Cosmetics and skin care products

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 493-506

  White, Ian R ^a   De Groot, Anton C ^b  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895318568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-X_30     Document Type: Chapter

References (132)

1. The European Commission's Inventory of Ingredients http://pharmacos. eudra.org/F3/cosmetic/cosm-inci-index.htm
2. Consumers' Association (1979) Reactions of the skin to cosmetics and toiletry products. Consumers'Association, London
3. de Groot AC, Beverdam EG, Ayong CT, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP (1988) The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Contact Dermatitis 19:195-201
4. Nielsen NH, Menné T (1992) Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 72:456-460
5. de Groot AC (1990) Labelling cosmetics with their ingredients. Br Med J 300:1636-1638
6. Dillarstone A (1997) Letter to the editor. Contact Dermatitis 37:190
7. Adams RM, Maibach HI (1985) A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:1062-1069
8. Meynadier J-M, Raison-Peyron N, Meunier L, Meynadier J (1997) Allergie aux parfums. Rev Fr Allergol 37:641-650
9. Lidén C, Berg M, Färm G, Wrangsjö K (1993) Nail varnish allergy with far-reaching consequences. Br J Dermatol 128:57-62
10. Ophaswongse S, Maibach HI (1995) Allergic contact cheilitis. Contact Dermatitis 33:365-370
11. Sainio EL, Kanerva L (1995) Contact allergens in toothpastes and a review of their hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 33:100-105
12. Skrebova N, Brocks K, Karlsmark T (1998) Allergic contact cheilitis from spearmint oil. Contact Dermatitis 39:35
13. de Groot AC, Weyland JW, Nater JP (1994) Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
14. de Groot AC, Frosch PJ (1997) Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 36:57-86
15. de Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD, van der Meeren HLM, van Joost T, Jagtman BA, Weyland JW (1988) The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 124:1525-1529
16. de Groot AC (1997) Cocamidopropyl betaine: a "new" important cosmetic allergen. Dermatosen 45:60-63
17. de Groot AC, van der Walle HB, Weyland JW (1995) Contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine. Contact Dermatitis 33:419-22
18. de Groot AC (1997) Contact allergens - what's new? Cosmetic dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 15:485-492
19. de Groot AC, van Ginkel CJW, Weyland JW (1996) Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): an important "new" allergen in cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:743-747
20. de Groot AC, de Cock PAJJM, Coenraads PJ, van Ginkel CJW, Jagtman BA, van Joost T, van der Kley AMJ, Meinardi MMHM, Smeenk G, van der Valk PGM, van der Walle HB, Weyland JW (1996) Methyldibromo glutaronitrile is an important contact allergen in the Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 34:118-120
21. Berne B, Boström Å, Grahnén AF, Tammela M (1996) Adverse effects of cosmetics and toiletries reported to the Swedish Medical Product Agency 1989-1994. Contact Dermatitis 34:359-362
22. de Groot AC, Frosch PJ (1998) Fragrances as a cause of contact dermatitis in cosmetics: clinical aspects and epidemiological data. In: Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, White IR (eds) Fragrances. Beneficial and adverse effects. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 66-75
23. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, White IR (eds) (1998) Fragrances. Beneficial and adverse effects. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
24. Guin JD (1982) History, manufacture, and cutaneous reactions to perfumes. In: Frost P, Horwitz SW (eds) Principles of cosmetics for the dermatologist. Mosby, St. Louis, Calif., pp 111-129
25. Scheinman PL (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review. Am J Contact Dermatitis 7:65-76
26. Guin JD, Berry VK (1980) Perfume sensitivity in adult females. A study of contact sensitivity to a perfume mix in two groups of student nurses. J Am Acad Dermatol 3:299-302
27. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, De Leo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Fransway AF, Maibach HI, Mathias CGT, Nethercott JR, Rietschel RL, Sheretz EF, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS (1998) North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 38:911-918
28. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Menné T (1996) Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis. Br J Dermatol 135:419-422
29. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE, Menné T (1997) Content and reactivity to product perfumes in fragrance mix positive and negative eczema patients. A study of perfumes used in toiletries and skin-care products. Contact Dermatitis 36:291-296
30. Dooms-Goossens A, Kerre S, Drieghe J, Bossuyt L, Degreef H (1992) Cosmetic products and their allergens. Eur J Dermatol 2:465-468
31. Johansen JD, Andersen TF, Kjøller M, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen KE, Menné T (1998) Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories. Am J Contact Dermatitis 9:80-86
32. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menne T, Rastogi SC, Bruze M, Andersen KE, Lepoittevan JP, Gimenez Arnau E, Pirker C, Goossens A, White IR (1999) Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 141:1076-1083
33. The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for Consumers (1999) Concerning Fragrance Allergy in Consumers. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph-risk/committees/sccp/documents/ out98-en.pdf
34. Nethercott JR, Larsen WG (1997) Contact allergens - what's new? Fragrances. Clin Dermatol 15:499-504
35. Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Svedman C, Goossens A, White IR, Uter W, Arnau EG, Lepoittevin JP, Menné T, Johansen JD (2005) Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52:207-215
36. Johansen JD, Andersen TF, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen KE, Menné T (1997) Patch testing with markers of fragrance contact allergy. Do clinical tests correspond to patients' self-reported problems? Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 77:149-153
37. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Menné T (1996) Exposure to selected fragrance materials. A case study of fragrancemixpositive eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 34:106-110
38. Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T, Bruze M, Lepoittevin JP, Dreier B, Andersen KE, White IR (1998) Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 38:29-35
39. Rastogi S, Johansen JD, Menné T (1996) Natural ingredients based cosmetics. Content of selected fragrance sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 34:423-426
40. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Menné T (1996) Quantitative aspects of iso-eugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 34:414-418
41. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Menné T (1996) Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 34:165-171
42. Fransway AF (1991) The problem of preservation in the 1990 s. I. Statement of the problem, solution (s) of the industry, and the current use of formaldehyde and formaldehydereleasing biocides. Am J Contact Dermat 2:6-23
43. Fransway AF, Schmitz NA (1991) The problem of preservation in the 1990 s. II. Formaldehyde and formaldehydereleasing biocides: incidences of cross-reactivity and the significance of the positive response to formaldehyde. Am J Contact Dermat 2:78-88
44. Fransway AF (1991) The problem of preservation in the 1990 s. III. Agents with preservative function independent of formaldehyde release. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:145-174
45. Morren MA, Dooms-Goossens A, Delabie J, De Wolf-Peeters C, Marien K, Degreef H (1992) Contact allergy to isothiazolinone derivatives: unusual clinical presentations. Dermatology 184:260-264
46. Frosch PJ, Lahti A, Hannuksela M, Andersen KE, Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Lachapelle JM (1995) Chloromethylisothiazolone/methylisothiazolinone (CMI/MI) use test with a shampoo on patch-test-positive subjects. Results of a multicentre double-blind crossover trial. Contact Dermatitis 32:210-217
47. de Groot AC, Weyland JW (1988) Kathon CG: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 18:350-358
