Fatal attractiveness: The shady side of cosmetics

Clinics in Dermatology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 167-179

  De Groot, Anton C ^a  

^a JEROEN BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; ALLERGEN; BETAINE DERIVATIVE; BRONOPOL; COSMETIC; DIAZOLIDINYL UREA; EUXYL K 400; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; GERMALL 115; GLYCEROL DERIVATIVE; HAIR DYE; HYDANTOIN; KATHON CG; LANOLIN; PAINT; PRESERVATIVE; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; QUATERNIUM 15; SUNSCREEN; TOLUENESULFONAMIDE DERIVATIVE;

CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT URTICARIA; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; HUMAN; PATCH TEST; PHOTOSENSITIVITY DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN DISEASE; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TOXICITY;

EID: 0031843215     PISSN: 0738081X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-081X(97)00179-X     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. 1. De Groot AC, Nater JP, van der Lende R, et al. Adverse effects of cosmetics: A retrospective study in the general population. Int J Cosm Sci 1987;9:255-9.
2. 2. Berne B, Lundin Å, Enander Malmros I. Side effects of cosmetics and toiletries in relation to use. A retrospective study in a Swedish population. Eur J Dermatol 1994;4: 189-93.
3. 3. De Groot AC, Weijland JW, Nater JP. Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994:422-724.
4. 4. De Groot AC, White IR. Cosmetics and skin care products. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 461-76.
5. 5. De Groot AC. Cosmetics. In: JD Guin, editor. Practical contact dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995:333-54.
6. 6. De Groot AC, Frosch PJ. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 1997;36:57-86.
7. 7. Adams RM, Maibach HI. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;13:1062-9.
8. 8. Lan LR, Lee JYY, Kao HF, et al. Persistent light reaction with erythroderma caused by musk ambrette. Cutis 1994; 54:167-70.
9. 9. Du Menagé H, Ross JS, Norris PG, et al. Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis; Sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen. Br J Dermatol 1995;132:543-7.
10. 10. Szczurko C, Dompmartin A, Michel M, et al. Photocontact allergy to oxybenzone: Ten years of experience. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1994;10:144-7.
11. 11. Jeanmougin M, Manciet JR, Pons-Guiraud A, et al. Contact and photocontact allergies to sunscreens. A six-year experience. Nouv Dermatol 1994;13:372-8.
12. 12. De Groot AC. Labelling cosmetics with their ingredients. Br Med J 1990;300:1636-8.
13. 13. Nielsen NH, Menné T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. Acta Derm Venereol 1992; 72:456-60.
14. 14. Lidén C, Berg M, Färm G, et al. Nail varnish allergy with far-reaching consequences. Br J Dermatol 1993;128:57-62.
15. 15. De Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD, et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1988;124:525-9.
16. 16. De Groot AC. Cocamidopropyl betaine: A "new" important cosmetic allergen. Dermatosen 1997;45:60-3.
17. 17. De Groot AC, van der Walle HB, Weijland JW. Contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:419-22.
18. 18. De Groot AC. Contact allergens - What's new? Cosmetic dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1997;15:485-91.
19. 19. De Groot AC, van Ginkel CJW, Weijland JW. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): An important "new" allergen in cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:743-7.
20. 20. De Groot AC, de Cock PAJJM, Coenraads PJ, et al. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile is an important contact allergen in the Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:118-20.
21. 21. Fransway AF. The problem of preservation in the 1990s. I. Statement of the problem, solution(s) of the industry and the current use of formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasing biocides. Am J Contact Dermat 1991;2:6-23.
22. 22. Fransway AF, Schmitz NA. The problem of preservation in the 1990s. II. Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing biocides: Incidences of cross-reactivity and the significance of the positive response to formaldehyde. Am J Contact Dermat 1991;2:78-88.
23. 23. Fransway AF. The problem of preservation in the 1990s. III. Agents with preservative function independent of formaldehyde release. Am J Contact Dermat 1991;2: 145-74.
24. 24. Rosen M, McFarland AG. Free formaldehyde in anionic shampoos. J Soc Cosm Chem 1984;35:157-69.
