Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 57-86

  De Groot, Anton C ^a   Frosch, Peter J ^b  

^a JEROEN BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adverse reactions; Allergic contact dermatitis; Balsam of Peru; Essential oils; Fragrance; Fragrance mix; Immediate contact reactions; Occupational contact dermatitis; Perfume; Photosensitivity; Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis

Indexed keywords

BALSAM PERU; COSMETIC; ESSENTIAL OIL; FRAGRANCE;

AIR POLLUTION; AXILLA; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ERYTHRODERMA; FACE; HUMAN; NECK; PHOTODERMATOSIS; REVIEW; RISK; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY; WRIST;

COSMETICS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; HUMANS; PERFUME;

EID: 0031059814     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x     Document Type: Review

References (264)

1. Fisher A A. Perfume dermatitis in children sensitized to balsam of Peru in topical agents. Cutis 1990: 45: 21-23.
2. Larsen W G. Perfumes. In: Baran R, Maihach H I (eds): Cosmetic dermatology. London: Martin Dunitz, 1994: 21-26.
3. Schaller M, Korting H C. Allergic airborne contact dermatitis from essential oils used in aromatherapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 1995: 20: 143-145.
4. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z. Allergy to perfume mixture. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 15: 115-116.
5. Fischer T. Perfumed products. In: Gum J D (ed): Practical contact dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995: 355-371.
6. Guin J D. History, manufacture, and cutaneous reactions to perfumes. In: Frost P, Horwitz S W (eds): Principles of cosmetics for the dermatologist. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1982: 111-129.
7. Scheinman P L. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: A review. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996: 7: 65-76.
8. De Groot A C, Weyland J W, Nater J P. Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology, 3rd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 65, 97, 142-147, 446-451, 475, 502-504, 509, 579-627.
9. Bauer K, Garbe D, Surburg H. Common fragrance and flavor materials. Preparation, properties and uses. Weinheim: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
10. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985: 12: 1-9.
11. Muller P M, Lamparsky D. Perfumes: art, science, and technology. New York: Elsevier, 1991.
12. Fenn R S. Aroma chemical usage trends in modern perfumery. Perfumer & Flavorist 1989: 14: 3-10.
13. Cooke M A, Cadby P A, Harrison R G. Data generation from perfume ingredient safety evaluation. In: Frosch P J et al. (eds): Current topics in contact dermatitis. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1989: 122-126.
14. Cooke M A. IFRA and the dermatologist. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 209-210.
15. Cooke M A, Cadby P A, Ford R A. Databases in the perfumery industry. Semin Dermatol 1989: 8: 85-87.
16. Eiermann H J. Comments on cosmetic safety and product labeling issues. Cosm Toiletries 1988: 103: 53-56.
17. Opdyke D L J. Inhibition of sensitization reactions induced by certain aldehydes. Fd Cosmet Toxicol 1976: 14: 197-198.
18. Ford R A. Studies on the quenching phenomenon. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 27: 60.
19. Basketter D A, Allenby C F. Studies of the quenching phenomenon in delayed contact hypersensitivity reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 160-171.
20. Basketter D, Allenby F. Studies on the quenching phenomenon. Reply. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 27: 61.
21. Safford R J, Basketter D A, Allenby C F, Goodwin B F J. Immediate contact reactions to chemicals in the fragrance mix and a study of the quenching action of eugenol. Br J Dermatol 1990: 123: 595-606.
22. Rothenborg H W, Hjorth N. Allergy to perfumes from toilet soaps and detergents in patients with dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1968: 97: 417-421.
23. Panconesi E, Sertoli A, Spallanzani P, Giorgini S. Balsam of Peru sensitivity from a perfumed cutting fluid in a laser factory. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 297-298.
24. Guin J D. Contact dermatitis to perfume in paper products. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981: 4: 733-734.
25. De Groot A C, Baar A J M, Terpstra H, Weyland J W. Contact allergy to moist toilet paper. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 135-136.
26. Larsen W G. Sanitary napkin dermatitis due to perfume. Arch Dermatol 1979: 115: 363.
27. Keith L, Erich W, Bush I M. Toilet paper dermatitis. JAMA 1969: 209: 269.
28. Larsen W G. Allergic contact dermatitis to the perfume in Mycolog cream. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979: 1: 131-133.
29. Garioch J J, Forsyth A, Chapman R S. Allergic contact dermatitis from the perfume in Locan® cream. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 61-62.
