Compositional analysis of grain and forage from MON 87427, an inducible male sterile and tissue selective glyphosate-tolerant maize product for hybrid seed production

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1964-1973

  Venkatesh, Tyamagondlu V ^a   Breeze, Matthew L ^a   Liu, Kang ^a   Harrigan, George G ^a   Culler, Angela H ^a  

^a MONSANTO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

composition; genetically modified; glyphosate tolerant; inducible male sterility; maize (Zea mays); statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GLYCINE; GLYPHOSATE; HERBICIDE; PLANT EXTRACT;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CHEMISTRY; DIETARY FIBER; DRUG EFFECT; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; GENETICS; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT INFERTILITY; PLANT SEED; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

AMINO ACIDS; BREEDING; DIETARY FIBER; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; GLYCINE; HERBICIDES; PLANT EXTRACTS; PLANT INFERTILITY; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; SEEDS; ZEA MAYS;

AGRICULTURE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HERBICIDES; HISTOLOGY; METABOLITES; NUTRIENTS; PLANTS (BOTANY); PROTEINS; SEED; STATISTICAL METHODS; TISSUE;

COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS; CONVENTIONAL BREEDING; GENETICALLY MODIFIED; GLYPHOSATES; MALE STERILITY; SECONDARY METABOLITES; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; ZEA MAYS;

