A matter of appearances: how corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 15-43

  Westphal, James D ^a   Graebner, Melissa E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77149171187     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.48036721     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Abrahamson, E., & Park, C. 1994. Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1302.
2. Aerts, W. 2005. Picking up the pieces: Impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 30: 493-517.
3. Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. 1999. Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification? Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1063-1069.
4. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 37: 315-342.
5. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. 2004. Board composition: Balancing influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 209-237.
6. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. 1997. The ubiquity and potency of labeling in organizations. Organization Science, 8: 43-58.
7. Bank Loan Report. 2004. Progress made in corporate governance but ways to go. 19: 8-9.
8. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 93-103.
9. Barry, B., & Watson, M. R. 1996. Communication aspects of dyadic social influence in organizations: A review and integration of conceptual and empirical developments. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook: 269-317. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Beatty, R. P., & Zajac, E. J. 1994. Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 313-335.
11. Belliveau, M. A., O'Reilly, C. A., III, & Wade, J. B. 1996. Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1568.
12. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. 2002. The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27: 231-274.
13. Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. 2003. Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. Journal of Business, 76: 455-475.
14. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. 1993. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518-539.
16. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Terry, R. L. 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics, 35: 371-390.
17. Brudney, V. 1982. The independent director-Heavenly city or Potemkin village? Harvard Law Review, 95: 597-659.
18. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Lubatkin, M. 1993. Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 763-793.
20. Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. 2004. The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on multi-national corporation performance. Journal of Management, 30: 509-528.
21. Carpenter, M. A., & Wade, J. B. 2002. Microlevel opportunity structures as determinants of non-CEO executive pay. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1085-1103.
22. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter, & C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 55: 591-621. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
23. Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. 1999. Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. In K. Cook & J. Hagan (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 25: 441-466. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
24. Clement, M. B., & Tse, S. V. 2003. Do investors respond to analysts' forecast revisions as if forecast accuracy is all that matters? Accounting Review, 78: 227-250.
25. Coombes, P., & Watson, M. 2000. Three surveys of corporate governance. McKinsey Quarterly, 4(special edition): 74-77.
26. Corporate Board. 2006. Survey finds corporate governance practices are improving. 27(May-June): 25-27.
27. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28: 371-382.
28. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269-290.
29. Davis, G. F. 2005. New directions in corporate governance. In D. S. Massey & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 31: 143-162. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
30. Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. 1994. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59: 547-570.
31. Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. 1994. A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 141-173.
32. Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. 1992. The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
33. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. 1999. Agency theory and the influence of equity ownership structure on corporate diversification strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1071-1076.
34. DeVellis, R. F. 1991. Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. 1975. Organizational legitimacy-social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18: 122-136.
36. Duhachek, A., & Iacobucci, D. 2005. Consumer personality and coping: Testing rival theories of process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15: 52-63.
37. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
38. Ellstrand, A. E., Tihanyi, L., & Johnson, J. L. 2002. Board structure and international political risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 769-777.
39. Elsbach, K. D. 1994. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 57-88.
40. Elsbach, K. D. 2003. Organizational perception management. In R. M. Kramer & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 25: 297-332. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
41. Elsbach, K. D., & Elofson, G. 2000. How the packaging of decision explanations affects perceptions of trustworthiness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 80-89.
42. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-326.
43. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 8-24.
44. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. 2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
45. Firebaugh, G., & Gibbs, J. P. 1985. User's guide to ratio variables. American Sociological Review, 50: 713-722.
46. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501-534.
47. Fleischer, A. B. 2008. The creation and performance of classification schemes: Rating systems in United States broker-dealers 1993-2000. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
48. Fleiss, J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
49. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. 1993. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33:233-258.
50. Fowler, K. L., & Schmidt, D. R. 1989. Determinants of tender offer post-acquisition financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 339-350.
51. Frankel, R., McVay, S., & Soliman, M. 2007. Street earnings and board independence. Working paper, Washington University.
52. Fredrickson, J. W., Hambrick, D. C., & Baumrin, S. 1988. A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 13: 255-270.
53. Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. 1998. The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23: 32-58.
54. Godfrey, L. G. 1988. Misspecification tests in econometrics (Econometric Society monograph 16). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
55. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
56. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193-206.
57. Hareli, S. 2005. Accounting for one's behavior-What really determines its effectiveness? Its type or its content. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35: 359-373.
58. Hayward, M. L. A., & Boeker, W. 1998. Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 1-22.
59. Henderson, A. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. 1996. Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 575-606.
60. Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. 1989. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 25-46.
61. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28: 383-396.
62. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Solomon, A. 2000. Security analysts' career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. RAND Journal of Economics, 31: 121-144.
63. Investor Relations Business. 2000. Good governance pays off. 5: 1-4.
64. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. 1982. Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self: 231-263. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. 1988. Upward influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 528-542.
66. Kochhar, R., & David, P. 1996. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 73-84.
67. Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors' incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 129-150.
