Gender differences in creative thinking: Behavioral and fMRI findings

Brain Imaging and Behavior

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 39-51

  Abraham, Anna ^a,b   Thybusch, Kristin ^a   Pieritz, Karoline ^a   Hermann, Christiane ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Cognitive strategy; Cognitive style; Conceptual expansion; Creative cognition; Divergent thinking; Neuroimaging; Semantic cognition; Sex differences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATIVITY; DECISION MAKING; DECLARATIVE MEMORY; DIVERGENT THINKING; EAR PLUG; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ORBITAL CORTEX; PERCEPTION; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; RULE LEARNING; SEMANTIC COGNITION; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; THEORY OF MIND; THINKING; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; WHOLE BODY TOMOGRAPHY; WORKING MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CREATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894274355     PISSN: 19317557     EISSN: 19317565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-013-9241-4     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abraham, A. (2012). The neuroscience of creativity: A promising or perilous enterprise? In D. A. P. Alejandre & M. M.-L. Garrido (Eds.), Creativity and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 15-24). Madrid: Fundación Tomás Pascual y Pilar Gómez-Cuétara.
2. Abraham, A. (2013). The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(246), 1-9. doi: 10. 3389/fnhum. 2013. 00246.
3. Abraham, A., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2009). Reality = relevance? Insights from spontaneous modulations of the brain's default network when telling apart reality from fiction. PloS One, 4(3), e4741. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0004741.
4. Abraham, A., & Windmann, S. (2007). Creative cognition: the diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods (San Diego, California), 42(1), 38-48. doi: 10. 1016/j. ymeth. 2006. 12. 007.
5. Abraham, A., Schubotz, R. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008a). Thinking about the future versus the past in personal and non-personal contexts. Brain Research, 1233, 106-119. doi: 10. 1016/j. brainres. 2008. 07. 084.
6. Abraham, A., Werning, M., Rakoczy, H., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008b). Minds, persons, and space: an fMRI investigation into the relational complexity of higher-order intentionality. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 438-450. doi: 10. 1016/j. concog. 2008. 03. 011.
7. Abraham, A., Kaufmann, C., Redlich, R., Hermann, A., Stark, R., Stevens, S., et al. (2012a). Self-referential and anxiety-relevant information processing in subclinical social anxiety: an fMRI study. Brain Imaging and Behavior. doi: 10. 1007/s11682-012-9188-x.
8. Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Schweckendiek, J., et al. (2012b). Creativity and the brain: uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1906-1917. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2012. 04. 015.
9. Albrecht, K., Volz, K. G., Sutter, M., Laibson, D. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2011). What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 218-225. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nsq046.
10. Andreano, J. M., & Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.), 16(4), 248-266. doi: 10. 1101/lm. 918309.
11. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29. doi: 10. 1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
12. Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. doi: 10. 1002/j. 2162-6057. 2008. tb01289. x.
13. Baker, F., Kennelly, J., & Tamplin, J. (2005). Themes within songs written by people with traumatic brain injury: gender differences. Journal of Music Therapy, 42(2), 111-122.
14. Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749), 819-823. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1115455.
15. Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527-536. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2011. 10. 001.
16. Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral cortex (New York, N. Y.: 1991), 19(12), 2767-2796. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhp055.
17. Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 49-57. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2006. 11. 004.
18. Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1-38. doi: 10. 1196/annals. 1440. 011.
19. Bunge, S. A. (2004). How we use rules to select actions: a review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(4), 564-579.
20. Cabeza, R., & St Jacques, P. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 219-227. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2007. 02. 005.
21. Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7(6), 477-484. doi: 10. 1038/nrn1909.
22. Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M., & Staley, J. K. (2007). Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biological Psychiatry, 62(8), 847-855. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsych. 2007. 03. 001.
23. De Frias, C. M., Nilsson, L.-G., & Herlitz, A. (2006). Sex differences in cognition are stable over a 10-year period in adulthood and old age. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 13(3-4), 574-587. doi: 10. 1080/13825580600678418.
24. Eliot, L. (2011). The trouble with sex differences. Neuron, 72(6), 895-898. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2011. 12. 001.
25. Ernst, M., Maheu, F. S., Schroth, E., Hardin, J., Golan, L. G., Cameron, J., et al. (2007). Amygdala function in adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a model for the study of early steroid abnormalities. Neuropsychologia, 45(9), 2104-2113. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2007. 01. 019.
26. Fine, C. (2010). From scanner to sound bite issues in interpreting and reporting sex differences in the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 280-283. doi: 10. 1177/0963721410383248.
27. Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. B., Frith, C., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1995). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 189-210.
28. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531-534. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2006. 05. 001.
29. Giedd, J. N., Clasen, L. S., Lenroot, R., Greenstein, D., Wallace, G. L., Ordaz, S., et al. (2006). Puberty-related influences on brain development. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 254-255, 154-162. doi: 10. 1016/j. mce. 2006. 04. 016.
30. Gong, G., He, Y., & Evans, A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: gender makes a difference. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, 17(5), 575-591. doi: 10. 1177/1073858410386492.
31. Hein, G., & Knight, R. T. (2008). Superior temporal sulcus-it's my area: or is it? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2125-2136. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2008. 20148.
32. Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 44(9), 1575-1583. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2006. 01. 026.
33. Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Arai, Y. (2001). Sex differences in children's free drawings: a study on girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 99-104. doi: 10. 1006/hbeh. 2001. 1670.
34. Jordan, K., & Wüstenberg, T. (2010). The neural network of spatial cognition and its modulation by biological and environmental factors. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(2), 83-90. doi: 10. 1027/1614-0001/a000015.
35. Jordan-Young, R. M. (2012). Hormones, context, and "Brain Gender": a review of evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1738-1744. doi: 10. 1016/j. socscimed. 2011. 08. 026.
36. Klein, T. A., Neumann, J., Reuter, M., Hennig, J., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M. (2007). Genetically determined differences in learning from errors. Science (New York, N. Y.), 318(5856), 1642-1645. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1145044.
37. Kohn, N., Kellermann, T., Gur, R. C., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2011). Gender differences in the neural correlates of humor processing: implications for different processing modes. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 888-897. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2011. 02. 010.
38. Kret, M. E., Pichon, S., Grèzes, J., & de Gelder, B. (2011). Men fear other men most: gender specific brain activations in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies-an FMRI study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 3. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00003.
39. Lin, W.-L., Hsu, K.-Y., Chen, H.-C., & Wang, J.-W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: a dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112-123. doi: 10. 1037/a0026241.
40. Lipp, I., Benedek, M., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Bergner, S., et al. (2012). Investigating neural efficiency in the visuo-spatial domain: an FMRI study. PloS One, 7(12), e51316. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0051316.
41. Lohmann, G., Muller, K., Bosch, V., Mentzel, H., Hessler, S., Chen, L., Zysset, S., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). LIPSIA - A new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. Computerised Medical Imaging and Graphics, 25, 449-457.
42. Luders, E., & Toga, A. W. (2010). Sex differences in brain anatomy. Progress in Brain Research, 186, 3-12. doi: 10. 1016/B978-0-444-53630-3. 00001-4.
43. Marchewka, A., Jednorog, K., Falkiewicz, M., Szeszkowski, W., Grabowska, A., & Szatkowska, I. (2012). Sex, lies and fMRI-gender differences in neural basis of deception. PloS One, 7(8), e43076. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0043076.
44. McCarthy, M. M., Arnold, A. P., Ball, G. F., Blaustein, J. D., & De Vries, G. J. (2012). Sex differences in the brain: the not so inconvenient truth. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32(7), 2241-2247. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 5372-11. 2012.
45. Moriguchi, Y., Touroutoglou, A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nst030.
46. Neumann, J., & Lohmann, G. (2003). Bayesian second-level analysis of functional magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage, 20(2), 1346-1355. doi: 10. 1016/S1053-8119(03)00443-9.
47. Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain-a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440-457. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2005. 12. 002.
48. Pagnani, A. R. (2011). Gender differences. In Editors-in-Chief: M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (second edition) (pp. 551-557). San Diego: Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/B9780123750389001060.
49. Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62-88. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1749-6632. 2010. 05444. x.
50. Razumnikova, O. M. (2004). Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: an EEG investigation in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 362(3), 193-195. doi: 10. 1016/j. neulet. 2004. 02. 066.
51. Rudebeck, P. H., & Murray, E. A. (2011). Balkanizing the primate orbitofrontal cortex: distinct subregions for comparing and contrasting values. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1239, 1-13. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1749-6632. 2011. 06267. x.
52. Runco, M. A., Cramond, B., & Pagnani, A. R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343-357). New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://www. springerlink. com/content/r193k8872152l51k/abstract/.
53. Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87-124. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. psych. 55. 090902. 142044.
54. Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). The neuroscience of remote spatial memory: a tale of two cities. Neuroscience, 149(1), 7-27. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroscience. 2007. 06. 056.
55. Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009). The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 489-510. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2008. 21029.
56. Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1578-1593. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2012. 03. 011.
57. Svoboda, E., McKinnon, M. C., & Levine, B. (2006). The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2189-2208. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2006. 05. 023.
58. Tewes, U. (1994). HAWIE-R. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest fur Erwachsene, Revision 1991; Handbuch und Testanweisung. Gottingen: Verlag Hans Huber.
59. Thirion, B., Pinel, P., Mériaux, S., Roche, A., Dehaene, S., & Poline, J.-B. (2007). Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. NeuroImage, 35(1), 105-120. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2006. 11. 054.
60. Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 445-453. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2005. 07. 001.
61. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
62. Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: the role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
63. Wolfensteller, U., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2010). Bending the rules: strategic behavioral differences are reflected in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 278-291. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2009. 21245.
64. Wolfensteller, U., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2011). Strategy-effects in prefrontal cortex during learning of higher-order S-R rules. NeuroImage, 57(2), 598-607. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2011. 04. 048.
65. Worsley, K. J., & Friston, K. J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited - Again. Neuroimage, 2, 173-181.