48. de Groot AC (1990) Methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) allergy: an updated review. Am J Contact Dermat 1:151-156
49. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Trevisi P, Guerra L (1995) Euxyl K 400: incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle. Contact Dermatitis 33:193-195
50. Schnuch A, Geier J (1994) Die häufigsten Kontaktallergene im zweiten Halbjahr 1993. Dermatosen 42:210-211
51. Jackson JM, Fowler JF (1998) Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K400): a new and important sensitizer in the United States? J Am Acad Dermatol 38:934-937
52. de Groot AC, van Ginkel CJW, Weyland JW (1996) How to detect sensitization to Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 34:373-374
53. Bruze M, Goossens A, Gruvberger B; ESCD; EECDRG (2005) Recommendation to include methyldibromo glutaronitrile in the European standard patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 52:24-28
54. Banerjee P, McFadden JP, Ross JS, Rycroft RJG, White IR (2003) Increased positive patch test reactivity to methyldibromo glutaronitrile. Contact Dermatitis 49:111-113
55. Rosen M, McFarland AG (1984) Free formaldehyde in anionic shampoos. J Soc Cosmet Chem 35:157-169
56. Parker LU, Taylor JS (1991) A 5-year study of contact allergy to quaternium-15. Am J Contact Dermat 2:231-234
57. Jacobs M-C, White IR, Rycroft RJG, Taub N (1995) Patch testing with preservatives at St John's from 1982 to 1993. Contact Dermatitis 33:247-254
58. Dooms-Goossens A, de Boulle K, Dooms M, Degreef H (1986) Imidazolidinyl urea dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 14:322-324
59. de Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Jagtman BA, Weyland JW (1988) Contact allergy to diazolidinyl urea (Germall II). Contact Dermatitis 18:202-205
60. Perret CM, Happle R (1989) Contact sensitivity to diazolidinyl urea (Germall II). In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 92-94
61. Hectorne KJ, Fransway AF (1994) Diazolidinyl urea: incidence of sensitivity, patterns of cross-reactivity and clinical relevance. Contact Dermatitis 30:16-19
62. Frosch PJ, White IR, Rycroft RJG, Lahti A, Burrows D, Camarasa JG, Ducombs G, Wilkinson JD (1990) Contact allergy to Bronopol. Contact Dermatitis 22:24-26
63. Storrs F, Bell DE (1983) Allergic contact dermatitis to 2-bromo-2-nitropane-1, 3-diol in a hydrophilic ointment. J Am Acad Dermatol 8:157-164
64. de Groot AC, Bos JD, Jagtman BA, Bruynzeel DP, van Joost T, Weyland JW (1986) Contact allergy to preservatives - II. Contact Dermatitis 15:218-222
65. de Groot AC, van Joost T, Bos JD, van der Meeren HLM, Weyland JW (1988) Patch test reactivity to DMDM hydantoin. Relationship to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 18:197-201
66. Menné T, Hjorth N (1988) Routine patch testing with paraben esters. Contact Dermatitis 19:189-191
67. Fisher AA (1993) The parabens: paradoxical preservatives. Cutis 51:405-406
68. Brasch J, Schnuch A, Geier J, Aberer W, Uter W; German Contact Dermatitis Research Group; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (2004) Iodopropynylbutyl carbamate 0. 2% is suggested for patch testing of patients with eczema possibly related to preservatives. Br J Dermatol 151:608-615
69. Schollnast R, Kranke B, Aberer W (2003) Anal and palmar contact dermatitis caused by iodopropynyl butylcarbamate in moist sanitary wipes. Hautarzt 54:970-110
70. Wakelin SH, White IR (1997) Contact dermatitis from chlorphenisin in a facial cosmetic. Contact Dermatitis 37:138-139
71. Tosti A, Guerra L, Vincenzi C, Piraccini BM, Peluso AM (1993) Contact sensitization caused by toluene sulfonamideformaldehyde resin in women who use nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat 4:150-153
72. Hausen BM (1994) Nagellack-Allergie. HG Z Hautkr 69:252-262
73. Hausen BM, Milbrodt M, Koenig WA (1995) The allergens of nail polish (I). Allergenic constituents of common nail polish and toluenesulfonamide- formaldehyde resin (TSF-R). Contact Dermatitis 33:157-164
74. Giorgini S, Brusi C, Francalanci S, Gola M, Sertoli A (1994) Prevention of allergic contact dermatitis from nail varnishes and hardeners. Contact Dermatitis 31:325-326
75. Kardorff B, Fuchs M, Kunze J (1995) Kontaktallergien auf Nagellack. Aktuel Dermatol 21:349-352