30. Larsen W G. How to instruct patients sensitive to fragrances. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989: 4 (part II): 880-884.
31. Dooms-Goossens A, Dubelloy R, Degreef H. Contact and systemic contact-type dermatitis to spices. In: Adams R M, Nethercott J R (eds): Dermatologic Clinics. Contact Dermatitis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1990: 89-93.
32. Veien N K, Hattel T, Justesen O, et al. Dietary restrictions in the treatment of adult patients with eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 17: 223-227.
33. Guin J D. Balsam of Peru. In: Guin J D (ed): Practical contact dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995: 265-270.
34. Fisher A A. Allergic reactions to feminine hygiene sprays. Arch Dermatol 1973: 108: 801-803.
35. Meynadier J-M, Meynadier J, Peyron J-L, Peyron L. Formes cliniques des manifestations cutanées d'allergie aux parfums. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1986: 113: 31-39.
36. Fisher A A. Consort contact dermatitis due to musk ambrette. Cutis 1995: 55: 199-200.
37. Morren M-A, Rodrigues R, Dooms-Goossens A et al. Connubial contact dermatitis: a review. Eur J Dermatol 1992: 2: 219-223.
38. Leroy D, Dompmartin A. Connubial photosensitivity to musk ambrette. Photodermatology 1989: 6: 137-139.
39. Lorenzi S, Guerra L, Vezzani C, Vinzenzi C. Airborne contact dermatitis from atranorin. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 315-316.
40. Dooms-Goossens A. Cosmetics as causes of allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis 1993: 52: 316-320.
41. Dooms-Goossens A, Deleu H. Airborne contact dermatitis: an update. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 211-217.
42. Angelini G, Vena G A. Airborne contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1992: 10: 123-131.
43. Shall L, Reynolds A J, Holt P J A. Photosensitivity to musk ambrette in a toilet soap and hair gel. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 324.
44. De Groot A C. Adverse reactions to cosmetics. Thesis, State University of Groningen, 1988.
45. Dahlquist I, Fregert S. Atranorin and oak moss contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 168-169.
46. Burry J N. Colophony, perfumes and paper handkerchiefs. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 15: 304-305.
47. Johansen J D, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Exposure to selected fragrance materials. A case study of fragrance-mix-positive eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 106-110.
48. Schorr W F. Lip gloss and gloss type cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis Newsletter 1973: 14: 408.
49. Maibach H I. Cheilitis: occult allergy to cinnamic aldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 15: 106-107.
50. Calnan C D, Cronin E, Rycroft R J G. Allergy to phenyl salicylate. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 208-210.
51. Van Ketel W G. Sensitization to cis-3-hexenyl salicylate. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 154-155.
52. Larsen W G. Allergic contact dermatitis to the fragrance material lilial. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 158-159.
53. Dahlquist I, Fregert S. Contact allergy to atranorin in lichens and perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 111-119.
54. Heine A. Allergisches Kontaktekzem durch Usninsäure in Deodorant Sprays. Derm Monatsschr 1987: 173: 221-225.
55. Thune P, Salberg Y, McFadden N, Staerfelt F. Sandberg M. Perfume allergy due to oak moss and other lichens. Contact Dermatitis 1982: 8: 396-400.
56. Lewis F M, Harrington C I, Gawkrodger D J. Contact sensitivity in pruritus vulvae: a common and manageable problem. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 264-265.
57. Burry J N. Environmental dermatitis. Contact dermatitis from perfumes in soap. Med J Austral 1986: 145: 160-161.
58. De Groot A C, Beverdam E, Tjong Ayong C, Coenraads P J, Nater J P. The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 19: 195-201.
59. Westat Inc. An investigation of consumers' perceptions of adverse reactions to cosmetic products. Washington: National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce, 1975.
60. Berne B, Lundin A, Malmros P E. Side effects of cosmetics and toiletries in relation to use. A retrospective study in a Swedish population. Eur J Dermatol 1994: 4: 189-193.
61. Adams R M, Maibach H I. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985: 13: 1062-1069.
62. De Groot A C. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 17: 26-34.
63. De Groot A C, Bruynzeel D P, Bos J D et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1988: 124: 1525-1529.
64. Broeckx W, Blondeel A, Dooms-Goossens A, Achten G. Cosmetic intolerance. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 189-194.