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

HEXAPODA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84894715680     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: 15205118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf4041589     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bennetzen, J. L. H.; Hake, S. C. Handbook of Maize, Genetics and Genomics; Springer: New York, 2009.
2. Feng, P. C. C.; Qi, Y.; Chiu, T.; Stoecker, M. A.; Schuster, C. L.; Johnson, S. C.; Fonseca, A. E.; Huang, J. Improving hybrid seed production in corn with glyphosate-mediated male sterility Pest Manage. Sci. 2013, n/a-n/a
3. Drury, S. M.; Reynolds, T. L.; Ridley, W. P.; Bogdanova, N.; Riordan, S.; Nemeth, M. A.; Sorbet, R.; Trujillo, W. A.; Breeze, M. L. Composition of forage and grain from second-generation insect-protected corn MON 89034 is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56 (12) 4623-4630
4. Ridley, W. P.; Harrigan, G. G.; Breeze, M. L.; Nemeth, M. A.; Sidhu, R. S.; Glenn, K. C. Evaluation of compositional equivalence for multitrait biotechnology crops J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59 (11) 5865-5876
5. Harrigan, G. G.; Lundry, D.; Drury, S.; Berman, K.; Riordan, S. G.; Nemeth, M. A.; Ridley, W. P.; Glenn, K. C. Natural variation in crop composition and the impact of transgenesis Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 402-404
6. Harrigan, G. G.; Harrison, J. M. Assessing compositional variability through graphical analysis and Bayesian statistical approaches: case studies on transgenic crops Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2012, 28, 15-32
7. Herman, R. A.; Chassy, B. M.; Parrott, W. Compositional assessment of transgenic crops: an idea whose time has passed Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27 (10) 555-557
8. Mudge, J. F. Explicit consideration of critical effect sizes and costs of errors can improve decision-making in plant science New Phytol. 2013, 199 (4) 876-878
9. Lovell, D. P. Biological importance and statistical significance J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61 (35) 8340-8348
10. EFSA EFSA Scientific Committee. Statistical significance and biological relevance EFSA J. 2011, 9 (9) 17
11. Lundry, D. R.; Burns, J. A.; Nemeth, M. A.; Riordan, S. G. Composition of grain and forage from insect-protected and herbicide-tolerant corn, MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 88017 × DAS-59122-7 (SmartStax), is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61 (8) 1991-1998
12. Saiki, R. K.; Innis, M. A.; Gelfand, D.; Sninsky, J. J.; White, T. J. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: New York, 1990; p 13.
13. Drury, S. M.; Reynolds, T. L.; Ridley, W. P.; Bogdanova, N.; Riordan, S.; Nemeth, M. A.; Sorbet, R.; Trujillo, W. A.; Breeze, M. L. Composition of forage and grain from second-generation insect-protected corn MON 89034 is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4623-4630
14. AOAC. AOAC International Method 923.03.In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
15. ANKOM Technology. ANKOM Technology Method 2; Ankom Technology: Macedon, NY, USA, 2009.
16. Foss-Tecator. Foss-Tecator Kjeltec 2400 Site Preparation, Installation, and Operating Guide; Foss Tecator AB: Höganäs, Sweden, 1999.
17. AOAC. AOAC International Method 985.29. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
18. AOAC. AOAC InternationalMethod 923.03. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
19. Hong, J. L. Determination of amino acids by precolumn derivatization 6-aminoquinolyl- N -hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate and ultra-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection J. Chromatogr., A 1994, 670 (1-2) 59-66
20. AOAC. AOAC International Method 994.12. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
21. AOAC. AOAC InternationalMethod 939.05. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
22. AOCS. AOCS Method Ce 2-66. In Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS, 5 th ed.; American Oil Chemists' Society: Champaign, IL, USA, 1997.
23. AOCS. AOCS Method Ce 2-66. In Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS, 5 th ed.; American Oil Chemists' Society: Champaign, IL, USA, 1997.
24. AOCS. AOCS Method Ce 1e-91. In Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS, 5 th ed.; American Oil Chemists' Society: Champaign, IL, USA, 2000.
25. AACC. AACC Method 86-80. In Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10 th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1999.
26. Weber, E. J. High performance liquid chromatography of the tocols in corn grain J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1984, 61.7, 1231-1234
27. Amaral, J. S. Simultaneous determination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in hazelnuts by a normal phase liquid chromatographic method Anal. Sci. 2005, 21, 1545-1548
28. AACC. AACC Method 86-47. In Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10 th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2000.
29. AOAC. AOAC International Method 986.11. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
30. AACC. AACC Method 80-04. In Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10 th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2000.
31. Knapp, D. R. Handbook of Analytical Derivatization Reactions; Wiley: Somerset, NJ, USA, 1979.
32. Johansen, H. N.; Glisto, V.; Knudsen, K. E. B. Influence of extraction solvent and temperature on the quantitative determination of oligosaccharides from plant materials by high-performance liquid chromatography J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 1470-1474
33. AOAC. AOAC International Method 999.11. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
34. AOAC. AOAC InternationalMethod 941.15. In Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, 18 th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
35. AACC. AACC Method 86-72. In Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10 th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1999.
36. AACC. AACC Method 86-51. In Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10 th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1999.
37. AACC. AACC Method 86-31. In Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10 th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1999.
38. Figueroa-Espinoza, M.-C.; Morel, M.-H.; Rouau, X. Effect of lysine, tyrosine, cysteine, and glutathione on the oxidative cross-linking of feruloylated arabinoxylans by a fungal laccase J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2583-2589
39. Krygier, K.; Sosulski, F.; Hogge, L. Free, esterified, and insoluble-bound phenolic acids. 1. Extraction and purification procedure J. Agric. Food Chem. 1982, 30, 330-334
40. Classen, D.; Amason, J. T.; Serratos, J. A.; Lambert, J. D. H.; Nozzolillo, C.; Philogene, B. J. R. Correlation of phenolic acid content of maize to resistance to Sitophilus zeamais, the maize weevil, in CIMMYT'S collections J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16.2, 301-315
41. Sosulski, F.; Krygier, K.; Hogge, L. Free, esterified, and insoluble-bound phenolic acids. 3. Composition of phenolic acids in cereals and potato flours J. Agric. Food Chem. 1982, 30, 337-340
42. Bredie, W. L. P.; Mottram, D. S.; Guy, R. C. E. Aroma volatiles generated during extrusion cooking of maize flour J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1479-1487
43. Buttery, R. G.; Stem, D. J.; Ling, L. C. Studies on flavor volatiles of some sweet corn products J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 791-795
44. Rogers, S. R.; Pesti, G. M. Determination of tryptophan from feedstuffs using reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography J. Micronutr. Anal. 1990, 7.1, 27-35
45. U.S. EPA. Assigning Values to Non-Detected/Non-Quantified Pesticide Residues in Human Health Food Exposure Assessments; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs: Washington, DC, 2000.
46. Littell, R. C.; Milliken, G. A.; Stroup, W. W.; Wolfinger, R. D.; Schabenberger, O. SAS for Mixed Models; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2006.
47. ILSI. Crop Composition Database, version 4.1. International Life Sciences Institute: Washington, DC, 2010.
48. Miao, Y.; Mulla, D. J.; Robert, P. C.; Hernandez, J. A. Within-field variation in corn yield and grain quality responses to nitrogen fertilization and hybrid selection Agron. J. 2006, 98 (1) 129-140
49. Thompson, D. L.; Jellum, M. D.; Young, C. T. Effect of controlled temperature environments on oil content and on fatty acid composition of corn oil J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1973, 50 (12) 540-542
50. Menkir, A. Genetic variation for grain mineral content in tropical-adapted maize inbred lines Food Chem. 2008, 110 (2) 454-464
51. Singh, V.; Moreau, R. A.; Haken, A. E.; Eckhoff, S. R.; Hicks, K. B. Hybrid variability and effect of growth location on corn fiber yields and corn fiber oil composition Cereal Chem. 2000, 77 (5) 692-695
52. Uribelarrea, M.; Below, F. E.; Moose, S. P. Grain composition and productivity of maize hybrids derived from the Illinois protein strains in response to variable nitrogen supply Crop Sci. 2004, 44 (5) 1593-1600
53. Widdicombe, W. D.; Thelen, K. D. Row width and plant density effect on corn forage hybrids Agron. J. 2002, 94 (2) 326-330
54. Harrigan, G. G.; Ridley, W. P.; Miller, K. D.; Sorbet, R.; Riordan, S. G.; Nemeth, M. A.; Reeves, W.; Pester, T. A. The forage and grain of MON 87460, a drought-tolerant corn hybrid, are compositionally equivalent to that of conventional corn J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57 (20) 9754-9763
55. Zhou, J.; Harrigan, G. G.; Berman, K. H.; Webb, E. G.; Klusmeyer, T. H.; Nemeth, M. A. Stability in the composition equivalence of grain from insect-protected maize and seed from glyphosate-tolerant soybean to conventional counterparts over multiple seasons, locations, and breeding germplasms J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59 (16) 8822-8828