The audit committee: Management watchdog or personal friend of the CEO?

Accounting Review

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 113-145

  Bruynseels, Liesbeth ^a   Cardinaels, Eddy ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Audit committee; Financial reporting quality; Monitoring; Social ties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894299596     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr-50601     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (80)

1. Abbott, L., S. Parker, and G. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 69-87.
2. Abbott, L., S. Parker, G. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22:17-32.
3. Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2006. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 207-242.
4. Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and T. L. Neal. 2009. The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (1): 65-122.
5. Bédard, J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2): 13-35.
6. Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC). 1999. Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. New York, NY: BRC.
7. Brown, H. L., and A. M. Wright. 2008. Negotiation research in auditing. Accounting Horizons 22 (1): 91- 109.
8. Caramanis, C., and C. Lennox. 2008. Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45:116-138.
9. Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal, and R. A. Riley Jr. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (3): 365-384.
10. Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, and Z. Ye. 2011b. Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (3): 1-31.
11. Carcello, J. V., and T. Neal. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 75 (4): 453-467.
12. Carcello, J. V., T. L. Neal, Z.-V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2011a. CEO involvement in selecting board members, audit committee effectiveness, and restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (2): 396-430.
13. Carey, P., and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review 81 (3): 653- 676.
14. Carroll, G. R., and A. C. Teo. 1996. On the social networks of managers. Academy of Management Journal 39 (2): 421-440.
15. Chan, K. C., P. Lee, and G. S. Seow. 2008. Why did management and auditors fail to identify ineffective internal controls in their initial SOX 404 reviews? Review of Accounting and Finance 7 (4): 338-354.
16. Chaney, P., D. Jeter, and L. Shivakumar. 2004. Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 51-72.
17. Cohen, J. R., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. M. Wright. 2008a. Form versus substance: The implications for auditing practice and research of alternative perspectives on corporate governance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (2): 181-198.
18. Cohen, L., A. Frazzini, and C. Malloy. 2008b. The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy 116 (5): 951-979.
19. Cohen, J. R., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. M. Wright. 2010a. Corporate governance in the post-Sarbanes Oxley era: auditors' experiences. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 751-786.
20. Cohen, L., A. Frazzini, and C. Malloy. 2010b. Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance 65 (4): 1409- 1437.
21. Cohen, J., U. Hoitash, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2013a. Audit committee industry expertise and financial reporting quality. The Accounting Review (forthcoming).
22. Cohen, J., L. M. Gaynor, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2013b. The Effects of Professional and Social Ties Between the CEO and Audit Committee on Investor Decision Making. Working paper, Northeastern University, Boston College, and University of South Florida.
23. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
24. Craswell, A., J. Francis, and S. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322.
25. Dao, M., K. Raghunandan, and D. V. Rama. 2012. Shareholder voting on auditor selection, audit fees and audit quality. The Accounting Review 87 (1): 149-171.
26. DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do nonaudit service fees impair independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1247-1274.
27. DeZoort, F. T., D. R. Hermanson, and R. W. Houston. 2008. Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: Pre-sox versus post-sox judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (1): 85-104.
28. DeZoort, T. F., and S. E. Salterio. 2001. The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge in audit committee members' judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2): 31-47.
29. Engel, E., R. M. Hayes, and X. Wang. 2010. Audit committee compensation and the demand for monitoring of the financial process. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49: 136-154.
30. Feng, M., W. Ge, S. Luo, and T. Shevlin. 2011. Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations? Journal of Accounting and Economics 51: 21-36.
31. Fich, E. M., and A. Shivdasani. 2006. Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance 61 (2): 689- 724.
32. Finkelstein, S., and D. C. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. Minneapolis/St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
33. Fracassi, C., and G. Tate. 2012. External networking and internal firm governance. The Journal of Finance 67: 153-194.
34. Gendron, Y., J. Bédard, and M. Gosselin. 2004. Getting inside the black box: A field study of practices in "effective" audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 153-171.
35. Gibbons, D. E. 2004. Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (2): 238-262.
36. Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 1998. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review 88: 96-118.