65. Dooms-Goossens A, Kerre S, Drieghe J, Bossuyt L, Degreef H. Cosmetic products and their allergens. Eur J Dermatol 1992: 2: 465-468.
66. Nielsen N H, Menné T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1992: 72: 456-460.
67. Nielsen B H, Menné T. Sensibilisation de contact aux constituants des cosmetiques dans une population Danoise non sélectionnée. La Glostrup allergy study, Danemark. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1993: 120: 33-36.
68. Guin J D, Berry V K. Perfume sensitivity in adults females. A study of contact sensitivity to a perfume mix in two groups of student nurses. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980: 3: 299-302.
69. De Groot A C, Nater J P, Van der Lende R, Rijcken B. Adverse effects of cosmetics: A retrospective study in the general population. Int J Cosmetic Science 1987: 9: 255-259.
70. Edman B. The influence of shaving method on perfume allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 291-292.
71. De Groot A C, Bruynzeel D P, Bos J D et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1988: 124: 1525-1529.
72. Schorr W F. Cosmetic allergy. Diagnosis, incidence, and management. Cutis 1974: 14: 844-850.
73. Skog E. Incidence of cosmetic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 449-451.
74. Romaguera C, Camarasa J M G, Alomar A, Grimait F. Patch tests with allergens related to cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 167-168.
75. Ngangu Z, Samsoen M, Foussereau J. Einige Aspekte zur Kosmetika-Allergie in Strassburg. Dermatosen 1983: 31: 126-129.
76. Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghøj P et al. Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 21: 291-299.
77. Edman B. Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 13: 129-135.
78. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis. A worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996: 7: 77-83.
79. Fisher A A. Perfume dermatitis. Part 1. General considerations and testing procedures. Cutis 1980: 26: 458-463,477.
80. De Groot A C, Liem D H. Facial psoriasis caused by contact allergy to linalool and hydroxy-citronellal in an aftershave. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 230-232.
81. Santucci B, Cristaudo A, Cannistraci C, Picardo M. Contact dermatitis to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 93-95.
82. Malten K E, van Ketel W G, Nater J P, Liem D H. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 1-10.
83. Audicana M, Bernaola G. Occupational contact dermatitis from citrus fruits: lemon essential oils. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 181-183.
84. Marren P, Wojnarowska F, Powell S. Allergic contact dermatitis and vulvar dermatoses. Br J Dermatol 1992: 126: 52-56.
85. Fisher A A. Perfume dermatitis. Part 1. General considerations and testing procedures. Cutis 1980: 26: 458-478.
86. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. A study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977: 113: 623-626.
87. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Andersen K E et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 333-342.
88. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Burrows D et al. Testing with the fragrance mix - is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 266-272.
89. De Groot A C, Van der Kley A M J, Bruynzeel D P et al. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 139-140.
90. De Groot A C, Liem D H, Nater J P, van Ketel W G. Patch tests with fragrance materials and preservatives. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 12: 87-92.
91. Schnuch A, Uter W, Lehmacher W et al. Epikutantestung mit der Standardserie. Erste Ergebnisse des Projektes "Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken" (IVDK). Dermatosen 1993: 41: 60-70.
92. Pilz B, Frosch P J. Kontaktallergene 1994. In: Plewig G, Korting H C (eds): Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venereologie. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 7-14.
93. Johansen J D, Menné T. The fragrance mix and its constituents: a 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 18-23.
94. Edman B, Möller H. Contact allergy and contact allergens in atopic skin disease. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1992: 3: 27-29,90.
95. Becker K, Temesvari E, Nemeth I. Patch testing with fragrance mix and its constituents in a Hungarian population. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 30: 185-186.
96. Wilkinson J D, Andersen K E, Camarasa J G et al. Preliminary results of effectiveness of two forms of fragrance mix as screening agents for fragrance sensitivity. In: Frosch PJ et al. (eds): Current topics in contact dermatitis. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1989: 127-131.
97. Marks J G, Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992 to 1994). Am J Contact Dermatitis 1995: 6: 160-165.
98. Freeman S. Fragrance and nickel: old allergens in new guises. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1990: 1: 47-52.
99. Shehade S A, Beck M H, Hillier V F. Epidemiological survey of standard series patch test results and observations on day 2 and day 4 readings. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 119-122.
100. Kintziou H, Papaioannou G, Rallis M. Sensitivity to perfumes and preservatives in patients with contact dermatitis. Int J Cosm Science 1990: 12: 115-120.
