Does client importance affect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence from going-concern opinions

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 201-230

  Li, Chan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Audit fee; Auditor independence; Going concern; Nonaudit fee

Indexed keywords

EID: 62949231101     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: 19113846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/car.26.1.7     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allison, P. D. 1999. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods & Research 28 (2): 186-208.
2. Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. Mayhew. 2003. Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 611-39.
3. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-92.
4. Asthana, S., S. Balsam, and S. Kim. 2004. The effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes-Oxley on the market for audit services. Working paper, Temple University.
5. Basioudis, I. G., M. A. Geiger, and V. Papanastasiou. 2006 Audit fees, non-audit fees, and auditor going-concern reporting decisions in the United Kingdom. Working paper, Aston University and University of Richmond.
6. Behn, B. K., S. E. Kaplan, and K. R. Krumwiede. 2001. Further evidence on the auditor's going-concern report: The influence of management plans. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (1): 13-28.
7. Blay, A. D., and M. Geiger. 2001. Market expectations for first-time going-concern recipients. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 16 (3): 209-26.
8. Cassell, C., G. Giroux, L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2006. Audit firms' client portfolio decisions in the face of increased regulation and constrained resources. Working paper, Texas A&M University.
9. Carcello, J. V., and Z. Palmrose 1994. Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement): 1-30.
10. Chung, H., and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 931-66.
11. Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputation and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322.
12. Craswell, A., D. J. Stokes, and J. Laughton. 2002. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (2): 253-75.
13. DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-99.
14. DeFond, M. L., and J. R. Francis. 2005. Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (Supplement): 5-30.
15. DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1247-74.
16. DeMaris, A. 2004. Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited response variables. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley-IEEE.
17. Ettredge, M., C. Li, and S. Scholz 2007. Audit fees and auditor dismissals in the Sarbanes-Oxley era. Accounting Horizons 21 (4): 371-86.
18. Ferguson, A., G. Seow, and D. Young. 2004. Nonaudit services and earnings management: UK evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (4): 813-41.
19. Firth, M. 2002. Auditor-provided consultancy services and their associations with audit fees and audit opinions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29 (5): 661-93.
20. Francis, J. R. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133-51.
21. Francis, J. R. 2006. Are auditors compromised by nonaudit services? Assessing the evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (3): 747-60.
22. Francis, J. R., and B. Ke. 2006. Disclosure of fees paid to auditors and the market valuation of earnings surprises. Review of Accounting Studies 11 (4): 495-523.
23. Francis, J. R., D. Stokes, and D. Anderson. 1999. City markets as a unit of analysis in audit research and the re-examination of Big 6 market shares. Abacus 35 (2): 185-206.
24. Frankel, R., M. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. Auditor independence and earning quality. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 71-105.
25. Gaver, J., and J. Paterson. 2007. The influence of large clients on office-level auditor oversight: Evidence from the property-casualty insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43 (2-3): 299-320.
26. Geiger, M. A., K. Raghundandan, and D. V. Rama. 1998. Costs associated with goingconcern modified audit opinions: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions, and client failures. Advances in Accounting 16: 117-39.
27. Geiger, M. A., K. Raghundandan, and D. V. Rama. 2005. Recent changes in the association between bankruptcies and prior auditor opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24(1): 21-35.
28. Geiger, M. A., and D. V. Rama. 2003. Audit fees, nonaudit fees, and auditor reporting on stressed companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (1): 53-69.
29. Gregory, A., and P. Collier. 1996. Audit fees and auditor change: An investigation of the persistence of fee reduction by type of change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 23 (1): 13-28.
30. Gujarati, D. N. 1995. Basic econometrics, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Gullapalli, D. 2005. Audit fees are on rise as companies pony up: Payments for consulting and other services shrink, in big change from 2000. Wall Street Journal, March 25, C3.
32. Hay, D., C. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141-91.