37. Higgs, J. L., and T. R. Skantz. 2006. Audit and nonaudit fees and the market's reaction to earnings announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1): 1-26.
38. Hill, C. W. L., and P. Phan. 1991. CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal 34: 707-717.
39. Hoitash, U. 2011. Should independent board members with social ties to management disqualify themselves from serving on the board? Journal of Business Ethics 99: 399-423.
40. Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. C. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 839-862.
41. Hwang, B.-H., and S. Kim. 2009. It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics 93: 138-158.
42. Klein, A. 2002a. Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review 77 (2): 435-452.
43. Klein, A. 2002b. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 375-400.
44. Knapp, M. C. 1987. An empirical study of audit committee support for auditors involved in technical disputes with client management. The Accounting Review 62 (3): 578-588.
45. Kothari S., A. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163-197.
46. Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure cognition and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 342-369.
47. Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 649-675.
48. Krishnan, J., Y. Wen, and W. Zhao. 2011a. Legal expertise on corporate audit committees and financial reporting quality. The Accounting Review 86 (6): 2099-2130.
49. Krishnan, G. V., K. K. Raman, K. Yang, and W. Yu. 2011b. CFO/CEO-board social ties, Sarbanes-Oxley, and earnings management. Accounting Horizons 25 (3): 537-557.
50. Larcker, D., and T. Rusticus. 2010. On the use of instrument variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49 (3): 186-205.
51. Larcker, D. F., S. A. Richardson, and I. Tuna. 2007. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review 82 (4): 963-1008.
52. Lee, H. Y., V. Mande, and R. Ortman. 2004. The effect of audit committee and board of director independence on auditor resignation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2): 131-146.
53. Levitt, A. 2000. Remarks before the conference on the rise and effectiveness of new corporate governance standards. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, December 12.
54. Li, C. 2009. Does client importance affect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence from going-concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (1): 201-230.
55. Lim, C. Y., and H.-T. Tan. 2008. Nonaudit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (1): 199-246.
56. Linck, J., J. Netter, and T. Yang. 2009. The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley act on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies 22: 3287-3328.
57. Louch, H. 2000. Personal network integration: Transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks 22: 45-64.
58. McNichols, M. F. 2002. Discussion of: The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 61-69.
59. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415-444.
60. Naiker, V., and D. Sharma. 2009. Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies. The Accounting Review 84 (2): 559-587.
61. New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). 2004. NYSE Corporate Governance Rules (Section 303a). New York, NY: NYSE.
62. Plickert, G., R. Ĉoté, and B. Wellman. 2007. It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? Social Networks 29 (3): 405-429.
63. Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 375-400.
64. Rogers, W. 1993. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13: 19-23.
65. Rose, A. M., J. M. Rose, and M. Dibben. 2008. The effects of trust on management incentives on audit committee judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting 22 (2): 87-103.
66. Saint-Charles, J., and P. Mongeau. 2009. Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations. Social Networks 31: 33-39.
67. Schmidt, B. 2008. Costs and Benefits of "Friendly" Boards during Mergers and Acquisitions. Working paper, Emory University.
68. Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (2): 291- 334.
69. Stefaniak, C. M., R. W. Houston, and R. M. Cornell. 2012. The effects of employer and client identification on internal and external auditor's evaluation of internal control deficiencies. Auditing: A Journal of Theory & Practice 31 (1): 39-56.
70. U.S. House of Representatives. 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law 107-204 [H.R. 3763]. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
71. Vera-Mũnoz, S. C. 2005. Corporate governance reforms: Redefined expectations of audit committee responsibilities and effectiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 62: 115-127.
72. Verbrugge, L. M. 1977. The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces 56: 576-597.
73. Westphal, J. D., and E. Graebner. 2010. A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Academy of Management Journal 53 (1): 15-43.
74. Westphal, J. D., and P. Khanna. 2003. Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (3): 361-398.
75. Westphal, J. D., and E. Zajac. 1995. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 60-83.
76. Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and nonaudit fees. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 721-744.
77. Woolridge, J. M. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Wysocki, P. 2010. Corporate compensation policies and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49 (1/2): 155-160.
79. Zhao, Y., and K. H. Chen. 2008. Staggered boards and earnings management. The Accounting Review 83 (5): 1347-1381.
80. Zmijewski, M. E. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (Supplement): 59-82.