101. Lim J T E, Goh C L, Ng S K, Wong W K. Changing trends in the epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 26: 321-326.
102. Gonçalo S, Cabral F, Gonçalo M. Contact sensitivity to oak moss. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 19: 355-357.
103. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 237-238.
104. Johansen J D, Andersen K E, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Threshold responses in cinnamic aldehyde-sensitive subjects. Results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 165-171.
105. Nethercott J R, Holness D L, Adams R M et al. Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1985 through 1989 (I). Frequency of response. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1991: 2: 122-129.
106. Swinyer L J. Connubial contact dermatitis to atranorin in lichens. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 226.
107. Fregert S, Dahlquist I. Patch testing with oak moss extract. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 221.
108. Fisher A A, Dooms-Goossens A. The effect of perfume "ageing" on the allergenicity of individual perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 155-159.
109. Hannuksela M. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 221-227.
110. Hannuksela M. Sensitivity of various skin sites in the repeated open application test. Amer J Contact Dermatitis 1991: 2: 102-104.
111. Peter C, Hoting E. Anwendungstest mit parfümierten Kosmetika bei Patienten mit positivem Epikutantest auf Duftstoff-Mischung. Dermatosen 1993: 41: 237-241.
112. Malanin G, Ohela K. Allergic reactions to fragrance mix and its components. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 21: 62-63.
113. McLelland J, Shuster S. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination. Br J Dermatol 1990: 122: 623-630.
114. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch testing with fragrance-mix and its constituents: discrepancies are largely due to the presence or absence of sorbitan sesquioleate. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 238-239.
115. Announcements. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 240.
116. Sugawara M, Nakayama H, Watanabe S. Contact hypersensitivity to ylang-ylang oil. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 248-249.
117. Sugai T. Group Study IV - farnesol and lily aldehyde. Environ Dermatol 1994: 1: 213-214.
118. Utsumi M, Sugai T, Shoji A, Watanabe K, Asoh S, Hashimoto Y. Incidence of positive reactions to sandalwood oil and its related fragrance materials in patch tests and a case of contact allergy to natural and synthetic sandalwood oil in a museum worker. Skin Res 1992: 34 (suppl 14): 209-213.
119. Paulsen E, Andersen K E, Carlsen L, Egsgaard H. Carvone: an overlooked contact allergen cross-reacting with sesquiterpene lactones? Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 138-143.
120. Rudner E A. North American Group results. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 208-209.
121. Mitchell J C, Adams R M, Glendenning W E et al. Results of standard patch tests with substances abandoned. Contact Dermatitis 1982: 8: 336-337.
122. Handley J, Burrows D. Allergic contact dermatitis from the synthetic fragrances Lyral and acetyl cedrene in separate underarm deodorant preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 288-290.
123. Malten K E. Four bakers showing positive patch-tests to a number of fragrance materials, which can also be used as flavors. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1979: suppl 85: 117-121.
124. Guin J D, Haffley P. Sensitization to alpha amyl cinnamic aldehyde and alpha amyl cinnamic alcohol. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983: 8: 76-80.
125. Lorenzi S, Guerra L, Vezzani C, Vincenzi C. Airborne contact dermatitis from atranorin. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 315-316.
126. Meneghini C L. Cosmetic constituents. Contact Dermatitis Newsletter 1970: 8: 182.
127. Sousa Basto A, Azenha A. Contact dermatitis due to incense. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 312-313.
128. Nakayama H. Pigmented contact dermatitis and chemical depigmentation. In: Rycroft R J G, Menné T, Frosch P J (eds): Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 637-659.
129. Keil H. Contact dermatitis due to oil of citronellal. J Invest Dermatol 1947: 8: 327.
130. Johansen J D, Rastogi S C, Jemec G B E. Dipropylene glycol allergy: a hidden cause of perfume contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1994: 5: 98-101.
131. Toyoda T, Watanabe S, Kawasaki M, Nakayama H, Sugawara M. Dehydro-eugenol found in ylang-ylang oil. Skin Res 1989: 31 (suppl 7): 35-43.
132. Malten K E. Sensitization to solcoseryl and methylanisate (fragrance ingredient). Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 219.
133. De Groot A C, Weyland J W. Systemic contact dermatitis from tea tree oil. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 27: 279-280.
134. Nakayama H, Hanaoka H, Oshiro A. Allergen controlled system (ACS). Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan Co, 1974.
