Avoiding the Target Language with the Help of Google: Managing Language Choices in Gathering Information for EFL Project Work

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 110-135

  Musk, Nigel ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894438223     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.102     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beckett, G. (2006). Project-based second and foreign language education: Theory, research, and practice. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present and future (pp. 3-16). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
2. Bialystok, E. (1983). Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 100-118). Harlow, England: Longman.
3. Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
4. Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 187-206). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Čekait, A. (2009). Collaborative corrections with spelling control: Digital resources and peer assistance. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 319-341. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9067-7
6. Chamot, A.U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. doi:10.1017/S0267190505000061
7. Chamot, A. U., & Keatley, C. W. (2003). Learning strategies of adolescent low literacy Hispanic ESL students. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Debski, R. (2000a). Exploring the re-creation of a CALL innovation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 307-332. doi:10.1076/0958-8221(200012)13:4-5;1-E;FT307
9. Debski, R. (Ed.). (2000b). Project-oriented CALL [Special issue]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4-5).
10. Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1995). Communication strategies: An empirical analysis with retrospection. In J. S. Turley & K. Lusby (Eds.), Selected papers from the proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Symposium of the Deseret Language and Linguistics Society (pp. 155-168). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
11. Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47, 173-210. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.51997005
12. Ewing, M. C. (2000). Conversations of Indonesian language students on computer-mediated projects: Linguistic responsibility and control. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 333-356. doi:10.1076/0958-8221(200012)13:4-5;1-E;FT333
13. Eyring, J. L. (1997). Is project work worth it? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED407838)
14. Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20-60). Harlow, England: Longman.
15. Garfinkel, H. (1994). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. (Original work published 1967)
16. Göthman, S. (2012). Language choice in Internet-based project work (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
17. Hedge, T. (1993). Key concepts in ELT: Project work. ELT Journal, 47, 276-277. doi:10.1093/elt/47.3.275
18. Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
19. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
20. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
21. Jeon-Ellis, G., Debski, R., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Oral interaction around computers in the project-oriented CALL classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 121-145. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/
22. Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16, 91-109. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/
23. Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404-427. doi:10.1093/applin/amm052
24. Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602-615. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.012
25. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom talks [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 88(4).
26. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. (n.d.). The Language Archive: ELAN [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan
27. Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 501-518. doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15.x
28. Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 65-94. doi:10.1515/iral.2009.004
29. Musk, N. (2011). Att spåra andraspråkslärande i en internetstödd frågesport [Tracking second language learning in an Internet quiz]. In R. Säljö (Ed.), Lärande och minnande som social praktik [Learning and remembering as social practice] (pp. 181-206). Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts.
30. Oxford, R. L. (Ed.). (2003). Language learning styles and strategies [Special issue]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4).
31. Oxford, R. L. (2010). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson/Longman.
32. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising "learning" in applied linguistics (pp. 105-126). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., & Kellerman, E. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
34. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
35. Stoller, F. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. 19-40). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
36. Tarone, E. (1978). Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: A progress report. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. C. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77 (pp. 194-203). Washington, DC: TESOL.
37. van Lier, L. (2002). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 140-164). New York, NY: Continuum.
38. van Lier, L. (2006). Foreword. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. xi-xvi). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
39. Vetenskapsrådet. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Ethical principles for research in the arts and social sciences]. Stockholm, Sweden: Vetenskapsrådet Tryck: Elanders Gotab.
40. Willems, G. (1987). Communication strategies and their significance in foreign language teaching. System, 15, 351-364. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(87)90009-1
41. Yang, N. D. (2003). Integrating portfolios into learning strategy-based instruction for EFL college students. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 293-317. doi:10.1515/iral.2003.014