33. Hopwood, W., J. McKeown, and J. Mutchler. 1994. A reexamination of auditor versus model accuracy within the context of the going-concern opinion decision. Contemporary Accounting Research 10 (2): 295-310.
34. Hosmer, D., and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Johnstone, K., and J. Bedard. 2007. Recent longitudinal evidence on risk management in auditing. Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
36. Khurana, I., and K. Raman. 2006. Do investors care about auditor's economic dependence on the client? Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (4): 977-1016.
37. Kida, T. 1980. An investigation into auditors' continuity and related qualification judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (3): 506-23.
38. Kinney, W. R., Z. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2004. Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 561-88.
39. Krishnamurthy, S., J. Zhou, and N. Zhou. 2006. Auditor reputation, auditor independence, and the stock-market impact of Andersen's indictment on its client firms. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (2): 465-90.
40. Krishnan, G. V. 2007. Did earnings conservatism increase for former Andersen clients? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 22 (2): 141-63.
41. Krishnan, J., and J. Krishnan. 1997. Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review 72 (4): 539-60.
42. Krishnan, J., S. Heibatollah, and Y. Zhang. 2005. Does the provision of nonaudit services affect investor perceptions of auditor independence? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (2): 111-35.
43. Larcker, D. F., and S. A. Richardson. 2004. Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 625-58.
44. Lennox, C. S. 1999. Non-audit fees, disclosure and audit quality. European Accounting Review 8 (2): 239-52.
45. Levitt, A. 2000. Renewing the covenant with investors. Remarks delivered at the NYU Center for Law and Business, New York University, New York.
46. Loudder, M. L., I. K. Khurana, R. B. Sawyers, C. Cordery, C. Johnson, J. Lowe, and R. Wunderle. 1992. The information content of audit qualifications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 11 (1): 69-82.
47. Lys, T., and R. L. Watts. 1994. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement): 65-93.
48. MacKie-Mason, J. 1990. Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions? Journal of Finance 45 (5): 1471-93.
49. Marquardt, D. 1980. You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models: Discussion of "A critique of some ridge regression methods". Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (369): 87-91.
50. McKeown, J., J. F. Mutchler, and W Hopwood. 1991. Towards an explanation of auditor failure to modify the audit opinions of bankrupt companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (1): 1-13.
51. Mutchler, J. F. 1984. Auditors' perceptions of the going-concern opinion decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 3 (1): 17-29.
52. Mutchler, J. F., W. Hopwood, and J. C. McKeown. 1997. The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (3): 295-310.
53. Palmrose, Z. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1): 55-73.
54. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2005. PCAOB 19b-4 for ethics and independence rules concerning independence, tax services, and contingent fees. New York: PCAOB.
55. Raguhunandan, K., W. Read, and S. Whisenant. 2003. Initial evidence on the association between non-audit fees and restated financial statements. Accounting Horizons 17 (3): 223-34.
56. Rama, D. V., and W J. Read. 2006. Resignations by the Big 4 and the market for audit services. Accounting Horizons 20 (2): 97-109.
57. Read, W., K. Raghunandan, and R. Rama. 2004. Local and regional audit firms and the market for SEC audits. Accounting Horizons 18 (4): 241-54.
58. Reynolds, J. K., D. R. Deis, and J. R. Francis. 2004. Professional service fees and auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 29-52.
59. Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 375-400.
60. Ruddock, C., S. J. Taylor, and S. L. Taylor. 2006. Nonaudit services and earnings conservatism: Is auditor independence impaired? Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (3): 701-46.
61. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2000. Final rule: Revision of commission's auditor independence requirements. Washington, DC.
62. Simon, D., and J. Francis. 1988. The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review 63 (2): 255-69.
63. Solomon, D. 2007. Auditing the auditors after Sarbanes-Oxley. Wall Street Journal, October 3, C2.
64. Stice, J. D. 1991. Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review 66 (3): 516-33.
65. Walker, P., and J. Casterella. 2000. The role of auditee profitability in pricing new audit engagements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19(1): 157-67.
66. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1983. Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (3): 613-33.
67. Weber, J., and Willenborg, M. 2003. Do expert informational intermediaries add value? Evidence from auditors in microcap IPOs. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 681-720.
68. Weil, J. 2004. Auditing firms get back to what they do best. Wall Street Journal, March 31, C3.