135. Benke G M, Larsen W G. Safety evaluation of perfumed shampoos: dose/response relationships for product use testing by presensitized subjects. J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol 1984: 3: 65-67.
136. Bernaola G, Escayol P, Fernández E, Fernández de Corrés L. Contact dermatitis from methylionone fragrance. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 71-72.
137. Sugai T. Historical data of the JSCD. Group study III - Fragrance materials. Environ Dermatol 1994: 1: 209-212.
138. Karlberg A-T, Magnusson K, Nilsson U. Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 26: 332-340.
139. Nakayama H, Matsuo S, Hayakawa K et al. Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 1984: 23: 299-305.
140. English J S C, Rycroft R J G. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyl heptine and methyl octine carbonate. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 174-175.
141. Van Ketel W G. Dermatitis from an aftershave. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 117.
142. Romaguera C, Camarasa J M G, Alomar A, Grimalt F. Patch tests with allergens related to cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 167-168.
143. Cronin E. Photosensitivity to musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 88-92.
144. Hausen B M, Kunze B. Kontaktallergie auf Patchouli-Öl. Akt Dermatol 1991: 17: 199-202.
145. Dooms-Goossens A, Degreef H, Holvoet C, Maertens M. Turpentine-induced hyper-sensitivity to peppermint oil. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 304-308.
146. Vilaplana J, Romaguera C, Grimait F. Contact dermatitis from geraniol in Bulgarian rose oil. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 301.
147. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by ylang-ylang oil. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 198-199.
148. Bonnevie P. Some experiences of war-time industrial dermatoses. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1948: 28: 231-237.
149. Holness D L, Nethercott J R. Epicutaneous testing results in hairdressers. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1990: 2: 224-234.
150. Guerra L, Tosti A, Bardazzi F et al. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: the Italian experience. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 26: 101-107.
151. Van der Walle H B, Brunsveld V M. Dermatitis in hairdressers (I). The experience of the past 4 years. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 30: 217-221.
152. Gola M, Sertoli A, Angelini G et al. GIRDCA data bank for occupational and environmental contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1992: 3: 179-188.
153. Holness D L, Nethercott J R. Patch testing in an occupational health clinic. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1994: 5: 150-155.
154. Wall L M, Gebauer K A. Occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 101-109.
155. Sun C-C, Guo Y-L, Lin R-S. Occupational hand dermatitis in a tertiary referral dermatology clinic in Taipei. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 414-418.
156. Goodfield M J D, Saihan E M. Fragrance sensitivity in coal miners. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 81-83.
157. Dugué P, Bel J, Gomez-Figueredo M. Allergie professionnelle à l'ambrette. Cinq observations dans l'industrie de la parfumerie. Rev fr Allergol 1990: 30: 29-31.
158. Zacher K D, Ippen H. Kontaktekzem durch Bergamottöl. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1984: 32: 95-97.
159. Calnan C D. Lovage sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsletter 1969: 5: 99.
160. Gutman S G, Somov B A. Allergic reactions caused by components of perfumery prepa-rations. Vestn Dermatol Venereol 1968: 12: 62-66.
161. Rudzki E, Rebandel P, Grzywa Z. Occupational dermatitis from cosmetic creams. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 210.
162. Brandão F M. Occupational allergy to lavender oil. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 15: 249-250.
163. Nethercott J R, Pilger C, O'Blenis L, Roy A-M. Contact dermatitis due to cinnamic aldehyde induced in a deodorant manufacturing process. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 241-242.
164. Rademaker M. Allergic contact dermatitis from lavender fragrance in Difflam® gel. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 58-59.
165. Rothenborg H W, Menné T, Sjølin K-E. Temperature dependent primary irritant dermatitis from lemon perfume. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 37-48.
166. Raugi G J, Storrs F J, Larsen W G. Photoallergic contact dermatitis to men's perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1979: 5: 251-260.
167. Wennersten G, Thune P, Brodthagen H, Jansen C, Rystedt I. The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study. Preliminary results. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 10: 305-309.
168. Leow Y H, Wong W K, Ng S K, Goh C L. 2 Years experience of photopatch testing in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 181-182.
169. Gonçalo S, Gil J, Gonçalo M, Baptista A P. Pigmented photoallergic contact dermatitis from musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 229-230.
170. Hayakawa R, Matsunaga K, Arima Y. Airborne pigmented contact dermatitis due to musk ambrette in incense. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 96-98.
