Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at increasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50-75: A randomized controlled trial

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 104, Issue , 2014, Pages 31-40

  Jensen, Jakob D ^a   King, Andy J ^b   Carcioppolo, Nick ^c   Krakow, Melinda ^a   Samadder, N Jewel ^a   Morgan, Susan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer information overload; Colonoscopy; Narratives; Randomized controlled trial; Tailoring; United States; Worksite interventions

Indexed keywords

CANCER INFORMATION OVERLOAD; COLONOSCOPY; NARRATIVES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TAILORING; UNITED STATES; WORKSITE INTERVENTIONS;

AGED; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84894495939     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abbott H. The Cambridge introduction to narrative 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Arora N.K., Hesse B.W., Rimer B.K., Viswanath K., Clayman M.L., Croyle R.T. Frustrated and confused: the American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2008, 23:223-228.
3. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior 2004, 31:143-164.
4. Beydoun H.A., Beydoun M.A. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes & Control 2008, 19:339-359.
5. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J.P.T., Rothstein H.R. Introduction to meta-analysis 2009, Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
6. Busselle R., Bilandzic H. Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: a model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory 2008, 18:255-280.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data 2010, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.
8. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Academic Press, NY.
9. Dal Cin S., Zanna M.P., Fong G.T. Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. Resistance and persuasion 2004, 175-191. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. E.S. Knowles, J.A. Linn (Eds.).
10. Dillard A.J., Fagerlin A., Dal Cin S., Zikmund-Fisher B.J., Ubel P.A. Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social Science & Medicine 2010, 71:45-52.
11. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:1149-1160.
12. Glanz K., Bishop D.B. The role of behavioral science theory in the development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health 2012, 21:299-418. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604.
13. Green M.C. Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication 2006, 56:s163-s183.
14. Green M.C., Brock T.C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79(5):701-721.
15. Griffith J.M., Fichter M., Fowler F.J., Lewis C., Pignone M.P. Should a colon cancer screening decision aid include the option of no testing? A comparative trial of two decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008, 8:10-19.
16. Hayes J.A. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling 2012, [White paper]. Retrieved from. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
17. Hayes A.F., Matthes J. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:924-936.
18. Jensen J.D. Addressing health literacy in the design of health messages. Health communication message design: Theory, research, and practice 2012, 171-190. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. H. Cho (Ed.).
19. Jensen J.D., Bernat J.K., Davis L.A., Yale R. Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 2010, 28:470-489.
20. Jensen J.D., Bernat J.K., Wilson K., Goonwardene J. The delay hypothesis: the manifestation of media effects over time. Human Communication Research 2011, 37:509-528.
21. Jensen J.D., Carcioppolo N., King A.J., Bernat J.K., Davis L.A., Yale R., et al. Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash. Journal of Health Communication 2011, 16:486-503.
22. Jensen J.D., Carcioppolo N., King A.J., Scherr C.L., Jones C.L., Niederdeppe J. The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Education & Counseling 2013, 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.016.
23. Jensen J.D., King A.J., Carcioppolo N., Davis L.A. Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. Journal of Communication 2012, 62:851-868.
24. Jerant A., Kravitz R.L., Rooney M., Amerson S., Kreuter M., Franks P. Effects of tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Education & Counseling 2007, 66:67-74.
25. Krebs P., Prochaska J.O., Rossi J.S. Ameta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive Medicine 2010, 51:214-221.
26. Kreuter M.W., Farrell D., Olevitch L., Brennan L. Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology 2000, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
27. Kreuter M.W., Green M.C., Cappella J.N., Slater M.D., Wise M.E., Storey D., et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2007, 33:221-235.
28. Kreuter M.W., Holmes K., Alcaraz K., Kalesan B., Rath S., Richert M., et al. Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Education & Counseling 2010, 81:S6-S14.
29. Kreuter M.W., Strecher V.J., Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring printed materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1999, 21:276-283.
30. Lairson D.R., DiCarlo M., Myers R.E., Wolf T., Cocroft J., Sifri R., et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer 2008, 112:779-788.
