Deodorants on the European market: Quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 29-35

  Rastogi, S C ^a   Johansen, J D ^b   Frosch, P ^c   Menne T ^b   Bruze, M ^d   Lepoittevin, J P ^e   Dreier, B ^c   Andersen, K E ^f   White, I R ^g  

^a NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c KLINIKUM DORTMUND   (Germany)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^f ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^g ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemical analysis; Contact allergy; Cosmetics; Deodorants; Fragrance mix; Fragrances

Indexed keywords

BENZYL ACETATE; CINNAMALDEHYDE; COSMETIC; DEODORANT AGENT; EUGENOL; FRAGRANCE; GERANIOL; ISOEUGENOL;

AEROSOL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PACKAGING; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

ACROLEIN; ALDEHYDES; ALLERGENS; DEODORANTS; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; EUGENOL; EUROPE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; HUMANS; PERFUME; PROPANOLS; TERPENES;

EID: 0031985905     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05633.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. De Groot A C. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 17: 26-34.
2. Berne B, Lundin Å, Malmros P E. Side effects of cosmetics and toiletries in relation to use. A retrospective study in a Swedish population. Eur J Dermatol 1994: 4: 189-193.
3. Edman B. Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 13: 129-135.
4. Johansen J D, Andersen T F, Kjøller M, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen K E et al. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy. A case referent study based on the patients history. Manuscript, in prepapation.
5. Johansen J D, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis. Brit J Dermatol 1996: 135: 419-422.
6. Johansen J D, Rastogi S C, Andersen K E, Menné T. Content and reactivity to product perfumes in fragrance mix positive and negative eczema patients. A study of perfumes used in toiletries and skin care products. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 291-296.
7. Rastogi S C, Johansen J D, Menné T. Natural ingredients cosmetics - content of selected sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 423-426.
8. Johansen J D, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Exposure to selected fragrance materials: a case study of fragrance mix positive eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 106-110.
9. Rastogi S C. Analysis of fragrances in cosmetics by gas-chromatography - mass spectrometry. J High Resolut Chromatogr 1995: 18: 653-658.
10. De Groot A C, Frosch P J. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 57-86.
11. Andersen K E, Vølund A, Frankild S. The guinea pig maximization test - with a muliple dose design. Acta Dermatoveneralogica 1996: 75: 463-469.
12. Marzulli F N, Maibach H I. Contact allergy: Predictive testing of fragrance ingredients in humans by Draize and Maximization methods. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 1980: 3: 235-245.
13. Marks J G, Belsito D V, DeLeo V, Fowler J F, Fransway A F, Maibach H I et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard Tray Patch test results (1992-1994). Am J Contact Derm 1995: 6: 160-165.
14. Opdyke D L J. Cinnamic aldehyde. Fragrance raw materials monographs. Fd Cosmet Toxicol 1979: 17: 253-257.
15. Johansen J D, Andersen K E, Rastogi S C. Menné T. Threshold responses in cinnamic aldehyde sensitive subjects: results and methological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 165-171.
16. International Fragrance Association. Code of Practice. Isoeugenol. Last ammendment June 1992.
17. Johansen J D, Andersen K E, Menné T. Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy by use and patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 414-418.
18. Suskind R R. Hydroxycitronellal: "The whole and final story?". RlFM Proceedings from the 6th International information exchange. Chauncey Conference Center, Princeton, New Jersey. Nov 1992.
19. Meneghini C L. Contact dermatitis in children. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ (eds): Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edition. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 406-408.
20. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Andersen K E et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 333-342.
21. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. A study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977: 113: 623-626.
22. OECD Guideline 406. Skin Sensitization 1991.
23. De Groot A C, Liem D H, Nater J P, Van Ketel W G. Patch tests with fragrance materials and preservatives. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 12: 87-92.
24. Malten K E, Van Ketel W G, Nater J P, Liem D H. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 1-10.
25. Santucci B, Christado A, Cannistraci C, Picardo M. Contact dermatitis to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 16: 93-95.
26. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: A worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Am J Cont Derm 1996: 7: 77-83.