171. Parodi G, Guerrera M, Rebora A. Lichenoid photocontact dermatitis to musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 136-138.
172. Giovinazzo V J, Harber L C, Bickers D R, Armstrong R B, Silvers D. Photoallergic contact dermatitis to musk ambrette. Histopathological features of photobiologic reactions observed in a persistent light reactor. Arch Dermatol 1981: 117: 344-348.
173. Ducombs G, Abbadie D, Maleville J. Persistent light reaction from musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 129-130.
174. Cirne de Castro J L, Pereira M A, Nunes F P, Pereira dos Santos A. Musk ambrette and chronic actinic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 13: 302-306.
175. Lan L R, Lee J Y Y, Kao H F, Wang B J, Chen H C. Persistent light reaction with erythroderma caused by musk ambrette. A case report. Cutis 1994: 54: 167-170.
176. Megahed M, Holzle E, Plewig G. Persistent light reaction associated with photoallergic contact dermatitis to musk ambrette and allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance mix. Dermatologica 1991: 182: 199-202.
177. Addo H A, Ferguson J, Johnson B E, Frain-Bell W. The relationship between exposure to fragrance materials and persistent light reactions in the photosensitivity dermatitis. Brit J Dermatol 1982: 107: 261-274.
178. Kaidbey K H, Kligman A M. Photocontact allergy to 6 methylcoumarin. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 277-282.
179. Kaidbey K H, Kligman A M. Photomaximization test for identifying photoallergic contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 161-169.
180. Kaidbey K H, Kligman A M. Photosensitization to coumarin derivatives. Arch Dermatol 1981: 117: 258-265.
181. Jackson R T, Nesbitt L T, DeLeo V A. 6-Methylcoumarin photocontact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980: 2: 124-127.
182. Kaidbey K H, Kligman A M. Contact photoallergy to 6-methylcoumarin in proprietary sunscreens. Arch Dermatol 1978: 114: 1709-1710.
183. Eiermann H J. Regulatory issues concerning AETT and 6-MC. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 120-122.
184. Szczurko C, Dompmartin A, Michel M, Moreau A, Leroy D. Photocontact allergy to oxybenzone: ten years of experience. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1994: 10: 144-147.
185. Leonard F, Kalis B, Journe F. The standard battery for photopatch tests in France. Prospective study by the French Society for Photodermatology. Nouv Dermatol 1994: 13: 305-314.
186. Fernández de Corres L, Muñoz D, Leaniz-Barrutia I, Corrales JL. Photocontact dermatitis from oak moss. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 528-529.
187. Menagé H du P, Ross J S, Norris P G, Hawk J L M, White I R. Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen. Brit J Dermatol 1995: 132: 543-547.
188. Abifadel R, Mortureux P, Perromat M, Ducombs G, Taieb A. Contact sensitivity to flavourings and perfumes in atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 27: 43-46.
189. Emmons W W, Marks J G Jr. Immediate and delayed reactions to cosmetic ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 13: 258-265.
190. De Groot A C, Liem D H. Contact urticaria to rouge. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 322.
191. McDaniel W R, Marks J G. Contact urticaria due to sensitivity to spray starch. Arch Dermatol 1979: 115: 628.
192. Temesvári E, Soos G, Podányi, Kovács I, Nemeth I. Contact urticaria provoked by balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 65-68.
193. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z. Immediate reactions to balsam of Peru, cassia oil and ethyl vanillin. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 360.
194. Nakayama H, Harada R, Toda M. Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 1976: 15: 673-675.
195. Saito F. Relationship between cosmetics and Riehl's melanosis. Hifuka Rinsho 1964: 6: 333.
196. Nagareda T, Sugai T, Shouji A et al. Incidence of positive reactions to cosmetic products and their ingredients in patch tests and representative cases with cosmetic dermatitis in 1991. Skin Res 1992: 34 (suppl 14): 176-182.
197. Romaguera C, Vilaplana J, Grimalt F. Contact dermatitis from oak moss. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 224-225.
198. Hayakawa R, Hirose O, Arima Y. Pigmented contact dermatitis due to musk moskene. J Dermatol 1991: 18: 420-421.
199. Serrano G, Pujol C, Cuadra J, Gallo S, Aliaga A. Riehl's melanosis. Pigmented contact dermatitis caused by fragrances. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989: 21: 1057-1060.
