From Scanner to Sound Bite: Issues in Interpreting and Reporting Sex Differences in the Brain

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 280-283

  Fine, Cordelia ^a,b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

gender; neuroethics; neuroimaging; science communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649402498     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721410383248     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fine, C. (2010). (See References). An accessible book that covers all the issues in more detail than the current article.
2. Lehrer, J. (2008, August 17). Of course I love you, and I have the brain scan to prove it - We're looking for too much in brain scans. Boston Globe, K1. An accessible account of general interpretative issues in fMRI research.
3. Miller, G. (2008). Growing Pains for fMRI. Science, 320, 1412-1414. A useful and accessible overview of issues, controversies, and potential solutions in the interpretation of fMRI data that provides concrete examples.
4. Russett, C.E. (1989). (See References). A historical account of Victorian brain science and its reactionary role in social attitudes toward female suffrage and higher education-surprisingly helpful for illuminating current biases in neuroscientific interpretation.
5. Weisberg, D.S. (2008). Caveat lector: The presentation of neuroscience information in the popular media. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 6, 51-56. A readable overview outlining the limited insight into psychological processes offered by fMRI, the potential danger of the overinterpretation of neuroimaging data in popular media, and the role of scientists in alleviating this problem.
6. Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R.C., & Belmonte, M.K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819-823.
7. Bishop, K.M., & Wahlsten, D. (1997). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Myth or reality? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 21, 581-601.
8. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9. Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
10. Gur, R.C., & Gur, R.E. (2007). Neural substrates for sex differences in cognition. In S.J. Ceci and W.M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. (pp. 189-198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Gurian, M. (2004). What could he be thinking? A guide to the mysteries of a man's mind. London, England: Element.
12. Ihnen, S.K.Z., Church, J.A., Petersen, S.E., & Schlaggar, B.L. (2009). Lack of generalizability of sex differences in the fMRI BOLD activity associated with language processing in adults. Neuro-Image, 45, 1020-1032.
13. Im, K., Lee, J., Lyttelton, O., Kim, S.H., Evans, A.C., & Kim, S.I. (2008). Brain size and cortical structure in the adult human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2181-2191.
14. Kaiser, A., Haller, S., Schmitz, S., & Nitsch, C. (2009). On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research. Brain Research Reviews, 61, 49-59.
15. Poldrack, R.A. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: Where do we stand? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 223-227.
16. Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O., & Illes, J. (2005). fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 159-164.
17. Russett, C.E. (1989). Sexual science: The Victorian construction of womanhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Sommer, I.E., Aleman, A., Somers, M., Boks, M.P., & Kahn, R.S. (2008). Sex differences in handedness, asymmetry of the Planum Temporale and functional language lateralization. Brain Research, 1206, 76-88.
19. Wallentin, M. (2009). Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain and Language, 108, 175-183.
20. Weisberg, D.S., Keil, F.C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J.R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470-477.