25. 25. Council on Scientific Affairs. Formaldehyde. JAMA 1989; 261:1183-7.
26. 26. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992 to 1994). Am J Contact Dermat 1995;6:160-5.
27. 27. Parker LU, Taylor JS. A 5-year study of contact allergy to quaternium-15. Am J Contact Dermat 1991;2:231-4.
28. 28. Jacobs M-C, White IR, Rycroft RJG, et al. Patch testing with preservatives at St John's from 1982 to 1993. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:247-54.
29. 29. Storrs F, Bell DE. Allergic contact dermatitis to 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol in a hydrophilic ointment. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983;8:157-64.
30. 30. Peters MS, Connolly SM, Schroeter AL. Bronopol allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1983;9:397-401.
31. 31. Frosch PJ, White IR, Rycroft RJG, et al. Contact allergy to bronopol. Contact Dermatitis 1990;22:24-6.
32. 32. De Groot AC, van Joost T, Bos JD, et al. Patch test reactivity to DMDM hydantoin. Relationship to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:197-201.
33. 33. Menné T, Hjorth N. Routine testing with paraben esters. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19:189-91.
34. 34. De Groot AC, Weijland JW. Kathon CG: A review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18:350-8.
35. 35. De Groot AC. Methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) allergy: An updated review. Am J Contact Dermat 1990;1:151-6.
36. 36. Marks JG, Moss JN, Parno JR, et al. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) biocide-United States multicenter study of human skin sensitization. Am J Contact Dermat 1990;1:157-61.
37. 37. Fransway AF. Sensitivity to Kathon CG: Findings in 365 consecutive patients. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19:342-7.
38. 38. Frosch PJ, Hannuksela M, Andersen KE, et al. Chloromethylisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (CMI/MI) use test with a shampoo on patch-test-positive subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:210-7.
39. 39. Conde-Salazar L, Baz M, Guimaraens D, et al. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: Patch test results in 379 hairdressers. Am J Contact Dermat 1995;6:19-23.
40. 40. Guerra L, Bardazzi F, Tosti A. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers' clients. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26:108-11.
41. 41. Funk JO, Maibach HI. Propylene glycol dermatitis: reevaluation of an old problem. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31: 236-41.
42. 42. Aberer W, Fuchs Th, Peters K-P, et al. Propylenglykol: Kutane Nebenwirkungen und Testmethodik. Dermatosen 1993;41:25-7.
43. 43. Wahlberg JE. Propylene glycol: Search for a proper and nonirritant patch test preparation. Am J Contact Dermat 1994;5:156-9.
44. 44. Tosti A, Guerra L, Vincenzi C, et al. Contact sensitization caused by toluene sulfonamide-formaldehyde resin in women who use nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat 1993;4:150-3.
45. 45. Hausen BM. Nagellack-Allergie. H+G Z Hautkr 1994;69: 252-62.
46. 46. Hausen BM, Milbrodt M, Koenig WA. The allergens of nail polish (I). Allergenic constituents of common nail polish and toluenesulfonamide-formaldehyde resin (TS-F-R). Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:157-64.
47. 47. Giorgini S, Brusi C, Francalanci S, et al. Prevention of allergic contact dermatitis from nail varnishes and hardeners. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31:325-6.
48. 48. Kardorff B, Fuchs M, Kunze J. Kontaktallergien auf Nagellack. Akt Dermatol 1995;21:349-52.
49. 49. Hausen BM. A simple method of determining TS-F-R in nail polish. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:188-9.
50. 50. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Jolanki R, et al. Methyl acrylate: A new sensitizer in nail lacquer. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33: 203-4.
51. 51. Rosenzweig R, Scher RK. Nail cosmetics: Adverse reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 1993;4:71-7.
52. 52. Barnett JM, Scher RK. Nail cosmetics. Int J Dermatol 1992; 31:675-81.
53. 53. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Estlander T, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by photobonded sculptured nails and a review of (meth)acrylates in nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat 1996;7:109-15.
54. 54. Carmichael AJ, Foulds IS, Bradbury DS. Loss of lanolin patch-test reactivity. Br J Dermatol 1991;125:573-6.
55. 55. Freeman S, Frederiksen P. Sunscreen allergy. Am J Contact Dermat 1990;1:240-3.
