Turning to forestry for a way out of poverty: Is formalizing property rights enough?

Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and Policies

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Andersson, Krister ^a,b   Pacheco, Diego ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bolivia; Forestry; Property rights; Rural development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920753736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/0199204764.003.0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Andersson, K. (2002). 'Can Decentralization Save Bolivia's Forests? An Institutional Analysis of Municipal Governance of Forest Resources'. Ph.D. dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
2. Andersson, K. (2003). 'What Motivates Municipal Governments? Uncovering the Institutional Incentives for Municipal Governance of Forest Resources in Bolivia'. Journal of Environment and Development, 12(1): 5-27.
3. Apedaile, L. P. and D. Harrington (1995). 'Implications of Agricultural Structural Change in the United States and Canada for Policy, Performance and Trade Harmonization'. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 43(1): 241-53.
4. Barbier, E. B. (2004). 'Explaining Agricultural Land Expansion and Deforestation in Developing Countries'. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5): 1347-53.
5. Contreras-Hermosilla, A. and T. M. Vargas (2001). Dimensiones Sociales, Ambientales y Económicas de las Reformas en la Política Forestal de Bolivia. Santa Cruz: Proyecto de Manejo Forestal Sostenible and the Center for International Forestry Research.
6. Davies, J., E. Magariños, E. Osinaga, and A. Bojanic (2000). 'Is Natural Forest Management a Viable Land Use Option in a Colonization Zone in Bolivia?' ODI Working Paper. London: Overseas Development Institute.
7. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) of the United Nations (1988). La Participación Campesina en el Desarrollo Rural. Santiago: La Oficina Regional de la FAO para America Latina y el Caribe.
8. Gibson, C., M. McKean, and E. Ostrom (2000). People and Forests: Communities, Institutions and Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Godoy, R. (2001). Indians, Rain Forests, and Markets: Theory, Methods, and Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Government of Bolivia (2002). Censo Nacional 2001. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE).
11. Knox, A., R. Meinzen-Dick, and P. Hazell (1998). 'Property Rights, Collective Action and Technologies for Natural Resource Management'. CAPRi Working Paper 1. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
12. Maxwell, S. and M. Pozo (1981). 'Farming Systems in the Colonization Crescent of Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Results of a Survey'. Working Document No. 22. Santa Cruz: CIAT.
13. Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14. Solorzano, R. (1994). 'Incentivos al Desarrollo del Sector Forestal en Bolivia'. Informe final de consultoría. La Paz: Proyecto FAO PAFBOL.
15. Southgate, D., R. Sierra, and L. Brown (1989). The Causes of Tropical Deforestation in Ecuador: A Statistical Analysis. Paper No. 89. London: London Environmental Economics Centre.
16. Stewart, R. (1994). 'Economic Impacts of Forest Sector Trade Policies: The Case of Costa Rica'. Report Prepared by Stewart Associates for USAID-Costa Rica.
17. Stewart, R. and D. Gibson (1995). 'Environmental and Economic Development Consequences of Forest and Agricultural Sector Policies in Latin America: A Synthesis of Case Studies of Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Bolivia', in H. Cortes-Salas, R. de Camino, and A. Contreras (eds), Readings of the Workshop on Government Policy Reform for Forestry Conservation and Development in Latin America. San Jose, Costa Rica: IICA, pp. 5-38.
18. Stocks, A. (1999). Iniciativas Forestales Indígenas en el Trópico Boliviano: Realidades y Opciones. Documento Técnico 76/1999. Santa Cruz: Proyecto BOLFOR.
19. Thiele, G. (1995). 'The Displacement of Settlers in the Amazon: The Case of Santa Cruz, Bolivia'. Human Organization, 54: 273-82.
20. Tratado de Cooperación Amazónica (TCA) (1997). Estrategia para Implementar las Recomendaciones de la Propuesta de Pucallpa sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible del Bosque. Caracas: Secretaría Pro-Témpore del Tratado de Cooperación Amazónico.
21. Usher, P. (1983). 'Property Rights: The Basis of Wildlife Management', in National and Regional Interests in the North, 3rd National Workshop on People, Resources, and the Environment North. Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Commission.