200. Zaynoun S T, Aftimas B A, Tenekjian K K, Kurban A K. Berloque dermatitis. A continuing cosmetic problem. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 111-116.
201. Katsambas A, Antoniou Ch. Melasma. Classification and treatment. J Eur Acad Derm Venereol 1995: 4: 217-223.
202. Hayakawa R, Matsunaga K, Arima Y. Depigmented contact dermatitis due to incense. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 272-274.
203. Goh C L, Ng S K. Bullous contact allergy from cinnamon. Dermatosen 1988: 36: 186-187.
204. Alomar A, Pujol R M, Esquius J. Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1990: 1: 177-179.
205. Thompson J A Jr, Wansker B A. A case of contact dermatitis, erythema multiforme, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981: 5: 666-669.
206. Seidenari S, Di Nardo A, Motolese A, Pincelli C. Erythema multiforme associated with contact sensitization. Report of 6 cases. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 1990: 125: 35-40.
207. Schleuter D P. Airway reponse to hair spray in normal subjects and subjects with hyper-reactive airways. Chest 1978: 75: 544-547.
208. Zuskin E, Bouhuys A, Beck G. Hair sprays and lung function. Lancet 1978: 2: 1203.
209. De Groot A C. Patch testing, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1994.
210. Fisher A A. Patch testing with perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1: 166-168.
211. McFarlane D F, DeLeo V A. Photopatch testing. In: Guin J D (ed): Practical contact dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995: 93-96.
212. White I R. Photopatch testing. In: Rycroft R J G, Menné T, Frosch P J (eds): Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 293-305.
213. Lahti A, Maibach H I. Immediate contact reactions. In: Menné T, Maibach H I (eds): Exogenous dermatoses, environmental contact dermatitis. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990: 21-35.
214. Katchen B R, Maibach H I. Immediate-type contact reactions: immunologic contact urticaria. In: Menné T, Maibach H I (eds): Exogenous dermatoses, environmental contact dermatitis. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990: 51-64.
215. Harvell J, Bason M, Maibach H I. Contact urticaria (Immediate reaction syndrome). Clin Rev Allergy 1992: 10: 303-323.
216. Harvell J, Bason M, Maibach H I. Contact urticaria and its mechanisms. Fd Chem Toxicol 1994: 32: 103-112.
217. Lahti A. Immediate contact reactions. In: Surber C, Elsner P, Bircher AJ, eds. Exogenous Dermatology. Curr Probl Dermatol. Basel: Karger, 1993: 22: 17-23.
218. Zajonz C, Frosch P J. Ursachen von Kontakturtikaria unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Arbeitsstoffen. Hautarzt 1994: 45: 65-73.
219. Fisher A A. Reactions of the mucous membranes to contactants. Clin Dermatol 1987: 5: 123-136.
220. Guin J D. Cinnamic aldehyde. In: Guin J D (ed): Practical contact dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995: 141-151.
221. Niinimäki A. Double-blind placebo-controlled peroral challenges in patients with delayed-type allergy to balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 78-83.
222. Veien N K, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Can oral challenge with balsam of Peru predict possible benefit from a low-balsam diet? Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996: 7: 84-87.
223. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z, Bruo W S. Sensitivity to 35 essential oils. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 196-200.
224. Sainio E-L, Kanerva L. Contact allergens in toothpastes and a review of their hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 100-105.
225. Knight T E, Hausen B M. Melaleuca oil (tea tree oil) dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994: 30: 423-427.
226. Selvaag E, Holm J-Ø, Thune P. Allergic contact dermatitis in an aroma therapist with multiple sensitizations to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 354-355.
227. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z. The value of a mixture of cassia and citronella oils for detection of hypersensitivity to essential oils. Dermatosen 1985: 33: 59-62.
228. McGeorge B C L, Steele M C. Allergic contact dermatitis of the nipple from Roman chamomile ointment. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 139-140.
229. Isaacs G. Permanent local anaesthesia and anhidrosis after clove oil spillage. Lancet 1983: 1: 882.
230. Selvaag E, Eriksen B, Thune P. Contact allergy to tea tree oil and cross-sensitization to colophony. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 124-125.
231. Leow Y-H, Ng S-K, Wong W-K, Goh C-L. Contact allergic potential of topical traditional Chinese medicaments in Singapore. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1995: 6: 4-8.
232. Escande J P, Foussereau J, Lantz J P, Basset A. Le problème des fausses sensibilisations croisées dans les allergies de groupe aux allergènes végétaux. Rev Fr Allergol 1973: 13: 70-75.
