Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance regimes

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 265-276

  Persha, Lauren ^a   Andersson, Krister ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Decentralization; Forests; Governance; Inequality; Institutions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894329722     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Agrawal A., Ostrom E. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society 2001, 29:485-515.
2. Agrawal A., Ribot J. Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. Journal of Developing Areas 1999, 33:473-502.
3. Alesina A., Spolaore E. On the number and size of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 112:1027-1056.
4. Andersson K. Local governance of forests and the role of external organizations: some ties matter more than others. World Development 2013, 43:226-237.
5. Andersson K., Agrawal A. Inequalities, institutions, and forest commons. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:866-875.
6. Andersson K., Gordillo G., van Laerhoven F. Local Governments and Rural Development: Comparing Lessons from Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru 2009, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
7. Andersson K., Pacheco D. Turning to forestry for a way out of poverty: is formalizing property rights enough?. Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and Policies 2006, Oxford University Press, UK. B. Guha-Khasnobi, R. Kanbur, E. Ostrom (Eds.).
8. Andersson K., van Laerhoven F. From local strongman to facilitator - institutional incentives for participatory municipal governance in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 2007, 40:1085-1111.
9. Andersson K.P. Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance. World Development 2004, 32:233-249.
10. Andersson K.P., Gibson C.C., Lehoucq F. Municipal politics and forest governance: comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development 2006, 34:576-595.
11. Baland J.-M., Platteau J.-P. The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management. World Development 1999, 27:773-788.
12. Bardhan P. Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2002, 16:185-205.
13. Bardhan P., Mookherjee D. Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review 2000, 90:135-139.
14. Bardhan P., Mookherjee D. Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics 2005, 89:675-704.
15. Bardhan P., Mookherjee D. Decentralisation and accountability in infrastructure delivery in developing countries. Economic Journal 2006, 116:101-127.
16. Barnes C., van Laerhoven F. Helping to self-help? External interventions to stimulate local collective action in joint forest management, Maharashtra, India. International Forestry Review 2013, 15:1-17.
17. Barron P., Clark S. Decentralizing Inequality? Center-Periphery Relations, Local Governance and Conflict in Aceh 2006, 35. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
18. Bassett K. Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city?. Urban Studies 1996, 33:539-555.
19. Bates R.H. Institutions as investments. The Political Dimension of Economic Growth 1998, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. S. Borner, M. Paldam (Eds.).
20. Berry W.D., DeMeritt J.H.R., Esarey J. Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: is a product term essential?. American Journal of Political Science 2010, 54:248-266.
21. Blair H. Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Development 2000, 28:21-39.
22. Brooks J.S., Franzen M.A., Holmes C.M., Grote M.N., Mulder M.B. Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 2006, 20:1528-1538.
23. Chhatre A., Agrawal A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:17667-17670.
24. Chomitz K.M., Buys P., De Luca G., Thomas T.S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests, Worlds Bank Policy Research Report 2007, World Bank, Washington, DC.
25. Cinner J.E., Daw T.M., McClanahan T.R., Muthiga N., Abunge C., Hamed S., Mwaka B., Rabearisoa A., Wamukota A., Fisher E., Jiddawi N. Transitions toward co-management: the process of marine resource management devolution in three east African countries. Global Environmental Change 2012, 22:651-658.
26. Clarke G.R.G. More evidence on income-distribution and growth. Journal of Development Economics 1995, 47:403-427.
27. Cowell F. Measuring Inequality 2011, OUP, Oxford.
28. Crook R., Manor J. Democracy and Decentralization in Southeast Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance 1998, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
29. Crook R.C. Decentralisation and poverty reduction in Africa: the politics of local-central relations. Public Administration and Development 2003, 23:77-88.
30. Dayton-Johnson J., Bardhan P. Inequality and conservation on the local commons: a theoretical exercise. Economic Journal 2002, 112:577-602.
31. Dreze J., Sen A. India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity 1996, Oxford University Press, Delhi.
32. Easterly W. Inequality does cause underdevelopment: insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics 2007, 84:755-776.
33. Faguet J.P. Decentralization and governance. World Development 2013, 53:2-13.
34. Fajnzylber P., Lederman D., Loayza N. What causes violent crime?. European Economic Review 2002, 46:1323-1357.
35. Farazmand A. Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review 1999, 59:509-522.
36. Fox J. The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship - lessons from Mexico. World Politics 1994, 46:151-184.
37. Fox J. How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Development 1996, 24:1089-1103.
38. Grindle M. Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization and the Promise of Good Governance 2007, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39. Gurang A., Bista R., Karki R., Shrestha S., Uprety D., Oh S. Community-based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small-scale Forestry 2013, 12:377-388.
40. Habermas J. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Harris J., Stokke K., Tornquist O. Politicizing Democracy: The New Local Politics of Democratization 2005, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
42. Hayes T. Parks, people and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 2006, 34:2064-2075.
43. Hayes T., Persha L. Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12:545-553.
44. Hayward C.R. The difference states make: democracy, identity, and the American city. American Political Science Review 2003, 97:501-514.
45. Horn M. The Political Economy of Public Administration 1995, Cambridge University Press, New York.
46. Imai K.S., Sato T. Decentralization, democracy and allocation of poverty alleviation programmes in rural India. European Journal of Development Research 2012, 24:125-143.
47. Iversen V., Chhetry B., Francis P., Gurung M., Kafle G., Pain A., Seeley J. High value forests, hidden economies and elite capture: evidence from forest user groups in Nepal's Terai. Ecological Economics 2006, 58:93-107.
48. Johnson C. Local democracy, democratic decentralisation and rural development: theories, challenges and options for policy. Development Policy Review 2001, 19:521-532.