68. Krishnan, H. A., & Miller, A. 1997. Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 361-374.
69. Kroll, M., Wright, P., Toombs, L., & Leavell, H. 1997. Form of control: A critical determinant of acquisition performance and CEO rewards. Strategic Management Journal: 18: 85-96.
70. Kuperman, J. C. 2003. Using cognitive schema theory in the development of public relations strategy: Exploring the case of firms and financial analysts following acquisition announcements. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15: 117-150.
71. Langevoort, D. C. 2006. Beyond "independent" directors: A functional approach to board independence. Harvard Law Review, 119: 1553-1575.
72. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. 1990. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34-47.
73. Lin, N., & Dumin, M. 1986. Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8: 365-385.
74. Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. 2003. Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multi-theoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28: 416-431.
75. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7: 83-104.
76. McNulty, T., Roberts, J., & Stiles, P. 2005. Undertaking governance reform and research: Further reflections on the Higgs review. British Journal of Management, 16(supplement 1): 99-107.
77. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.
78. Mizruchi, M. S. 2004. Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theory and Society, 33: 579-617.
79. Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. 2001. Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making. American Sociological Review, 66: 647-671.
80. Murphy, K. M., & Shleifer, A. 2004. Persuasion in politics. American Economic Review, 94: 435-439.
81. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Journal, 16: 145-179.
82. Parrino, R., Sias, R. W., & Starks, L. T. 2003. Voting with their feet: Institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 68: 3-46.
83. Pedriana, N., & Stryker, R. 1997. Political culture wars 1960s style: Equal employment opportunity-Affirmative action law and the Philadelphia plan. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 633-691.
84. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. 1999. The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology: 37-72: New York: Guilford Press.
85. Pfeffer, J. 1981. Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 3: 1-52. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
86. Phan, P. 2000. Taking back the boardroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
87. Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 631-642.
88. Pollock, T. G., Rindova, V. P., & Maggitti, P. G. 2008. Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the U.S. IPO market. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 335-358.
89. Porac, J. F., Wade, J. B., & Pollock, T. G. 1999. Industry categories and the politics of the comparable firm in CEO compensation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 112-144.
90. Rao, H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895-1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29-44.
91. Rao, H., Greve, H. R., & Davis, G. F. 2001. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 502-526.
92. Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26: 175-191.
93. Ryan, L. V., & Schneider, M. 2002. The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Academy of Management Review, 27: 554-573.
94. Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 158-178.
95. Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. 2007. The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 33-58.
96. Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. 1992. Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 43: 133-168. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
97. Shaver, J. M. 2005. Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. Journal of Management, 31: 330-353.
98. Shivdasani, A., & Zenner, M. 2004. Best practices in corporate governance: What two decades of research reveals. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 16(2): 29-41.
99. Stickel, S. E. 1995. The anatomy of the performance of buy and sell recommendations. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(5): 25-39.
100. Strang, D., & Sine, W. D. 2002. Interorganizational institutions. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Blackwell companion to organizations: 497-519. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
101. StataCorp. 2005. Stata statistical software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
102. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610.
103. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Lindskold, S. 1972. The exercise of power and influence: The source of influence. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), The social influence process: 287-345. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
104. Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 195-211.
105. Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. 2001. Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 351-360.
106. Useem, M. 1993. Executive defense: Shareholder power and corporate reorganization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Useem, M. 1996. Investor capitalism: How money managers are changing the face of corporate America. New York: Basic Books.
108. Vafeas, N. 1999. The nature of board nominating committees and their role in corporate governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26: 199-225.
109. Wade, J. B., O'Reilly, C. A., III, & Chandratat, I. 1990. Golden parachutes: CEOs and the exercise of social influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 587-603.
110. Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., & Pollock, T. G. 1997. Worth, words, and the justification of executive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(supplement 1): 641-664.
111. Wayne, S. J., & Kacmar, K. M. 1991. The effects of impression management on the performance appraisal process. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 48: 70-88.
112. Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. 1997. The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50: 979-1006.
113. Westphal, J. D. 1998. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 511-538.
114. Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: The consequences of social ties in the CEO/board relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 7-24.
115. Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. 2008. The pacification of institutional investors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 29-72.
116. Westphal, J. D., & Clement, M. 2008. Sociopolitical dynamics in relationships between top managers and security analysts: Favor rendering, reciprocity, and analyst stock recommendations. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 873-897.
117. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1994. Substance and symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 367-390.
118. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1995. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 60-83.
119. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1998. The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 127-153.
120. Womack, K. L. 1996. Do brokerage analysts' recommendations have investment value? Journal of Finance, 51: 137-167.
121. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. 1995. Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation: Substance and symbolism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 283-308.
122. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. 2004. The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review, 69: 433-457.
123. Ziegler, R., Diehl, M., Zigon, R., & Fett, T. 2004. Source consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus: The three dimensions of the Kelley ANOVA model in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30: 352-364.
124. Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 70-105.
125. Zuckerman, E. W. 2000. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 591-619.