56. 56. Dromgoole SH, Maibach HI. Sunscreen intolerance: Contact and photocontact sensitization and contact urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;22:1068-78.
57. 57. Funk JO, Dromgoole SH, Maibach HI. Sunscreen intolerance. Contact sensitization, photocontact sensitization, and irritancy of sunscreen agents. Dermatol Clin 1995;13: 473-81.
58. 58. Foley P, Nixon R, Marks R, et al. The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: Results of a longitudinal population-based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia. Br J Dermatol 1993;128:512-8.
59. 59. Pons-Guiraud A, Jeanmougin M. Allergie et photo-allergie de contact aux crèmes de photoprotection. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1993;120:727-31.
60. 60. Trevisi P, Vincenzi C, Chierewgato C, et al. Sunscreen sensitization: A three-year study. Dermatology 1994;189: 55-7.
61. 61. Gonçalo M, Ruas E, Figueiredo A, et al. Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:278-80.
62. 62. Parry EJ, Bilsland D, Morley WN. Photocontact allergy to 4-tert-butyl-4′-methoxy-dibenzoylmethane (Parsol 1789). Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:251-2.
63. 63. Bilsland D, Ferguson J. Contact allergy to sunscreens chemicals in photosensitivity dermatitis/actinic reticuloid syndrome (PD/AR) and polymorphic light eruption. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29:70-3.
64. 64. Fowler JF. Cocamidopropyl betaine: The significance of positive patch test results in twelve patients. Cutis 1993; 52:281-4.
65. 65. Angelini G, Foti C, Rigano L, et al. 3-Dimethylaminopro-pylamine: A key substance in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine? Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:96-9.
66. 66. Pigatto PD, Bigardi AS, Cusano F. Contact dermatitis to cocamidopropylbetaine is caused by residual amines: Relevance, clinical characteristics, and review of the literature. Am J Contact Dermat 1995;6:13-6.
67. 67. Angelini G, Rigano L, Foti C, et al. Contact allergy to impurities in surfactants: Amount, chemical structure and carrier effect in reactions to 3-dimethylaminopropylamine. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:248-52.
68. 68. Basketter DA, Lea L, Ross JS. Does DMAPA play a role in CAPB allergy? In: Book of abstracts, Jadassohn Centenary Congress, London, 9-12 October 1996;44.
69. 69. Aalto-Korte K, Jolanki R, Estlander T, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:193-4.
70. 70. De Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Coenraads PJ, et al. Frequency of allergic reactions to methyldibromoglutaronitrile (1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane) in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:270-1.
71. 71. Tosti A, Guerra L, Bardazzi F, et al. Euxyl K 400: A new sensitizer in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:89-93.
72. 72. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Trevisi P, Guerra L. Euxyl K 400: Incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:193-5.
73. 73. Schnuch A, Geier J. Die häufigsten Kontaktallergene im zweiten Halbjahr 1993. Dermatosen 1994;42:210-1.
74. 74. De Groot AC, van Ginkel CJW, Weijland JW. How to detect sensitization to Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:373.
75. 75. Perrenoud D, Homberger HP, Auderset PC, et al. An epidemic outbreak of papular and follicuiar contact dermatitis to tocopheryl linoleate in cosmetics. Dermatology 1994;189:225-33.
76. 76. Perrenoud D, and the Swiss Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Papular and follicular contact dermatitis: Irritation and/or allergy? Curr Probl Dermatol 1995;23:9-17.
77. 77. Dooms-Goossens A. The red face: Contact and photocontact dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology 1993;11: 289-95.
78. 78. Dooms-Goossens A. Cosmetics as causes of allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis 1993;52:316-20.
79. 79. De Groot AC. Patch testing: Test concentrations and vehicles for 3700 allergens, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
80. 80. De Groot AC, White IR. Cosmetic ingredient labelling in the European Community. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25: 273-5.
81. 81. Elsner P. What is the state of cosmetic labelling in Europe? Am J Contact Dermat 1993;4:198-200.
82. 82. Dillarstone A. Letter to the Editor. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:64-5.
83. 83. De Groot AC, Weijland JW. Conversion of common names of cosmetic allergens to the INCI-nomenclature. Contact Dermatitis 1997;37:145-50.