Corporation. Available at: http://www.faxitron.com/. Accessed September 3, 2006.
9. McCormick JT, Keleher AJ, Tikhomirov VB, et al. Analysis of the use of specimen mammography in breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2004; 188:433-6.
10. Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC.. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg 2005; 71:22-7;; discussion 27-8.
11. Carmichael AR, Ninkovic G, Boparai R. The impact of intraoperative specimen radiographs on specimen weights for wide local excision of breast cancer. Breast 2004; 13:325-8.
12. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, et al. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:33-6.
13. Power C, Kavanagh D, Hill AD, et al. Needle-localised biopsy of impalpable breast lesions: a novel adjunct to surgical technique and specimen mammography. Surgeon 2004; 2:343-5.
14. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later: updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:625-51.
15. Tabar L, Dean PB, Kaufman CS, Duffy SW, Chen HH. A new era in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2000; 9:233-77.
16. Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman B, Kaufman L. Intraoperative ultrasound facilitates surgery for early breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:988-93.
17. Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman B, Kaufman LB. Intraoperative ultrasonography guidance is accurate and efficient according to results in 100 breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 2003; 186:378-82.
18. Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman B, Kaufman LB. Encircling guidewire facilitates complete excision of image-localized breast lesions. Am J Surg 2003; 186:413-5.
19. Rahusen FD, van Taets Amerongen AH, van Diest PJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: a feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins. J Surg Oncol 1999; 72:72-6.
20. Snider HC, Morrison DG. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6:308-14.
21. Muttalib M, Tisdall M, Scawn R, et al. Intra-operative specimen analysis using Faxitron microradiography for excision of mammographically suspicious, non-palpable breast lesions. Breast 2004; 13:307-15.
22. Kaufman CS, Delbecq R, Jacobson L. Excising the re-excision: stereotactic core biopsy decreases need for re-excision of breast cancer. World J Surg 1998; 22:1023-8.
23. Clingan R, Griffin M, Phillips J, et al. Potential margin distortion in breast tissue by specimen mammography. Arch Surg 2003; 138:1371-4.
24. Kubtec Corporation. Available at: http://www.kubtec.com/pages/popups/ digiview.htm. Accessed September 3, 2006.
25. Federated Ambulatory Surgery Association. 2004 ASC Financial Benchmarking Survey. Available at: http://www.fasa.org. Accessed September 3, 2006.