The Nature of Psychological Reactance Revisited: A Meta-Analytic Review

Human Communication Research

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 47-73

  Rains, Stephen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871453330     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. *Indicates a study included in the meta-analysis.
2. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Berkowitz, L. (1973). Reactance and unwillingness to help. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 310-317.
5. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2.2) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biotstat.
6. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
7. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
8. Brehm, J. W., & Sensenig, J. (1966). Social influence as a function of attempted and implied usurpation of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 703-707.
9. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
10. Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., & Voloudakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance: Communicating threats to attitudinal freedom. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Theory and practice (pp. 213-232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. Human Communication Research, 27, 38-68.
14. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2003, May). On the nature of reactance and its role in health communication. Paper presented at the 53rd annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
15. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17. Gardner, E. (2010). Ease the resistance: The role of narrative and other-referencing in attenuating psychological reactance to persuasive diabetes messages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
18. Hammock, T., & Brehm, J. W. (1966). The attractiveness of choice alternatives when freedom to choose is eliminated by a social agent. Journal of Personality, 34, 546-554.
19. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
20. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
21. Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426-445.
22. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
23. Hornik, R., Jacobsohn, L., Orwin, R., Piesse, A., & Kalton, G. (2008). Effects of the national youth anti-drug campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 2229-2236.
24. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
25. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Ivanov, B., Miller, C. H., Sims, J. D., Harrison, K. J., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., et al. (2011, November). Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
27. Jenkins, M., & Dragojevic, M. (2010, November). Examining the process of resistance to persuasion: A politeness theory based approach. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
28. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
29. Kim, S.-Y., & Levine, T. (2008a, November). Intertwined versus separate process models of resistance to persuasion: The moderating effect of method. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
30. Kim, S.-Y., & Levine, T. (2008b, November). Revisiting the intertwined model of psychological reactance. Paper presented at annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
31. Kim, S.-Y., & Levine, T. (2008c, May). Three reasons why persuasive messages fail. Paper presented at the 58th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
32. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184.
34. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
35. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
36. Magid, Y. (2011). The following message might make you mad: Forewarning and inoculation against reactance. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
37. Martinez, A., Quick, B., & Stephenson, M. (2009, November). TV ads advocating condom use among sexually active college students: A quantitative analysis of psychological reactance on message effectiveness, quality, and ad attitudes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
38. Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219-240.
39. Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the persuasive effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 25-51.
40. Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292-320.
41. Nabi, R. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69, 204-216.
42. Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
44. Quick, B. (2005). An explication of the reactance processing model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
45. Quick, B. (2007, November). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on reactance-inducing messages, reactance, and reactance restoration. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
46. Quick, B. (2010, November). An assessment of the operationalization of psychological reactance. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
47. Quick, B. L. (2012). What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication, 27, 1-9.
48. Quick, B. L., & Bates, B. R. (2010). The use of gain- or loss-frame messages and efficacy appeals to dissuade excessive alcohol consumption among college students: A test of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 603-628.
49. Quick, B., & Considine, J. (2007, May). Examining use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive message for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Paper presented at the 57th annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
50. Quick, B. L., & Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise advertisements for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication, 23, 483-491.
51. Quick, B. L., & Kim, D. K. (2009). Examining reactance and reactance restoration with Korean adolescents: A test of psychological reactance within a collectivist culture. Communication Research, 36, 765-782.
52. Quick B., & Scott, A. (2009, November). Family communication patterns as a moderator of the relationship between psychological reactance and a motivation toward communicating about being an organ donor with family. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
53. Quick, B. L., Scott, A. M., & Ledbetter, A. (2011). A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 660-679.
54. Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34, 255-276.
55. Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on reactance-inducing messages, reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research, 34, 448-476.
56. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111-163). Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
57. Rains, S. A., & Turner, M. M. (2004, May). Reactance, message processing and failed health campaigns. Paper presented at the 54th annual conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
58. Rains, S. A., & Turner, M. M. (2007) Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model. Human Communication Research, 33, 241-269.
59. Richards, A., & Banas, J. (2011, November). Inoculating against reactance. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association's, New Orleans, LA.
60. Ringold, D. J. (2002). Boomerang effects in response to public health interventions: Some unintended consequences in the alcoholic beverage market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 25, 27-63.
61. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
62. Roubroeks, M. A. J., Ham, J. R. C., & Midden, C. J. H. (2010). The dominant robot: Threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), PERSUASIVE 2010, Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 174-184). Berlin: Springer.
63. Roubroeks, M., Ham, J., & Midden, C. (2011). When artificial social agents try to persuade people: The role of social agency on the occurrence of psychological reactance. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3, 155-165.
64. Roubroeks, M., Midden, C., & Ham, J. (2009). Does it make a difference who tells you what to do? Exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (article 15). New York: ACM.
65. Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 397-422.
66. Silvia, P. J. (2006) Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 673-688.
67. Smith, M. J. (1977). The effects of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of message quality and initial receiver attitude. Communication Monographs, 44, 196-206.
68. Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1968). Attitude change as a function of felt competence and threat to attitudinal freedom. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 64-75.
69. Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1970). Effects of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 18-22.
70. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
71. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 37, 117-123.
72. Zhang, Q., & Sapp, D. (2011, November). Psychological reactance in the classroom: Request politeness, relationship distance, and resistance intention. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.