76. Staines KS, Felix DH, Forsyth A (1998) Desquamative gingivitis, sole manifestation of tosylamide/formaldehyde resin allergy. Contact Dermatitis 39:90
77. Castelain M, Veyrat S, Laine G, Montastier C (1997) Contact dermatitis from nitrocellulose in a nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis 36:266-267
78. Hausen BM (1995) A simple method of determining TSF-R in nail polish. Contact Dermatitis 32:188-190
79. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1995) Methyl acrylate: a new sensitizer in nail lacquer. Contact Dermatitis 33:203-204
80. Rosenzweig R, Scher RK (1993) Nail cosmetics: adverse reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 4:71-77
81. Barnett JM, Scher RK (1992) Nail cosmetics. Int J Dermatol 31:675-681
82. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Estlander T, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Jolanki R (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by photobonded sculptured nails and a review of (meth) acrylates in nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat 7:109-115
83. Conde-Salazar L, Baz M, Guimaraens D, Cannavo A (1995) Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: patch test results in 379 hairdressers. Am J Contact Dermat 6:19-23
84. Marcoux D, Riboulet-Delmas G (1994) Efficacy and safety of hair-coloring agents. Am J Contact Dermat 5:123-129
85. Pigatto PD, Bigardi AS, Cusano F (1995) Contact dermatitis to cocamidopropylbetaine is caused by residual amines: relevance, clinical characteristics, and review of the literature. Am J Contact Dermat 6:13-16
86. Fowler JF, Fowler LM, Hunter JE (1997) Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study. Contact Dermatitis 37:276-281
87. Fowler JF Jr (1993) Cocamidopropyl betaine: the significance of positive patch test results in twelve patients. Cutis 52:281-284
88. Angelini G, Foti C, Rigano L, Vena G (1995) 3-Dimethylaminopropylamine: a key substance in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine? Contact Dermatitis 32:96-99
89. Funk JO, Dromgoole SH, Maibach HI (1995) Sunscreen intolerance. Contact sensitization, photocontact sensitization, and irritancy of sunscreen agents. Dermatol Clin 13:473-481
90. Foley P, Nixon R, Marks R, Frowen K, Thompson S (1993) The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population-based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia. Br J Dermatol 128:512-518
91. Bilsland D, Ferguson J (1993) Contact allergy to sunscreen chemicals in photosensitivity dermatitis/actinic reticuloid syndrome (PD/AR) and polymorphic light eruption. Contact Dermatitis 29:70-73
92. Darvay A, White IR, Rycroft RJG, Jones AB, Hawk JLM, McFadden JP (2001) Photoallergic contact dermatitis is uncommon. Br J Dermatol 145:597-601
93. Manciet JR, Lepoittevin JP, Jeanmougin M, Dubertret L (1994) Study of the cross-reactivity of seven benzophenones between themselves and with fenofibrate. Nouv Dermatol 13:370-371
94. Pons-Guiraud A, Jeanmougin M (1993) Allergie et photoallergie de contact aux crèmes de photoprotection. Ann Derm Venereol (Stockh) 120:727-731
95. Gonçalo M, Ruas E, Figueiredo A, Gonçalo S (1995) Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 33:278-280
96. Theeuwes M, Degreef H, Dooms-Goossens A (1992) Paraaminobenzoic acid (PABA) and sunscreen allergy. Am J Contact Dermat 3:206-207
97. Wilson CI, Cameron J, Powell SM, Cherry G, Ryan TJ (1997) High incidence of contact dermatitis in leg-ulcer patients - implications for management. Clin Exp Dermatol 16:250-261
98. Nachbar F, Korting HC, Plewig G (1993) Zur Bedeutung des positiven Epicutantests auf Lanolin. Dermatosen 41:227-236
99. Kligman AM (1998) The myth of lanolin allergy. Contact Dermatitis 39:103-107
100. Matthieu L, Dockx P (1997) Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101. Contact Dermatitis 36:150-151
101. Wolf R (1996) The lanolin paradox. Dermatology 192:198-202
102. Guerra L, Bardazzi F, Tosti A (1992) Contact dermatitis in hairdressers' clients. Contact Dermatitis 26:108-111
103. Funk JO, Maibach HI (1994) Propylene glycol dermatitis: re-evaluation of an old problem. Contact Dermatitis 31:236-241
104. Aberer W, Fuchs T, Peters KP, Frosch PJ (1993) Propylenglykol: kutane Nebenwirkungen und Testmethodik. Dermatosen 41:25-27