49. Kauneckis D., Andersson K. Making decentralization work: a cross-national examination of local governments. Studies in Comparative International Development 2009, 44(1):23-46.
50. Knight J. Institutions and Social Conflict: Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Larson A.M. Natural resources and decentralization in Nicaragua: are local governments up to the job?. World Development 2002, 30:17-31.
52. Larson A.M. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:540-549.
53. Larson A.M., Barry D., Dahal G.R. New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. International Forestry Review 2010, 12:78-96.
54. Larson A.M., Soto F. Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2008, 33:213-239.
55. Leonard D.K., Brass J.N., Nelson M., Ear S., Fahey D., Fairfield T., Gning M.J., Halderman M., McSherry B., Moehler D.C., Prichard W., Turner R., Vu T., Dijkman J. Does patronage still drive politics for the rural poor in the developing world? A comparative perspective from the livestock sector. Development and Change 2010, 41:475-494.
56. Lund J.F., Saito-Jensen M. Revisiting the issue of elite capture of participatory initiatives. World Development 2013, 46:104-112.
57. Maharjan M.R., Dakal T.R., Thapa S.K., Schreckenberg K., Luttrell C. Improving the benefits to the poor from community forestry in the Churia region of Nepal. International Forestry Review 2009, 11:254-267.
58. Manin B. On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory 1987, 15:338-368.
59. Milanovic B. True world income distribution, 1988 and 1993: first calculation based on household surveys alone. Economic Journal 2002, 112:51-92.
60. Mogoi J., Obonyo E., Ongugo P., Oeba V., Mwangi E. Communities, property rights and forest decentralisation in Kenya: early lessons from participatory forest management. Conservation and Society 2012, 10:82-194.
61. Molinas J.R. The impact of inequality, gender, external assistance and social capital on local-level cooperation. World Development 1998, 26:413-431.
62. Naidu S.C. Heterogeneity and collective management: evidence from common forests in Himachal Pradesh, India. World Development 2009, 37:676-686.
63. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
64. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
65. Pacheco P. Avances y desafíos en la descentralización de la gestión de los recursos forestales en Bolivia. Center for International Forestry Research and Proyecto de Manejo Forestal Sostenible (BOLFOR) 2000, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.
66. Palmer C., Engel S. For better or for worse? Local impacts of the decentralization of Indonesia's forest sector. World Development 2007, 35:2131-2149.
67. Persha L., Agrawal A., Chhatre A. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science 2011, 331:1606-1608.
68. Persha L., Blomley T. Management decentralization and Montane forest conditions in Tanzania. Conservation Biology 2009, 23:1485-1496.
69. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Agrawal A. Does REDD plus threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 2010, 328:312-313.
70. Platteau J.-P. Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change 2004, 35:223-246.
71. Platteau J.-P., Gaspart F. The risk of resource misappropriation in community-driven development. World Development 2003, 31:1687-1703.
72. Porter-Bolland L., Ellis E.A., Guariguata M.R., Ruiz-Mallen I., Negrete-Yankelevich S., Reyes-Garcia V. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest Ecology and Management 2012, 268:6-17.
73. Poteete A.R., Ostrom E. Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: the role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change 2004, 35:435-457.
74. Poteete A.R., Ostrom E. Fifteen years of empirical research on collective action in natural resource management: struggling to build large-N databases based on qualitative research. World Development 2008, 36:176-195.
75. Prasad K.C., van Koppen B., Strzepek K. Equity and productivity assessments in the Olifants River basin, South Africa. Natural Resources Forum 2006, 30:63-75.
76. Rabe-Hesketh S., Skrondal A. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata 2008, Stata Press. 2nd Edition.
77. Robinson L.W., Berkes F. Multi-level participation for building adaptive capacity: formal agency-community interactions in northern Kenya. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:1185-1194.
78. Ruttan L.M. Economic heterogeneity and the commons: effects on collective action and collective goods provisioning. World Development 2008, 36:969-985.
79. Saito-Jensen M., Nathan I., Treue T. Beyond elite capture? Community-based natural resource management and power in Mohammed Nagar village, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Conservation 2010, 37:327-335.
80. Schreckenberg K., Luttrell C. Participatory forest management: a route to poverty reduction?. International Forestry Review 2009, 11:221-238.
81. Shah A. Local Governance in Developing Countries, Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series 2006, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
82. Sikor T., Nguyen T.Q. Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam's Central Highlands. World Development 2007, 35:2010-2025.
83. Somanathan E., Prabhakar R., Mehta B.S. Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:4143-4147.
84. Sutinen J.G., Kuperan K. A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics 1999, 26:174-193.
85. Thoms C.A. Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: a critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum 2008, 39:1452-1465.
86. Tilly C. Durable Inequality 1999, University of California Press, Berkeley.
87. Topp-Jorgensen E., Poulsen M., Lund J., Massao J. Community-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands of Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 2005, 14:2653-2677.
88. Tresiman D. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York.
89. Turyahabwe N., Geldenhuys C.J., Watts S., Obua J. Local organisations and decentralised forest management in Uganda: roles, challenges and policy implications. International Forestry Review 2007, 9:581-596.
90. Useem M. The social organization of the American business elite and participation of corporation directors in the governance of American institutions. American Sociological Review 1979, 44:553-572.
91. Varughese G., Ostrom E. The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development 2001, 29:747-766.
92. Vedeld T. Village politics: heterogeneity, leadership and collective action. Journal of Development Studies 2000, 36:105-134.
93. Vyamana V.G. Participatory forest management in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania: who benefits?. International Forestry Review 2009, 11:239-253.