Fragrances

Clinics in Dermatology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 499-504

  Nethercott, James R ^b   Larsen, Walter G ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRAGRANCE; ALLERGEN; PERFUME;

ALLERGY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PATCH TEST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIZATION;

ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME;

EID: 0030829457     PISSN: 0738081X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-081X(97)00053-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Eiermann H, Larsen W, Maibach H. Prospective study of cosmetic reactions: 1977-1980. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982; 6:909-17.
2. Adams R, Maibach H. A five year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;13:1062-9.
3. Broeckx W, Blondeel A, Dooms-Goosens A, et al. Cosmetic Intolerance. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16:189-194.
4. Guin J, Berry V. Perfume sensitivity in adult females. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;11:1168-74.
5. Bonnevie P. Etiology and pathogenesis of the eczemas. Copenhagen: A Busck, 1939.
6. Bonnevie P. Some experiences of war-time industrial dermatoses. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1948;28:231-7.
7. Pirila V, Kilpio O. On occupational dermatoses in Finland: A report of 1752 cases. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1954;34:395-402.
8. Hjorth N. Eczematous allergy to balsams allied perfumes and flavoring agents with special reference to balsam of Peru. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh) 1961;41(suppl 46):1-216.
9. Magnusson B, Wilkinson D. Cinnamic aldehyde in toothpaste. 1. Clinical aspects of patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:70-6.
10. Kirton V, Magnusson B. Cinnamic aldehyde in toothpaste. 2. Further studies. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:77-80.
11. Collins F, Mitchell J. Aroma chemicals - Reference sources for perfume and flavor ingredients with special reference to cinnamic aldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:43-7.
12. Mitchell J. Contact hypersensitivity to some perfume materials. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:196-9.
13. Nakayama H, Hanaoka H, Ohshiro A. Allergen controlled system (ACS). Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo, 1974, p 42.
14. Nakayama H. Cosmetic series patch test - Allergens type 7. Saiseikai Central Hospital 1-4-17, Mita, Minatoku, Tokyo, Japan, pg 25.
15. Schorr W. Cinnamic aldehyde allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:108-11.
16. Arctander S. Perfume and flavor materials of natural origin. Elizabeth, NJ: Steffan Arctander, 1960:309-12.
17. Arctander S. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals), vol. 1. Elizabeth, NJ: Steffan Arctander, 1969: 149.
18. Arctander S. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals), vol. 1. Elizabeth, NJ: Steffan Arctander, 1969: 619.
19. Larsen W. Cosmetic dermatitis due to a perfume. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:142-5.
20. Fisher A. Patch testing with perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:166-8.
21. Larsen W. Perfume dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1977;113: 623-6.
22. Thune P. Contact allergy due to lichens in patients with a history of photosensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1977;3: 267-72.
23. Thune P, Solberg Y, McFadden N, et al. Perfume allergy due to oak moss and other lichens. Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:396-400.
24. Calnan C, Cronin E, Rycroft R. Allergy to perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1980:580-1.
25. Calnan C, Cronin E, Rycroft R. Allergy to phenyl salicylate. Contact Dermatitis 1981;7:208-11.
26. Santucci B, Cristaudo C, Picardo M. Contact dermatitis to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16:93-5.
27. Malten K, van Ketel W, Nater J, et al. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1984;11:1-10.
28. de Groot A, Liem D, Nater J, et al. Patch tests with fragrance materials and preservatives. Contact Dermatitis 1985;12:87-92.
29. Hayakawa R, Matsunaga K, Arima Y. Depigmented contact dermatitis due to incense. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16: 272-4.
30. Kaidbey KH, Kligman AM. Photocontact allergy to 6-methylcoumarin. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:277-82.
31. Raugi GJ, Storrs FJ, Larsen WG. Photoallergic contact dermatitis to men's perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5: 251-60.
32. Opdyke D. Food and cosmetic toxicology. Monographs on fragrance raw materials. 1975, 1969, 875.
33. Kroon S. Standard photopatch testing with musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 1983;9:1-4.
34. Parker R, Beuhler E, Newman E. Photoxicity, photoallergy, and contact sensitization of nitro musk perfume raw materials. Contact Dermatitis 1986;14:103-9.
35. Rothenberg H, Hjorth N. Allergy to perfume from toilet soaps and detergents in patients with dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1968;97:417-21.
36. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis - A worldwide multicenter investigation. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996;7:77-83.
37. Emmons W, Marks J. Immediate and delayed reactions to cosmetic ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1985;13:258-65
38. Handley J, Burrows D. Allergic contact dermatitis from synthetic fragrances lyral and acetyl cedrane in separate underarm deodorant preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31:288-90.
39. de Groot A, van der Kley A, Bruynzeel D, et al. Frequency of false positive reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:139-40.
40. Johansen J, Menne T. The fragrance mix and its constituents: a 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:18-23.
41. Frosch P, Pilz B, Andersen K, et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:333-42.
42. Frosch P, Pilz B, Andersen K, et al. Testing with fragrance mix. Is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:266-72.
43. Larsen W. Allergic contact dermatitis to the fragrance material lilial. Contact Dermatitis 198;158-9.
44. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al. A study of the response to fragrance mix, jasmin, Peru balsam and a new fragrance mixture. Paper presented at the Perfume Symposium, London, UK, October, 1996.
45. Larsen W. How to instruct patients sensitive to fragrances. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:880-4.