105. Wahlberg JE (1994) Propylene glycol: search for a proper and nonirritant patch test preparation. Am J Contact Dermat 5:156-159
106. White IR, Lovell CR, Cronin E (1984) Antioxidants in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 11:265-267
107. Le Coz CJ, Schneider G-A (1998) Contact dermatitis from tertiary-butylhydroquinone in a hair dye, with cross-sensitivity to BHA and BHT. Contact Dermatitis 39:39-40
108. Serra-Baldrich E, Puig LL, Gimenez Arnau A, Camarasa JG (1995) Lipstick allergic contact dermatitis from gallates. Contact Dermatitis 32:359-360
109. Parsad D, Saini R, Verma N (1997) Xanthomatous reaction following contact dermatitis from vitamin E. Contact Dermatitis 37:294
110. Wyss M, Elsner P, Homberger H-P, Greco P, Gloor M, Burg G (1997) Follikuläres Kontaktekzem auf eine Tocopherollinoleathaltige Körpermilch. Dermatosen 45:25-28
111. Foti C, Rigano L, Vena GA, Grandolfo M, Liguori G, Angelini G (1995) Contact allergy to oleamidopropyl dimethylamine and related substances. Contact Dermatitis 33:132-133
112. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Guerra L, Andrisano E (1996) Contact dermatitis from fatty alcohols. Contact Dermatitis 35:287-289
113. le Coz CJ, Lefebvre C (2000) Contact dermatitis from maleated soybean oil: last gasps of an expiring cosmetic allergen. Contact Dermatitis 43:118-119
114. Laube S, Davies MG, Prais L, Foulds IS (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from medium-chain triglycerides in a moisturizing lotion. Contact Dermatitis 47:171
115. Guin JD (2001) Allergic contact cheilitis from di-isostearyl malate in lipstick. Contact Dermatitis 44:375
116. le Coz CJ, Ball C (2000) Recurrent allergic contact dermatitis and cheilitis due to castor oil. Contact Dermatitis 42:114-115
117. Magerl A, Heiss R, Frosch PJ (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from zinc ricinoleate in a deodorant and glyceryl ricinoleate in a lipstick. Contact Dermatitis 44:119-121
118. le Coz CJ, Lefebvre C, Ludmann F, Grosshans E (2000) Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/eicosene copolymer: an emerging cosmetic allergen. Contact Dermatitis 43:61-62
119. Stone N, Varma S, Hughes TM, Stone NM (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/1-triacontene copolymer in a sunscreen. Contact Dermatitis 47:49
120. Kimura M, Kawada A (2000) Follicular contact dermatitis due to polyoxyethylene laurylether. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:879-880
121. Diegenant C, Constandt L, Goossens A (2000) Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1, 3-butylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 43:234-235
122. Le Coz CJ, Leclere JM, Arnoult E, Raison-Peyron N, Pons-Guiraud A, Vigan M; Members of Revidal-Gerda (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from shellac in mascara. Contact Dermatitis 46:149-152
123. Moffitt DL, Sansom JE (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from phthalic anhydride/trimellitic anhydride/glycols copolymer in nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis 46:236
124. Batta K, Bourke JF, Foulds IS (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis from colophony in lipsticks. Contact Dermatitis 36:171-172
125. Hausen BM, Wollenweber E, Senff H, Post B (1987) Propolis allergy (I). Origin, properties, usage and literature review. Contact Dermatitis 17:163-170
126. Guin JD (2003) Patch testing to FD&C and D&C dyes. Contact Dermatitis 49:217-218
127. Kiken DA, Cohen DE (2002) Contact Dermatitis to botanical extracts. Am J Contact Dermat 13:148-152
128. Nakagawa M, Kawai K, Kawai K (1995) Contact allergy to kojic acid in skin care products. Contact Dermatitis 32:9-13
129. de Groot AC (1988) Adverse reactions to cosmetics. Thesis, State University of Groningen, the Netherlands
130. De Groot AC (1998) Fatal attractiveness: the shady side of cosmetics. Clin Dermatol 16:167-179
131. De Groot AC (1994) Patch testing. Test concentrations and vehicles for 3700 allergens, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
132. de Groot AC, Weijland JW (1997) Conversion of common names of cosmetic allergens to the INCI nomenclature. Contact Dermatitis 37:145-150