233. El-Rab M O G, Al-Sheikh O A. Is the European standard series suitable for patch testing in Riyadh. Saudi Arabia? Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 310-314.
234. Morton C A, Garioch J, Todd P, Lamey P J, Forsyth A. Contact sensitivity to menthol and peppermint in patients with intra-oral symptoms. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 281-284.
235. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z. Sensitizing and irritating properties of star anise oil. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 305-308.
236. Starke J C. Photoallergy to sandalwood oil. Arch Dermatol 1967: 96: 62-63.
237. Li L-F. A clinical and patch test study of contact dermatitis from traditional Chinese medicinal materials. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 392-395.
238. Bilsland D, Strong A. Allergic contact dermatitis from the essential oil of French marigold (Tagetes patula) in an aromatherapist. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 55-56.
239. Puig L, Alomar A, Randazzo L. Cuatrecasas M. Erythema multiforme-like reaction caused by topical application of thuja essential oil. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1994: 5: 94-97.
240. Cachão P, Menezes Brandão F, Carmo M, Frazão S, Silva M. Allergy to oil of turpentine in Portugal. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 205-208.
241. Rietschel R L. Contact urticaria from synthetic casssia oil and sorbic acid limited to the face. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 347-349.
242. Romaguera C, Grimait F. Sensitization to cinnamic aldehyde in toothpaste. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 377-378.
243. Seite-Bellezza D, El Sayed F, Bazex J. Contact urticaria from cinnamic aldehyde and benzaldehyde in a confectioner. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 272-273.
244. Mathias C G T, Maibach H I, Conant M A. Perioral leukoderma simulating vitiligo from use of a tooth-paste containing cinnamic aldehyde. Arch Dermatol 1980: 116: 1172-1173.
245. Mathias C G T, Chapler R R, Maibach H I. Contact urticaria from cinnamic aldehyde. Arch Dermatol 1980: 116: 74-76.
246. Ostler H B, Okumoto M, Daniels T, Conant M A. Drug-induced cicatrisation of the conjunctiva. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 155.
247. Allen C M, Blozis G C. Oral mucosal reactions to cinnamon-flavored chewing gum. JADA 1988: 116: 664-667.
248. Rycroft R J G. Allergic contact dermatitis from dipentene in honing oil. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 325-329.
249. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z. Immediate reactions to balsam of Peru, cassia oil and ethyl vanillin. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 360-361.
250. Vilaplana J, Grimait F, Romaguera C, Conellana F. Contact dermatitis from eugenol in mouth-wash. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 223-224.
251. Guerra P, Aguilar A, Urbina F, Cristóbal MC, García-Pérez A. Contact dermatitis to geraniol in a leg ulcer. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 298-299.
252. Romaguera C, Grimait F, Vilaplana J. Geraniol dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 185-186.
253. Taylor A E M, Lever L, Lawrence C M. Allergic contact dermatitis from strawberry lipsalve. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 142.
254. Lewis F M, Shah M, Gawkrodger D J. Contact sensitivity to food additives can cause oral and perioral symptoms. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 429-430.
255. Andersen K E. Contact allergy to toothpaste flavors. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 195-198.
256. Ferguson J E, Beck M H. Contact sensitivity to vanilla in a lip salve. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 352.
257. Hausen B M, Simatupang T, Bruhn G, Evers P, Koenig W A. Identification of new allergenic constituents and proof of evidence for coniferyl benzoate in Balsam of Peru. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1995: 6: 199-208.
258. Meneghini C L, Angelini G. Secondary polymorphic eruptions in allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatologica 1981: 163: 63-66.
259. Bruynzeel D P, van den Hoogenband H M, Koedijk F. Purpuric vasculitis-like eruption in a patient sensitive to balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 207-209.
260. Thune P. Photosensitivity and allergy to cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 54-55.
261. Forsbeck M, Skog E. Immediate reaction to patch tests with balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 201-205.
262. Hjorth N. Eczematous allergy to balsams, allied perfumes and flavouring agents. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1961: 41: suppl 46.
263. Mitchell J C, Calnan C D, Clendenning W E et al. Patch testing with some components of Balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 57-58.
264. Oxholm A, Heidenheim M, Larsen E, Batsberg W, Menné T. Extraction and patch testing of methylcinnamate, a newly recognized fraction of Balsam of Peru. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1990: 1: 43-46.