31. Lang A. Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication 2006, 56:S57-S80.
32. Larkey L.K., Gonzalez J. Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer prevention and early detection among Latinos. Patient Education & Counseling 2007, 67(3):272-278.
33. Larkey L.K., Hecht M. Amodel of effects of narrative as culture-centric health promotion. Journal of Health Communication 2010, 15:114-135.
34. Ling B.S., Schoen R.E., Trauth J.M., Wahed A.S., Eury T., Simak D.M., et al. Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening. Archives of Internal Medicine 2009, 169:47-55.
35. Lipkus I.M., Green L.G., Marcus A. Manipulating perceptions of colorectal cancer threat: implications for screening intentions and behaviors. Journal of Health Communication 2003, 8(3):213-228.
36. Manne S.L., Coups E.J., Markowitz A., Meropol N.J., Haller D., Jacobsen P.B., et al. Arandomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2009, 37:207-217.
37. Marcus A.C., Mason M., Wolfe P., Rimer B.K., Lipkus I., Strecher V., et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. Journal of Health Communication 2005, 10:83-104.
38. McQueen A., Tiro J.A., Vernon S.W. Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2008, 17:2231-2237.
39. Moyer-Gusé E., Nabi R.L. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research 2010, 36:26-52.
40. Myers R.E., Bittner-Fagan H., Daskalakis C., Sifri R., Vernon S.W., Cocroft J., et al. Arandomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2013, 22:109-117.
41. Myers R.E., Ross E., Jepson C., Wolf T., Balshem A., Millner L., et al. Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Preventive Medicine 1994, 23:142-151.
42. Myers R.E., Sifri R., Hyslop T., Rosenthal M., Vernon S.W., Cocroft J., et al. Arandomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 2007, 110:2083-2091.
43. Nabi R., Moyer-Gusé E., Byrne S. All joking aside: a serious investigation into the persuasive effects of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs 2007, 74:29-54.
44. Noar S.M., Benac C.N., Harris M.S. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133(4):673-693.
45. Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., Hayes A.F. Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescription. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:185-227. 10.1080/00273170701341316.
46. Rains S.A. The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research 2013, 39:47-73.
47. Rawl S.M., Champion V.L., Scott L.L., Zhou H., Monahan P., Ding Y., et al. Arandomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives. Patient Education & Counseling 2008, 71:215-227.
48. Rimer B.K., Kreuter M.W. Advancing tailored health communication: a persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication 2006, 56:S184-S201.
49. Ruffin M.T., Fetters M.D., Jimbo M. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine 2007, 45:267-273.
50. Schafer J.L., Olsen M.K. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1998, 33:545-571.
51. Schank R.C., Berman T.R. The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations 2002, 287-313. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ. M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, T.C. Brock (Eds.).
52. Shrum L.J. Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: effects and underlying processes. Media effects: Advances in theory and research 2009, 50-73. Routledge, New York, NY. J. Bryant, M.B. Oliver (Eds.).
53. Siegel R., Naishadham D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2013, 63:11-30.
54. Slater M.D., Rouner D. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory 2002, 12(2):173-191.
55. Smith R.A., Brookes D., Cokkinides V., Saslow D., Brawley O.W. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2013, 63(2):87-105.
56. Tilley B.C., Vernon S.W., Myers R., Glanz K., Lu M., Hirst K., et al. The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program. Preventive Medicine 1999, 28:276-283.
57. Tiro J.A., Vernon S.W., Hyslop T., Myers R.E. Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2005, 14:2855-2861.
58. Vernon S.W., Bartholomew L.K., McQueen A., Bettencourt J.L., Greisinger A., Coan S.P., et al. Arandomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2011, 41:284-299.
59. Vidal L., LeBlanc W.G., McCollister K.E., Arheart K.L., Chung-Bridges K., Christ S., et al. Cancer screening in U.S. workers. American Journal of Public Health 2009, 99(1):59-65.
60. Walsh J.M.E., Gildengrorin G., Green L.W., Jenkins J., Potter M.B. The FLU-FOBT Program in community clinics: durable benefits of a randomized control trial. Health Education Research 2012, 27(5):886-894.
61. Walsh J.M., Salazar R., Nguyen T.T., Kaplan C., Nguyen, Hwang J., et al. Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2010, 39:1-14.
62. Winterbottom A., Bekker H.L., Conner M., Mooney A. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 67:2079-2088.
63. Witte K., Cameron K.A., McKeon J.K., Berkowitz J.M. Predicting risk behaviors: development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication 1996, 1:317-341.
64. Yale R.N. Measuring narrative believability: development and validation of the narrative believability scale (NBS-12). Journal of Communication 2013, 63(3):578-599.
65. Zillmann D. Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication 2006, 56:S221-S237.